Dear friends, Under the right conditions it is possible to cause a small nuclear reaction in certain types of iron. In the early days i wrote about discharges of magnetic energy similar to the discharge of magnetic energy during an atomic explosion. I even pointed out this was related to my power technology. Nobody seems to wonder about that or why the Atomic Energy Commission of the federal government was involved. It is possible to cause a small nuclear eaction that releases some energy by converting the material. If you take the energy and use it to cause another reaction and it's energy to cause another, you can see that this process can go very wrong. There is a reason i call my devices bombs. If the unit hits the correct frequency and stays there too long it will start to convert too much material and energy at once. This will only take a second,or less. I did point out that I did not want to be responsible for giving out information making it possible that someone would make a big crater of a hole where their house used to stand with resulting death of themlves and possibly their families and neighbors too. It is in my writings quite literally. I never said these things were safe. However, i do think there are ways to make it safe in a way that it runs without the danger of self destruction. Sincerely, SM YES, reaction has played a part in the development of my technology. YES, we also used two different metals in the development of the technology. NO, it is not easy to sink the heat from the unit whilst in operation. This is because: Any large piece of metal, including aluminum, placed close to the unit will change it's operational characteristics, and so it stops, etc. You can operate the unit in close proximity of metal but not bolted to it.We tried to make a water proof unit and submerge it in water but that proved to be a disaster! Aye, therein lies the rub. Sincerely, Your friend, Steven The output of heat is NOT proportional to the energy output of the unit. We found that very interesting because it goes against everything we have been taught. The units heat up gradually and logarithmically to an accelerated point of self destruction. They heat up at an identical rate regardless of load. It is almost as though the energy output is some byproduct of the units operation.... You could describe the usable current output of my coil as DC but with some hash in it. doesn't really have any convertible AC component which could provide a mechanical motive force as you suggested. The destructive heating caused by the eddy currents becomes the problem we face when we make a really large powerful coil. I am sorry about the confusion in regard to my statements in letters to you about the generator. It is difficult for me to take the concepts in my mind translate them into printed words send them to you so you can read them and translate them into a picture in your mind. It is not easy to do this. I am sorry I don't wish to mislead in any way. I am restricted from making any statements involving the following: Size and number of turns of collector coil. Material of collector coil. Control apparatus. Any control frequency. Any combinations of control frequencies. Any lack of controlled frequencies, etc. Amount of amplification and or power of input needed, etc. I have been in some difficulty trying to convey as much help as I can while being restricted by these parameters. As my memory tells me, I originally used three old tube type frequency generators coupled to tube amplifiers composed of a 12BY7- input tube and a driver coupled to a 6AS7G output tube. It was using this apparatus that enabled me to first strike those magical tones. Since then there have been so many combinations it boggles the mind. About the collector: It is three separate coils of multi strand copper wire laid one on top of the other, not interleaved. Three is important. You can do many things with three coils. You can run them in parallel, you can run two in series and one in parallel, or etc. You can run a separate frequency into each coil for better control on large power units if need be. The control wiring is vertically wound in several segments around each of the horizontal collector coils. Other control wires are wound around all of the horizontal collector coils together. Through the different control wire and coil wire arrangements you can keep complete control of the unit most of the time. However, you must have an emergency KILL switch. A way of cutting off all the control frequencies simultaneity. This kill switch must be, manual and also connected through a heat sensor buried within the collector coil. it should automatically stop the function of the unit before it self destructs on it's own. This is important for obvious reasons. Also the kill switch should also be connected to cut off whenever it measures over voltage. If that should ever happen, you would never have enough time to hit the kill switch before the inevitable explosion occurred. You know, it is very similar to the idea of a long garden hose. Picture a hose with water in it. If you pick up one end and move along the length of the hose you will move the water constantly along in the direction you are moving. You could also squeeze the hose in the direction to move the water along as well. And you could do both to control the movement of the water more precisely. You can think of the movement of water as the movement of electrons through the collector coils. I hope the things I share with you give you ideas about how my unit works. As you know, I am a great believer in understanding, not copying. Sincerely, SM. In many of our designs we use three coils as the collector. they can be run parallel to give higher current lower voltage output at excitation. They can be run in series to create high voltage, lower current when reaching the point of excitation. We have used other multiples of run of wire as well in various units construction. Most of the most successful units we made had control wiring run or wrapped vertically over the horizontal collector wires. You can se them in the units in some of the videos under black plastic covering. They were run perpendicular to the travel of the collector wires. They were run in multiple segments. each segment could be fed a different frequency individually and or from a collector section to help perpetuate the oscillation and control. It must be close to impossible to see all this in your head. That is why i have been concerned about HOW to explain anything using just words. Sincerely, SM The use of the magnets are not necessary as used in a few of the units. There were different designs. some designs were based on different control and start up systems. I don't know if my answer helped you or not. Let us say that you have a magnetic field perhaps it is only a small permanent magnet. Now, you have a single copper wire twelve inches long. If you move the magnet across the surface of the wire from left to right at a certain speed you create an electron flow which is DC and it has a power potential based on how strong the field is and how fast the magnet if moved. So, if you increase the size of the magnet or the speed it moves you create a larger flow of electrons, larger as in higher voltage or more currant. Since I feel as though I have absolutely no future any longer, I would like to make one admission to you. I have made a statement that I have not necessarily believed to be the absolute truth. I and my collogues noted the rather maximum magnetic factors involved with the devices in operation. IE, there is always extremely strong magnetic fields at frequency at close and distant proximity. We were never able to actually understand what came first... The fields or the power. Are the fields just a coupling mechanism from a power source converted from? Or is the power source that the unit couples just the earth's magnetic field pure and simple? We were coached to come to a decision and maintain that it is the Earth's magnetic field which is the source of the power which is converted by the power units while in operation. Well, I tell you now Lindsay that actually we never found out what the absolute provable source of the power is. Our founding was cut off. The powers that be assumed we had a marketable item and that money would be available for future research. we would find out all the secrets of the universe, etc. However, that was not to be. So here we are..... I tell you that I honestly do not know for sure where the actual source of the power comes from. I hope that you will not think less of me for my admission to you. I want to tell you something important that may help you to understand what is going on inside the collector. You know what a particle accelerator is... Well you can accelerate electrons to past the speed of light and you know what happens? They disappear. Does that mean that there is no speed of light ? NO, it means that the electrons go out of this dimensional plane. Scientists are not prepared to explain anything beyond this point. Neither am I. However it has been hypothesized that IF the electrons did not leave our dimensional realm, and stayed here, they would rip the fabric of time and space, possibly destroying our universe as we know it. That means that the power released would be unbelievable and totally inconceivable to mankind. But never the less, it is fact. My friend, listen. Think about, no, visualize the following: Imagine that you have a cannon which fires a projectile at a velocity of 1000 miles an hour. The amount of energy held in the moving projectile until converted is lets say a figure of ten. It will never become more then our figure of ten. The energy will slowly dissipate until the projectile slows and begins to fall to the ground and it's finale dissipation will occur when it strikes the earth or the object it was aimed at. Now, we have been told that there will never be more energy available from the projectile other then what was given to it when first fired into the sky, EXCEPT for the following example: Now, there can be a further dissipation of energy if the projectile was carrying a charge of dynamite to explode on impact as well. Do you see how the different things all relate here? Let me expand your mind for a moment.... Suppose that the projectile which you fired was another cannon? Now you have another cannon traveling at 1000 miles an hour... Now, if you could fire the second cannon, the projectile coming from it would be traveling at a velocity of 1000 miles an hour after being fired. However, since the cannon is already traveling at a speed of 1000 miles an hour when you fire it, the speed of the second fired projectile is essentially now 2000 miles per hour and the energy available to convert from the second projectile, is now twice the ten available from the first projectile! You now have energy availability of twenty to convert from the second projectile. Now, what if the projectile fired from the second cannon were another cannon and you fired it. Since the second cannon is traveling at 2000 miles per hour then the projectile you fire from it would make 3000 miles per hour, and so on and so on.... The energy released from the speed of multiple projectiles increases the energy available to be dissipated upon impact many fold! The faster the speed of ANYTHING the more energy will be available for conversion. A long time ago, i said, if you take a bullet and throw it at the side of an automobile;e it will bounce off. However, if you place the bullet into a gun and fire it at the automobile it, with sufficient velocity, go through the metal door and through the other side because of the inertia energy available for conversion. Speed is energy if you can convert the mass into energy quickly enough! Anything no matter how small can store enough energy to convert into huge amounts of energy. Even electrons..................................... Now, electrons can travel only so fast along the surface of the wire because of magnetic flux. what if you disable the effects of the flux? Now the electrons float freely without anything holding them back. electrons at the sped of light are now a possibility! How much energy can be converted from a stream of electrons traveling close to the speed of light? Remember the bullet story. Think of this: Energy conversion is different when you consider speed. 12 volts at 100 amps is slow and the energy can not dissipate quickly enough to kill you by discharge. But, it is a lot of energy especially if converted to speed. Reduce that 100 amps to 100 mA but increase the voltage (speed) to 100,000 volts and you can electrocute someone! "My unit operates on these principles"!!!!!. Think about all those frequencies traveling inside the collector coil and how they interact..... Sincerely, Ü I have one comment about what KOSH said in regard to the clamp meter. The meter measures anything powerful in regard to electron flow based on the strength of magnetic field. So the meter displays that there is OBVIOUSLY a LARGE magnetic field inside the coil!!!!! If the meter says five amps just from a contact high, that means there is one helava lot of power spinning around inside there! It amazes me how elementary that example is and yet the geniuses on line say, Whats the meter for?.....It aint clamped on anything... One engineer from a large American power company told me that the meter says more then anything else about the demonstration. You cant fool the meter, it must have a strong field to react and show a current. So, it aint batteries and it ant radio waves, but it is electron flow of a high order creating a large magnetic field. Or vice versa? Ha, Ha!!! The first successful units only deliverd a couple of volts, but when these are put into rotation it amplifies the output many fold! The key is in resonating with the energy present. As most of you know in classic radio reception, the low frequency component is filtered out of the carrier wave by a diode and fed into a capacitor to smooth it out into sound. Some receivers first mix the received signal with a signal from a local oscillator and then the mixed signals are further processed in the next stage. Even other receivers stimulate the oscillation by feeding back a small amount of energy into the tank circuit. I made an amp and had a really difficult time with a 35K resonance. I had so much trouble with it that I finally left the resonance there. I last measured it at 35.705K at a really high level. It is a good thing that I can't hear that high. But it does prove that my output transformer is capable of going up to 245K HZ. Which I measured. HEY, did you know that the frequency is proportional to the speaker's circumference? it appears that the frequency should change with the circumference of the speaker. That makes sense to you does it? No one I have talked to realizes that yet. I use 15" speakers myself. They are 15" from the dead center of the outside flange to the other sides flange. You know transistors just don't do well at those high frequencies. They try hard but they just make all sorts of harmonics all over the place. dirty things transistors. MOSFETS are better you know if you wanted to make an amplifier that behaved as though it was a tube amp but in a smaller size. Well as soon as I get my amp finished I will let you know if I have any more problems with it. But I like the sound and the power of it already. By the way, have you seen the video of the compass turning violently in the center of the unit while in operation? Notice that when I first turn the unit on that the compass starts to spin very slowly. it speeds up faster and faster until it just stops. When it stops the unit is always operating at about it's design maximum. We never found out why any of this occurred. It tended to reinforce what I observed as the turbine effect. When the unit is shut off the compass starts to revolve again and slowly comes to a rest. By the way, the fire discharge everyone sees in the video is after the output of the device is switched through a large high value resister! I hope that will wake up a few of you to the danger potentials. I want you to start and think of the generator principles the exact same way that passing the sound barrier was accomplished. Read how the engineers in this country finally developed the proper wing design to accomplish super sonic speed in aircraft. I hope it will give you a picture of what is going on inside the generator and especially the collector. I can only talk to you guys metaphorically because the company is threatening me constantly and my attorneys have warned me several times this month to STOP writing to the web site or I must face the consequences. I wonder if any of the folks realize just what I am risking when I give them information that they just take for granted and then demand more. You can do much with those frequencies. Higher frequencies are actually the real catalyst... You asked if the patent had any relevance to my technology. the answer is no. All the patents issued on the technology are related to the control parts only. there are 14 patents in all as i remember. non of them are revealing in nature as to the technology itself. Stupid people appear to think that when you get a patent it is for the whole shebang. Not so. You can patent a bolt, which is a part of the moon rocket without mentioning that it is part of the moon rocket. Major corporations do it as a rule to prevent reverse engineering and also people finding out any concept not yet available. BY THE WAY! If someone could locate all 14 patents they would have all the information needed to make a perfect control unit..... No wonder everyone is so interested in where the patents are. As I understand it, the Harmon International company acquired ownership of at least some aspects of the patent. They are the holders of many large electronic companies including the famous JBL company. By the way, if you read the patent you know how lengthy and involved even a simple patent can be. Some of my patents are over 750 pages long!!! Can you imagine the poor slob who had to read all of that? However, I very much enjoyed the concepts you sent to me because these people appear to be thinkers and in fact have many parts to the concept puzzle. If you read the information provided by many research scientists you will find that it seems to always point to some form of release or catalyst of sorts occurring.? .Note that in the TPU this is what happens. I never had the benefit of knowing exactly what was going on inside the thing. We had theories and so on but never any concrete facts. I kept moving frequencies up and down, changing control devices and size of rings the kind of wire and materials used and over the years we developed some basics for tpu design. But we never found out all of the high order thinking involving the depth of some of the research i have read about. Steven, I hope that you are diong ok today I can only hope that this communication will be useful A letter from somebody who has read everything. Greetings, Mr. Mannix: My name is Carl hurst. For several years I have been building my own designs for motors and replications of mainly Bedini-type energizers and circuits. Indeed, I have about five iterations running at any one time. I have closely followed the efforst of Stefan Harman, Edwin Badertscher, Jean-Loius Naudin, Marcus Wagner, Paul Lindemann, and several others through different cooperative building groups and have contributed myself. I believe through my own building efforts and research, I have learned a great deal about electromagnetic circuits. I took about a week and pored through every single post in the long string of posts concerning Mr. Steven Mark and his invention. The simple elegance of his device left me speechless. It makes perfect sense to me. (I was educated a long time ago as a EE) Here is what I preceive in his power toroidal device, and I will try to make this concise and sensical: 1. When one builds a bifilar coil, using one winding for power, and one for trigger, and drive this with a transistor, there is a certain point, when you bring a magnet close to one end of the coil, you will get a loud squealing noise from the coil. This feedback is the result of the trigger and power coil constantly switching the power transistor used to drive that coil off and on again. It is also a point where that coil/transistor combination produce a high voltage output which one can gather from the collector of the transistor. If left unchecked, this resonant frequency of on/off switching will burn up the transistor, and thus a resistor must be put into the trigger winding circuit to lessen the voltage produced in the winding. It is one element of what I believe is happening in the Mark device. 2. When one places several coils around a toroid, one can think of switching from one to the next, preferably sequentially, the minimum number of coils being three. In this case one could use the trigger winding from one coil to turn on the power of the second coil, the trigger from the second to the third power, the third trigger to the power winding of the first coil. 3. Flux can switch directions within a ferrous material instantaneously, and some say superluminally. It takes very little switching power to flip flux "bundles" from one direction to another, given that there is a good path for the flux to move through. The toroid is perfect for this. If one were to turn on a magnetic field in one coil, that flux permeates most of the toroid, but more importantly is perceived by the next coil. This in turn triggers that coil to operate, and the first coil field is shut down. In this way, one could use coils to move the flux in PULSES around the toroid. This switching from coil to coil, accomplished with low power, high voltage pulses occurs at a natural frequency of the circuit and that frequency that can be handled by the power transistors. 4. The high voltage, low power is a result of the "kick" whereof Steve Mark speaks. It was most clearly described by Nikola Tesla, when he observed a very high voltage spike at the VERY INSTANT a DC switch was closed. In fact he spoke of people being killed by this spike. Such a spike (though lower in magnitude) happens within a transistor at the very instant its gate is closed to allow power to course through it. I learned of this in vacuum tubes from my dad when he taught me how to build my first Heathkit shortwave radio in 1963. He said: "Whenever possible, leave the radio on - it doesn't consume much power, but the startup surges will quickly burn up your tubes." 5. When a coil is thus activated, initially it creates a very powerful magnetic spike. Imagine that this can even be more amplified if the transistor is turned on only to close the gate of a silicone controlled rectifier, in order to dump a small capacitor very suddenly through the coil. 6. It becomes easy to see that when one talks about the switching ability of transistors, 5kHz is perfectly reasonable, switching from one coil to the next. 7. Next we have the challenge of making the many pulses of magnetic power unidirectional. As we all know current running through a wire creates a circular magnetic field centered about that wire. This also anwers the old question you posed on one of your posts as to why a set of jumper cables jumps when chorted across the battery terminal. Well, first, the direction of current is opposite in the two leads, thereby quadrupling the magnetic force in the narrow space between the two wires. This powerful magnetic "linear" flux concentration between the cables then tries to orient itself to the ambient earths magnetic flux lines, and hence, jumps. Note, however, that there is more at play here. The VERY INSTANT you connect the cable to the battery, you also have that very high voltage spike whereof Tesla spoke. This spike has a large Radiant Energy component to the electricity. It contributes a great deal to the powerful magnetic pulse. 8. Back to unidirectional flux in the toroid. In order to create a mainly DC current in windings around part or all of the toroid, we must now ensure the flux moves in ONE direction. Well, the placement of a magnet at right angles to the flow around the toroid would tend to make the flux take a preferential direction. The flux of a controlling coil in a flux-gating device such as some of the Joe Flynn devices is quite weak, but exerts enormous diretional control on even very powerful flux. This is the concept exploited in the design of the newest patent of the Magnetic Power Module. (Interestingly, it appears to be a derivation of Steven Mark's efforts....) Thus, instead of using additional small coils to make the toroidal flux take one preferred direction as compared to the other can be acco0mplished by the use of a ferrite magnet, as seen in the videos (I, too have watched them numerous times.) 9. Now to the question of the little pieces of wire and the magnet. I don't remember anyone anwering this to your or Mr. Mark's satisfaction. Let me have a go. When you move a magnet across a wire you generate a current in that wire. However, what was not iterated is that the amount of current generated is not only a matter of the strength of the magnet, but rather the SPEED and distance at which that magnet is moved across that wire. Thus when we speak of moving the magnet across a small piece of wire at the speed of a gunshot, you generate a very sudden, high voltage spike in that little piece of wire. Conversely, if you could move that wire crossways through even a weak magnetic field with few flux likes, you could generate a voltage spike. In essence Mark is doing this in his toroid. He states he is running at about 5kHz. For four coils (like the one that is open on the cardboard box in his garage with two lamps), he may be banging two opposed coils simultaneously with spikes, with the magnet forcing one direction, or he is running them sequentially. For the sequential version, that would mean the "magnetic flux North" (for lack of a better way to describe it) passes one spot in the toroid 1250 times per second. The RPM of the flux would therefore be AT LEAST 75,000RPM. Can you imagine the kind of power you might generate from Neo mgnets in an armature near windings if you COULD rev that puppy up to 75,000RPM? Only this toroid has no back EMF when a load is put on the wires. 10. Remember I was talking about SPEED of the magnet passing the wires playing a significant role in the voltage produced. If we take the above example of 75,000 RPM, it is easy to calculate for a 14" diameter totoid, that the actual speed of the magnet "flying"past the wires at a very close range would be 3,123.74 statute miles per hour or 4,581.5 ft/second. Compare this to the bullet of a high powered rifle at 2,800 ft/sec. 11. One need only to add all the little pieces of wire, which are now individual loops of wire around the toroid's ring itself to see why the toroid generates such enormous voltages and currents. Needless to say, toroidal coils, like any coil have a preferred resonant frequency. If the toroidal coil is tuned to the "kick" frequency or pulsed frequency, one can see that this thing would put out scary amounts of power. 12. I shall make a stab here and say that these toroids DO NOT heat up until a load is put on the output wires. It would intuitively make sense that this heating is not only due to current flow within the toroid off-take winding, but also due to the new magnetic field that would result within the toroid, due to the DC current now flowing around it. Strangely, using the left hand rule for magnetism, this toroid is an abberation. Because when one thinks of the current beginning the flow through a load, the magnetic flux this winding creates is ADDITIVE to the pulsing magnetic flux created by the coils. 13. When we look at the earth's magnetic field, there are some weird things to look at. Does a high-speed rotational flux field draw or lense or concentrate flux lines into a Mark device? Maybe that is exactly what it does. This simply ADDS more density to the field. However, something else strikes me more simply. Mark has set up his terrific sequential pulsed magnetic field with a small battery (who cares if there is a battery - that point is moot when you look at the power out) which rotates nearly twice as fast as the bullet from a high powered rifle. It creates enormous numbers of flux lines crossing wires per second. That is key and it takes little power. Once power is established, one could take a tiny amount from the output and run the circuit, so again the battery is moot. The main thing is the device's strange reaction to physical movement. I attribute this to the ENORMOUS impact of the SPEED at which the magnetic flux moves. 14. We see how even small flux density, when accelerated to very high speed, can STILL generate current in conductors, be they wires or even flat surfaces. Whe we talk about these effects, we understand that ANY magnetic device, be it a simple magnet compass or object, will try to orient itself to the earth's magnetic field. Try and experiment. See how a magnetized needle in a match turns slowly to north in a cup of water. Now take a strong neodymium magnet and tape a piece of thread to it and let it hang. Note how QUICKLY and how STRONGLY it orients itself to the earth's field. What Mark appears to have proven is that one can create the effect of higher strength of a magnet through speed of movement of the field. And the field appears to be strengthened drastically by the ADDITIVE pulses of the coils pumping the toroid up to saturation. 15. To me the reason that the toroid appears to "judder" as one attempts to move the toroid across the table is straightforward. As the field rotates, there is a point in the device where the rotating field (perhaps rotating is the wrong word) better, field in its racetrack, is oriented in direct opposition to the Earth's magnetic field. On the diametrically opposite side, the field is perfect attraction to teh earth's field. This means that pushing the device North and South would have the most pronounced juddering or washboard effect. However, going crossways to N_S may also have weird effects, the flux lines moving at right angles to one another. I would tend to say this might be even more pronounced when a big load is put on the output coil, if my above assumption is correct with the inner ADDITIVE flux under load. 16. It makes sense that if we are moving a relatively weak magnetic field at very high RPM or lap rate, then perhaps we are now also talking about a gravitic interaction. Since it appears that gravity and spinning superconducting magnets are related, and we are spinning this field at a VERY high rate, then the orientation on startup is most likely also directly interacting with "gravitons?" I won't go there, as I know too little about the field. Suffice it to say, that gravity is directional, be it into the earth or into space from the earth's center. Either way it is directional. Inverting the toroid MAY then be affected in operation or stopped when it is inverted. Has Steven Mark solved this? It sounds SOOOOO interesting. And naturally, with smaller toroids, he is also talking about higher angular acceleration of the field, due to the smaller diameter. Maybe this also has a bearing on the trait? 17. The imploding television story is very interesting. Could Mark's device be close to tapping into or creating such a powervul magnetic vortex? Has he seen any evidence of magnetic attraction of any objects in or near the toroids? Anyway, Mr. Mannix - if you have read this far, then you understand that I have a genuine desire to understand Mr. Mark's technology. My wife and I will be retiring and living in Sri Lanka soon. That country is COMPLETELY dependent on importd fossil fuels. It is a lovely but very poor country. I have been grappling with several ways I may be able to help, and hence have been spending alot of time with the Bedini devices. I believe it may have given me a leg up on Steven Mark's devices. It would be an honor to hear from you, and have your thoughts (and perhaps even Mr. Mark's) thoughts on my information above. If you have a way I can find out more about U.E.C., it would be most appreciated. I really feel it is worth keepign up with Mr. Mark's devices and somehow push for this clean power to become a marketed module. Heck, one could build them directly INTO appliances with or without inverters so the appliances would not even HAVE power cords. Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 00:45:54 EDT Subject: Re: More car payments... To: Dearest lindsay, I hope this letter finds you well and in good spirits. I have been extremely ill. Please forgive the fact that I have not been able to write to you as of late. You can tell I think by my style of writing that you are actually communication with me not someone else attempting to interrupt our correspondence. Another reason I do not want to write to you too often without good reason. However, the letter you sent to me is proof that it will not be long before the technology gets out into the world. Carl is absolutely correct about most everything in his letter.You I am sure have already realized that. There are exact points of interest in 9 and 13. Yes we are definitely spinning the field at an unbelievable high rate. But I thought people would have guessed that by now. no one realizes how everything changes in physics when velocities become extreme. If you take a small piece of lead the size of a rifle bullet and throw it at the door of your automobile, nothing will happen except it will bounce off. Now, load the bullet into your riffle and propel the lead at high velocity. It will not only go through the metal of your car door but probably through the entire car and out the opposite door and even then continue on for some distance. Has anyone ever done any research on what happens when we create a magnetic field and revolve it faster and faster. What changes and at what speed or frequency of the pulsed field do things suddenly change? Also, #17, YES. This is very interesting. Sincerely, Your friend Steven Now I am you know that anytime you have a magnetic field moving past a wire you have electron flow in that wire or more precisely on the surface. Let us say that you have a magnetic field perhaps it is only a small permanent magnet. Now, you have a single copper wire twelve inches long. If you move the magnet across the surface of the wire from left to right at a certain speed you create an electron flow which is DC and it has a power potential based on how strong the field is and how fast the magnet if moved. So, if you increase the size of the magnet or the speed it moves you create a larger flow of electrons, larger as in higher voltage or more currant. Everyone tells us that the earth's magnetic field is measured as being too insignificant to generate any useable power, that is not so. Let me give you something to think about... If you had a short wire and you moved a magnet across it you would always have limited potential because the length of wire was so short. OK now what if we increase the length of the wire to many miles in length even with a very weak magnetic field moving across the wire you still have a much greater potential flow of power available. If we put it into a perspective of power per inch it may be easier to understand. If you have a small magnetic field moving across a wire twelve inches long it can generate an electron flow equal to lets say one millivolt per inch. If you move the magnet twelve inches at the same speed you get 12 millivolts as you transgress the twelve inches of wire. Understand that I am trying to convey a principal that you can understand for use in the future. So, you have a wire twelve inches long and you can make 12 millivolts moving a magnet across it. If you have a wire 1000 feet long and you move the same small magnetic field across the length of it you can create much more voltage potential perhaps 12,000 millivolts lets say. So, you have managed to generate a significant amount of electric power with a weak magnetic force. OK, how does this help us? where am I going with this? Suppose you have 1,000 pieces of wire twelve inches long and you run the same weak magnetic field over them all at the same time..... you get the same flow of electrons. If the wires are run in series then you will get the 12,000 millivolts etc. If you connect the wires in parallel you will get higher current but lower voltage. However, the power potential is the same whether you run the wires in series or parallel. If you know how to find the circuit potential, you tune into the frequency and you have enough short pieces of wire you can convert as much power as you wish in a given space. Things are more complex then what I have told you but I am just trying to give you an idea of how the technology works. How it IS POSSIBLE to use what appears to be a weak magnetic force to generate large useable amounts of power. That brings up some more information I want to convey. Some of the units in the demo videos did in fact have one or two 9V batteries to provide a separate controllable DC source for the solid state control circuit. We eventually learned how to make the power converters start with only the flick of a permanent magnet across the coils. You may find it humorous that we had to find a way to make the things work without any batteries purely because UEC needed us to honestly answer the question >Does it have any batteries inside of it?< They wanted us to be able to truthfully answer NO, to anyone who asked that question. You would be surprised how difficult it can be to explained to a lay person how impossible it is to convert a 9V battery into the juice needed to light a single 100 watt 120 volt light bulb, let alone make toast with an electric toaster!!! You ask me to take a look at the postings here. http://www.overunity.com/index.php/topic,1761.1120.html http://overunity.com/1761/user-turbos-replication-of-steven-marks-tpu/1050/#.WvutoGe1csU and tell you what I think.... I think that progress appears to being made. I am also quite sure that one of these guys will blow themselves up soon. The only way we will know is when one of them, with mystery, stops witting... That will be the indication. Sincerely, S Ü (URL CORRECTED DUE TO SERVER UPGRADE) (later) The sound made by that gentleman is nice and shows results however I would liken it to the comparable difference between, a small stick of dynamite and a 2000lb bomb... Let him go on. he may find frequencies which are safer and easer to control. if the unit generates more heat then power you are safe because it will destroy itself long before it blows up. we worked on that theory for a long time at UEC. Take care. S Ü Yes, the lengths of wire have a direct bearing on everything. The collector is straightforward and I am sure that you have the idea by know. There are many different ways to construct the control circuit. There are many different ways to inject the frequencies of excitation into the collector coil. Some will give you little reaction and some will give you smoke. Remember my description of a water hose? YES THERE IS A ROTATING FEILD WHICH CAUSES ELECTRONS TO FLOW IN COPER WIRE AND BE USED TO PROVIDE USEFULL WORK FORSE. THERE ARE MANY WIRES PERPINDICULAR TO THE MAIN COLECTOR. THIS IS A NECESSARY PART OF THE DEVICE. SINCERELY, SM. The interesting thing is how with the right combination of frequencies, you can actually create a revolving field with inertial! That is what I have referred to as , The inertia effect, do you remember? In regard to your query about the pulse DC conversion and the potential use of the coil to provide motive force: The multiple frequencies traveling around the coils are of too high a frequency to provide for any motive effort. They are only a means to achieve an end. The multiple frequencies begin to feed themselves and the multiple kicks become a combined big kick. I call it resonating. That is why if you notice in the video tapes that it takes just a few seconds for the coil to begin to function at maximum effort. You see, one little kick amounts to nothing. However imagine if you had hundreds of thousands of little kicks combining into one big current kick . . . I hope this letter finds you well and in the best of spirits. I am doing OK today. In many of our designs we use three coils as the collector. they can be run parallel to give higher current lower voltage output at excitation. They can be run in series to create high voltage, lower current when reaching the point of excitation. We have used other multiples of run of wire as well in various units construction. Most of the most successful units we made had control wiring run or wrapped vertically over the horizontal collector wires. You can se them in the units in some of the videos under black plastic covering. They were run perpendicular to the travel of the collector wires. They were run in multiple segments. each segment could be fed a different frequency individually and or from a collector section to help perpetuate the oscillation and control. It must be close to impossible to see all this in your head. That is why i have been concerned about HOW to explain anything using just words. Sincerely, SM By the way, something strange is that, once I made a unit with some old corroded wire for the collector and it worked very well for it's size. I made another identical collector with shiny new wire and it did not work quite as well. I never found out why, but there was a difference. I did not spend too much time on the curiosity because I had unlimited funding and a whole room full of every kind of wire there was. The first successful unit I made put out 5 volts. Next I made a unit that put out 20 volts, and that took me about 8 months. I didn't make a truly successful unit till I could get 60 volts at 100 watts and that took me almost two years. I demonstrated it and got research capital and engineering help. off we went until we got 1000 volts and ten amps. we stopped because we knew we had achieved a real fantastic breakthrough in power that would change the world. Dear Lindsay, I have some very important things to tell you. First. My attorney left several messages for me over the last week. I finally called him on Friday and he informed me of the fact he needed to set up a meeting with me in his office in as soon as possible and that I needed to be prepared to meet with someone from the federal government.. I was shaken to the bone! He also told me that I was not to mention my future meeting to anyone including the following: Paul, anyone with UEC, anyone on the Internet including you, my family, the press, or anyone in the communication business, my elected representatives and etc. It sounded as though he was reading a list off to me. He said that, he was. I told him i was a little scared to show up. He said that he understood my fear but it would be in my best interest to get into his office Monday and he would do his best to protect me. I asked him what i needed to be protected from? He said he had to respond to the authorities about their concerns regarding my possible breaking of federal laws. He said that the charges could be very serious against me and he needed to keep things from getting out of hand. He told me that he convinced them (the federal authorities ) that I was not intentionally breaking any laws or going against their wishes in any way. He assured them that he would get me into his office for them to talk to and they would see for themselves that I am a nice little guy who would never knowingly break the law. So off i went this morning to my attorneys office in hopes of not getting arrested and placed into prison. I don't think I would like prison, Lindsay... The first thing there I was taken into a room by my attorney and told what not to say to the Feds. Also, I was told what to do if I was arrested, etc. So I was fully scared to death!!! Next, I was taken into the meeting. Therein was my attorney and his secretary with note pad in hand. I was introduced to three gentleman in business suits. One was from the FBI, ( Federal Burrow of Investigation ), one was from the Atomic Energy Commission of the federal government and the other was from the Federal Department of Justice, Washington DC. I now had to go to the bathroom at this moment of my life more then ever!!! I sat down and listen to the man from the FBI remind me that I had been given a document from the federal government several years ago informing me of the fact that I no longer had control of my power technology because it had been deemed to be in the interests of the American people for it to remain in the control of federal authorities and that I was not to talk about it directly with other people, especially nationals of foreign countries without permission from the folks in Washington DC. He also reminded me that to do so would be breaking the law and committing a federal offence, which is a big thing here in America. He went on to tell me that he was there in official capacity as an investigator from the FBI to see if i had indeed broken the law. Why had I broken the law? Because I had been discussing my technology with other people without the permission of the folks in Washington DC. I asked them how they knew that I had spoken to people about my technology and they told me that: First of all, it was not MY TECHNOLOGY. I had no rights concerning it at all. It is under the control of the federal government for the benefit of the people of the United States. Second, The ownership of the technology is highly questionable. Third, Do not play games with us Steven, you know we know that you have been discussing the technology with anybody who will listen! They further accused me of deliberately posting information on the Internet. I said that I absolutely had not! The man from the FBI said that i had been collaborating with a foreign gentlemen in Australia to post information and therefor had been involved in a conspiracy to dispense information which is against the law for me to do. Then he pulled out a rather large stack of papers which turned out to be copies of everything posted Internet wise about my technology for the last ten years or whatever. Then my attorney interjected and they got into a long discussion which i didn't listen to very much. I was looking at the man from the Atomic Energy Commission and noted he had a kind face. He smiled at me and we began to talk. He told me that he admired my work very much. He told me that he thought of me as a fellow scientist. He told me that as scientists we had an obligation to protect people from our findings or things we discover if they may be generally harmful to them or the public at large. He told me that it was the duty of conscientious scientists to keep the black genies in the bottles so as not to harm society any more then necessary. He mentioned the Atomic bomb and how much better the world would be if it never had been invented, right? I said , right! He went on to discuss my technology in detail and reminded me of the destructive capability when the devices reach harmonic perfection. I told him that was a good analogy, or way of putting it. He told my that he didn't think I wanted to be responsible for giving out information making it possible and moreover inevitable that someone would make a big crater of a hole where their house used to stand with resulting death of themselves and possibly their families and neighbors too. He finally finished up with, And for God sake, with the terrorists hunting for weapons of mass destruction, why on earth would you want to hand them something like this to use to kill perhaps many millions of people? Do you think Moslems are not interested in this technology? They have a lot of oil so they would be interested in it for another reason wouldn't they Steven? I agreed with him and told him I hadn't thought of it in that perspective before. I told them all that I wasn't trying to do anything wrong at all. I didn't realize the implications of the possible results of talking to you about the technology. I told them that you were an engineer and interested in the scientific possibilities of the discovery only. The agent from the FBI said that I had no real way of knowing who you were and what you might actually be up to did I? I agreed with him. He said that they read everything going into and out of your computer wether or not anything is posted on that web site we guys like so much... He said that the Australian government was allied with the United States regarding this matter and that the Australian authorities would deal with you as need be. However, lets hope it does not become necessary shall we? Yes of course I said? I said, I never meant to get into trouble with this. I told them I just felt bad because of all the nasty things people were saying about me and that i starting talking to you and you said that you would try and tell the straight story about me and the technology. I have a right to defend my self don't I? The answer was, NO! I am not entitled to defend myself. What i need to do is, to feel good about doing the right thing. I need to do what my government tells me is good for me to do. I need to develop pride in making the correct decision to keep quiet about technology that may hurt other people or even help terrorists to kill many, many others. I was told that With knowledge comes responsibility!!! I told them I never intended to do anything wrong. I was sorry. I asked them to please forgive me and not to put me in prison. They said they could prefer charges against me at any time but are reluctant because of my well meaning attitude as displayed during the meeting. They told me that It would be a good idea if I told you to post information saying that I had no intention of revealing anything about my experiments or how the demonstrations were accomplished to the extent that they convinced so many people of their authenticity.That the demonstrations were more for amusement then anything else and that I am making it very clear that I never intended to convince the public at large. People attempting to duplicate anything they have seen in my demonstrations will not be able to do so and should not try. I asked them if I had their permission to tell you about today and they said yes of course. So........... that is what happened to me today. How was your day Lindsay? I want to mention about something I read on the site. A person named TAO wrote this to you a while back: >As a gesture of good faith towards you and the rest I'll throw out some insights... Lets talk about the 'kick.' When the old Edison DC generators were turned on, back in the day, they released this 'kick' and killed many workers in the process. A man by the name of Tesla had seen this. He wondered how and why this 'kick' would occur. So he experimented with wire and disruptive discharges from capacitors. It was found by him that this kick could be made so powerful that it could explode wires instantly. This kick came out of the wires perpendicularly. He discharged capacitors into stout wire and through a spark gap. The key to the kick's strength and appearance was in how fast Tesla discharged the capacitors into the spark gap AND how fast Tesla STOPPED the flow of current AT the spark gap. Tesla used all types of devices to stop this flow of current, magnets, a flame, counter-rotating engines. His goals were to get the time in which the discharge is STOPPED to be much quicker. As Tesla did this he found that the perpendicular radiations, the ones from the wires, caused electrical effects to appear in wires and other copper/metal materials near the STOPPED current/discharge. These electrical effects could be made to create electrons on other wires and copper around his STOPPED current/discharge wire. So, based on those things, lets look at the Mark device. Lets say Steven put one big stout cable around or in the rings,and all around these he had many many windings. Now, if Steven put into that stout cable a current and before the current could get to the end of the wire, he stopped it's flow abruptly, then perpendicular radiations (the KICKS), the same Tesla observed, would appear and spread from this stout cable, this would cause Tesla'a copper charging effect, which would hit all the other wires in Steven's coils. Now, if Steven wired the coils right and stopped the discharge of the current through the coils he would be able to extract a lot of extra energy from the tap points on the coils. This is basically how Tesla's magnifying transmitter works. Capacitors discharged ABRUPTLY into a wire, then the current flow is stopped ABRUPTLY before the current makes it to the end of the wire, and this KICK comes out of the wires perpendicularly. This KICK would then charge copper with electrons(hot electricity) or their opposites(cold electricity). It just depends on how you setup the device. So, I would say that Steven's KICKS have a direct relationship to Tesla's Magnifying Transmitter, its REAL operation.< So Lindsay, this guy definitely has the secret. I do not know if he will be able to duplicate power generation, but he does have the secret. Do you think he knows it? The only part he doesn't have any idea about is that by starting the oscillation you cause the current to flow in the collector which causes the magnification of the process within the collector which will ultimately produce the greater voltage and power in usable amounts during operation. Lindsay, it is so VERY hard to describe things with words! Sincerely, SM I don't think I am paranoid. look at the facts... I have a donut that can make ten amps of electric at several hundred volts... When I attempted to give you more ideas about the conceptualization i used words like, catalyzed, etc, because i was trying to spark ideas about the frequencies importance of interaction. When I told you about the discovery of the speed of sound i wanted you to realize the importance of looking at change inside the torrid at the exact point of catalyst. the analogy of the whole wing concept is actually a very good one to describe what happens inside the power torrid at the exact moment power conversion takes place. But i see now that it is just too difficult to get the picture into your mind with out a lot of direct communication. Tell me, where did you read about the gray noise system? It was sold to the largest manufacturer of home entertainment products in the USA. They developed something for the government, although I do not know what. That system had 14 separate patents on it. One basic and 13 peripheral. Oh well, the good times. Take care.