Wow i didnt realize that real power could be used using an Avramenko Plug
I am using a 230v Spark Arrestor it also works as well with a 600v spark Arrestor, a 1.5kv 100nF Cap and 2 Uf4007 diodes.
I am using my Bemf pulser to feed the plug.
Peter
Cool.. Peterae..
So your are getting a recovery every 75ns? Looks like your body is acting like a virtual ground ( sink ) and adding capacitance to one side of the circuit.
Hi Ds
Yes very interesting playing with this, i could run 2 of those sg's at the same time with 2 plugs, where as i had trouble running 1 sg with my BEMF generator even after a 5 stage walton cockroft multiplier.
Hi Peterae,
I like thinks like this! The faster the diode the more unidirectional that pulse will be.. ie. less times the cap will ring through the arc in the sg.
When the diode does its job you kind of have to sit around and wait for the 75ns to elapse before it is ready to cycle again. lol..
I had always wanted to put say five diodes in parallel and in line with each diode put a resistor with a slightly different value than the next. R , R+1 , R+2 , etc...
The proposed result being the lowest value resistor R would focus cycle 1 through its diode holding off all the other diodes then say 5ns later the next pulse would see the first diode still trying to recover so it would hit the next path of least resistance R+1 and hit its diode...
Sort of a diode cascade.. I dont know if it would work but it may be worth a try..
|---WWW---->|------| R
|---WWW---->|------| R+1
|---WWW---->|------| R+2
|---WWW---->|------| R+3
Very interesting Ds
I will see if i can give it a try.
Peter
I dont know if it will work but it may be wort a shot..
What happens if you put a diode across the cap?? Does it kill the sg?
Thanks
Not tried the diode but i can do, what values of resistance do you think i should try?
Peterae, I dont know.. It takes very little difference for a pulse to choose one diode path over another, that is why most people will use the same value resistor inline with diodes when they build a parallel bank, it evens out the load rather than overloading one diode. It would take some experimenting..
2 more Tests on the Avramenko Plug
This time i am using the gap to drive a 240VAC trandformer Primary and connecting a 12v 5 Watt bulb to the 2 18VAC secondaries which are in parallel.
The second test is the same but using 2 very different diodes which are rated for 20kv@3A no difference can be seen.
Peter
As Requested by ds here's a vid of a diode across the Cap
Peter
This should make it run bright without the need for the cast iron
the original article on the Plug showed it connected to one terminal of a HV transformer
Just done a rough power calculation.
Using 3 x 1000uF caps in series to give a measured value of 315uF
Using a 90v gap which was firing at 112v
I averaged the time over 20 gap fires with the long sink wire connected to the positive side and also to the negative side to see if there was a difference.
Input Supply was 125V @ 11mA = 1.375 Watts.
Cap energy @ 112v is =1.976 Joules now i am assuming the gap discharges the cap to 0v which is unlikely, so the following calcs are maximum values.
Positive wire
20 gap fires over 2:20:87 seconds.
=7.00435 = average seconds per gap fire
Given that a watt is joules/second this gives 282mW
Negative wire
20 gap fires over 2:18:746 seconds.
=6.9373 average seconds per gap fire
= 285mW
These values are inline with the brightness of the bulb in the above experiments, i estimated about 0.25 watts at the brightness they showed.
It must be noted i think i can get a more efficient power supply running to power Avramenko plug to increase the cop.
Peter
I have now measured the Transformer Inductance
Primary is 3.351 Henry @ 120Hz
Series R is 670 Ohms
Secondary in series with bulb is 118.72mH @ 120Hz
Series R is 40.21 Ohms
So if i use 2 x 500nF caps for my primary that will give a resonant freq of 122.97Hz
which means i will need a 14.11uF cap on my secondary
Peter
Peterae, you may want to use a variable capacitor or variable inductor in line to tune it in?
I dont see where you took into account the self capacity of the inductors in calculating your tank?? Did I miss that??
Hi Ds
I tried the resonance circuit above, but the gap wouldn't fire, i guess because it's dc across the plug then there is no way for the dc to get to the SG as it's blocked by both inline caps.
My last test used 3 x 1000uF caps in series to get a higher volt cap and with a 90v SG across this i timed the fire rate and determined the maximum power my cap was charging at, and because i knew my input power i concluded i was way under unity with this setup.
Another thing i proved was that 2 AV plugs do load the supply and the cop doesn't improve.
If i build a better supply then i may re try some readings, but for now i have shelved this for the ability of going OU.
Peter
Quote from: darkspeed on 2010.01.29, 19:23:40
Hi Peterae,
I like thinks like this! The faster the diode the more unidirectional that pulse will be.. ie. less times the cap will ring through the arc in the sg.
When the diode does its job you kind of have to sit around and wait for the 75ns to elapse before it is ready to cycle again. lol..
I had always wanted to put say five diodes in parallel and in line with each diode put a resistor with a slightly different value than the next. R , R+1 , R+2 , etc...
The proposed result being the lowest value resistor R would focus cycle 1 through its diode holding off all the other diodes then say 5ns later the next pulse would see the first diode still trying to recover so it would hit the next path of least resistance R+1 and hit its diode...
Sort of a diode cascade.. I dont know if it would work but it may be worth a try..
|---WWW---->|------| R
|---WWW---->|------| R+1
|---WWW---->|------| R+2
|---WWW---->|------| R+3
Works more like you want if you replace the resistors with very small inductors - each stage with a little more inductance.
Each stage would be as follows:
input to diode then output of diode to one side of cap (other side of cap to minus) then input of cap to a coil - coil to another diode - output of diode to load.
Tie all the inputs together and then all output together to make one circuit.
You won't see power this way but you can send one long pulse to the input and have several pulses out. This is a basic passive frequency multiplier.
Enjoy ;D
Quote from: Peterae on 2010.02.05, 20:14:20
Hi Ds
I tried the resonance circuit above, but the gap wouldn't fire, i guess because it's dc across the plug then there is no way for the dc to get to the SG as it's blocked by both inline caps.
My last test used 3 x 1000uF caps in series to get a higher volt cap and with a 90v SG across this i timed the fire rate and determined the maximum power my cap was charging at, and because i knew my input power i concluded i was way under unity with this setup.
Another thing i proved was that 2 AV plugs do load the supply and the cop doesn't improve.
If i build a better supply then i may re try some readings, but for now i have shelved this for the ability of going OU.
Peter
can you post a quick sketch of the circuit you used to drive the A-Plug?
Hi Chaps
I was using my blocking mono to drive the Av plug it's all here
http://www.overunityresearch.com/index.php?topic=68.0
Peter
Quote from: Peterae on 2010.02.08, 19:35:52
Hi Chaps
I was using my blocking mono to drive the Av plug it's all here
http://www.overunityresearch.com/index.php?topic=68.0
Peter
did you ground the plug?
no i dont have a ground yet, i have a massive cast iron machine behind my bench and found it's mass was enough to produce good effects, the other option was for me to touch it, i guess a metal sphere would have also worked
The Av Plug was connected to the positive terminal of the blocking mono only
Quote from: Peterae on 2010.02.08, 20:14:16
no i dont have a ground yet, i have a massive cast iron machine behind my bench and found it's mass was enough to produce good effects, the other option was for me to touch it, i guess a metal sphere would have also worked
The Av Plug was connected to the positive terminal of the blocking mono only
http://jnaudin.free.fr/avramenko/avramenk.htm
high voltage
2-diodes - cap - gap - no ground
US patent is 6104107
Naudin's replication: http://jnaudin.free.fr/html/afep01.htm
It's interesting that Paulo & Alexandra Correa use an Avremenko config, but with 2 caps in series with the earth in the middle.
(http://www.overunityresearch.com/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=172.0;attach=889;image)
Now if we were to connect Don's secondary's across each cap i wonder if we could convert back to longitudinal waves or reconvert the energy using a reverse Tesla coil.
Peter, thanks for posting this as I have been just starting to test with AV stuff!
Quote from: Peterae on 2010.02.12, 22:31:12
It's interesting that Paulo & Alexandra Correa use an Avremenko config, but with 2 caps in series with the earth in the middle.
(http://www.overunityresearch.com/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=172.0;attach=889;image)
Now if we were to connect Don's secondary's across each cap i wonder if we could convert back to longitudinal waves or reconvert the energy using a reverse Tesla coil.
Tesla mentioned that the secondary could be directly coupled to the primary if necesary. As I recall, it prevents arcing between the two. Dollard directly coupled.
The Avremenko config appears to convert the converted energy back into conventional current.
I believe the TPU utilizes a field interaction effect to accomplish this same feat - hence the static DC field.In a Tesla Magnifier, the energy interacts with the standing wave produced during resonance. Tesla even published diagrams showing the nodes and anti nodes along the length of his magnifier coil. You can not take the converted energy straight of the top terminal and drive conventional loads with it, but you will find that you can make several recievers that convert the same quantity of energy.