I have a problem with that video. He states that if that TPU runs for more than 15 minutes it will get so hot that it'll melt the tape. Then he shows that after 20 minutes it's barely cool. Then. The fact that it loses any voltage at all implies that it's not solid state. There has to be some chemical process to lose charge. If it were solid state it would absolutely not lose any mass or any voltage. And then the big question. If it loses charge how does one recharge it? Can it be recharged is the question? I understand this technology is now a decade or so old? If it's not recahargeable then it's considerably more costly than your average battery which makes its value moot. So. My question would be - is there a patent? And if not then why? If it was meant to be exploited then its technology would be open. Or is this another technology that was bought - and then buried by the MIB?
He states that if that TPU runs for more than 15 minutes it will get so hot that it'll melt the tape. Then he shows that after 20 minutes it's barely cool. Did you mean "barely warm". We have no idea what the actual temperature rise over ambient was, as this was not measured. SM said the unit in question was rated at around 8 amps, he was drawing much less. He may have been referring to a full load condition. The fact that it loses any voltage at all implies that it's not solid state.
If it were solid state it would absolutely not lose any mass or any voltage.
I don't know how you arrive at this, and don't know the context in which you are using this term. Solid state has many definitions, please be more accurate in your statement. If you mean "solid state" in the context that it contained semiconductors devices as part of it's operation, it is no guarantee that it would have excellent regulation unless this was a factor in the design. e.g. It could have been a boost converter with or without without feedback regulation. A small drop in voltage under load can partially and possibly wholly accounted for by the positive temperature coefficient of copper wire, as I stated earlier. Depends on the gauge and length of the wire used and the temperature rise over ambient. Hidden batteries could not have have exhibited such a small drop in voltage over the time shown in the video. Based on their load line curves, the drop would have been much greater. If a boost converter was used, and the boost converter had some feedback regulation we could expect to see the voltage change witnessed in the video, around 1%. And then the big question. If it loses charge how does one recharge it? Can it be recharged is the question? I understand this technology is now a decade or so old? If it's not recahargeable then it's considerably more costly than your average battery which makes its value moot.
Please exercise due diligence and go back and read the Schinzinger lab reports. Apparently you have a misinterpretation of the device. My question would be - is there a patent? And if not then why? If it was meant to be exploited then its technology would be open. Or is this another technology that was bought - and then buried by the MIB?
These things remain a mystery on top of other mysteries surrounding the device. The deeper you dig, the deeper the rabbit hole.
« Last Edit: 2010-11-29, 00:08:04 by ION »
---------------------------
"Secrecy, secret societies and secret groups have always been repugnant to a free and open society"......John F Kennedy
|