|
Resonance and OverUnity
My thesis for this short write up is the following:
WE WILL NEVER ACHIVE OVERUNITY, BUT THAT’S OK, WE HAVE RESONANCE!
For those that don’t know me well, my thesis is a bit “tong-in-check”. Before we discuss Resonance, it is beneficial to discuss this notion of “Overunity”, and to make sure we agree on its definition.
Let’s begin with a general notion of Overunity, and what it means to some. A statement that most people would probably agree to is the following: “if I get more out than I put in, I must have overunity.” Some think in terms of power flow as: Pout/Pin > 1 must mean overunity, others in terms of energy Eout/Ein > 1 means overunity (this is more correct ). However, there is a shortcoming in both of these definitions because the duration of time is not clearly specified.
Give Me More Time
A good example that illustrates this shortcoming is a battery that powers a light bulb. Power flows out of the battery and no power flows into it, at the same time, so this qualifies as an overunity device because Pout>Pin, where Pin=0 or if this experiment runs for let’s say 1 second, that Eout>Ein as well. So obviously there is a need to consider the time history of an experiment and specify the time domain over which we make a determination of overunity. An obvious time domain for many theoretical studies is the infinite time domain (–INF < t < +INF), and I chuckle a bit at this definition when I see it, as it’s obviously never going to be implemented properly in the true sense of the word, because our days are numbered and short compared to INFINITY, or all time if time ever had a beginning or it’s ever going to have an end. However, from a practical point of view, an “infinite” time span can be 1 microsecond and be 99.999999999% accurate compared to an integration over true “infinity”, because if the waveform we are integrating rises from zero and decays back to zero during this time, and outside of these limits it stays at a zero value “forever” we don’t need to worry about the outer bounds (we hope and assume.)
What Are You Hiding
In case you are wondering where I am heading with this, you need not wait any longer. It’s the concept of energy storage! Yes most of us know that energy can be stored in batteries as chemical energy, in springs as elastic potential energy, in velocity as in kinetic energy of a rotor perhaps, or in a gravitational potential by lifting a weight to some height from which it can drop and deliver energy. If we don’t keep energy storage in mind we can be fooled into thinking we might have overunity. The list of energy storage mechanisms I listed is just a small list that is well known (I hope) but if we are sincere with ourselves we should have the common sense to realize that there are processes out there that we don’t fully understand or even partially, and which could come into play in our experiments. Seeing excess energy out of an experiment should not induce us to quickly believe we have overunity, unless we are absolutely certain that we have ruled out all forms of energy storage. This will NEVER be possible in our short life spans, not with 100% certainty at least. What most likely could come out of this is a discovery of a new form of energy storage, or perhaps a flow of energy previously undiscovered, which leads me to the next discussion.
Send Me Some Energy
Energy flows are everywhere around us. The sun sends its warm rays upon the earth and supports life in various ways. Water is evaporated and condenses and we obtain clouds and rain and the rivers carry this water down to the oceans and lakes and the process repeats. There are also thermal differences in the air and ocean waters and these cause movement and convection to occur and some build windmills to try and capture some of this “free” energy. So a good point to make at this time is the fact that we need to consider the SYSTEM. If we let our system be the wind mill, than it appears we have an overunity device, but we know better than that. We need to expand our system to as large a sphere as possible, but once again we are finite people on a little speck of dust in this huge universe. There is a slim chance we will comprehend in our lifetimes the immense universe to a level of rigor required for wagering ones hard earned career credentials on backing up this notion of overunity. So humbly we have to come to the conclusion and determination that we can not claim overunity, because there is too much unknown, and not enough known!
Conservation of Foolishness
Some people are endowed with a certain amount of foolishness which can neither be created nor destroyed. All jokes aside, we know full well the statement of conservation of energy. At present it seems to stand on a firm scientific footing and it’s unlikely it will be toppled, and we should be quite happy about this. If there were a mechanism in nature that created energy we could overheat and perish or if there was a mechanism that consumed energy, than we could cool off and freeze to death. Energy just changes from one form to another; it has many faces and aspects, and there are HUGE amounts of energy all around us. Some of you might be thinking about ZPE, but to tell you the truth I chuckle at this new notion of ZERO POINT ENERGY, and the long formulas and deep theoretical efforts to prove it. I took thermodynamics long ago, and it’s no secret that the ambient temperature around us represents Mega Joules of energy per cubed what ever, inch^3, cm^3, you name it. We don’t have to go into fancy math to prove there is energy at zero Kelvin, most of us will never even live one microsecond under those conditions. What we have is a condition of bathing in energy every day of our lives. The problem is how do I use this energy, or can I use it? What is needed is a temperature difference which creates a flow of energy, and that we can tap. (I’ll skip a discussion of entropy and the quality of energy)
Energy Reception
To capture energy that flows, or more appropriately convert it to something we can handle and direct at will, depends on the nature of the flow and it’s behavior over time. If we have a constant flow of water, like a river, than we’ll use different methods than if it’s alternating, like the waves in the ocean. These alternating flows of energy need to be handled differently, and this is where RESONANCE comes into play. Resonance allows us to flow a small quantity into a large quantity, at the correct time when the large quantity will not oppose the small quantity. It is all about timing and the interplay between energy storage and energy flows. Let me bring this discussion to something more concrete so we don’t drift off into a philosophical cloud. Let’s consider Radio Waves and their reception.
WTF ... Over
Since Tesla and Marconi, demonstrated wireless communications (let’s not forget Hertz who proved Maxwell's theoretical deductions), we have not been able to get rid of these manmade electromagnetic disturbances. (that’s right I want them GONE Turned OFF! lol) Most AM radios used a tuned inductor (by adding a capacitor) and this raises the voltage at the coil terminals from that which can simply be induced magnetically acording to the formula V = -N d PHI/dt. The tuned coil terminal voltage (not loaded), over the unturned level, is a ratio known as “Q” or quality. The higher the Q, the higher the tuned voltage, and the more power is received and “funneled” into our receiver. I will not make an attempt to prove this to you as it’s more involved than you might care for, but basically the magnetic and electric fields that resonate around the antenna (due to tuning) interacts with the radio waves and their magnetic and electric field vectors. This interaction is very similar to POSITIVE current flow into a POSITIVE voltage, which means power is delivered to the voltage producing device. To further illustrate, imagine with me a series of (+) and (-) charges spaced evenly, that move towards the right, perhaps small pellets of metal fired in sequence from a gun and charged appropriately. Obviously, the net flow of charge is zero, but does this mean that power flow is zero? The answer is NO. I can place a controllable voltage source at the receiving end that creates an alternating voltage field to intercept these charges. It will have a (+) voltage when the (+) charges arrive and a (-) voltage when the (-) charges arrive. I will thus be able to extract lots of energy from this seemingly NEUTRAL stream of charges. As each pellet arrives and imparts it’s energy the voltage will get stronger and stronger, and build up to a high level, such that all the energy of the pellets will be dissipated, than we will have a perfect reception of energy. What I just described is a type of “RADIO” operation based on charges and not RADIO WAVES, just to illustrate the point. A number of other phenomena can be used, like acoustic energy flows etc.. Resonance is quite important but not overunity per se.
Conclusion
What Conclusion? , this ain’t over! I don’t know what I’m talking about but it sure feels good to say it. I never knew the feeling, thanks MH. If this has helped anybody in any way, send $10 to the GK to help him keep RESONATING away. Who knows he might down another UFO out of the sky and humanity will undergo “another” discontinuous jump in knowledge. And who knows, maybe even RomeroUK will benefit from this and will undergo a type of spiritual renewal and confess his sins with tears and penance, and a NEW BUILD! LOL Life is short, so RESONATE!
Dr Jackl (or is it Hyde?)
PS. I reserve the right to expand and contract my SYSTEM definiton at will, if I don't like you I'll expand it and tell you how WRONG and DELUDED you are, but if I like you I'll shrink it and congratulate you on your achivements! LOL
« Last Edit: 2011-07-19, 23:18:49 by EMdevices »
|
Author
Topic: Should Milehigh be released from his Ban -- POLL (Read 21542 times)
