So explain these "higher-level novel predictions" of the links you provided, especially on what is experimentally testable, with a level of analysis sufficient to say that you have not glossed over Distinti's work and concluded anything about it.
In the original post you deleted a few times, I was following-up on your requests for more mathematical/refutable citations from Distinti: I only need math, not generalities.
More generalities and no refutable theory.
I was 'calling the bluff' in a sense, that I suspect you hadn't actually read any of the papers deep enough to make a declarative statement that it was 'not a refutable theory'.  That was confirmed in the next post: I do not accept links that are supposed to justify a point of view, but are not accompanied by personal analysis, clearly explaining how they would be relevant to the topic of the thread.
But to get back to the actual topic and answer your question, one thing I found interesting just glancing through Distinti's work was his predicted values for drift velocity on Earth was relatively close to what was measured by Michaelson-Morley-Miller a century prior (attached). And despite the many theories out there, it's rare to see a set of papers that goes all the way from basic electrical engineering relationships to deriving the Schwarzschild radius without resorting to pages of tensors and differential equations. That made it interesting to me because it means that derivations of things like antigravity/time dilation/negative impedance solutions would be more directly engineerable/falsifiable. http://www.distinti.com/docs/ne.pdf - extremely low-level EE https://www.distinti.com/docs/ng.pdf - extremely high-level cosmic It's probably a flawed theory in many places, but IMO not worth throwing the whole thing out arbitrarily (unless I had something better to recommend).
---------------------------
"An overly-skeptical scientist might hastily conclude by scooping and analyzing a thousand buckets of ocean water that the ocean has no fish in it."
|
Author
Topic: Electromagnetism and relativity (Read 6948 times)
