From F6FLT Yes, it's hard to get your head around it, and there are technical inconsistencies in what is said in the patents.
The assignee of the last patent you cited is "Redemptive Technologies Ltd", but you can see that it is also the applicant and there it says "Road Town , Tortola ( VG ) ; Robert Ray Holcomb , Road Town , Tortola ( VG )". The assignee is Holcomb.
All the information we have on his systems comes only from Holcomb. This is not reassuring.
- no third party involved in his case
- only three people on their team
- a multitude of details in the patents without presentation of a general guiding idea
- conditioning speech with lots of references and images of a green world without pollution
- a claimed source of energy, the spin of unpaired electrons, without any explanation of the causal links that would prove it and make the difference with a conventional system Holcomb's action is easy to understand from the perspective of another businessman/inventor like myself... First, the goal of a patent, disclosure or the company is to protect there investment and interests. It's not to help you understand the technology so you can build your own or steal the technology and your a liability. If you were actually smart enough to figure out how all this works and told everyone you would destroy there company. All there decades of hard work and the potential of more research is at risk because you want to tell everyone. I mean, if everyone knew how it works and could build and replicate the technology why would they buy any of holcombs products?. In fact I have seen countless losers in the forums who stole others work and tried to patent it so they could profit at the expense of the real inventor. Not only did these people steal the technology but also gaslighted the real inventor and spread misinformation to discredit them. So the real inventors need to take care to protect all there hard work and interests. So why would anyone share anything?. Most real inventors share just enough to help others understand the concept so they can make some progress. Not enough to understand everything and become the inventors competition and a threat but just enough to learn and make some progress. So of course the information given will always be vague or incomplete. The onus is on everyone else to rise to the occasion not for the inventor to lower themselves to others level. Here's another kicker, many want the technology but aren't willing to change there beliefs or perspective to get it. They want the technology but also want to cling to the past and outdated ideals/beliefs contrary to the purpose of the technology to move forward conceptually and intellectually. As we know this is equivalent to giving a caveman advanced weapons which no intelligent inventor should ever agree to. An intelligent inventor understands it would only be a matter of time before the technology was used against them or the one's they care about, it is inevitable. For example, the imbeciles who built nuclear weapons will be just as dead as everyone else if anyone is ever stupid enough to use these weapons. Vladimir Putin recently claimed he would start a nuclear war if he was personally threatened or his interests. Imagine that, one petty weak minded man just threatened to destroy all of mankind as we know it if he's threatened or doesn't get his way. This is the ultimate danger whenever scientists and inventors give imbeciles advanced technology. AC
---------------------------
Comprehend and Copy Nature... Viktor Schauberger
I take comfort in the fact there are people magnitudes more intelligent than I could ever be developing new technology I will probably never understand. It proves evolution works...
|
Author
Topic: Holcomb and other FE technology debate (Read 49802 times)
