Thanks Gyula
Very helpful for those of us without the proper background / training required for this work.
The strips were in parallel, wanted to try that first to see the difference vs series when powering using back EMF.
Suffice to say there's probably not much point - will build it out as a "looped" oscillator next, see what happens.
(How best to calculate the required inductance for "L2"? Can it be copper pipe? or some 16mm
2 7 core EGC? suggestions appreciated)
RE the claims - agreed, I'm just putting the idea out there but there's always a chance someone might try something others have not and discover "unexpected results" (or so I hope)
Wouldn't consider SLA Capacity gain "free" personally - but it's a nice perk provided radiant charging doesn't damage them as some claim (Heard mixed opinions on this - some say it's about the same amount of corrosion as forced current - others say it's far less - some people (Bedini & others included) claim / claimed that it is far superior method vs forced current charging and makes them last much longer and hold a higher voltage and more capacity after ~100 charge cycles.
I put this down to the yet - understood properties of the lead metal contained within an SLA battery.
(Bedini showed what looked to be alchemic conversion from Pb into Au in a DIY transistor in one of the EFTV episodes..
I wonder if perhaps monatomic gold is created in the electrolyte solution, if temporarily, vastly decreasing internal resistance (momentarily?) Just a thought I have had.)
Although LFE cells (according to J. Perry) have excellent qualities for capturing "spikes" and contains no lead
So go figure .. Li - ion is
apparently OK too provided an internal BMS is not present.
(I personally wince at the thought having seen one go off before
but have seen others rejuvenate laptop batteries etc with little cause for concern)
It would seem that the "bringing in extra energy" part remains to be directly concluded, but yet could be IMO by someone building and sharing a self runner that is undeniably genuine.
We should not dismiss the notion of looped overunity machines becoming globally implemented .. only takes one ..
Rather, we should actively explore possibilities by using the knowledge and lessons learned by previous experimenters
And hold hope as Tesla did, that the underpinning forces in this reality are "mobile", and not "static"
if kinetic — and this we know it is, for certainMash them together in frustration if need be
The energy crisis (engineered or otherwise) is only getting worse
Science has yet to reveal a (practicable) universal theory and our best fundamental conclusions regarding current flow and associated phenomena, are known to be wrought with inconsistencies, as all humans who originated such theories are .. but conclusions should be drawn regardless, and acted upon accordingly in my view .. This is how things "get done" people trying things out in an informed way, out of curiosity..
Even Experts must work in a "box" for best effect
As I see it
Only a true master can be relied upon to competently explore the periphery of their respective uncharted territories..
That is, one should expect failure in their OU experiments, and not be dissuaded by it, as it could be "so simple you'd laugh" where uncounted other methods will
never work..
https://youtu.be/SGl9dBOJp9E?t=256As I see it, we are discussing several devices at once here, many are said to operate on this same principle (or thereabouts)
If any of the HV / Radiant / Background energy based devices ever worked then I'd "hazard a guess" that
they all could.
Sort of like how gravity, a "weak" force, is only tangible and affecting matter when at a certain "volume"
IE It takes a cosmic sized body to "incur" it at any "noticeable" level.
If extra energy can be "pumped" into a system then it's likely to be exponentially more available at higher voltages..
I suspect this is why lfarrand wants to take those 1.2kv switching devices up to 2Kv..
But I imagine this raise in voltage brings extra implications that must be accounted for such as heat, stability etc.
Without more extensive equipment and a deeper understanding I am pretty limited in what I can achieve with radiant circuits .. Working blind with no scope .. Boils down to "wow that's maxed the meter out" or "that light's
very bright" for now . I can build ions circuit but I have no way to "read it" until I have a proper scope.
For the time being I am putting all my focus on the Gravity motor
As I am much better equipped to pull it off than any HV based design. (atm)
Need to educate myself a bit further before I attempt my next "Alexkor" design.
It would appear as though the "sky is the limit" RE revising it with different components but I have very limited experience with circuit design.
Mainly I hope this post spurs others onto do some work on this design
When I first signed up I had basically no idea what anyone was talking about in most of the threads
This is just a little more approachable for the "uninitiated"
And is becoming quite a nice database with contributions having been made IMO
EDIT ps. Gyula - is this quote of relevance to loading the device / running it open circuit (as
shouldn't be done)
Could the impulse be considered "
undamped" when the device is running open circuit?
IE Would it be fair to say the LED load "damp(en)s" the impulse in this sense?
Energy stored in the condenser and discharged in an inconceivably small interval of time. You could not produce that activity with an undamped wave. The damped wave is of advantage because it gives you, with a generator of 1 kilowatt, an activity of 2,000, 3,000, 4,000, or 5,000 kilowatts; whereas, if you have a continuous or undamped wave, 1 kilowatt gives you only wave energy at the rate of 1 kilowatt and nothing more. That is the reason why the system with a quenched gap has become popular.Would this be a good source for myself and others to grasp this concept:
http://www.differencebetween.net/technology/difference-between-damped-and-undamped-oscillations/
Author
Topic: The Alexkor Device (Read 5001 times)
