PopularFX
Home Help Search Login Register
Welcome,Guest. Please login or register.
2026-03-28, 05:11:37
News: Registration with the OUR forum is by admin approval.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6]
Author Topic: Free energy is easy, ask an intelligent question...  (Read 16493 times)
Group: Professor
Hero Member
*****

Posts: 2497
...
I suspect my experience growing up is why I never found alternative or free energy all that difficult. The notion of environmental energy was normal and natural to me from a young age.

That’s how things were done in the past, when there was no electricity. We burned wood, and the CO₂ was then absorbed by the trees again. A self-sustaining system – ‘how wonderful’, as environmentalists would say.
The problem is that none of this meets our needs today. What might work for a detached house becomes a huge challenge when it comes to city blocks and hundreds of thousands of people to power. And even if it did, we would still be a very, very long way from meeting our overall needs, particularly those linked to industrial production and transport.
Even renewable energy lacks the consistency required for our needs, and causes significant nuisance due to the low ratio of energy produced to the space and volume occupied. Realistically, the only options currently available are oil, gas and nuclear power. And barring a miracle in the realm of free energy, the best option for the near future is nuclear fusion. Hot.

« Last Edit: 2026-03-16, 16:20:00 by F6FLT »


---------------------------
"Open your mind, but not like a trash bin"
   
Hero Member
*****

Posts: 526
"Researchers at ETH Zurich have achieved a breakthrough by creating a miniature superconducting magnet capable of generating a 42-tesla field, small enough to fit in a palm. This 42-tesla (42 T) magnet, composed of four REBCO pancake coils, significantly advances superconducting technology for NMR and MRI applications."

now connect it with Clemente Figuera patent and for me it looks like MW power plant is almost possible today without big input power.
   
Group: Tech Wizard
Hero Member
*****

Posts: 1319
Hej Forest,

The super magnet needs liquid helium and over 1000 Amper to get 42 Tesla, did you consider that?    :D      It is surely an advancement in creating very strong magnetic fields though.

For others here, this is a description https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.adz5826 


"Researchers at ETH Zurich have achieved a breakthrough by creating a miniature superconducting magnet capable of generating a 42-tesla field, small enough to fit in a palm. This 42-tesla (42 T) magnet, composed of four REBCO pancake coils, significantly advances superconducting technology for NMR and MRI applications."

now connect it with Clemente Figuera patent and for me it looks like MW power plant is almost possible today without big input power.
   

Group: Administrator
Hero Member
*****

Posts: 4571
The super magnet needs liquid helium and over 1000 Amper to get 42 Tesla, did you consider that?   ://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.adz5826[/url]
However, as with any superconducting electromagnet, the 1000A of current does not have to be continuously supplied from outside after it's ramped up. ...and this current does not run down so the electromagnet becomes self-powered and can by moved around as long as the LH stays cold.
In practice, the recondensing pump dissipates some energy to keep the LH liquid but that in not the electromagnet's fault.  The heat used to boil the LH does not come from the magnet but from the air and ambient temperature.  Thermal insulation is a big factor.
   
Hero Member
*****

Posts: 526
"Furthermore, the magnet coils are small enough to fit in the palm of a hand and consume less than 1 watt of power."
   

Group: Mad Scientist
Hero Member
*****

Posts: 1132
superconducting.   hmm.  ok.  how much energy does it take to gather and compress the gas that cools the super conductor in order to hold currents indefinately??  seems like a lot to keep that going. 

superconductors have their uses. but the cost is not a bargan in real world applications. i keep hearing of 'ideal' this and that.  many say FE is fantasy land, but keep refering to super this and that, of which seems super costly for general use... Tesla im sure, if he had FE, did not require super anything. just simplistic materials configured in a correct way. that is what we need to work on.   

lets say we could get a super conductor to have never ending currents. it is only stored energy that 'costs' to hold it.  break that loop and apply it to a work load. not so ever lasting now is it. did it have more energy than what was applied in the first place, even if we neglected the energy to cool the thing?  super conductors are useful for certain things. but there is no free energy there.

mags

   

Group: Administrator
Hero Member
*****

Posts: 4571
Let's say we could get a superconductor to have never ending currents. It is only stored energy that 'costs' to hold it.
Yes, especially on the warm Earth.  In space it would not cost anything to hold it.

Break that loop and apply it to a work load. Not so ever lasting now is it.
Correct, once the loop is broken - so is the current.

Did it have more energy than what was applied in the first place, even if we neglected the energy to cool the thing? 
No, what you get out is what you put in.   Just like with a capacitor but by a different mechanism.

superconductors are useful for certain things. but there is no free energy there.
Certainly not by themselves.
   

Hero Member
*****

Posts: 559


Buy me some coffee
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K9b3bPyizbc

The Bedini guy, seems to be going round in circles.


---------------------------
Electrostatic induction: Put a 1KV charge on 1 plate of a capacitor. What does the environment do to the 2nd  plate?
   

Group: Administrator
Hero Member
*****

Posts: 4571
The Bedini guy, seems to be going round in circles.
Describe the circles
   

Hero Member
*****

Posts: 559


Buy me some coffee
Describe the circles
He keeps re-building the same circuitry with "It'll work this time" hopium. Different coils, better diodes, higher spec transistors, better gate drivers, etc etc,... and now his bearings are done, so they need replacing. As I said, "circles". lol
« Last Edit: 2026-03-24, 15:28:36 by Aking.21 »


---------------------------
Electrostatic induction: Put a 1KV charge on 1 plate of a capacitor. What does the environment do to the 2nd  plate?
   
Hero Member
*****

Posts: 526
I saw a few days video which I think present one of the simplest free energy device and IMHO it's real. The only thing which is missing is tank circuit on primary powered by any electronic resonant circuit. Primary must be high Q to get high COP at output:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xmy-QuaXQjY&t=140s

Schematic :
   

Group: Administrator
Hero Member
*****

Posts: 4571
I saw a few days video which I think present one of the simplest free energy device and IMHO it's real. The only thing which is missing is tank circuit on primary powered by any electronic resonant circuit. Primary must be high Q to get high COP at output:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xmy-QuaXQjY&t=140s

It uses this Chinese miracle.



Even if you somehow learn the output voltage, frequency and current of this module, replicating that 12x8cm transformer-capacitor only with information about its wire gauges, is a shot in the dark.

  Transformer-capacitor with 3 windings.

A similarly wound transformer-capacitor also appears in this article.

Also, that light bulb is not a resistive incandescent type like the symbol on the schematic implies.  The accompanying text on the schematic clarifies this.
In the video, it appears as a cracked standard LED bulb tailored for a 240VAC mains supply, but the physics of LEDs requires them to be supplied with a much lower voltage ...and DC or PDC.
To satisfy this requirement, that LED light bulb must have some kind of 240VAC to low-voltage DC converter built-in.  This converter will have a profound impact on the current flowing in the primary winding of the transformer-capacitor since that LED bulb is connected in series with it.

In the simplest case the converter is constructed as a simple capacitive divider with a rectifier. 
In more complex solutions, the 240VAC is first rectified and then applied to a high-frequency buck-converter. 
In the highest quality LED bulbs, an additional high-frequency PFC stage precedes the buck converter.

The first case severely distorts the current waveform coming out of the Chinese HV module and the two latter solutions modulate the primary current of the transformer-capacitor with undetermined high frequency harmonics.
   
Group: Professor
Hero Member
*****

Posts: 2497
...
A similarly wound transformer-capacitor also appears in this article.
...

How can a bloke who seems to have access to decent equipment be so incompetent that he makes so many crass, beginner’s mistakes?
For example, he denies that a circuit with a capacitor in series is a closed circuit for varying currents, not an open one! And he even uses this as a pretext to criticise the laws of physics.  C.C

Clearly, he only wants to see what suits him, and will therefore never manage to create a self-sustaining device, despite how easy it would be to do so if one were to believe the far-fetched and dubious principles he puts forward.


---------------------------
"Open your mind, but not like a trash bin"
   

Group: Administrator
Hero Member
*****

Posts: 4571
For example, he denies that a circuit with a capacitor in series is a closed circuit for varying currents, not an open one! And he even uses this as a pretext to criticise the laws of physics.  C.C
Maybe he does not believe in displacement current ...or has never heard of it  ...or maybe you did not realize that this article has been machine translated from the russian language and in that language an open switch has 0Ω resistance and a closed switch has ∞ resistance (ideally).

Also he might have never heard of the variability of capacitance with voltage in non-ideal capacitors. ...and about inductive CSRs.

On the other hand: this video claims increasing battery voltage.
   

Group: Professor
Hero Member
*****

Posts: 2362
.......an open switch has 0Ω resistance and a closed switch has ∞ resistance (ideally).
Does the translator really make that profound mistake?

Smudge
   

Group: Administrator
Hero Member
*****

Posts: 4571
Does the translator really make that profound mistake?
Russian transistors, too.  Their collector and drain currents are the largest when the transistors are "open".

Oh!, you asked about "translator" - not "transistor".  Yes, machine translators make that mistake all the time.  Human translators, too.
It is not a matter of translating the individual words "open"  and "closed" incorrectly.  For example: the word "open" in a phrase like "open windows" has the same meaning in both Russian and English ...but in the phrase "open transistor" it has the opposite meaning.
These words acquire different meanings in electric contexts.  Only a technical human translator or an AI translator would be able to account for this context.
   
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6]
« previous next »


 

Home Help Search Login Register
Theme © PopularFX | Based on PFX Ideas! | Scripts from iScript4u 2026-03-28, 05:11:37