Hello, I'm back.
Interesting discussion, and I congratulate those who have studied the hard 9/11 evidence and read my published peer-reviewed papers on the subject. Four of these published papers are linked on my web page,
http://www.physics.byu.edu/research/energy/ .
Have you read my published papers on 9/11? If so you will note that I approach the subject by asking "What evidence is there?" and
I do experiments, and I have published my findings with colleagues -- in scientific/technical journals. I also have lectured many times regarding this research -- likewise on my energy research going back to muon-catalyzed fusion research (began with experiments for which I was the Lead Investigator, LAMPF, 1982 for about a decade).
In addition to publications, several of my talks have been recorded and are available on YOUTUBE; search "Steven Jones 911". For example:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YjaqquI5OKM = My talk in
Australia in Nov 2009; discusses in parts 4 and 5 my findings on the destruction of WTC7 and why I find that EXPLOSIVES were used to bring WTC 7 down. See attachment.
I do not shy away from other "non-hard" evidences either -- e.g., the PUT OPTIONS that made many millions when UA and AA stocks plummeted after 9/11,
Sec'y of Transportation Mineta's whistleblower testimony, the lack of air defenses that day, the Bush/Cheney administration lies about the safety of the WTC dust, and so on. These topics are presented in several of my videotaped talks -- and in this rather humorous review:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yuC_4mGTs98 Some of you will find interesting: http://journalof911studies.com/volume/200704/JonesWTC911SciMethod.pdf
in which I note that
our "metal-catalyzed {cold} fusion" claims have in fact been verified in experiments in Japan and Europe; with references of course. The best metal alloy to enhance cold fusion found so far is a Pd-Li alloy; and BTW my work on cold fusion continues (see links at my web page).
Realistically now, I do not think that Congress will investigate 9/11 or the Bush/Cheney administration's LIES in getting the US into the 9/11 wars. Nor do I think that the problem lies just in that one administration... or in just one party. There are elite, wealthy controllers who control money and energy -- of this I find considerable evidence which I would
rather not take the time to go into here.
(See my vids, please.) But IMO
the globalist oligarchical controlling power elite have weaknesses, like the Death Star on Star Wars. A critical weakness (for us a strength) I believe lies in the ability of inventors such as ourselves to come up with an alternative energy source which if
cheap, green and reliable -- will undercut the control they now wield over oil/fossil resources, and over the electrical grid. Finding such an energy source could lead to a New Renaissance, a peaceful revolution if you will.
I and many of you seek alternative, non-conventional novel energy -- call it free energy if you wish. (I don't particularly like the term 'free energy', because it suggests the energy comes out of nothing, violating Conservation of Energy).
TWO LINKED GOALS: 1) we achieve novel energy AND 2) get it into distributed manufacture around the world -- into homes and communities without having it controlled or stomped down by the power elitists. Can you see what this would lead to? energy in the HANDS of the 99% rather than controlled by the 0.1%? I'll leave it at that for you to ponder.
Ciao, for now.
Steve