Rosemary has now posted a challenge (now that she has seen my simulation here and knows I won't probably be allowed to accept her challenge under Stefan's heavy moderation).
Here is her post at OU.com
Guys a quick word here. I challenge anyone to do a simulation where the phase angles are at precisely 180 degrees. If they are not precise then, as day follows night - they'll ring and cancel out at zero. At 180 degrees they'll reinforce each other.
What intrigues me is this. I've been called delinquent - ignorant - presumptuous - pretentious - deluded - self-serving - deceptive - optimistic - fanciful - manipulative. Name it. It's there. In fact I've also been called an IDIOT SAVANT. Poynty? I have a really functional intelligence quotient. Surely that much is evident? And right now Hamburger is throwing a hissy fit with MileHigh as his praise singer. So what? What if I am all of those things? What has it got to do with the issue at hand? We are only showing results. And those results are hugely promising. But they unquestionably need research. We're all, on our team - ONLY anxious that this get researched. If any out there need to take the credit - FEEL FREE. Just DON'T try and patent it. I'll contest that to my dying breath and with my last cent.
Kindest as ever,
Rosemary
First let me say that I for one have absolutely no interest in any intellectual property that has ever spawned forth from Rosemary, so she needn't worry on that account at all. Second, I dispute that Rosemary or her team of experts has shown any results other than the same very results I demonstrated in a thirty minute simulator exercise, which match her results quite closely.
Furthermore, my simulation clearly shows that her measurements "results" which consist of polluted and inaccurate representations of both the battery voltage and the shunt voltage are not worthy of basing any further investigation of input power upon unless and until they are corrected to remove the artifacts and gross waveform distrortions and exaggerated amplitudes caused by the dominant inductances in the battery wiring and the shunt.
She herself has not demonstrated any waveforms that are clearly "precisiely 180 degrees out of phase" and, despite her insistance that that would be surprising. essential or meaningful, it is not. What is important are two things:
The current flowing into and out of the battery and the DC voltage of the battery. These and only these will reveal the true input power being supplied by the battery. Rosemary's obsession with the phases of the "battery" voltage and drain current are based upon the absolute fallacy that the battery voltage is 150VAC and the shunt current waveform is accurate in both time and amplitude despite it being taken across an element that has several times the inductive reactance as it has resistance. Many times more. My simulations clearly show this in an unequivocal way.
In truth, the battery voltage is virtually a constant DC voltage with less than a volt of AC ripple and the true resistive shunt voltage is far smaller and differently-time-aligned and differently shaped and differently centered about zero than the illusionary inductive shunt waveforms indicate. So any statement regarding perfect phase opposition based on two incorrectly-represented critical variables is also bogus. Not to mention that her own waveforms do not meet that criterion.
In general, it is absolutely to be expected and totally unsurprising that the basic drain voltage and drain current waveforms are by nature 180 degrees out of phase in a MOSFET circuit, whether operating linearly or as a true switch. As the drain current goes up, the drain voltage pulls down. This is obvious to anyone half-skilled in the art and is not evidence of a magical or special or unique situation or result.
Feynman and Harti have now taken over the thread and are making a barrage of demands for much more detailed documentation, scope shots, build specs, etc. Rosemary is frantically trying to appease and accommodate these demands while at once cleaving to the false comfort of being sheltered from my revelations here by these two whose obvious agenda is to prolong the saga of Rosemary Ainslie's magical zipon technology for as long as possible and to help her continue the clouds of dark energy ink that the Octopus so loves to hide within when attacked.
The mystery, however, has been solved. But you know what? Folks like Stefan, Aaron, Lindemann, Bedini and Sterling make their livings by endlessly prolonging and convoluting and digging up new examples of these false claims of overunity inventors. They could not survive if the light of day were shone brightly into each and every corner of false "promise" for free energy such that all could quickly see through the bullshit and delusions.
Talk about paid disinformation agents! These guys do this shit for a living and have figured out how to play each episode out for as long as possible in front of the gullible believers. I am completely convinced of that, These guys know that 99% of this stuff is obvious bullshit yet they promote and prolong it on purpose to make a buck. And when anyone sharp comes along and quickly shows the obvious errors and fallacies, they turn aqs one against them, banning them and accusing them of being paid misinformation artists, Dat's da game, here folks! And this forum is probably the only exception.
Idiot Savant? Maybe...not too sure about the Savant part unless it's in regard to her near perfect ability to cloud, distract, avoid and obfuscate. All is as it should be in Heaven. The true distorters for financial gain are teamed with the idiot savant of the decade. Don't expect any free energy any tme soon, folks! Not from that motley crew of charlatans and pretenders.
Humbugger
Author
Topic: The Rosemary Ainslie Circuit (Read 460628 times)
