thanks for keeping us in check ramset
Lindsay, I don't think I have seen your postings and these strange waveforms you speak about, can you send me a link?
I did see agentgate's 10 or 15 pictures or so, that he initially posted, and among them I saw the spiky waveforms. Please don't tell me that's what you are excited about.
Putting in energy from a generator and getting excited about some pulses you might not understand is really what this TPU effort has been about all along. Such a waste of time. Hopefully somebody learned something about properly switching inductive loads.
SM plainly stated his device is not a free energy device, but nobody is listening, and I think I know why.
EM
Until a device can be demonstrated to have been fully reverse engineered, various paths of research to do so are valid. This includes the Power Line Coupling Theory, and the approach agentgates has taken. At the present time, one path is no more valid than the other, and as such, the proponents of all paths need to accept this and not diminish the work others are doing. We all have our opinions about the TPU and its inventor, and the best approach to study and hopefully crack the secret of its inner workings, and that is OK. Accept that everyone may not agree with your own approach, and continue on with your research. Forcing your ideas onto others when they may have their own is not conducive to a friendly environment to be involved in, so please keep that in mind when expressing your opinions. Make comments of your own observations and conclusions, and leave it at that-- is the best approach imo. A comment about SM's commentary in the videos, in particular the one showing the FTPU: SM says the device has been in development for about 20 years! If true, that would place the TPU's beginnings in around the mid 70's. Interesting. He also says that "they are not free energy devices", "they are conversion devices", "they're not unrealistic devices that can't be properly demonstrated". Be careful how you interpret what he says here. Keep in mind that these are promotion videos meant to attract investors and their money. The phrase "Free Energy Device" would send 99.9% of investors running for the hills, so OF COURSE he is not going to say this device makes free energy. Someone also didn't think it was prudent to leave SM's use of the word "unrealistic" in the commentary, and it was muted out in the video versions released on the web. If you think about it, that was a wise thing to do. The point being; don't take everything said in the commentary part of the videos so literal. There are good reasons things are said a certain way. .99
---------------------------
"Some scientists claim that hydrogen, because it is so plentiful, is the basic building block of the universe. I dispute that. I say there is more stupidity than hydrogen, and that is the basic building block of the universe." Frank Zappa
|