OverUnity Research

Electrical / Electronic Theory and Learning Center => bemf => Topic started by: TinMan on 2015.04.07, 11:13:02

Title: The T reactor
Post by: TinMan on 2015.04.07, 11:13:02
Well i thought i would start a thread on this(what was suppose to be a junk project),as it turns out that it has some interesting things going on. I am in the process of changing to batteries in hope that i can loop it without to much trouble.
Anyway,here is the first video of the setup.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QVffZOnerUk
Title: Re: The T reactor
Post by: TinMan on 2015.04.07, 11:16:06
OK.here is the second video,where the system is running on batteries. As you will see in the video,we have a very good example of the run battery climbing in voltage,even though we are only drawing from the battery,and no power being returned. It's being triggered from my SG,and the inductive kickback is being sent to a charge battery ahla hudini style.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YWPJXqUFD4o
Title: Re: The T reactor
Post by: TinselKoala on 2015.04.07, 13:56:24
Can you post a schematic? I'm always worried when a device is clocked by an external SG because it's possible that the signal generator is supplying significant power to the circuit. That's one reason why I built in a dedicated 555 pulser to my EMJ build, to get rid of the possibility that the external signal generator was contaminating the power measurements.
Title: Re: The T reactor
Post by: Chet K on 2015.04.07, 14:40:45
I heard your gonna put in Ground Rods [like Clarence]

didn't you get the memo... :o

*  Ground rod *  Memo    
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D39u9eeGG4c


For a fellow such as yourself [that makes it rain during experiments  :D] I wouldn't stand too
close ...
Title: Re: The T reactor
Post by: TinMan on 2015.04.07, 15:02:17
Quote from: Chet K on 2015.04.07, 14:40:45
I heard your gonna put in Ground Rods [like Clarence]

didn't you get the memo... :o

*  Ground rod *  Memo    
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D39u9eeGG4c


For a fellow such as yourself [that makes it rain during experiments  :D] I wouldn't stand too
close ...
Funny you should say rain-->it's been raining since lunch time here. >:(
Title: Re: The T reactor
Post by: TinMan on 2015.04.07, 15:11:07
Quote from: TinselKoala on 2015.04.07, 13:56:24
Can you post a schematic? I'm always worried when a device is clocked by an external SG because it's possible that the signal generator is supplying significant power to the circuit. That's one reason why I built in a dedicated 555 pulser to my EMJ build, to get rid of the possibility that the external signal generator was contaminating the power measurements.
Schematic ? lol
Im still changing things around here every couple of hours. I'd be drawing schematics full time at that rate.
We have 5v P/P from the SG,and a 100 ohm resistor on the base. So the SG may be delivering 62.5mW max,as we have only 2.5v delivered to the base,and we are drawing 387mW from the battery. Just go's to show how battery voltage can increase when a light load is drawn from them O0.
Title: Re: The T reactor
Post by: TinMan on 2015.04.07, 15:17:39
Quote from: Chet K on 2015.04.07, 14:40:45
I heard your gonna put in Ground Rods [like Clarence]

didn't you get the memo... :o

*  Ground rod *  Memo    
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D39u9eeGG4c


For a fellow such as yourself [that makes it rain during experiments  :D] I wouldn't stand too
close ...
Man that looks awsome. If that is slow motion on one lightning strike,then how fast were those little lightning bolts that seem to build the path for the larger ones that looked like they were in slow motion. O0
Title: Re: The T reactor
Post by: Chet K on 2015.04.07, 15:18:29
So Its already raining....

perfect time to call "the Power" .. :D  but you better wait till tomorrow to bring the thunder and lightning
you wouldn't want to wake the neighbors. 8)

** I see your comment above
yes that one is from Tinsel ,[better copy than the first]

this is what can happen when you summon the beast...be careful with those ground rods  O0
[and you Do know I'm quite serious  given your reputation around here]
Title: Re: The T reactor
Post by: TinMan on 2015.04.08, 13:31:36
Hey guy's,your going to want to see the next video. I built a new coil of my own design for the reactor,in the hope of collecting power from the reactive power. Anyway,i decided to give it a go as a inductive kickback charger,and what happened next has me a bit baffle'd :o

I will let the video tell the story,and will get it up ASAP. O0
Title: Re: The T reactor
Post by: PhysicsProf on 2015.04.08, 13:51:57
  Looking forward to it, TinMan.  Luv your videos!   O0
Title: Re: The T reactor
Post by: TinMan on 2015.04.08, 15:45:22
Here is the video on my new coil design. I guess the best thing to do is just watch the video.
I am yet to determine the power source that is running the device ATM

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0vHhgYW3GDI
Title: Re: The T reactor
Post by: Chet K on 2015.04.08, 17:08:15
I hope the TinMan is resting now [1 AM in OZ],sometimes its good to go to bed with dreams of self runners [been there]
And I hope when you wake up it will not be just a dream    O0
Title: Re: The T reactor
Post by: TinMan on 2015.04.08, 17:33:04
Quote from: Chet K on 2015.04.08, 17:08:15
I hope the TinMan is resting now [1 AM in OZ],sometimes its good to go to bed with dreams of self runners [been there]
And I hope when you wake up it will not be just a dream    O0
Lol-im to hyped up chet to sleep.
OK-you will need to sit down-and no laughing.
It seems that the only conection we need to get it to run is a !!!ground wire!!!-->yes,ground-not mains neutral,although they are one in the same here. So i ran a wire from the device to the grounded copper water pipes of the house,and it run's. How it runs i dont know yet,but i will work it out.
Title: Re: The T reactor
Post by: Chet K on 2015.04.08, 17:45:25
 ;D
Now you have to go drive some Rods into the ground and take it outside and hook it up
careful your neighbors don't lock you up [2 AM hammering Rods in the dark]
:D
Slider [below]
He's referencing the Clarence deal [Barbosi and Leal thread]
Clarence has 48 ground rods and counting for his unit to work.

I like Brad's better....

Title: Re: The T reactor
Post by: Slider2732 on 2015.04.08, 17:49:27
Ahhhh...so do you think it's a leaky Ground connection ?
The circuit would still have to fire at that 36kHz and upward rate though, which is weird enough. Thing being, that the transistor would have to fire to produce that rate and there isn't the current to do so ?


Here's a test. If you could wind a coil around the Neutral wire and see if it inductively couples to still run. That would then make it a 'wireless' feed.
Or plonk a big copper ground rod in your yard.
However, on from there would be to tune it much like a crystal set and run the neon from ambient waves. Maybe WiFi, phone coverage waves, radio stations. It's obviously efficient at lighting that neon, so perhaps it can be tuned around to charge batteries or run motors.

Title: Re: The T reactor
Post by: Grumage on 2015.04.08, 17:52:54
Dear Tinman.

I have to disagree with regards to the frequency change. From my perspective there was no change in the main spikes, was the scope counting the intermediate spikes between ?

You appear to have a modern day Cook coil !! Very well done.

Cheers Grum.
Title: Re: The T reactor
Post by: Chet K on 2015.04.08, 17:58:26
 :o Slider thinks it could be proximity to the new Space rock.
Title: Re: The T reactor
Post by: Slider2732 on 2015.04.08, 18:06:57
Haha, well, hey that's the other odd new thing in the room  >:-)

The distant Ground rod idea is based on own experiments.
If you take 2 copper rods (house gauge copper) and drive them at least 4ft apart into anywhere in your back garden, then put a crystal set earphone/speaker straight across the rods, you may well hear mains hum.
:)

ETA: the distance might well be used to advantage, rather than forming resistance. Place the ground rods, connect with wire that forms 2x 1/4 wave of the AM radio band. So about 100ft of wire to each, suspended as straight wires in the air, at least a couple of feet from the ground. Then connect the circuit to it.
Title: Re: The T reactor
Post by: TinMan on 2015.04.08, 18:08:20
Quote from: Grumage on 2015.04.08, 17:52:54
Dear Tinman.

I have to disagree with regards to the frequency change. From my perspective there was no change in the main spikes, was the scope counting the intermediate spikes between ?

You appear to have a modern day Cook coil !! Very well done.

Cheers Grum.
Yea,as i mentioned in the video,i think the scope was trying to read the smaller spikes when they rose slightly in amplitude.

And what is a Cook coil?
Title: Re: The T reactor
Post by: Chet K on 2015.04.08, 18:28:30
http://www.overunityresearch.com/index.php?topic=1616.0

Cook coil thread
Title: Re: The T reactor
Post by: Grumage on 2015.04.08, 18:28:46
Quote from: TinMan on 2015.04.08, 18:08:20
Yea,as i mentioned in the video,i think the scope was trying to read the smaller spikes when they rose slightly in amplitude.

And what is a Cook coil?

Dear Tinman.

Ooop's sorry missed the dialogue !!  ;)

Daniel McFarland Cook. He made the comment in his patent that the effect worked with a single coil but with a pair, was far superior.

Based on Sliders comments could the device be picking up a Wi Fi signal or some other Medium frequency transmission ? As daft as it may sound are you able to construct a simple tuneable tank circuit based around the fundamental frequency ? And see if you can tune into it ?

Cheers Grum.
Title: Re: The T reactor
Post by: TinMan on 2015.04.08, 18:47:05
Quote from: Grumage on 2015.04.08, 18:28:46
Dear Tinman.

Ooop's sorry missed the dialogue !!  ;)

Daniel McFarland Cook. He made the comment in his patent that the effect worked with a single coil but with a pair, was far superior.

Based on Sliders comments could the device be picking up a Wi Fi signal or some other Medium frequency transmission ? As daft as it may sound are you able to construct a simple tuneable tank circuit based around the fundamental frequency ? And see if you can tune into it ?

Cheers Grum.
We dont have anything that is around that frequency here in OZ. My wifi is 2.3GHZ,and most radio stations around here  are around 90 MHZ. Not sure what the TV stations are,but will look into that. It has to be running of some sort of signal input from some where,and i will find it sooner or later-i hope.
Title: Re: The T reactor
Post by: Aking.21 on 2015.04.08, 18:51:53
TinMan:  I think you've just reproduced the Kunel patent, in a slight variation.

http://www.intalek.com/Index/Projects/Patents/DE3024814.pdf

You are the first to do it that I know about.

Very interesting.
Title: Re: The T reactor
Post by: Grumage on 2015.04.08, 19:12:49
Quote from: TinMan on 2015.04.08, 18:47:05
We dont have anything that is around that frequency here in OZ. My wifi is 2.3GHZ,and most radio stations around here  are around 90 MHZ. Not sure what the TV stations are,but will look into that. It has to be running of some sort of signal input from some where,and i will find it sooner or later-i hope.

Dear Tinman.

I just re read my post !! Duh, you already have !!   :D  ;D

Cheers Grum.
Title: Re: The T reactor
Post by: Slider2732 on 2015.04.08, 19:32:09
Had to reread it myself Grum, but, yes indeed, he's tuned it exactly, to something  8)

The Kunel Patent looks related for sure.

Are the magnets running around like a weird TPU and PMH crossover, allowing them to oscillate based on coil resistance, inductance, loop area and magnetic strength ? could that be how the frequency manifests ?
Could there indeed be a Leedskalnin inclusion here.
or,
Will Brad post that he's found the frequency to be a TV remote, stuck in the 'on' position, that fell under his chair ? lol
Title: Re: The T reactor
Post by: ion on 2015.04.09, 02:38:14
Dear Tinman

Try removing all connections from the signal generator and the scope, including the grounds. Does the neon still  illuminate?

Regards, ION
Title: Re: The T reactor
Post by: TinMan on 2015.04.09, 03:26:22
Quote from: ION on 2015.04.09, 02:38:14
Dear Tinman

Try removing all connections from the signal generator and the scope, including the grounds. Does the neon still  illuminate?

Regards, ION
It requires a ground only to opperate. If ground is removed,then it stop's running.
So it would seem ATM that it is recieving a signal of some sort,and the ground is needed to complete the conection.The neon will glow slightly if i use myself as the ground.
Title: Re: The T reactor
Post by: JimBoot on 2015.04.09, 04:06:51
You're not near Exmouth are you? I hear there's a decent Haarp install up there  ;D Very interesting work
Title: Re: The T reactor
Post by: TinMan on 2015.04.09, 04:28:39
Quote from: JimBoot on 2015.04.09, 04:06:51
You're not near Exmouth are you? I hear there's a decent Haarp install up there  ;D Very interesting work
Ah yes,that.
Not many know about that one,but for those interested-
http://loveforlife.com.au/content/11/01/26/us-military-haarp-facility-exmouthwestern-australia-even-more-advanced-one-alaska
Title: Re: The T reactor
Post by: Hoppy on 2015.04.09, 07:43:03
Interesting experiment Tinman. Do you intend to try tuning for increased output derived from the substantial signal being picked-up by your device?
Title: Re: The T reactor
Post by: TinMan on 2015.04.09, 09:31:00
Quote from: Hoppy on 2015.04.09, 07:43:03
Interesting experiment Tinman. Do you intend to try tuning for increased output derived from the substantial signal being picked-up by your device?
The first thing i have to do is find out what signal it is picking up. I have been fooling around with it for around 6 hour's now,and am no closer than i was yesterday. It dose need a ground--wont run without it. So i have been trying different types of aerials on the scope to try and find a strong signal-but as yet,haven't found one other than the 50Hz mains. Now I'm trying to figure out how to see if the ground itself has some sort of signal ???
Title: Re: The T reactor
Post by: Centraflow on 2015.04.09, 10:57:39
Possible ELF submarine carrier if you are on the coast "at sea level", Mwatts of power

regards

Mike 8)
Title: Re: The T reactor
Post by: Aking.21 on 2015.04.09, 15:55:26
It's possible that you've created an electret and it needs a ground reference point to direct electron flow.
If you can take your device for a drive and use the car chassis as ground, that will probably be very illuminating.
pun intended. lol
Title: Re: The T reactor
Post by: Chet K on 2015.04.09, 17:49:54
Brad
Well
thinking about you Dad and his lifes work...
this comment from Mike N is quite intuitive [I'm a bit slow] and very suspect for other reasons...

quote
Possible ELF submarine carrier if you are on the coast "at sea level", Mwatts of power
end quote

might be a solution to your long standing puzzle?
But maybe Not




Title: Re: The T reactor
Post by: TinMan on 2015.04.11, 01:05:33
Quote from: Chet K on 2015.04.09, 17:49:54
Brad
Well
thinking about you Dad and his lifes work...
this comment from Mike N is quite intuitive [I'm a bit slow] and very suspect for other reasons...

quote
Possible ELF submarine carrier if you are on the coast "at sea level", Mwatts of power
end quote

might be a solution to your long standing puzzle?
But maybe Not





Nope-no submarines of the coast here-->well none that I'm aware of anyway lol.

OK,well another disappointing find-along with the cap charger effect.

While the cap charging circuit was doing it's thing(or not doing it's thing),i was able to find out what was running the neon on that silly coil i made. Turns out that what i was seeing on the scope in the first video was just random noise,and nothing to do with what was really going on. After some more scoping,i found across the collector/emitter junction a nice AC wave form-although slightly square-and exactly matched mains frequency of 50 HZ. So off to the meter box,and switch off the power to the workshop. Upon entering the workshop,i see no more glowing neon. So i turn the power back on to the workshop,and the neon was glowing again. The next thing i did was to start unplugging things to see where the strong signal was coming from,and turns out that my UPS is the source of the strong signal that is running the neon.

So this is another lesson learned,and i now know to turn of the UPS when making any power measurements on small devices. This presents a problem,as my scope runs from the UPS to isolate the scope grounds from mains ground/neutral.

So in the last two day's,i have managed to kill two free energy devices lol O0. But not all is lost,as the new coil design is a kickass inductive kickback charger-as will be seen soon.
Title: Re: The T reactor
Post by: JimBoot on 2015.04.11, 09:17:04
Just put it next to your neighbours meter box, voila free energy. Nice little radiant collector though considering no external aerial.
Title: Re: The T reactor
Post by: muDped on 2015.04.11, 20:44:55
Quote from: TinMan
...
The next thing i did was to start unplugging things to see where the strong signal was coming from,and turns out that my UPS is the source of the strong signal that is running the neon.

So this is another lesson learned,and i now know to turn of the UPS when making any power measurements on small devices. This presents a problem,as my scope runs from the UPS to isolate the scope grounds from mains ground/neutral.
...

You may be able to suppress the radiant energy that your
UPS is propagating by placing it inside a shielded enclosure
such as a metal box.  If the radiant energy is getting into
your wiring then some RFI filters can be installed at each
input and output wire of your UPS.  RFI filters are relatively
easy to make yourself.

Spurious radiation can be a real "problem" as you've discovered.

Well Done! on your sleuthing work TinMan.

Electromagnetic Interference article.
Title: Re: The T reactor
Post by: Hoppy on 2015.04.12, 13:28:57
Many of us have been there Tinman but good on you for finding the source of the energy. The sad thing is that there are also many that did not find the source and believe that their device's were running on ZPE.