Here is an interesting paper:
Energy Conservation: Science or Ideology?
Thanks. My opinion is that conservation of energy is definitely an ideology, so vehement it might be on par with the negative aspects of religion.
Quote from: feynman on 2011.03.15, 23:48:01
Thanks. My opinion is that conservation of energy is definitely an ideology, so vehement it might be on par with the negative aspects of religion.
New theory makes overunity possible: http://gratisenergi.se/aircars.htm (http://gratisenergi.se/aircars.htm) Best Wishes, Hermes
Isn't this about the same thing?
Quote
...http://gratisenergi.se/aircars.htm (http://gratisenergi.se/aircars.htm)...
"
if someone found a way to make a compressor that was more than 100% efficient, it would be in use everywhere."
It's common sense.
If something like that did exist in the past, we'd really be taking our forefathers for complete idiots not to have spotted it and used it, and imho, the idiocy is more on the side of those who would think so.
This would be particularly true for a supposed invention dating back nearly a century.
Is it possible to pressure gas to doesn't its temperature increase ? Because many energy used for it.
Quote from: chief kolbacict on 2025.05.04, 12:18:58
Is it possible to pressure gas to doesn't its temperature increase ? Because many energy used for it.
It's not the temperature that's important, it's the thermal energy that's troublesome.