Thoughts - 100ns double pulse generators

Author Topic: Thoughts - 100ns double pulse generators (Read 141 times)

Topic Options

Slider2732

Thoughts - 100ns double pulse generators « on: 2012-02-15, 22:36:35 »

Group: Elite Experimentalist
Hero Member

Posts: 1602
... .-.. .. -.. . .-.

I'm following an 'inspiration' thought.
That, blisteringly fast nanosecond secondary pulsing of a coil can bring forth sizable outputs, scaling technologies for practical use..

Regarding the use of a coreless coil - Tesla reported that "The aether becomes the core, but due to its very fine properties, higher frequencies must be used, as the remnant magnetism of the previous pulse decays much faster than in an iron based core"
Also - "What Tesla is saying is that for optimal results, the frequency with which pulses are delivered into the input circuit and main coil, should be correlated with the time taken for each pulse to travel the length of the coil (period of the coil). However, in determining the period of the circuit, such factors as the volume of the capacitor and resistance of the coil must also be taken into consideration."
An aside but also mentioned "the apparatus Tesla was producing in 1897, was markedly different from the apparatus he was producing in 1892. The later apparatus was in fact DC based over-unity coil pulse apparatus"
(Source - http://peswiki.com/index.php/Article:Tesla_DC_Thermoelectric_Coils *NOTE mbrownn advises a virus risk with this link* )
The device that Sterling Allan has been viewing in South Africa has the statement within his trip report of "The switch between the master take a few nanoseconds."
(Source - http://www.overunityresearch.com/index.php?topic=1305.25 )

I wish to explore methods of switching a coil faster than the current can catch up.
It's not the initial pulse to a coil that matters, so much as the secondary push back before the field completely collapses.

How to achieve it ?
Mechanical is one way, physical contacts separated by tiny 'dead spots' on a wheel and spaced to bring a much larger initial pulse, than the second pulse.

The Wiki article on the nanosecond states: "100 nanoseconds – cycle time for frequency 10 MHz, radio wavelength 30 m (shortwave)"
10MHz capable power transistors would seem obvious...so let's have a look at a few popular and available ones:.
MJE3055 - 2 MHz
MJL13007 - 4 MHz
MJL21194 - 4 MHz
TIP42C (PNP) - 3 MHz

So, MOSFET's then ?
IRF630 - Turn on, Rise, Turn off, Fall times = 170ns
IRF720 - 67ns <---------------------------------------------------------- AHA !

Perhaps MOSFETs are the key for this.

We need to saturate the core (if one is used), saturate the windings and then blast a second pulse before that energy fully collapses.
Thus, the timing is in the switcher, mechanical mechanism or both an electrical component and a mechanical solution.

Solid state would be the preference...perhaps the Steven Mark TPU comes along at such a point.

Are there common chips, perhaps found within cellphones or other GHz applications capable of being timed to such speeds, that would fire the MOSFETs ?
Is it likely to need a PIC type solution ?

I'd really like to know what you think

« Last Edit: 2012-02-16, 07:50:23 by Slider2732 »

---------------------------

ʎɐqǝ from pɹɐoqʎǝʞ a ʎnq ɹǝʌǝu

mbrownn

Re: Thoughts - 100ns double pulse generators « Reply #1 on: 2012-02-16, 01:38:35 »

Full Member

Posts: 246

Hi slider, Your first link is showing a threat on my antivirus...

File name peswiki.com/skins/common/wikibits.js?97
Treat name Exploit Blackhole Kit (type 2115)

I am not an expert on this so could be wrong but It does sort of make sense.

The first pulse should be in a coil of high inductance to give a relatively slow collapse and the second pulse, will cause an intensification of the radiant, as the radiant is much faster than the current. We could also ring the radiant out of the coil by using coil shorting during the collapse.

This is how I would do it, Note that the two extra batteries are going to receive negative energy and may crystallize

Slider2732

Re: Thoughts - 100ns double pulse generators « Reply #2 on: 2012-02-16, 06:47:47 »

Group: Elite Experimentalist
Hero Member

Posts: 1602
... .-.. .. -.. . .-.

A virus ? heck, I always try to use decent enough websites and that one is one of Sterling Allan's isn't it ?
I've got Ubuntu running here, so is probably why all seemed safe. I'll edit the first post to point out a potential hazard.

I'd envisage one power source for all aspects of the drive circuit.

You've got me thinking now, about using an actual Tesla tower sort of coil. As in, a Primary of much greater wire gauge than the Secondary, but same amount of copper. By doing so, the Secondary is the main driving coil and receives the first power pulse.. The second pulse would be to the Primary, inducing the voltage to the Secondary and, because the two are tuned to resonance, would 'have to' knock the collapse back into the coil. The 2 power pulses wouldn't ever electrically negate, the energies being within the coil itself.

---------------------------

ʎɐqǝ from pɹɐoqʎǝʞ a ʎnq ɹǝʌǝu

mbrownn

Re: Thoughts - 100ns double pulse generators « Reply #3 on: 2012-02-17, 13:17:53 »

Full Member

Posts: 246

The way things work it might mot have anything to do with his site or it may be a false warning, who knows? It looks like A java threat, I have searched to try and find out what it is and found this explanation.

"Note that an exploit kit is a piece of software that is designed to exploit (hence the name exploit kit) a collection of known security holes present in common software. E.g. security holes in outdated java versions, outdated browsers, outdated PDF readers, etc. If a security leak is found by the exploit kit, a mechanism is activated to abuse this security leak and install some piece of malware.

If you are using Chrome there is a very decent possibility that you are invulnerable to this exploit kit, because Chrome´s built-in sandbox has proven in hackers conventions that it is practically inpenetratable.
Also Internet Explorer 8 requires some brilliant script to crack and still it takes 1-2 minutes. Means if you hit a poisoned webpage and get out in 30 seconds, you are safe.

The weakest link imo in the browser category is Mozilla Firefox, without NoScript. Running that is asking for problems (older IE is definitely worse though) "

Slider2732

Re: Thoughts - 100ns double pulse generators « Reply #4 on: 2012-02-21, 00:21:19 »

Group: Elite Experimentalist
Hero Member

Posts: 1602
... .-.. .. -.. . .-.

Yep, Chrome....though i'm looking to use other browsers because of the latest Google shenanigans regarding privacy and targeting of advertising.

THIS is bizarre.
I'm reading the Sterling Allan trip thread on the main forum and do note, like probably many, that there are 3 discussions going on. 1 is the main topic which Steve attempts to post on. 1 is the sidetrack bickering of MileHigh being MileHigh and the other, is, well, completely related to the discussion in this thread !

To quote giantkiller:

Quote

I have been working with very narrow pulses and coil windings that Smith, Kapanadze, SM, EVgrey, Moray and Spherics talked about.
The idea is there is no conduction just pure potential. This is the start of the process. The way SM achieved it was using multiple frequencies to get an eclipsing overlap. The pulsing would shut off very quickly. This rings the coils. Then the next part of the process is to get a sympathetic vibratory ringing between 2 coils going. This creates a resonant transformer overload condition. Just like in every day electronic failures.
If you google [patrick j. kelly free energy] a list of his documents comes up and you will see scores of this. This is where the thumping comes from because of the shifting of the coil away from its center resonant point and back to a resonant connection. The beat frequency is 8hz Schumann. Google [schumann resonance]

This is why it is so simple. We control the overload condition just shy of self destruction. Just like SM stated. And [the coils work naturally].
Make sense?

In my envisaged embodiment, the 2 coils would be a bifilar arrangement.
It could very well be that a Lockridge trifilar suits the effects even more, by using that extra coil as a momentary time delay.

---------------------------

ʎɐqǝ from pɹɐoqʎǝʞ a ʎnq ɹǝʌǝu

mbrownn

Re: Thoughts - 100ns double pulse generators « Reply #5 on: 2012-02-21, 02:57:11 »

Full Member

Posts: 246

Quote from: Slider2732 on 2012-02-21, 00:21:19

Yep, Chrome....though i'm looking to use other browsers because of the latest Google shenanigans regarding privacy and targeting of advertising.

THIS is bizarre.
I'm reading the Sterling Allan trip thread on the main forum and do note, like probably many, that there are 3 discussions going on. 1 is the main topic which Steve attempts to post on. 1 is the sidetrack bickering of MileHigh being MileHigh and the other, is, well, completely related to the discussion in this thread !

To quote giantkiller:

In my envisaged embodiment, the 2 coils would be a bifilar arrangement.
It could very well be that a Lockridge trifilar suits the effects even more, by using that extra coil as a momentary time delay.

Interesting, my research lead me to the conclusion that the ringing between the coils may be causing a gain that could be tapped. Of course in a universal motor you have three coils in series which do ring as the commutator goes round. In a modern motor this is minimized by having a continuous rotor winding but in the old types this ringing was significant and did lead to rapid brush wear. I could be wrong here but i see repulsing coils as similar to bucking and attracting coils similar to bifilar.

If we are attempting to use a modern motor a trifilar coil can be used to impedance match a gain in a resonant tank circuit with the load which is the motor. In the old type motor it could be used the same way or as a bucking coil which can separate the spikes from the current with the spikes being collected from the third winding. In the same way this ringing can be collected. Just as I think I am solving the problem, new things show up that I have to resolve.

Bedini said that the coil was trifilar with the windings twisted together, this could be wired to be biflar with a collector or bucking with a collector or a number of other ways. My problem is there are 12 ways to wind a universal motor, 6 ways to wind the rotor and as many ways to to connect the trifilar coil so there are literally dozens of ways this thing can be configured. add to that the fact that these components will have to be matched to show the results we want and you see the size of the problem. Gain in these systems is usually manifested in volts but the motor needs amps to work, this is also a clue to what we need to do. We need this voltage gain to be transferred and collected in a winding on the motor that has few turns thus giving a small load for the amount of power being transmitted. When I post a circuit I don't talk about this ringing because I am not sure of its energy but I do know that any energy that can be collected needs to be collected and converter to usable power for the motor.