Good morning All.
I'm reminded of proposed systems that have gone before. Some explanations also hark back to earlier " pioneers " !
What about the elegant solution that Nikola Tesla showed in the " Ozone " patent? A segmented disc that controlled the input to the drive motor? This would ensure that the armature wouldn't need rewinding removing the possibility of " shorted " turns.
Brad, you showed us some time back how to add a second commutator to a motor shaft, there's your answer.
Although my training was in the electric area I'm far more comfortable in the mechanical, IMO there's " nowt " wrong in using good old fashioned technology.
Cheers Grum.
I prefer mechanical as well Graham,and yea,it is easy enough to fit a second comutator or slip rings to the motor,but that doesn't give you a means to control the motor,or change the winding configuration. It seems that the Matt motor was only designed to pulse charge battery 3. This being the case,why not just use a PWM?. This would save the brushes,and give you a means to capture the flyback if you so wish to do so. The fact that they (Matt and Dave) insist that you need a Matt motor to achieve OU,shows how little they know about what is actually going on in there own system. I do have 1x 4 pole motor,im sure you have seen it in a few of my video's. Its the 24v 1HP PM motor,but im not prepared to junk that on this device. And then there is the !speed up under load! wonder generator,that is now needed to gain OU. Now we have gone another step,where we have the solid state version. Seems they jump to the next step before anyone has confirmed OU in the last step. Oh well,I'll just keep plugging away with the motor rewind,and see what we find. Brad
---------------------------
Never let your schooling get in the way of your education.
|
Author
Topic: Generating System (Read 59818 times)
