Really, it is the inter-winding capacitance as I pointed out previously that you are missing which will greatly affect your calculations and performance. For example, 1.1mm enameled wire when tightly bifilar wound will exhibit ~ 50pf/M. Therefore, 157.6 meters of wire will have ~7.9nF of inter-winding capacitance. How much signal will one be able to couple to these bifilar windings with only 1-10pf in series along with a 180 degrees phase shift?
IMO, very little.
Pm
Many thanks for your valuable input, is much appreciated as it helps to bring more enlightenment in this working principle of the patent
According to my calculations inter winding will add 7.34 x 10@-14 F, result in being negligible (in terms of total capacitance)… maybe i am wrong or you just miscount some zeros.
Also, we are not talking about coupling anything as we use wire connection output and in case of cascading wire connection should be used as they need to be placed at some distance apart to avoid interference as per patent description. Also, i think i already stressed enough that those 2 capacitors are placed there for phase shift only and their capacitance needs to be small not to affect the impedance but big enough to make possible phase shift, hence value suggested “at least half pico Farad” but “no more than 10 pico Farad” and choosing” 1 of the 2 with half value of the other” … or maybe i have described this in a different thread
Also, in claims of the patent we can find that by using other different values of one of the 2 in series different angle shift can be obtained.
Also, if your reference to capacity is regarded to similar devices aka kapanadze, don smith, akula … indeed there it is needed mutual inductance, but this device is much simplified without the need of many other effects in order to amplify and extract energy from the aether … and in some similar devices we can see coils connected by wires at neccessary distance to prevent interfernce.
We can see how the “non existent aether” create so much trouble when we work with fe and ou. That’s why we need to acknowledge first where ou and fe coming from and how to manipulate to benefit from it.
As i explained above, I am trying to avoid dragging the dialogue on this side and possibly focus on build and prove. And once we have them built and working we can discuss further the existence or non existence of something that mainstream science say it don’t exist according to their limited understanding.
So, the main purpose is to build, and make it easy to replicate within some guidelines easy to follow and enjoy the benefits.
Also, attempts to scale up would prove beyond doubts what inventor claims with poof, theory method and instructions.
This remind me of anomalous long lasting batteries experiment which being unexplainable (in their terms) has put people off to use it for their on benefit and still using wrong against their own interest electricity storage in power banks for household solar/wind generation, electric vehicles and everywhere a battery is required. Yes, i am speaking about +100 times more usage of the same amount of energy.
Also i welcome anyone to join and ask or even build if they want and once is proved this patent at least for themselves those who build we can discuss way and method to scale up.
feature is available which provides a place all members can chat, either publicly or privately.
Author
Topic: Replication attempt of patent NL1032750 (Read 4394 times)
