I stand with the Jewish people because they are the winning team in the end.
This statement appears to me as hubris. Did you miss President Putin's United Nations address last year ? https://sputniknews.com/politics/201609281045788670-russia-putin-syria-us/'Do You Realize What You've Done?'https://sputniknews.com/politics/201609281045788670-russia-putin-syria-us/"What we propose is to join efforts to address the challenges that all of us are facing and create a genuinely broad international coalition against terrorism," he told the UN General Assembly in 2015. "Similar to the anti-Hitler coalition, it could unite a broad range of parties willing to stand firm against those who, just like the Nazis, sow evil and hatred of humankind." Putin warned that some might be tempted to use this proposal as a pretext for accusing Russia of "its growing ambitions," as if they themselves have no ambitions. "It is not about Russia's ambitions, dear colleagues, but about the recognition of the fact that we can no longer tolerate the current state of affairs in the world."Usuryhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UsuryUsury (/ˈjuːʒəri/[1][2]) is, as defined today, the practice of making unethical or immoral monetary loans that unfairly enrich the lender. Originally, usury meant interest of any kind. A loan may be considered usurious because of excessive or abusive interest rates or other factors. Historically in Christian societies, and still in many Islamic societies today, charging any interest at all can be considered usury.[3][4][5] Someone who practices usury can be called a usurer, but a more common term in contemporary English is loan shark. Nuclear blackmailhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_blackmailNuclear blackmail is a form of nuclear strategy in which an aggressor uses the threat of use of nuclear weapons to force an adversary to perform some action or make some concessions. It is a type of extortion, related to brinkmanship. EffectivenessNuclear blackmail is considered most effective[by whom?] when the person making the threat is unhinged and ostensibly willing to commit suicide. (See game theory) It is generally regarded[by whom?] as ineffective against a rational opponent who has or is an ally of someone who has assured destruction capability. If both states have nuclear weapons, the form of nuclear blackmail becomes a threat of escalation. In this situation if the opponent refuses to respond, then one's choices are either surrender or suicide. During the Cold War, the explicit threat of nuclear warfare to force an opponent to perform an action was rare in that most nations were allies of either the Soviet Union or the United States. The Jewish people could only be 'the winning team in the end' if they achieved total domination without the opponent realising what was happening until it was too late. The events of the last 15 years have clearly shown that this is not the situation. The Jews, or Zionists (you have not clearly differentiated the two, and many passionate Zionists like the current UK Foreign Secretary Boris Johnson are not Jewish) have clearly lost and their only option is surrender and make peace, or nuclear suicide that will destroy all life on planet Earth and end our species. Your position on this matter GK quite clearly disturbs me.
---------------------------
Everyman Standing Order 01: In the Face of Tyranny; Everybody Stands, Nobody Runs.
Everyman Standing Order 02: Everyman is Responsible for Energy and Security.
Everyman Standing Order 03: Everyman knows Timing is Critical in any Movement.
|
Author
Topic: 9/11 debate - enter at your own risk! (Read 975396 times)
