Why dont you like posting in this forum EF ?
Erfinder, not EF! Let the assumptions begin....
I took nothing out of context.....i posted it just as you stated-
Quote: The small group who are working on a similar project should take note, because this is how its done (I should also say that this isn't limited to any particular switching model, its a free for all when you know what you're doing.
This is your very reply to cool joules statement-->The secondary coil puts out !many many! more times than the primary.
The fact is-it dose not. What is being shown there is a mechanical/visual version of the joule thief-nothing more. You stated that this is how it's done. Maybe you could explain how what is done then,if it dosnt refer to cool joules experiment.
See....your error is to be found in
your assumption to what my statement was referring. Instead of you asking for clarification, you decided to judge as you have been taught by those who have on several occasions handed you your ass. You assume that I am in agreement with his claim, I am not, what my statement referred to were some of the relations found in the rig he demonstrated, yes I could have been more specific, however, such is the case when posting on impulse.
No im not. I know exactly what is happening with cool joules setup-->which is what you commented on.
This is a repeating pattern with you, "you know exactly what's going on" in everyone's setup....
And i was not. I was referring to the DUT,and the comment you posted under that very thread.--->nothing to do with your bench buddy.
We aren't friends guy..I am not your buddy.....
Like i said,i !never! commented on anything to do with your bench,i was commenting on the statements directly related to the video and DUT.
Good, you weren't commenting on my bench. However, your failure was in making an assumption regarding my statement, your dislike for me fueled your post. All you had to do was ask for clarification, no, you chose to do what you always do in such instances. You judged first, and are only now asking questions.
Rubbish. Quote: --because this is how its done.
That is a claim,not a statement.
Again, you have no idea what you're talking about because you don't know what I am referring to, you assume to know what I am referring to. I made a statement, you would have demonstrated great wisdom had you asked for clarification. Had you done so, I would have engaged you with respect, now, you can kiss my ass.
I think your biggest problem EF,is you dont like being wrong,and you hate being corrected. Why not just learn from your mistakes as i have done many times,both here and at OU.com. You will see here many threads where i am learning-take the coils,electric and magnetic field thread for instance-->i continue to learn from my mistakes. You on the other hand love to comment on other peoples work,but have a big hissy fit when others try to correct you. On that note,i have never made comments on your bench work,as we never see any of it--you show nothing.
Again Brad, it's Erfinder not EF. Where I come from, everyone's wrong. You are in the same boat as everyone else. This is a sinking ship, sailing the high shit seas. That which you hold for gospel, and allow others to shovel down your throat is shit. Can I prove this? Nah..... Do I need to? Nope..... It's pretty clear that mankind has turned this beautiful spaceship into a shit sandwich. I liked you better before you were converted, when being wrong was a matter of opinion, or perspective, theirs not your own. I don't mind being corrected, by a fellow seeker, you are no longer a fellow seeker in my opinion.
You are learning, I agree, you are learning how to forget what attracted you to these types of platforms in the first place....again my opinion. One minute you speak with the authority of one who has it figured out and will in his own time lead the rest to the promise land, and in the next minute you are the bitch of the guy who tells you how to properly make measurements.
I have been around for a while, longer than I care to mention, and one thing I can say with absolute certainty........you aren't the man I once admired and respected.
As far as my presenting my work, you really think I am going to let you call my work rubbish? Do you even hear yourself anymore? Who in the hell do you think you are? Your attitude is worse than that from those few who can and do speak with authority! At least they have the decency, and humility to NOT perform a replication of something that the "KNEW IN ADVANCE or OTHERWISE" would not pan out! No, you do the replication, and piss in the guys face you call peer. I am reminded of the post I made that started this...the comment about it being better to be pissed off than pissed on. You took offense, strange behavior from one who publicly pissed on a fellow peer, literally stating the "truth as you see it" that his work was "rubbish.........It's this type that you have become that keeps me content, I know exactly who to approach and when. As I told you before, you aren't worth the time, not anymore.
So how about ! you ! replicate Cool joules DUT,and do some accurate energy(being electrical/magnetic in this case) over time calculations,and then come back and tell us all that this is how it's done.
Brad
You assume my work isn't related....you assume I haven't been here...If I were looking for what you and others demonstrate, I would do as you suggest. Fact is Tinman, I'm not, my research is removed from the established. My stuff wouldn't interest you anyway, mindless rubbish.........why in the hell are you still around if you got it all worked out.....(note the lack of question mark.....)
I'm not getting paid for this soooo lets just end it......Savvy!
Author
Topic: "COOL JOULE" makes a claim (Read 19794 times)
