Here's a video investigating this guys claims.
I'm not saying a device that looks like a free energy device is not possible,but it would be an energy converter,one form of energy to another
form of energy.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-ham2Q0E8Lk
The first problem is that the video leads with the standard BS that such a device must violate the conservation of energy and be a perpetual motion machine. As expected the conversation then degenerates into the absurd notion the device is stealing RF power and that it takes away from legitimate research. In other words the same old shtick. On free energy devices, I like to use the black box analogy. Suppose we had a black box with two wires coming out of it which supplies practical amounts of power for long periods of time. Here 99% of people would jump to the absurd conclusion this must violate the conservation of energy. The reason is because they have very little knowledge, understanding or experience not a violation of the COE. In fact I know quite a few electrical engineers and found they have little understanding of energy or advanced electrodynamics. They are glorified electricians from my experience. For example, I put the black box question to them and everyone failed even though the answer is easy. A betavoltaic nuclear battery can produce practical amounts of power for decades inside a closed black box. Which also gives us some insight into how many FE devices work. You see the majority of FE inventors claimed they do not know where the energy comes from but relates to a different form of electricity and the strange radiation produced from it. Ring a bell?, "a betavoltaic nuclear battery generates electricity directly from particles emitted by a radioactive source". Now we have a known method of conversion from radiation to electricity. The next obvious step would be to focus on what the strange form of electricity/radiation is and where it comes from. In fact the observation of a strange form of electricity and radiation dates back to the late 1800's. Viktor Schauberger described strange radiations similar to roentgen rays emanating from some devices. Vacuum tubes were lit with a strange red glow, bulbs were illuminated but did not get hot and the radiation had biological effects. These inventors like Schauberger were not weekend warriors or arm chair critics and dedicated most of their life to their work in this field. T.H.Moray spent 30 years working on one device. Of course, Hubbard was a different story and he was supposedly given this technology by Nikola Tesla who was his friend. He didn't have to work decades for it like most inventors. Which may explain why he sold the technology to the highest bidder and retired early. Most inventors sold out or quit after being confronted with constant hostility and death threats. It also begs the question, if Hubbard's device did not work then why didn't the people who bought it for a large sum of money say something or file a law suit?. My guess is it worked as claimed.
« Last Edit: 2026-04-01, 17:53:30 by Allcanadian »
---------------------------
Comprehend and Copy Nature... Viktor Schauberger
“The first principle is that you must not fool yourself and you are the easiest person to fool.”― Richard P. Feynman
|
Author
Topic: Hubbard Coil (Read 86331 times)
