quote author=F6FLT link=topic=4616.msg111073#msg111073 date=1711534257]
In science, it's very easy to invalidate a theory: all you need to do is prove a counter-example.
Who does? Do you?
Yes,
How about the biggest example there is--
General relativity predicts that the expansion of the universe should slow down at a rate determined by the density of matter and energy within it.
So the fact that the universe is expanding, and this expansion rate is speeding up, not slowing down, is a prime example that general relativity is not absolute.
And then we see what often happens when things do not meet the !absolute! science--they invent things, so as the scientific theory sticks.
So to account for this expansion that go's against general relativity, they come up with this mystical dark energy-just so as Einstein’s theory sticks.
But so far, this dark energy and dark matter have not been detected in any way shape or form.
Until such time as this !dark! energy is found and observed (science), then general relativity is not absolute.
And to quote: Quantum mechanics can be said to be the cornerstone of modern physics. For every physical field theory it should be possible to formulate it as quantum field theory. Actually, it is generally accepted that the field theories of electromagnetism or gravitation are but an approximation, the "classical limit", of more fundamental underlying quantum field theories. It is also assumed that interaction theories have to be gauge theories. The possibility of formulating gravity as quantum field theory is essential in the context of the unification of all fundamental interactions. However, all attempts to find a consistent quantum gauge field theory of general relativity have failed. This indicates again that general relativity can hardly be an absolutely correct theory of gravitation.
Unlike FE researchers who accept anything from one of their own
That is simply not true, and we see that time and time again on this forum alone, where the top guns here are always pointing out mistakes that the other top guns make.
This forum is not energetic forum.
physicists always try to invalidate their own theories.
Maybe in the past, but no so much now, for the fear of reprisal and defunding.
The governments now determine the science, and say who can say what.
Take for example the last pandemic, where doctors in Australia (my country) were silenced against any bad outcome that could happen in relation to the vaccines.\
Fancy that, unqualified members of the government telling medical experts how to do there job, and determine what doctors could talk to patients about.
Those who have problems understanding this approach are proving to be completely useless in the search for FE, as demonstrated by the absence of a free energy solution for the general public, despite all the stupid but recurrent claims that it already exists.
I remember a long time ago, some of these !experts! said heavier than air machines could not fly.
Along came a couple of pushbike mechanics
These laws of physics you value so much say that energy can be neither created nor destroyed, but only transformed.
If that is the case, then the outcome of every experiment carried out on this forum has already been determined.
But- these very same scientists and physicists came up with this !dark! energy, which has yet to be proven to even exists, so as Einstein's theory of general relativity has an escape goat--> it must stand true at all costs.
Have you determined that things like the TPU, and Stan Myres water fuel car were a hoax ? If so, how exactly did you determine that ?
Was it by blindly believing what you read in text books, or was it done by way of examining the devices ?
Which way would have been the scientific method ?
So enough of the nonsense, you can't talk about a "mistake" about relativity without providing proof
I did just that.
t's time to show a little intelligence, rationality and modesty in relation to people who have 20 or 30 IQ points more than us
There is no evidence that Einstein even took an IQ test. The 160 was a guess based around his work.
They figured Einstein was a genius, and an IQ of 160 is classed as genius, so that is how they came up with that number.
But what is an IQ test anyway ?, and how do different IQ tests determine your actual IQ.
I did two official Australian IQ tests. On the first i got 156, and on the second, which was completely different, i got just 139
I bet there are a lot of us here that could do things Einstein has no idea about, like strip and rebuild a motorcycle engine.
If you don't understand the merits of scientific theories, study them.
Scientific merits are gained through experimentation and data, which is exactly what we do here.
Nature doesn't conform to simplistic, alternative pseudo-theories
Nor is it dictated by what man knows today, or mans interpretation of the laws of physics.
We are far from fully understanding the laws of the universe.
Perhaps one of us will find this !dark! energy ?
Sorry for the mood swing, but it had to be said.
We all have the right to put forth our arguments, regardless of mood.
Coming back to the subject of "negative friction", I think it's an idea worth exploring, and I've already said so to Broli. In particular, the thermal agitation of magnetic particles, which is disordered kinetic energy obtained from the ordered energy linked to the origin of motion, could perhaps in my opinion have an effect on magnetism by defeating or circumventing the conservativity of the magnetic flux. So proven theories such as relativity doesn't preclude extravagant ideas. How to test this experimentally remains to be seen.
Magnetic fields have energy, so they can do useful work.
Brad
Never let your schooling get in the way of your education.
Author
Topic: We should talk about negative friction. (Read 2215 times)
