@All
I understand the criticism in my last post was a little harsh so here is another perspective ----.
"Common sense is the collection of prejudices acquired by age eighteen."
"Imagination is more important than knowledge."
"The only real valuable thing is intuition."
"Anyone who has never made a mistake has never tried anything new."
"Great spirits have often encountered violent opposition from weak minds."
"We can't solve problems by using the same kind of thinking we used when we created them."
Albert Einstein
I remember when I started reading Einstein's original works, not the watered down condensed version most people read and I found it odd that Einstein was a rebel. As well if we read the quotes above Einstein would seem to be mocking everyone here because the underlying theme found in his work and thoughts was that a fool will blindly accept anything without question. That is a person can be well educated and knowledgeable, have an intimate understanding of science and technology but is still a fool if they never question any and or all of it. This is why people like Einstein defined the science of the 20th century and won Nobel's and the people who blindly believed everything they were told accomplished little if nothing.
LOL, this reminds me of a comment made by MH when he called me an Anarchist and it struck me as odd that I was not offended by it in any way in fact I took it as a compliment. I had to think about this for quite some time until it made sense and I found it related to the people who have influenced my thoughts. You see if anyone bothered to read the original works of Amphere, Faraday, Maxwell, Tesla, Steinmetz, Einstein etc... there is this underlying theme of rebellion because most all of the greatest minds we know of thought most of their peers and 99% of the population suffered from some form of delusion. They wondered why people would simply accept everything they were told when it seemed obvious that what they were told was flawed and based on assumptions. Now the odd part of this little story is that I imagine most everyone here is thinking --- well that was then and this is now and things have changed but have they changed?. If we believe everything we have been told and never question it then I would submit that nothing has changed because it was never about the science it was about evolution and the process of discovery. Discovery is not rehashing the same old BS and calling it something new which seems to be the underlying theme of the present day, it is a great marketing scheme and gives the appearance of progress however it has very little substance.
Here is the problem, if something is really "new", if something is truely a new discovery which holds more truth than that before it then something must have been untrue to some extent. However this implies someone must have been wrong and we know as a fact that science cannot be wrong because it is based on logic and undeniable proof. So here we have a problem, if science, logic and undeniable proof are infallible as some suggest then how can they ever be wrong? Logically if science cannot be wrong then nothing can be more right and no progress or discovery can occur. Now just how in the hell can an undeniable truth based on infallible logic be wrong when we know as a fact it must have been because something new has replaced it?. One has to wonder who we should believe when so many speak of infallible logic and the undeniable truth based on undeniable proof which is continually being proven wrong, it does not give me a great deal of faith that anyone has any real credibility when considering the facts of the matter. It would also suggest that they do not understand the english language nor the terminology because an "undeniable fact" or an "undenialble truth" cannot change --- EVER, for all eternity it must remain as it is or it should be obvious that it not undeniable. What many call the undeniable truth and the facts seems more like the "flavor of the week" in my opinion.
@Poynt99
Aaron, Rosemary, and the countless others on those two other forums are in much the same class; despite their claims to the contrary, they haven't a clue what they are talking about.
Do you know what the really weird part of all this is?, the best case scenario here is that they are right and we are wrong. They succeed and make all of us look stupid and in the process a new age of free energy evolves which saves the planet from the insanity currently taking place, I hope they are right. It kind of put's a new perspective on this when one considers that many of Einstein's peers most likely told him "you haven't a clue what you are talking about", do any of us --- really?
Regards
AC
Comprehend and Copy Nature... Viktor Schauberger
“The first principle is that you must not fool yourself and you are the easiest person to fool.”― Richard P. Feynman
Author
Topic: Invitation to Aaron: Let's debate your claim of over unity in a bouncing ball (Read 12310 times)
