PopularFX
Home Help Search Login Register
Welcome,Guest. Please login or register.
2025-05-13, 14:58:11
News: Check out the Benches; a place for people to moderate their own thread and document their builds and data.
If you would like your own Bench, please PM an Admin.
Most Benches are visible only to members.

Pages: 1 ... 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 [25] 26
Author Topic: Kapanadze replication  (Read 122985 times)

Full Member
***

Posts: 199
I tried to enter into resonance with barium titanate, very old experiments. All I got were high-voltage discharges. There is no power as such at all. There are modern generators using piezoelectrics - all this is a consumable, fuel that lasts for a short time. The patent clearly states where the energy comes from - it is its own resonance and resonance with the ether. No chemistry is indicated there, so do not invent something that is not there!

Broadcasting of a radio station is the vibrations of the ether, thanks to which we receive television and radio. No one tried to resonate with them, but only received these vibrations. Perhaps this is the meaning and effect.
   
Full Member
***

Posts: 197
   

Full Member
***

Posts: 199
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3YmQv6UtPPw

Why 00.0 ?
On|off Read the author's description under the video.
   
Sr. Member
****

Posts: 281
No one tried to resonate with them, but only received these vibrations.

What about super-regenerative radio receivers? Don't they work along a similar principle of resonating (pumping up signal / amplifying) and quenching (discharging power)?

https://i.ibb.co/k5h9T24/art285m.jpg
Kapanadze replication


Armstrong's Super-Regenerative Circuit
Super-Regenerative Receivers
   

Sr. Member
****

Posts: 314
The coils melt from such currents, but you do not see them...

If the coil heats up, it radiates heat into the environment.  To replenish the dissipated energy, a power source is needed.  :(
   

Full Member
***

Posts: 199
What about super-regenerative radio receivers? Don't they work along a similar principle of resonating (pumping up signal / amplifying) and quenching (discharging power)?

https://i.ibb.co/k5h9T24/art285m.jpg
Kapanadze replication


Armstrong's Super-Regenerative Circuit
Super-Regenerative Receivers
Yes, it looks very similar.
   

Sr. Member
****

Posts: 314
I'm going to make an induction heater by using old welder. One person asked me to help with this.
To heat such a workpiece, the welding machine must provide at least two kilowatts.
Reading you, I wonder if it is possible to make the power in the inductor greater than what the welding machine consumes from the electrical network ?  ;) Because 2-3 kW in continuous mode is heavy for the welding machine and is associated with the risk of damaging the machine.
   

Full Member
***

Posts: 199
I'm going to make an induction heater by using old welder. One person asked me to help with this.
To heat such a workpiece, the welding machine must provide at least two kilowatts.
Reading you, I wonder if it is possible to make the power in the inductor greater than what the welding machine consumes from the electrical network ?  ;) Because 2-3 kW in continuous mode is heavy for the welding machine and is associated with the risk of damaging the machine.
Why does he need a welding machine?
There is a regular LC circuit, with a large capacity and low inductance. The second question is, how does this relate to Kapanadze?
   
Sr. Member
****

Posts: 281
Kapanadze saw the effect by accident; he was assembling a completely different device. I don’t think there’s anything more complicated than a high-voltage multiplier. He also talked about the welding machine that worked when he was assembling something high-voltage..... and he saw that effect.
   

Sr. Member
****

Posts: 314
Why does he need a welding machine?

Because this device has already been,and contains most of the device's parts itself.
   

Full Member
***

Posts: 199
This is a pulse current reading using a Tesla receiving transformer as an example. There is a video by Kapanadze from 2007 in which he demonstrated current amplification. The current amplifier is visible there.
Unlike conventional pickup, there is full synchronization with the passing voltage. The high-voltage low-frequency transformer is controlled by a phase detector, as resonance occurs between the two coils, it closes the coil around the coil with a discharge. It creates a separate strong magnetic field, which interacts with the passing voltage (video from post 1). Only the current is amplified, the voltage remains the same.
   
Full Member
***

Posts: 197
This is a pulse current reading using a Tesla receiving transformer as an example. There is a video by Kapanadze from 2007 in which he demonstrated current amplification. The current amplifier is visible there.
Unlike conventional pickup, there is full synchronization with the passing voltage. The high-voltage low-frequency transformer is controlled by a phase detector, as resonance occurs between the two coils, it closes the coil around the coil with a discharge. It creates a separate strong magnetic field, which interacts with the passing voltage (video from post 1). Only the current is amplified, the voltage remains the same.

To increase the current it must have current and voltage components together. That is why it is specified in watts.

It is a simple task 2*2.

you have 10V and 10A so you have 100W
now you say that you want to add the current itself, e.g. 50A

I am asking how many watts does this current have? 0V? = 0W
maybe 2V? ok
so how many watts do you have now?

You are telling me that if you have 10V and 10A you want to make +50A and get how much?
10V 50..60A?

That is the problem. It cannot be done this way. It is an illusion, just like reactive current.

Who decided that this coil in the picture is a current amplifier?

We can also see a similar coil in 2 other Kapanadze films, if it can be considered similar.

I like the scheme as much as hundreds of others  ;) :D ;D

   

Full Member
***

Posts: 199
For now I rely on the words of Kapanadze himself and his patent.
Now what I see is a classic Tesla circuit, where in resonance from a pulse of a discharged capacitor, a very high voltage is obtained. This voltage is transformed into a current that can melt nails, for example.
It is also known that Kapanadze adds current to voltage - CURRENT AMPLIFIER, but the voltage remains the same - according to him, and he adds current in pulses!
   
Full Member
***

Posts: 197
In the patent we read that the field of the first coil is equalized because they are different.
I ask which coils is Kapanadze talking about!?
We see the coils in the picture. He points to them saying that they are primary and secondary.
stop.
Has anyone wondered what this means!?
How can the magnetic field of the first coil on the same core, even if it is an air core, the magnetic field differ!?
This is nonsense. The magnetic field in such an arrangement is the whole! the same.

When can we say that the magnetic field of one coil is different than the other?

When the coils are distant from each other or isolated from each other's magnetic field.


This would fundamentally change what everyone is trying to match.

The coils are similar in the greenbox and orangebox 2004 but are much smaller in the 2kW on the table and for the Turks in the 5kW if we compare it that way.
Why are these coils visible at all? because it is irrelevant!? because the real coils are in the box? or maybe only one coil is real.
Then the magnetic fields of the coils could be equalized by thinking about it.
   
Full Member
***

Posts: 197
For now I rely on the words of Kapanadze himself and his patent.
Now what I see is a classic Tesla circuit, where in resonance from a pulse of a discharged capacitor, a very high voltage is obtained. This voltage is transformed into a current that can melt nails, for example.
It is also known that Kapanadze adds current to voltage - CURRENT AMPLIFIER, but the voltage remains the same - according to him, and he adds current in pulses!

Look what is written here. Unfortunately I do not know where it is from.
   

Full Member
***

Posts: 199
Date - beginning of 2017 "@Alik пишет: Ещё позавчера был целую неделю у Тариеля....Схему "Сапога" Тариель и Тимур со смехом отверг....Эту "дезу" в топку.... из того что разрешено сказать 1) заземление в схеме обязательно 2) искровик в схеме обязателен 3) для начала процесса нужна фаза и ноль хоть с генератора хоть с розетки , выход две фазы напряжение тоже что и на входе (заземление обязательно), усиливается токовая составляющая причем импульсно (так и сказал токовый усилитель) что неудобно при потреблении приходится городить дорогие преобразователи, либо перематывать синхронный двигатель и что бы он тянул гидравлику или маховики. Больше никакой информации дать не имею права но надеюсь много ложных схем отсёк..... Удачи ребята Свободная энергия есть....))))"
Sorry that it's in Russian, but this is the original. Whoever understands it, whoever translates it. I think it's true.
   
Full Member
***

Posts: 197
Date - beginning of 2017 "@Alik пишет: Ещё позавчера был целую неделю у Тариеля....Схему "Сапога" Тариель и Тимур со смехом отверг....Эту "дезу" в топку.... из того что разрешено сказать 1) заземление в схеме обязательно 2) искровик в схеме обязателен 3) для начала процесса нужна фаза и ноль хоть с генератора хоть с розетки , выход две фазы напряжение тоже что и на входе (заземление обязательно), усиливается токовая составляющая причем импульсно (так и сказал токовый усилитель) что неудобно при потреблении приходится городить дорогие преобразователи, либо перематывать синхронный двигатель и что бы он тянул гидравлику или маховики. Больше никакой информации дать не имею права но надеюсь много ложных схем отсёк..... Удачи ребята Свободная энергия есть....))))"
Sorry that it's in Russian, but this is the original. Whoever understands it, whoever translates it. I think it's true.

I know these words.
« Last Edit: 2024-12-12, 07:47:24 by maxmalone »
   

Full Member
***

Posts: 199
In the patent we read that the field of the first coil is equalized because they are different.
I ask which coils is Kapanadze talking about!?
We see the coils in the picture. He points to them saying that they are primary and secondary.
stop.
Has anyone wondered what this means!?
How can the magnetic field of the first coil on the same core, even if it is an air core, the magnetic field differ!?
This is nonsense. The magnetic field in such an arrangement is the whole! the same.

When can we say that the magnetic field of one coil is different than the other?

When the coils are distant from each other or isolated from each other's magnetic field.


This would fundamentally change what everyone is trying to match.

The coils are similar in the greenbox and orangebox 2004 but are much smaller in the 2kW on the table and for the Turks in the 5kW if we compare it that way.
Why are these coils visible at all? because it is irrelevant!? because the real coils are in the box? or maybe only one coil is real.

The box is big, there may be more coils in there! Then the magnetic fields of the coils could be equalized by thinkiBut the coil has been spotted on other installations!
It is located right in the "place of power" )))
How to determine where the high current is spinning - where the wires are thick, and the current amplifier is the thickest conductor!ng about it.
   

Full Member
***

Posts: 199
You can avoid building complex circuits, but make it on two kachers, transmitting and receiving, make a switched inductor circuit with a frequency of 50 Hz in the receiving one, match it in phase with the alternating voltage from the transformer, for example, and make measurements of the current.
All this is approximately the same as I did in the 1st post of this topic, except for where to get the current!
   

Full Member
***

Posts: 199
Academician Atsyukovsky, talked to Kapanadze, he also has a theoretical patent, which he substantiated in his book. Kapanadze looked and said - "Well, add something and it will work." Most likely, this concerned the current collection.
   
Full Member
***

Posts: 197
This was drawn by GIA. You know who that is. I don't know if this is a real diagram, but there are big similarities. There is only a third output coil missing from the GIA drawing, but in the conversation Kapanadze supposedly said there were 3 coils. Why is this not in the patents? Maybe it is, for example, element 11? Or maybe it is not there at all.
   

Full Member
***

Posts: 199
Kapanadze said in the Aquarium video: "This is a classic Tesla circuit, only no one could make it work." Probably because the current was constantly removed from it, but it had to be added to the voltage.Thus making it work!
   

Full Member
***

Posts: 199
Why is this not in the patents? Maybe it is, for example, element 11?
Kapanadze really spoke about 3 coils, although in the patent there are 2. Probably because the 3rd coil is a current amplifier. And in the video 2 coils are wound, and on top is a spiral.
   
Full Member
***

Posts: 197
Kapanadze said in the Aquarium video: "This is a classic Tesla circuit, only no one could make it work." Probably because the current was constantly removed from it, but it had to be added to the voltage.Thus making it work!

So this is about feedback which is visible as a diode in the diagram.

Tesla has such a circuit! It is identical to Kapanadze in this respect.
I have never seen anyone show it. It even has what is not visible in Kapanadze's patent. It is almost identical to this one.
   

Sr. Member
****

Posts: 314
If we are talking about, for example, a hydrogen exchanger, e.g. from a Toyota MIRAI car, as I read:
The exchanger itself weighs approximately 300 kG and delivers up to 90 kW.
This gives 3Kg/1kW, so 5kW = 15kg, stupid calculation.

ok. Do you know Mr. Petros Zografos? Greek.
It shows a device that probably produces hydrogen and immediately turns it into electricity.

https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=Petros+Zografos

50kW generator
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HEulh5rUTQw


The problem is that it only works for him. Several measurement errors were found in his shows, so it is not known what he really shows and what he gets.

It was found today in my old computer, these pictures dated 2017.  I don't know were they here earlier.
   
Pages: 1 ... 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 [25] 26
« previous next »


 

Home Help Search Login Register
Theme © PopularFX | Based on PFX Ideas! | Scripts from iScript4u 2025-05-13, 14:58:11