Holcomb and other FE technology debate

Home Help Search Login Register

Welcome,Guest. Please login or register.

OverUnity Research > General - Free Energy Related > Miscellaneous Discussions (Moderator: Allcanadian) > Holcomb and other FE technology debate

2023-09-26, 22:45:27
News: Registration with the OUR forum is by admin approval.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 [14] 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22

« previous next »

Author Topic: Holcomb and other FE technology debate (Read 49796 times)

JimBoot	Re: Holcomb and other FE technology debate « Reply #325 on: 2022-08-22, 22:15:21 »
Group: Tinkerer Hero Member Posts: 1670	Excellent thanks for that SL. I’ve printed with iron pla in the past but it has a permeability of 2 so I decided not to print a rotor. I have not looked at the Ferro resins specs though. I’ll see what I can find. I need a resin printer:)

solarlab	Re: Holcomb and other FE technology debate « Reply #326 on: 2022-08-29, 17:55:30 »
Sr. Member Posts: 317	F Y I Further development of the Holcomb varient (LinGen, amongst others) by Solarlab, et. al. has been moved to a wide bandwidth Web Page type environment to allow for more content, video streaming with indexing and easy browsing. Thanks go out to the OUR folks for hosting the initial content. Watch your PM for further details. Best regards and good luck in your quest for OU! Solarlab

solarlab	Re: Holcomb and other FE technology debate « Reply #327 on: 2022-09-13, 07:12:33 »
Sr. Member Posts: 317	Holcomb LinGen Controller Update F.Y.I. STM32F7xx Controller design is in Alpha Test and it's pretty inpressive so far! Took longer than expected to design using the ARM HAL TIM functions but it does not impact the main processor - had a long learning curve w.r.t. the TouchGFX (LCD/Touch display functions) but it's pretty cool - easily sets/changes the "Sequence Time/Interactions" - nice engineering design tool! New MOSFET & Drivers (US made) were also used - somewhat expensive but performed flawlessly. Schematic and software might be uploaded to the web site soon. Keep an eye out... SL « Last Edit: 2022-09-13, 17:45:19 by solarlab »

solarlab	Re: Holcomb and other FE technology debate « Reply #328 on: 2022-09-19, 04:37:18 »
Sr. Member Posts: 317	Beta is on the webside - testing looks good so far! (crossed fingers)

Frederik2k1	Re: Holcomb and other FE technology debate « Reply #329 on: 2022-09-19, 08:37:07 »
Newbie Posts: 34	Quote from: solarlab on 2022-09-19, 04:37:18 Beta is on the webside - testing looks good so far! (crossed fingers) Is there a link to it?

JimBoot	Re: Holcomb and other FE technology debate « Reply #330 on: 2022-09-19, 21:58:49 »
Group: Tinkerer Hero Member Posts: 1670	Quote from: solarlab on 2022-09-19, 04:37:18 Beta is on the webside - testing looks good so far! (crossed fingers) great can’t wait to see it when you are ready to share. Thanks.

solarlab	Re: Holcomb and other FE technology debate « Reply #331 on: 2022-09-20, 21:32:05 »
Sr. Member Posts: 317	A quick update: See attached video below (a slow go - but it works!). ------------------------ NASA-recommended meters confirm incredible HES performance3.mp4 (1659.72 kB - downloaded 129 times.)

F6FLT	Re: Holcomb and other FE technology debate « Reply #332 on: 2022-09-21, 10:19:50 »
Group: Experimentalist Hero Member Posts: 1909	It would have been surprising if HES had said it wasn't working. Apart from the DNV report provided by HES, who else but HES has verified that it works? --------------------------- "Open your mind, but not like a trash bin"

solarlab	Re: Holcomb and other FE technology debate « Reply #333 on: 2022-09-21, 18:26:35 »
Sr. Member Posts: 317	Quote from: F6FLT on 2022-09-21, 10:19:50 It would have been surprising if HES had said it wasn't working. Apart from the DNV report provided by HES, who else but HES has verified that it works? No one else of any great OUR stature - so you might as well just move along then - nothing for you folks to see here! BTW - what's the Troll/Shill rate per post these days?

JimBoot	Re: Holcomb and other FE technology debate « Reply #334 on: 2022-09-21, 23:38:19 »
Group: Tinkerer Hero Member Posts: 1670	Thanks SL they are very active on LinkedIn atm. Lots of people wanting to hand over $ but no word on shipping still. Still trying a variety of winds and rotors here.

Chet K	Re: Holcomb and other FE technology debate « Reply #335 on: 2022-09-22, 01:21:46 »
Group: Ambassador Hero Member Posts: 3904	SL Honestly that “paid to disrupt “ thing ? It is not a proper fall back position here ( or at other forum) this “paid shill “ response looks like loosing an argument and resorting to ….( insults and name calling? Besides it incurs a risk of liability on our hosts behalf ( defamatory) That being said …. Yeah we need to get more research and less sledgehammer here ! Respectfully Chet K Ps And honestly I have yet to speak with a builder or theorist here who does not appreciate the input of said person HOWEVER!! Temperance has been a part of those discussions And how to balance this at these open source forums for the benefit of Newer members not familiar with …..

solarlab	Re: Holcomb and other FE technology debate « Reply #336 on: 2022-09-22, 02:42:32 »
Sr. Member Posts: 317	Quote from: Chet K on 2022-09-22, 01:21:46 SL Honestly that “paid to disrupt “ thing ? It is not a proper fall back position here ( or at other forum) this “paid shill “ response looks like loosing an argument and resorting to ….( insults and name calling? Besides it incurs a risk of liability on our hosts behalf ( defamatory) That being said …. Yeah we need to get more research and less sledgehammer here ! Respectfully Chet K Ps And honestly I have yet to speak with a builder or theorist here who does not appreciate the input of said person HOWEVER!! Temperance has been a part of those discussions And how to balance this at these open source forums for the benefit of Newer members not familiar with ….. Chet K, Re: F6FLT If it walks like a Duck, Quacks like a Duck and behaves like a Duck - you get the idea... Commenting in eleven different threads in one session says it all. BUT - making a stupid comment on this thread; that F6FLT himself knows is absolutely not true and can be easily varified (makes his comment a complete, fabricated, lie), thus qualifies as TROLL/SHILL material, period! No one should tolerate this kind of abuse - and I won't - liability or not. Otherwise the forum will become, well, what it's already become. If this childish nonsense is not challenged it will continue - and if it continues, fine, that's your choice - but, I refuse to tolerate it - OK! And, if it takes "sledgehammering" then so be it. A great deal of excellent technical research and information has been presented here, by me, so to have some bozo disrupt the thread with dumb-ass comments, then he (and you all) should expect an extremely harsh treatment. SL PS - Speaking of research, why don't you try doing a little R&D, and a little less defending of the disrupters? « Last Edit: 2022-09-22, 03:43:07 by solarlab »

Chet K	Re: Holcomb and other FE technology debate « Reply #337 on: 2022-09-22, 03:59:28 »
Group: Ambassador Hero Member Posts: 3904	Solarlab It cannot be denied that you have posted a large amount of research data on Holcomb ! And it represents the cutting edge in simulation technology! I apologize if you perceived my comment as dismissive of your efforts! Been a long day over here … This needs more discussion Ps I see you added a bit at the end ( I was calling a few builders for opinions prior to posting ) I hope this time next month this will all be a moot point ! And we will have that piece of meat we so desperately need ! Have a good night EDIT BTW that preaching to the Choir thing …may feel good… but as of this writing …??? Edit for clarity ( comment below) All claims unless profoundly obvious …example “ here it is running .. this is how you replicate it “ This will Take actual repeatable results ( which can be independently replicated) of a real world on the bench device … ( “which hopefully are” incoming ( thanks to Mike 🤞 This will silence skeptics once and for all !

solarlab	Re: Holcomb and other FE technology debate « Reply #338 on: 2022-09-22, 04:29:13 »
Sr. Member Posts: 317	Quote from: Chet K on 2022-09-22, 03:59:28 Solarlab It cannot be denied that you have posted a large amount of research data on Holcomb ! And it represents the cutting edge in simulation technology! I apologize if you perceived my comment as dismissive of your efforts! Been a long day over here … This needs more discussion Ps I see you added a bit at the end ( I was calling a few builders for opinions prior to posting ) I hope this time next month this will all be a moot point ! And we will have that piece of meat we so desperately need ! Have a good night EDIT BTW that preaching to the Choir thing …may feel good… but as of this writing …??? This will Take actual repeatable results … ( incoming 🤞 Sorry, I have no idea what your talking about in your EDIT bit. You can easily repeat the results - it's all given in the "LinGen" presentation. Do it as many times as you need to, until you've convinced yourself... This is the same proposition F6FLT, and others, were encouraged to do - no one did however! Still a bit bewildered as to why not... strange? But, hey, whatever. _{Think I've repeated this a few times before.} Anyway, have a good evening!

F6FLT	Re: Holcomb and other FE technology debate « Reply #339 on: 2022-09-22, 13:57:37 »
Group: Experimentalist Hero Member Posts: 1909	Quote from: solarlab on 2022-09-21, 18:26:35 Quote Apart from the DNV report provided by HES, who else but HES has verified that it works? No one else of any great OUR stature - so you might as well just move along then - nothing for you folks to see here! ... If there are no credible third party measurements, I will wait for them, since I do not have the industrial means to build a replica of the machine, and no simple setup, proof of concept, has been provided. The lingen seems indeed very close to Holcomb's system. In both cases moving fields are supposed to be at the origin of the OU. The problem is that a moving field is only a variable field because nothing really moves with the field, as explained there: https://www.overunityresearch.com/index.php?topic=4261.msg100069#msg100069 The so-called displacement of the field is therefore not the direct cause. If there really is OU, the key would be in the way fields from different sources vary and superpose. On the other hand one wonders why so many coils. The injection of extra-energy is not global, it must be done at precise points of the device, and symmetry requires that it be done in the same way at all equivalent points, for example at each coil, in which case it is not clear why only two or three coils would not be enough. --------------------------- "Open your mind, but not like a trash bin"

solarlab	Re: Holcomb and other FE technology debate « Reply #340 on: 2022-09-22, 15:37:55 »
Sr. Member Posts: 317	It's one of the simplest excess energy devices you will ever find - that is if you take a few minutes to study it. No mystery what so ever! Third party measurements - try Florida Power and Light - FPL. Displacement - so many coils - etc. and other such foolishness - you obviously have no idea about which you attempt to speak. So, give it a pass, and just move on. Nobody here will even spend 1 second to argue with you! For those with a genuine interest - see below:

solarlab	Re: Holcomb and other FE technology debate « Reply #341 on: 2022-09-22, 15:57:44 »
Sr. Member Posts: 317	So, let's go through it again, shall we: Dr. Holcomb's method and technique have been extensively evaluated and tested. They are valid and do produce excess energy - see the previous 9 pages of this thread. Here are some links [probably missed a few] related to the analysis evolution: Initial thoughts (applications, etc. 2022-04-05): https://www.overunityresearch.com/index.php?topic=4261.msg98375#msg98375 Patent link (initial target patent): https://www.overunityresearch.com/index.php?topic=4261.msg98509#msg98509 Preliminary field roll tests: https://www.overunityresearch.com/index.php?topic=4261.msg98891#msg98891 https://www.overunityresearch.com/index.php?topic=4261.msg98892#msg98892 Magnetic Field Gain simulation tests: https://www.overunityresearch.com/index.php?topic=4261.msg98900#msg98900 https://www.overunityresearch.com/index.php?topic=4261.msg98901#msg98901 https://www.overunityresearch.com/index.php?topic=4261.msg98908#msg98908 Flat Solid-State Rotor WO 2018 134233 Holcomb: https://www.overunityresearch.com/index.php?topic=4261.msg98965#msg98965 Simulation Configuration (various and corrected timing?): https://www.overunityresearch.com/index.php?topic=4261.msg98965#msg98965 https://www.overunityresearch.com/index.php?topic=4261.msg98977#msg98977 Timing: https://www.overunityresearch.com/index.php?topic=4261.msg99028#msg99028 Brassboard and CAE results: https://www.overunityresearch.com/index.php?topic=4261.msg99112#msg99112 https://www.overunityresearch.com/index.php?topic=4261.msg99113#msg99113 https://www.overunityresearch.com/index.php?topic=4261.msg99114#msg99114 Bench Test Driver: https://www.overunityresearch.com/index.php?topic=4261.msg99201#msg99201 Additional analysis and results: https://www.overunityresearch.com/index.php?topic=4261.msg99359#msg99359 Hopefully these will help clear up this confusion and misconception... ------------------------ Holcomb and other FE technology debate BH_derivative.GIF (26.02 kB, 908x534 - viewed 300 times.) Holcomb and other FE technology debate Co-Energy_Energy_HES_EM7_small.gif (30.06 kB, 625x209 - viewed 292 times.) Holcomb and other FE technology debate Induced_Voltage_Coil-9_Only_HES_EM7_small.gif (29.94 kB, 487x209 - viewed 290 times.)

solarlab	Re: Holcomb and other FE technology debate « Reply #342 on: 2022-09-22, 16:02:30 »
Sr. Member Posts: 317	LinGen - a simple varification of the Holcomb patent: ------------------------ Holcomb and other FE technology debate Simplified_LinGen_BLOCK_DIAGRAM_small.gif (142.75 kB, 794x608 - viewed 290 times.) Holcomb and other FE technology debate Holcomb_Fuel_Source-80.png (627.83 kB, 825x621 - viewed 301 times.) Holcomb and other FE technology debate Timing_4msON_1msSeq_Rev 02_22May22.PNG (238.54 kB, 1153x1353 - viewed 119 times.)

solarlab	Re: Holcomb and other FE technology debate « Reply #343 on: 2022-09-22, 16:06:03 »
Sr. Member Posts: 317	LinGen Magnetic Field Intensity - simulation, since you can't really see the magnetic field with your eyes: ------------------------ Holcomb and other FE technology debate Magnetic Field Intensity - 2_Animation_0-17.gif (3318.37 kB, 2364x1756 - viewed 119 times.) Holcomb and other FE technology debate Bf-Zp-CS-b_HES_LinGen_4Coil-ST37_03LO_01.gif (509.28 kB, 1484x765 - viewed 109 times.)

Grumpy	Re: Holcomb and other FE technology debate « Reply #344 on: 2022-09-22, 16:26:42 »
Group: Tinkerer Hero Member Posts: 3932 tExB=qr	Quote from: solarlab on 2022-09-22, 16:02:30 LinGen - a simple varification of the Holcomb patent: I don;t understand how the "magnification effect" works. Can you please explain it?

solarlab	Re: Holcomb and other FE technology debate « Reply #345 on: 2022-09-22, 16:45:48 »
Sr. Member Posts: 317	Quote from: Grumpy on 2022-09-22, 16:26:42 I don;t understand how the "magnification effect" works. Can you please explain it? Dr. Holcomb explains the "magnetic effect" - BH Curve of electrical steel provides the "gain" mechanism - in this video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nm1VJ65LcXM Review the comments as well. His patents provide, in great detail, how he uses the electrical steel [BH effect] and rotating/sliding magnetic field, without any moving parts, to accomplish the excess energy. Go back through this thread and hopefully you will get the idea. Three different materials [ST37, Plexiglass, 1008] are shown in the simulation below. Details are given in the first 9 pages of this thread and attached report. It's important to note that differing types of magnetic steel react differently depending on their BH characteristics (shown in the simulation ST37 versus 1008) with respect to the driving Pulse Rate. Appreciate that the Pulse Rate and Duty Cycle are arbitrary - select/set as required. ------------------------ Holcomb and other FE technology debate MagGain_Magnetic_Energy_Density_XYplane_just_above_pole_HES_LinGen_3test.gif (2167.77 kB, 1295x811 - viewed 130 times.) MagGain_Report 2.pdf (2850.44 kB - downloaded 72 times.)

solarlab	Re: Holcomb and other FE technology debate « Reply #346 on: 2022-09-22, 18:55:38 »
Sr. Member Posts: 317	BH relationship - Linear versus Non-Linear Energy Inductance Non-Linear Materials Magnetic Apparent Energy for a Magnetostatic Field Solution Typical DC B-H Loops of Magnetic Materials (shows hysteresis curves) - these "loops" are important when considering pulse timing (hold-off) - reverse polarity, and other schemes, can also be used to reduce loop hysteresis DC Magnetization Curves for Magnetic Materials (same as above - different units - no Loop) ------------------------ Holcomb and other FE technology debate B-H_Relationship_W-energy-density.GIF (132.11 kB, 1366x1558 - viewed 124 times.) Holcomb and other FE technology debate Inductance_nonlinear_materials.GIF (129.39 kB, 1188x1366 - viewed 111 times.) Holcomb and other FE technology debate Magnetic_Apparent_Energy_BH.GIF (48.21 kB, 1019x802 - viewed 106 times.) Holcomb and other FE technology debate Typical DC B-H Loops Magnetic Material small.png (114.88 kB, 853x897 - viewed 109 times.) Holcomb and other FE technology debate DC Magnitization Curves for Magnetic Materials small.png (816.94 kB, 917x686 - viewed 101 times.)

solarlab	Re: Holcomb and other FE technology debate « Reply #347 on: 2022-09-23, 00:53:10 »
Sr. Member Posts: 317	Misc NOTES and Info Saturated the N-4pole section (only showing 4 of 8 poles for file size reasons) to show the Sliding Magnetic Field effect more clearly. Photo of Holcomb testing LinGen type device. Note the "rotor laminate" in the foreground center and lamination press to the left, N - S in center. Primary focus at the moment are the Holcomb Large (xxxKW) round generators and not the LinGen type devices. Notes 12Apr22 Gramme NOTE: Holcolm's patent WO2018134233A2 on page 2 mentions the Zenobe Gramme generator on page 2. Interestingly, the Gramme winding does not suffer from counter-emf. In it's original design the Gramme efficiency suffered but not because of counter-emf. Holcolm page 3 (same patent) discusses "back EMF" or "reverse torque" and LenZ's Law in some detail. Magnetic Gain and Domain Alignment-Relaxation There seems to still be some confusion regarding the magnetic domain alignment, relaxation, and re-alignment. The animated gif attached clearly shows the differences. Other animations also exist in the previous link list. Complete alignment, complete relaxation and complete re-alignment occurs every 2 milliseconds in the animation. Holcomb refers to this occuring every 4 milliseconds in his patent. This gif viewer is good for stopping or slowing the animation: https://sourceforge.net/projects/gifviewer/ *OK, thats it*! ------------------------ Holcomb and other FE technology debate Bf-ZXmid-Cont_HES_LinGen_4Coil-ST37_4msON-Time_1ms_SeqLO_01.gif (1275.66 kB, 1484x765 - viewed 129 times.) Holcomb and other FE technology debate HES-1.gif (295.14 kB, 683x515 - viewed 138 times.) B-H Loops are covered here in detail.rtf (1.71 kB - downloaded 75 times.)

solarlab	Re: Holcomb and other FE technology debate « Reply #348 on: 2022-09-23, 01:44:36 »
Sr. Member Posts: 317	Hopefully that was of some help and you found it interesting! Have a great weekend... ------------------------ Holcomb and other FE technology debate CAT needs air.jpg (58.45 kB, 640x640 - viewed 130 times.) Holcomb and other FE technology debate Cat-cheap-gas.jpg (117.85 kB, 540x720 - viewed 111 times.) Holcomb and other FE technology debate Cat_door.gif (2907.08 kB, 400x362 - viewed 109 times.)

solarlab	Re: Holcomb and other FE technology debate « Reply #349 on: 2022-09-23, 04:27:03 »
Sr. Member Posts: 317	Couple hour delay so I read through this thread - all 14 pages of it - and ran across a post I did about a month ago: Quote from: solarlab on 2022-08-19, 19:22:42 Holcomb Varification Question 1. How is it that after studying the Holcomb patents for several days I was able to determine the four (4) basic principles of the operation, determine how to varify these characteristics and, in turn, use several modern professional CAE tools to simulate, and thus, varify the operation of at least one version of the Holcomb device? 2. How is it that the "first pass" WAG (wild ass guess) design I used in the simulation yielded an output Voltage of 40 Volts peak-to-peak with a substantial co-energy component using only 8 poles (4-N & 4-S) and an ad-hoc Lap winding? 3. If it doesn't work then how come it actually works and was proven, and shown, to work on a first pass WAG CAE implementation? SL Found it enlightening since, after reviewing most of the posts by some of you fellows, all my above questions were answered! Unfortunately the answer doesn't speak well for the general "where-with-all" of most of you here (Jimboot exempted). You know, when the mention of this "OUR Forum" surfaces in general techncal discussions there's a lot of funny expressions and comments that sometimes surface (some are rather crude); and, after reviewing just this thread, it's pretty obvious why these comments are what they are. There are, in fact, a few that observe in silence. Guess I had better just remain annonamous and pretend I was never a part of this Circus! Try and take this as constructive criticism [hard as it may be] and try to clean up your act...

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 [14] 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22

« previous next »

Home Help Search Login Register

Theme © PopularFX | Based on PFX Ideas! | Scripts from iScript4u

2023-09-26, 22:45:27

SMF 2.0.18 | SMF © 2021, Simple Machines
XHTML
RSS
WAP2