Grumpy, that was most interesting, thanks for posting. This is what I mean by all this circumstantial evidence surrounding 9/11, and I know there is more cause I read it way back when. This topic is so vast one can go in so many directions and write volumes on it.
@all
I think the following article is unbiased as far as possible, and seems very exhaustive with plenty of references on this question of demolition.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Trade_Center_controlled_demolition_conspiracy_theoriesLike I’ve stated before, I see this demolition issue as a diversion to the main conspiracy of who did it. It should be very apparent to an intelligent person that the reason the towers fell is because they were hit by airplanes and damaged, with the collapse starting at the damaged location. I don’t discount what Dr Jones et. al. found, either. We just don’t know where the red chips found in the dust came from, but why be obsessed with red chips in the dust when there are so many other things to investigate? On the question of Building 7, I know what I’ve heard on TV during the news, and what the intended meaning of the words was. The “pull it” remark did not refer to pulling the emergency personnel from the buildings, as the article states, but to demolish it. I believe they didn’t need to set up explosives on all floors, as they usually do, simply weaken a few beams up top and the force of the floors collapsing on the bottom ones increases, and a domino effect takes it down all the way, just like we witnessed. The placing of these few explosives could have been carried out that day maybe in one hour or less. This was certainly not a standard demolition project, but a quick emergency type of operation.
Let’s talk about remote control of flying vehicles. During the Afganistan and Iraq wars it became apparent that a new way to prosecute wars is being utilized. Remote control drones, like the Predetor and Reaper, are now mainstream war machines.
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/20/world/asia/20drones.html These vehicles are controlled from half the way around the world, from the US mainland. I worked with a few folks that went into "combat" from the comfort of their chairs. Now let me ask this question. Did these systems get developed in a year or two since the war began? No they did not. Some of the architecture and links that make this possible have been around for a while but not widely advertised. I know because I worked on related technology and waveforms around that time, and it wasn't new. In fact Remote Control of airplanes goes back to WWII, that's how JFK's older brother died, and his death was classified and not even president Kennedy could get the answers he sought about his brother’s death at that time. (the info has been declassified since) So, if the planes that flew into the world trade center were remote controlled, I have no doubt a remote control terminal was used much like what is now used to control the drones in Afghanistan and Pakistan.
After the Clinton era, and the significant demilitarization of the US, (e.g. number of bases closed, pentagon budget reductions, etc..) because of the end of the cold war, and after that euphoric dot com bubble period, I knew that as soon as the republicans were taking over something military in nature was going to happen to bring back the value of all the defense stocks. As soon as Bush junior took office, we had that China incident, that mid air collision between a US surveillance plane and a Chinese jet and the ensuing drama after they made an emergency landing in China at some military base. I thought OK these guys are focused on Asia, and North Korea, so we’ll see action there, but then out of the blue, on September 11th, we find out that the game had changed and we were getting involved in the oil rich regions of the middle east, once again. If papa Bush couldn’t do it, by golly, junior was going to pull it off and finish what was started.
OK, let me fast forward a bit, we went to war in Afghanistan not necessarily to get Bin Laden, but to make a regime change. Bin Laden and Al Qaeda was the excuse, and the Taliban would not turn them over, so we decided the Taliban must go, they are too fundamentalist, and they don’t play nice with the new world order. Bin Laden in a few interviews has said that he did not order attacks on the WTC, I read that in a few places but I don’t have a link. But no matter, we finally caught up with him in Pakistan and what a royal screw up that mission was contrary to all the praise and cheer.
So many people tend to idolize the Navy Seals, Delta Forces, and all these other “elite” squads, and rightly so because they undergo some serious training and have some nifty equipment, but in reality, the operations they pull off are usually a piece of cake compared to what the Marines endured on the streets of Fallujah in Iraq, day in and day out. These Special Op guys have a very easy job from this perspective. I mean, how hard is it to sneak in with night vision goggles and shoot unarmed men and women, catching them unawares? Think about that.
The operation they pulled off in Pakistan was a ridiculous blunder if you ask me. They shot the one men that could have shed so much light on 9/11 if put on trial, and lost a billion dollar stealth helicopter in the process, revealing critical technology to a foreign country. They ought to be prosecuted under the Import Export laws, same laws I abide by at work. We worked hard on some of this stealth technology, and these nitwits couldn’t even carry out a proper destruction of the helicopter. What do you expect from a bunch of trigger happy muscle heads? But what really bugs me about the whole Bin laden operation is his killing, and then not even releasing photos to prove they got him and of course DNA and make the body available for analysis by 3rd parties, which they claim they did on the boat, yeah sure. Talk about a slap in the face to all the military families that have lost loved one in this war believing the lies about terrorism and Bin Laden in particular. I think a senator or congressmen initiated a lawsuit against the White House administration for this purpose. And by the way, that “famous” photo of Obama and his cabinet with some Generals and Hillary Clinton watching in awe the operation as it unfolded is such a fake and staged of course later after the fact. In fact the live feed was never transmitted after a certain point.
What a sham this whole 9/11 and all the repercussions, and all the loss of life. The world is controlled by this cabal of power hungry maniacs. Since the world’s been turning, the powerful have wanted more power, more territory, more control. Examples like king Nebuchadnezzar of ancient Babylon come to mind, the Persian Empire, Alexander the Great, the Roman Empire, and since then the most notorious, the Papacy and the reign of terror they carried out during the middle ages until the “deadly wound” was received when the French General Berthier took the Pope captive in 1798 ending their more then a 1000 year supremacy. Then the “wound” was healed later by Mussolini, and the world has been wondering after the “BEAST” ever since. Do you see what crowds this little puppet figure of a false man made religion draws? In the book “Keys of this Blood”, Jesuit Malachi Martin, reveals some very interesting facts about this organization and it’s operations and desires. Do you know that these Jesuits have infiltrated all political levels? This once Protestant nation is now un-recognizable, and the separation “wall” between State and Religion is constantly being eroded. So who is really pulling all the strings behind the scenes? Who are the real players at the very top? Is it Israeli banking giants? Capitalists? Papal fish heads? Why do so many people want to control you and me, and rule over us? How about we give them all the finger, and stop fighting their wars, believing their lies, buying their products, and using their money? I can’t believe the Papacy use to sell indulgences at the time of the reformation. Give us money and you can sin. Talk about a new low. Just so you know I don’t hate people that believe a certain way, but I sure think they are deceived by their moral and religious leaders, and this applies to anybody who does not question what they are told, weather it be wall street stories, world history, or your local car salesmen down the street.
ok, that's my rant for tonight.
Author
Topic: 9/11 debate - enter at your own risk! (Read 973506 times)
