About different things

Author Topic: About different things (Read 5977 times)

Vasik041	Re: About different things « Reply #50 on: 2021-10-31, 07:45:20 »
Group: Guest	Quote from: Kator01 on 2021-10-30, 23:43:22 Hello Vasik, I was watching some russian tutorials form different authors and there was a term in one of the vids which caught my attention "Romanov nod" by Denis Permyakov https://youtu.be/q3w3Q_YRfEE While I was searching for this term I found this interesting tutorial: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=trVuWDIdgsc I think it is very important. Do you have time to create a transcript of what this guy is speaking about ? It starts at some different topic but then it becomes more and more interesting because he dives right into energy-production and the techniques for this. I found some other vid about vortex-creation by Konstantin Yurevich : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=75j99LkHRgs&t=0s in which he refers to a person with the name Alexander Vladimirovich . Did you ever hear this name ? Mike Hello Mike, I made summary for two short videos. You can try use autotranslated captions for long video (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=trVuWDIdgsc) Regards, Vasik ------------------------ dlr421.pdf (19.89 kB - downloaded 135 times.)

Kator01	Re: About different things « Reply #51 on: 2021-11-01, 01:02:52 »
Newbie Posts: 49	Vasik, thank you. So do you know more about Romanov ? The principle of the vortex-coil-winding is well explained. Now, I used the google-Autotranslation with the long lecture of Romanov but I could not catch up with his main concept he explained with the universe-grid he was drawing. So is there another translation tool you use for english to russian and vice versa ? Google is terrible could not get 10 % of what he is saying. Can you also please have a look at the "Tigers Blocking Generator" thread. I showed a short vid where Permyakov explains to the other guy to first understand the left side of the circuit while he was covering the right section of the circuit with his hand. I got the impression the guy was not familiar with the Kacher-Circuit. We simply miss a systematic approach to the underlying principles and it seemed to me that he was pointing the way to it Mike