So needing a break from the workshop, I decided to run an idea I had some years back, by ChatGPT.
I put forth a real world idea, that most could build, and let ChatGPT do all the calculating for me. I asked it to subtract 20% from each calculation, to more than represent real world losses. I specified each component, and then asked if this is doable (which it all is), just so as chatGPT new it was a real world experiment. In each step, i asked ChatGPT to make the calculations. As we went along, and each section of the device was calculated by ChatGPT, i asked ChatGPT to add up energy consumed, and energy produced. When we got to the end sum total of energy, we ended up with more stored energy than that which we started with.
So i then suggested to ChatGPT that the conservation of energy did not hold true, and you can guess what the reply was lolthe conservation of energy must hold true it said lol. I then asked it how could that be, when it was you that made all the calculations of this simple system, and showed that we ended up with more stored energy than it took to create it. I saidi think you are being bias toward theenergy must be conserved theory, even though your own calculations show different. I asked ChatGPT to double check all the math it had done. I then got the answer below.
I have edited out the system giveaway points, as i intend on building it very soon. This is a simple built, but holds great ramifications, and will show that all is not absolute.
So, can anyone else come up with a doable system that breaks the conservation of energy law? Put your ideas forward.
Brad

Never let your schooling get in the way of your education.
