|
Still not perfect, but slightly improved. Interesting to read about the brother Hans v. Unruh:
Willy Beyer
Attorney and notary
Berlin, May 25th 1922
Mr
State Secretary Dr. Kempner,
Berlin
Reich Chancellery Wilhelmstr.
Dear Mr. State Secretary,
Referring to your conversation with the Horren Dr. Jossel
and Wolff allow me to submit the following to you:
The engineer Willy v. Unruh (nobility denied) made
an invention or discovery a few years ago that was supposed
to make it possible to generate large quantities of electricity
using small means.
The first small experimental apparatus worked in 1912.
In the years that followed, the experiments continued and were
partially interrupted by the war.
In 1916, however, a larger apparatus was already in operation.
After the war, especially in 1920, an even larger apparatus
demonstrated considerable achievements.
Unruh was approached by a large number of money people,
both national and foreign, who wanted to earn money by exploiting
the device. However, it cannot be used because Unruh always
feared that his discovery would be brought to his attention and because
the device only burned occasionally.
In the fall of 1922, a number of financiers filed a lawsuit
against Unruh for fraud, and in November 1922 he was
simultaneously arrested for alleged fraudulent fraud.
The pre-trial detention lasted for years and Unruh was in the first instance because of the amount through the apparatus and because of the check, which was smaller than Unruh's and did not have the great achievements of the same.
counterfeit checks
sentenced to 5 years in prison. The experts,
who had not seen the apparatus working, explained that,
according to the known laws of nature and the current state of
science, it was impossible for the apparatus to have the
highest performance.
In the second instance, the experts repeated their opinion.
However, the power was stopped. 4 years reduced, taking into
account 2 years of examination booklet and retention period of one
year, so that 1 year remains to be wasted, of which around 4
months have been served.
Unruh is currently in pretrial detention in double
custody.
The second instance did not find, as the first instance did,
that the apparatus was fraudulent because a large number of independent
witnesses were able to testify that they had frequently seen
the apparatus in operation and had not detected any errors despite
all the efforts.
The second instance therefore had to leave open the question
of whether the device was a fraud or not, but condemned
Unruh because he had spent large sums of money on an
unfinished device and used it for himself.
During Unruh's pre-trial detention, his brother Hans built
an apparatus on his behalf to guide to prove that his brother's device was not a fraud and to help his brother in the criminal proceedings. This device has also burned repeatedly, but is currently not burning.
In the last few months a captain a. D. Coler of both devices, d. H. that of willy and that of Hans v. Unruh, as well as looking for the secret writing of Willy v. Knowing the balance exactly, he built a device that works. But the apparatus is essential
[... differences and patent rights between the v. Unruh group and Coler au avoid,
both have united and are also in the process of producing the
group Hans v. Unruh, as well as another group Conrad with
Hans v. Unruh worked so that everyone interested
in the device would be united in a top group.
Interested parties from abroad have already gathered
around Colert's apparatus and have had their
expert provide a copy of the attached report.
[... is the following plan:
All interested groups should be brought together
immediately, if possible in the next few days, into a unified
Unruh-Coler group.
This plan has already largely been implemented.
The balance device that was installed after Willy von. The
balance wheel has now been completed and should be set to
burn immediately. Last Friday, with the permission of the public
prosecutor's office, von Unruh went through several attempts
to switch on his device, discovered and eliminated
significant errors, and had notable initial successes. According to his
belief, it is still a matter of hours or days until the device returns
to its previous performance.
3./As soon as the apparatus is activated, the criminal trial experts
should be called in immediately and examine the apparatus.
As soon as the performance of the device has been determined
through these reports, the invention should be offered to the German
Reich.
Only if the German Reich rejects it should it be made
available to foreign countries.
In order to carry out these flanes, it is urgently necessary to have
Mr v. Unruh to be freed from prison at least temporarily
so that he
can get his device ready. The public prosecutor's office rejects the
suspension of punishment because there is incompetence and the
completion of the apparatus is not a major suspension of punishment,
especially since it is not clear whether the apparatus actually
caught fire. The opinion of the public prosecutor's office may be
formally correct, but it does not take into account the importance
of Unruhs findings.
Incidentally, Unruh has lost about 50 pounds over
the years of eseft and suffers from chronic gallbladder
catarrh and continued biliary calcium. In my opinion, there are doubts about its ability to hold.
On the other hand, the invention of Unruh, if it exists,
is of such enormous consequence that the German
Reich has the greatest interest in clarifying this question
as quickly as possible and in exploiting the invention
in its own interest. If the balance apparatus does what it
has done for a while, then a transformation is imminent
which, in my opinion, is as important as the service
of the fire for humanity.
It is therefore urgently necessary that v. Unruh
is to be released at least for one month from prison as quickly as
possible, for the two reasons listed above, so that the above-
mentioned plans can be implemented as quickly as possible
|
feature is available which provides a place all members can chat, either publicly or privately.
Author
Topic: Hans Coler Colleage letters survived (Read 2405 times)
