AG
You also mentioned the Catcher I think the idea is to drive it like a Relay coil so as to not use a perfect sine wave driver or square wave but as a fly back pulse generator
Charge and discharge pulses are produced with the shortest possible on time as that’s
So as to generate large switch off BEMF pulse.
The majority of successful FE inventors in the past such as Moray, Hendershot, Figuera, Hubbard, Tesla etc. specifically called for open solenoid type coils.
This was because the coil charge/discharge occurs much more more rapidly with an open coil. They specifically mention not the frequency but the field rate of change we call the "slope" on our oscilloscopes. I picked up on this right away because most only consider voltage, current and frequency not the actual rate of change.
We could think of it this way...
A Sine Wave of X frequency has a given rate of change/slope associated with that specific frequency. However a square wave or impulse can have the same frequency of X but any rate of change/slope. So the frequency or rate of oscillation could be low however if the rate of change/slope increases/decreases in nanoseconds then that slope is resonant with any resonant frequency lesser than itself. Here we could ask an obvious question, are any two frequencies resonant because of the frequency of oscillation or because the rate of change/slopes are resonant?.
This may be why a single impulse with an absurd magnitude and rate of change/slope generates such a wide spectrum of interference with every other oscillation. As Tesla said, his goal was to produce the highest magnitude impulse in the smallest time frame... now we know why.
It's kind of funny when I think about it, everyone including myself was barking up the wrong tree and not listening again. Tesla said in no uncertain terms it was not the frequency but the time period that mattered. In fact I reproduced Tesla's radiant matter experiments and under the right conditions large amounts of physical material are ejected from a conductor at high velocity. Not Electromagnetic waves but actual material which carries an absurd amount of energy on it's surface.
We could think of it this way...
I have a tin foil covered ping pong ball ie. large particle and I want it to transfer X energy across Y distance, how do I do it?. Well, there's only one way and said particle must carry the maximum allowable "energy" with it. The higher the surface charge and the greater it's velocity the greater the energy transfer. Translation, the highest magnitude in the smallest time period, aka Tesla's disruptive discharge.
So in some sense we don't need what many conceive as a "conductor" as it can take many forms. I was dissipating kW in the form of a very fine black powder ejected from the surface of an 8" SS sphere. There were no sparks, no corona so where exactly did the energy go?. These were unidirectional impulses with no reversal onto the sphere and every impulse caused the sphere to emit a very loud "ping" noise and eject charged material with every impulse.
What's kind of messed up is that I don't think I'm all that smart, I don't feel all that empowered or intelligent. The other day I moved some round bales, fed the horse and other critters, watered the grass and garden then hit the bench trying to devise a way to double the input energy of a device with 6 basic components. It's so messed up and such a contradiction in terms even I don't know what to make of it. So how does this happen?...
What I do know is you gentlemen are better than this, what I see in the forums... ramp it up, kick some ass, you got this.
Regards
AC
Hi there i'm a little lost in the jargon your using sorry.
Regards Sil
Comprehend and Copy Nature... Viktor Schauberger
“The first principle is that you must not fool yourself and you are the easiest person to fool.”― Richard P. Feynman
feature is available which provides a place all members can chat, either publicly or privately.
Author
Topic: Dally, Shark & Ruslan workbench (Read 222533 times)
