|
@GK
Mam oh man, how the hell did you lose 250k?
In such a setup with only one Primary ring and one secondary wind as I had shown in the previous post, this can be tried with a simple straight iron wire but the idea of turning it into a ring is to be able to influence all the degrees of the ring with one added magnet as he did in the FTPU. The secondary is wound right on the iron wire so that we capitalize on proximity at all times.
Yes, previous FTPU drawings I had done showed the iron wire or aluminum wire wound 2.25 or 2.5 turns (primary) and then the secondary was would over all the turns. This was way before I found Spin Conveyance which now says to me that the last half of the primary being pulsed will have no change in polarity hence practically no sway in the nuclei, hence no conveyance and hence it is just there reducing the overall proximity of the secondary to the real active half of the primary. If the Secondary was closely wound over all the length of that 2 foot length of iron wire, even with no activity in half the primary, this would do what?. Increase voltage and decrease amperage. So winding the secondary on only half of the primary will produce less voltage but more amperage which is what we want.
You see, if you had let's say 30 rings in the 6TPU, that would be 30 primaries in parallel but the secondaries can be grouped in less parallel sets then those sets in series to bring up the voltage while you are getting maximum amperage out of the output as well.
You do not need 30 rings right now, just one to get some basic data.
1) Pulse primary with the make-break on the primary side that has the secondary. That is the half of the primary that will change with the pulse and return bias when the pulse is off (change). Change is what the secondary wants to see.
2) Pulsing can also be one wire, but in general you will scope the primary to find what the primary resonance frequency is. You can use just the probe to not create added influences. At resonance the primary will have fewer atoms involved but each will sway more then any other, plus the energy consumption of the pulse will drop to its lowest level at resonance. By bringing down energy consumption to a minimum (resonance), this helps the overall output to pass the COP or get very close. You will be surprised how efficient this is.
3) Then it is time to tank the secondary and see how much output can be produced.
4) From there you can bring in a magnet and see what the effects are.
Question to ask: Does a magnet have a resonance and if so, what if the primary was pulsed close to the magnets resonance where once the magnet is approached, the primary frequency close to the magnets resonance frequency would increase the overall intensity of the iron wire rebias which produces greater nucleic sway and hence which imparts greater coupling to the secondary then the energy used to produce. It is at that level that the OU can find a place to exist and not in so many of our regular standard EE postulations.
This is a very simple build but it has the chance of showing some good results and plus it is easy enough that more @members can do their own similar tests and try variations. It will be in those variations that all of a sudden something will pop up as "out of the ordinary". Maybe adding a small capacitor like those yellow ones in the LTPU are obviously used on the pulse side and not as any capacitor tank,like the two other bigger caps in the LTPU?
The FTPU was the first and it should have remained the main focus of all our attention for all these years since it was the most open build. If SM started with the FTPU, that 's where we should have started and stayed as well.
What I am trying to say is pretty blunt I guess. The advent of experimenting with an LTPU sized build and coming to any functional discovery will be so remote that the effort is almost lost from the start because of all the potential build variables. It's like looking for a needle in a big hay stack. @BruceTPU tried the big one but again, all you need is one mistake and the whole shebang becomes a bust from the start but you will not know it. So why not just reduce the hay stack with the smallest analog, find the functional basis and from there, just increase the basis numbers in parallel.
Once SM found the effect in bench trials and built it in the simplest FTPU, he then built the STPU, 6TPU, MTPU and LTPU in the FTPUs' image. He did not reinvent something new at each build. He just deployed the same effect, the same topology but in different ratings and formats. We are the ones who have been jumping to so many conclusions and theories (me included in we). We took the whole gambit to all extremes but through all that, I was stuck like everyone else with Standard EE as the guiding base. It is only when I discovered the SC concept that I could start looking at the FTPU with more of an outside looking in. The FTPU as it was shown had a flaw that SM mentioned. That flaw can only be because the secondary was wound over all the ring turns whereas according to my best estimate, my previous post explains how it should have been built to eliminate that flaw and I am sure the SM found that out but could not show it since it was soooo simple you would laugh.
wattsup
« Last Edit: 2017-07-23, 13:56:41 by wattsup »
---------------------------
|
Author
Topic: What is Known about the TPU (Read 442473 times)
