@Exn It is to be emphasized that the Lenz law is simply induction from a load circuit carrying a current towards the source circuit that causes the current. It is exactly the same phenomenon of induction acting in both directions. So if the Lenz's law doesn't apply for some reason, ordinary induction from the source to the load circuit doesn't apply for the same reason, and the cause for a current in the load disappears.
In the mechanical area, it is the same as pretending that when two identical masses collide, only one would have inertia and would throw the other one, while it is obvious that the effect is symmetric. That is a good explanation and it could be clarified further by saying Lenz's Law is simply the self-induction of the coil. A changing external magnetic field induces a potential difference across a coil which produces a current and the direction of this induced current is such that it must produce a magnetic field which opposes the change of the external magnetic field which induced it in the first place. Here we should be clear that a current cannot oppose anything as it does not have this capacity to act through a distance and it is the fields generated by the current which are in opposition. A charge in motion produces a changing field which produces a force and motion in another charge having its own field which opposes the the first field as all are bound to one another through the space they occupy. The problem I have found is that realistically one could not hope to change this action/reaction unless they had a fundamental understanding of what these fields are in reality, not what they do but what they are fundamentally. Lo and behold when we do find the answer to this question we find the primary fields (Electric, Magnetic and Gravic) are virtual particles popping in and out of existence from an unknown number of parallel universes. At which point it should be obvious that we really do not have a clue what the fields are because the answer is not really an answer to anything. The answer simply leads to a million more questions we could not possibly hope to answer which lends credibility to the notion that we will never be able to change something which we have no real knowledge or understanding of. The answer may as well be fairies and unicorns because not only is it completely absurd but it also violates pretty much all the known laws of science we say cannot be violated. There is one thing we can speculate on here and that is if we knew what the fields were in reality then there is the possibility that we could modify then to fundamentally change how they act and react in which case all bets are off. I mean let's be realistic here, if the the fields are some magical mysterious virtual particles popping in and out of existence from an unknown number of parallel universes then anything is possible. On another note has anyone ever seen the Richard Feynman interview when he is asked what a magnetic field is?, when this very confident physicist who many people believe can explain almost anything breaks out in a cold sweat, turns white as a ghost and starts stuttering and backpeddling, lol priceless. He may as well have pulled his pants down to his ankles and danced a jig on the stage because at that point everyone knew the jig was up, the leading physicist on the planet and he can't explain what a magnetic field is ... imagine that. AC
---------------------------
Comprehend and Copy Nature... Viktor Schauberger
“The first principle is that you must not fool yourself and you are the easiest person to fool.”― Richard P. Feynman
|
Author
Topic: The Liberty Perspective (Read 8550 times)
