OverUnity Research

Hack link to chat page.
http://www.overunityresearch.com/chat/index.php (http://www.overunityresearch.com/chat/index.php)


I am going to start this thread out with nothing but pertinere:

And to this list I would add Tesla's balanced coil if I could find it again. It was as big as a room.

http://serenityhealing.net/20.html

Done.
Aside from all the science, these configs all hold the same parameter.

The PDF is the grand daddy of them all.
http://www.elisanet.fi/dncmrc/lthesis.pdf
http://www.elisanet.fi/dncmrc/

The flash movie is a red wire with a blue mag field modulated by the circuit field resonance that Don Smith talk about recharging his battery while running.

http://www.overunityresearch.com/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=33.0;attach=176

Amazing simalarities Paul...  :)

I don't think it's coincedence.

Marco.

I had a wooden core coil with 53 turns 24awg secondary and 7 turn 16awg primary. Natural resonant freq showed up as 188khz to 240khz. Add .0033uf to tank it on both windings. Got the draw down to 43ma. with a 100ohm resistor in series using sine wave.

Looks like the Pri and Sec are close in mass.

Quote from: Turbo on 2009.12.18, 21:13:49
Amazing simalarities Paul...  :)

I don't think it's coincedence.

Marco.

My Smith air coil build with scope shot. square in on the middle coil and sine out on the 2 outer coils.
My center piece is just a chunk of flexi tube. It just happens to fit in the spool. Aint life great!

pictures of box connections.

you can put 50 to zero ohms between the fet and coil.

GK coil.

I like that GK coil.. Very Clever ..

Then like this....
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gY63-25hp44 (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gY63-25hp44)

8) 8) 8) :o :o :o :o ;) ;) ;) ;) :D :D :D :D :D

That is the only combination I could perceive that would do anything in the TPU. After all, we knew it had to be Tesla somewhere and this driver is in 99% of the devices and its true what Grumpy said about raising the voltage.

At 242vdc I almost burned up my rat shack transformer.

I have stopped posting publicly. I saw the firestorm over agentgates and don't want to go thru that again.

Quote from: giantkiller on 2010.01.10, 07:06:08
Then like this....
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gY63-25hp44 (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gY63-25hp44)

Thats interesting!

One thing I learned that made a big difference for me is to place a restriction on the pulse going into a resonant tank system and also place a restriction on the output...... leaving enough energy in the two tanks to ring each other up.... until the output tank can overcome the restriction and do some work...

If you load the output side of the tank system directly the magic never has a chance to happen..

Its the hand off between the two tanks that creates so many chances to capture the energy that initally exists on a blank wire..

I ran across this:
He has the right information but wants to do too much electronics.
http://www.alt-nrg.org/plans.html

I also thought about what sparks asked me about the electrolitic caps on the supply. I don't need True DC. What if the DC is at its highest point of the ripple when the fet turns on?
The ripple shows up with 14mghz in it and that sharp spike appears on top of each crest. But not enough of them for my satisfaction.
What I am going to do next is take the NST and pulse the gate while connecting the NST output to a FWRB for the DC supply. At 3kv I need to put resistance at the gate and drain for starters.
Also adding diodes at the tanks to lock the energy in the resonant circuit area.

The Trinity

The WW  ;D

here caps and hv supply.

Quote from: darkspeed on 2010.01.10, 07:28:50

Quote from: giantkiller on 2010.01.10, 07:06:08
Then like this....
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gY63-25hp44 (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gY63-25hp44)

Thats interesting!

One thing I learned that made a big difference for me is to place a restriction on the pulse going into a resonant tank system and also place a restriction on the output...... leaving enough energy in the two tanks to ring each other up.... until the output tank can overcome the restriction and do some work...

If you load the output side of the tank system directly the magic never has a chance to happen..

Its the hand off between the two tanks that creates so many chances to capture the energy that initally exists on a blank wire..

if you make it go faster than it is supposed to then the medium must compensate.

I think I got it this time. It is the geometry of the winds is all.
Look at the green winding with the spaces, capacitance and inductance. We get a frequency from that. The last youtube I made was driving just that with 4khz sine wave. I get ~8mghz out.
I realize this also looks like a shortwave antenna if the stranded was laid out straight. Then I remember the notched PVC coil has 2 of these GK coil primaries.

And I woke up!

If i have three layers of these windings with a slightly different spacing or wire length then I would be heterodyning in a circle. That means a rotating magnetic field.
If it travels across the scope screen then it travels in a circle.

Layer one tested with 4khz @ 140vdc. Screams at ~9mghz. I realized that is all there is to the lastest coil build. I can make a 3 layer, 4 quadrant tpu the size of a golf ball.

3 wire lengths. 3'8", 3'2", 2'8". The frequencies will correspond. An upcoming scope shot will tell.

I have my fet 6 inches from the coil and that equates to 140 volts with a jagged wave top. If I rasie the voltage to 242 then the wave top is very even on top, less ac wave part.
I like to keep my voltage down so tonight I will move the fet closer to the coil and put it in the center. My thinking is that is why the components are sitting on the ring. I know, why else. But it serves a purpose for the feedback of parasitic ringing.

top coil is 11.03 Mghz 18vpp
mid coil is 10.94 Mghz 19vpp
bot coil is 10.17 Mghz 28vpp
Serially connected bot to mid to top is 9.997 Mghz 19vpp
All in parallel is 4khz 5 vpp. No Mghz ringing.

Moving the fet closer after resonation starts does nothing. The ringing starts up immediately anyway.

The varicaps are in parallel for this test.
The vdc meter readings are taken when the oscillator side is always shut off. The meter readings are inconsistent when the oscillator side is turned on.
DC power supply across the fet, 100ohm 5 watt resistor, and bot coil has to be greater than 45vdc for the ringing to appear. Moving the coil nearer the fet at less then 45vdc does not actuate the resonation!
At 49vdc the ringing in chirp patterns starts to appear.
At 60vdc the ringing is solid and no chirping appears. I remover the varicap and the ringing stops, still at 60vdc.

No tank varicaps in parallel!
At 86vdc the ringing starts as the chirping waveform.
At 88vdc and above the chirping disappears into the full ringing waveform.

After the ringing is full on then raising the volts to 140 does nothing to the p2p of the gate ringing. Higher than 140vdc will give you headaches.

Hope this helps.

Another test I will do is to drive some of the coils on Mighty Little. I can almost predict the results. Short length, low turns count, fatter wire gauge relates to standard conduction. Large voltages can be applied to smaller gauges giving the better outer field generation. As the wire thickness increases we advance into higher levels of conduction if the voltage is not raised accordingly.

***************************************************************************************************************
Patent http://www.pat2pdf.org/patents/pat5339061.pdf (http://www.pat2pdf.org/patents/pat5339061.pdf)

http://www.aetherenergy.com/Technologies/PAGDrefs.php (http://www.aetherenergy.com/Technologies/PAGDrefs.php)

Oh Yeah, Baby! http://www.pureenergysystems.com/academy/papers/Evolution_E.V.Gray_Circuit_Topology/index.html (http://www.pureenergysystems.com/academy/papers/Evolution_E.V.Gray_Circuit_Topology/index.html)

I gather other pics to put here for doco sake.

(http://www.overunityresearch.com/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=33.0;attach=427)

This is the response from Borderland Sciences:

QuoteHello,

I have not spoke to Eric in a few years now.

He does his best thinking in his cars, so I have heard.

All who wander are not lost....may be the best way to understand Mr. Dollard : )

Thanks,

James



--- On Tue, 12/22/09, paul@denver.net <paul@denver.net> wrote:


From: paul@denver.net <paul@denver.net>
Subject: Hello to Eric Dollard
To: bsrf@sbcglobal.net
Date: Tuesday, December 22, 2009, 11:19 AM


I heard he is living out of his car! I need to contact him.
Do you or anybody know how I can reach him, what his current status is?

Paul

GK.. if you are looking for eric..

he just did a presentation in sf..

----------------------------------------------

The San Francisco Tesla Society

presents a free presentation featuring

Eric Dollard

"A History of the Marconi & RCA Station:
Bolinas California"

Sunday, November 8, 2009  1:45 p.m. - 4 p.m. at the

San Francisco Public Library
Senator Milton Marks Richmond Branch
351 9th Avenue @ Clement
10th Avenue Entrance
San Francisco, CA 94118

http://www.sftesla.org/Newsletters/2009/SFTS_news_2009_11_08.htm

The San Francisco Tesla Society Information Hotline
(415) 820-1451
is available 24 / 7 when you can't get to the web.
Provided by Baylink Voicemail Communications.

.

The cardboard is an air form. It lets the most energy ring in space instead of sumped inside a captive media. Like the ECD. Sumped equals losses if your view is correct. But in reality the same energy is somewhere else just not in the place we want where it can do the most good.
In other words: Inside metal is a bad place. No electrical current or magnetic current but air current/flux lines. The lines appear in 2 different ways, flux in the metal or flux in the air. If you ring the metal flux the metal sings. If you ring the air flux the planet sings because the air flux is coupled with the earth flux and atomic flux. This gives us 2 tuning forks instead of one.
The flux lines are actually standing waves of electron polarity. Which denotes a frequency. Put iron filings on a paper and expose them to a magnetic to expose the flux lines. Measure the distance between them at their furthest distance, usually the middle. That will give you the base or a harmonic distance of the frequency wave.
The strange wavehill hump points to the compwave. The pancake uses this as transmission media.

One more thought like this and I qualify for planetary expulsion.

--giantkiller.

text

Hi, pics to order take 4..
(http://C:%5CDocuments%20and%20Settings%5CAdmin%5CMy%20Documents%5Cscope%20coil.JPG)
(http://%5BC:%5CDocuments%20and%20Settings%5CAdmin%5CMy%20Documents%5Cscope%20typical.JPG/img%5D%3Cbr%20/%3E%5Bimg%5D)C:\Documents and Settings\Admin\My Documents\output.JPG

Missing pics coming,
(http://C:%5CDocuments%20and%20Settings%5CAdmin%5CMy%20Documents%5Cscope%20coil.JPG)

output light,

Finished microphone to fm synthesizer adapter amplifier for voice input to Superliminal Heterodyning Integration Transmitter.

GK

Quote:
Superliminal Heterodyning Integration Transmitter.
---------------------------------------

Next Time you go on vacation.

Can I carry your luggage around?

Sounds like your having to much fun??

Chet

PS
Szaxx
Is that a new coil ? or a pic of something from 2001[A Space Odessy]

PPS
Looks very familiar?

@Chet,
You can carry my luggage only if it is going the same direction I am going.  :D

Hi All,

@chet Nearly...its a design based on wilbert smiths cad coil or a variant i have been toying with... the idea is to get all even number loops on the top and all odd number loops on the base with the first loop finishing directly below the start point and then winding so the alternate ends finish up 1 notch BEFORE the last odd/even run.
sounds a bit confusing but nature likes things this way and then (theoretically) looking at the magnetic fields produced working in vectors of course and the effect I was hoping to create effects the outer field in a way to act as a magnetic bearing.
B field hopefully will orientate itself without twisting giving gain in the secondary...thats the general idea.
trying a pic.

(http://C:%5CDocuments%20and%20Settings%5CAdmin%5CMy%20Documents%5CThe%20coil.JPG)



the coil is 160mm OD and 95mm high cutting in 5mm slots each end. The notches are 1/4 inch apart making 80 in total. the wires go in at notch 31 loop around the back of the stud and out at 32. The wire goes in at the empty stud before the prevoius loop and out at the same exit the previous loops wire goes in.  They are built similar to the agent gates  way.
cheers ste

Hi,
Having a little trouble with this machine......
originally the scope shot first is the output 1 loop pickup on all shots.
Using a BU508 transistor it gave no output worth using.
the second shot. top tace is the output as clean as I could get it lit bulb. The lower trace is at the gate of the fet IRF840. When you increase the input fron zero the gate signal seems to go to near flatline ..further than that the spikes go mental over 400 volts out and theres lots of em too. Its powered with 12V batt and limited on current .3Amp or so shown. the bulb is low voltage but nearly burns out when input increadsed with little more drain from supply.
Interesting effects when changing freq using sine input.. the brilliance increases when shifting freq and the unit sings around 9KHZ but nothing is secure on the coil.output coil too tight to fit so will get it rewound as soon as poss.
Cheers for now Steve

Ken posted this in a chat session so I thought I would expose some more info.

What 2 driven wires do...

.

I switch direction connections and it makes no difference.

The TPUs are a resonance generator much like the rotoverter. The generator sits parallel to the engine. Each field complements the other by reflecting back back and forth. This is why the rotovertor model on the single shaft in series does not work. The single shaft does not convey the resonant field to the load nor vice versa.

GK

This [if the link connects] looks like a similar configuration to the above

Courtesy of "wings"

http://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=bg&tl=en&u=http%3A%2F%2Fmazeto.net%2Findex.php%3Ftopic%3D897.0

Chet

yes. ECD type

Quote from: ramset on 2010.02.15, 13:33:20
GK

This [if the link connects] looks like a similar configuration to the above

Courtesy of "wings"

http://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=bg&tl=en&u=http%3A%2F%2Fmazeto.net%2Findex.php%3Ftopic%3D897.0

Chet

The difference between the BTC(Bruce_tpu coil) and the GK4 is the BTC is sequenced in a circumferal field while the GK4 jacks a toroidal field.
The BTC heterodyning causes a precession of Bloch wall perturbations much like the Rodin coil. This is further enhanced by the interleaving of the control windings which are steel. The GK4 uses iron with radially dispersed control windings. Both create a bias field or flux field for additive control.
The BTC has a circumferal field created by the vertical steel control windings. The GK4 has a toroidal field created by the horizontal iron loops.
This is the main difference in geometry.

1 freq square wave. Have the GK4 Otto mobius winding diag that I will apply next..

I ran a square freq into the steel and another square freq into the copper with 120v across the coil.
The scope shows 12.7mghz. The pc speaker has a .5 second chirp window with what sounds like 1khz.
If I change one of the freq the GFI plug in the other room chatters off and on. But the PC never falters. ???

I am back on track with using 2 or 3 freqs and square waves doing the bifilar testing.

BruceTPU needs 3 freqs because he has 3 different control wire lengths and they are steel.
The GK4 needed 3 freqs because the collectors were iron and all control windings are the same length.
The sm17 showed antenna wire outer wrap of 2 wires, 2 freqs. Or a piece of iron wire in series with one of the runs. Only 1 freq needed to produce the comp wave on the outer wrap. This would impinge on the 3 horizontal rings in the antenna wrap.
If I can bang a GFI at a distance then hitting a copper loop in the vicinity should be no problem.
Another dangerous coil on the bench. This is why I stopped. The wife gets really pissed!

Think I'll play my guitar and let this settle on my mind a while.

Quote from: giantkiller on 2010.02.22, 04:30:09
If I change one of the freq the GFI plug in the other room chatters off and on. But the PC never falters. ???

@GK

If you add a center toroid, then the PC will turn on and off programs. lol

http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=8227.msg230142#msg230142

The 2 frequencies are 21hz and 200hz.

Quote from: wings on 2010.03.01, 12:18:19
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Opb0LvX7jZY&feature=player_embedded

Two things:
The ring configuration is in the vein of the ECD and the scope shot shows major promise. The ringing shows up symmetrically in the on time. But the off time has a higher peak to peak and faster oscillations. This is most important! The self oscillation start is in the off time. His scope shots show the same pattern I started with. The next test is to reduce the on time or change the on time to 25%. His signals are 75%/25%. You want the off time oscillations to overlap the back end of the on time ringing. In other words 'The two sets of waves will overlap'. ;) Then you see the consecutive spikes building. We push the swing at the correct time...
The constant DC at the back end of the on time stabilizes the polarity of the electron torque. All is quiet. This stops the oscillatory function. Then the off transistion has to start up again only to loose any reverberation that might happen. The reverb or echo is necessary to start an acoustic or wave tidal imposition. This whole process uses the established wave content or standing wave as a bias or stored energy. That is the constant resource that resonance supplies.

Here is what I have seen: The coil produces intense noise in the off time. If the duty cycle is lowered the next check is to see where the off time oscillatory function stops along the off time window. If it stops short of the impending on time occurance then 2 things have to occur. Change the input frequency or the coil winding/configuration. Sm stated he 'snipped wires'. This can happen in alot of ways and do alot of things.

Now the unfortunate news:
This is the feedback process that is like a teseract in a house of mirrors. You change one parameter then go to another part of the configuration and adjust something else. It could be electrical or mechanical. That is the nature of the beast. I got to this point and the next step is to work the power output stage. In other words: Once you have established the echo you then need a target. Whoa!

Previous efforts have attempted to drive a coil to get power. This is basic transformer action and will not work. Doesn't matter if you use square, sine, or spark gaps. Just because you step on the gas doesn't mean you'll make it around the corner faster. >:(

http://amasci.com/freenrg/a-vectFE.html (http://amasci.com/freenrg/a-vectFE.html)
http://amasci.com/tesla/tesceive.html (http://amasci.com/tesla/tesceive.html)

Yessir, I am going there next.

Will post new build test tonight. I have wound my antenna on a styrofoam core. I am curious about adding an electrostatic capacitor in the flux field. Also I have yet to charge up any styrofoam with a stun gun.

Quote from: wattsup on 2010.02.22, 05:54:05
@GK

If you add a center toroid, then the PC will turn on and off programs. lol

Combination Don Smith & Steven Mark coils.
This is an amalgamation of processes and configurations we have all seen. Nothing new here.

Also,
Standing wave model evident by the shape of the ship.



Air LED


The quarter wave length of the coil resonance should of the core radius.

Wound the bucking toroid in 10 minutes, fired up the controller and lit the led in less 1 minute. Setup was a snap.


Going back to the sport model with the dual pulse comp wave protocol with this tiny bucking toroid. I have a bigger one in the works on a 5" iron ring I bought from Ironhead. That one will have a bucking toroid inside another bucking toroid to the specs that Wattsup posted in OU.

I will start this one again. You can hear the bucking going on!

What if....
Two counter pulsed rings facing opposingly each produce the comp field. Use that effect to pulse the center bucking build that Wattsup is mentioning. The comp field is much higher in amplitude than the input voltage plus little current.
In reproducing Wattsup's BFpancake and bucking mag amp tests I have seen how easy it is to conceal the magamp in a small confine plus this little device, the bucking toroid, really does amplify. SM's bucking toroids are all the same unit. Obviously it is the real deal like Wattssup said.
Now with the opposing comp fields producing a greater magnetic force it produces a really compressed tight field between the 2 rings that snaps like electroctsatic discharge due to a very finite, and very pronounced, strong Bloch wall. This snap represents a high speed discharge and we know the reaction of coils to that. That snap becomes our striker that rings the bell. That bell emits frequencies to the out rings or compunds into the center secondary of the bucking toroid.

The bottom line is to produce a Bloch with a lot of magnetic pressure then use that strong force as our magnetic bias. The strong the Bloch wall then is the stronger that force equalling atomic matter or atomic/subatomic control.
And when we release the Excessive Bloch wall pressure? Mother nature takes over and puts the system back to equalibrium. And that can be read/captured also.

I now believe that the the Bloch wall compression, release, flipping is the bucking effect.

Add HV part of circuit and moved the fet push pull drivers to a better board. Applying this to the collector.
Testing with 1k, 3k, 4k freqs.
I need to diode bridge the HV sine to DC and raise the output voltage to 1500dc. I have uwave diodes good to 16kv/ .5amp(HVR-1)
I am integrating a Marx bank to supply the HV. Heading for 1500vdc for the collector.
With 1 single run collector I will have to search out a way to couple the collector energy off. A parallel run would have made it real easy. Want to maintain the dipole.
Will also add a cap to the collector for resonant LC attributes.

Diags for circuit.
On the doco list for additions are:
Add HV circuit
Make a full electronic schematic
Clarify the ground connections

Set up a testing protocol. Duty cycle not mentioned but will get this to 10 - 5 % ON time.
2 sets of tests exit: standard pulsing, induction, LC and anomolies.

http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=8227.msg251295#msg251295

I noticed an interesting pattern of discharge in the all the readings I have done:
The Tesla coil gets pumped up and produces multiple outward burts. Reports on functioning TPUs/coils report receiving lightning strikes.
The only difference is the direction of discharge.

Over the last 4 years I have stripped 9 monitors and have one sweet selection of HV caps, high wattage resistors, chokes, diodes, and transformers.

Also have dual scope probes rated at 4kv.

Building a Marx capacitor bank for 50kv upto 6a.

Have tried to used small NSTs for HVDC and they just don't cut it when rectified.

Using resistor ladder to subdivide current HV down to meter acceptable range.

The previous circuit is for standalone, self oscillating operation. I will meld the HV process into that circuit after the field jacking tests.

The plan is to apply up to 4kv on the collector at low current and modulate that field with adjustable DCV on the control coils. :)

Then tap off the collector. So far I have a 4kpf, 2kv cap inline with a 30kv diode.

https://www.gap-power.com/videos/videos.html

http://uvs-model.com/UVS%20on%20MM_experiment.htm

T.T.Brown applied high voltage to an aluminium plate which then registered lighter in weight.
He applied pulsing and this caused propulsion and velocity to a piece of mass.

Podkletnov removed the physical target then applied vectored pulsing which produced propulsion and acceleration to a magnetic density of mass but having no material properties. In other words no physical properties relating to a visible object. This magnetic mass then moved very quickly in a linear path.

Both of these men created a movable mass of high density.
T.T.Brown did not move a metal plate. It was deflected by the high density magnetic mass to a lower density area in space.

Steven Mark put this process in a ring. The Podkletnov process now becomes an inertial vortex. Time this correctly to spin the field. Place conductors in the travel path to collect the EMF.

The pulsing creates a higher density field in the high voltage, high density field of the bias. We also get fast pulse transistions which look like high density boundaries.

The plan is to use the high density flux field as a meduim for creation of rogue waves.

Have EC600 up and running.
Collector is powered at settings of 4kv, 5watts, 5ma with 100k ohm, 5watt in series.
Resistor temperature rises to +100 degrees Faren. Setup is finicky. Can't get to 4kv across coil unless resistor wattage is matched up with driving current.
Making adjustments to milliamps, volts and watts to find best setting for coil.
So far the EC600 looks bullet proof.
Next implication is to pulse the controls with 555 timer box as an initial setup. Then try dual pulse protocol under software control.

Can do:

QuoteGK,

Can't the EC600 be set to limit to 5mA? If so, you shouldn't need any resistance in series with the coil. Just use an output diode as ION mentioned.

.99

Have HV turned off for the moment to get the resonant rise going.


Also this just in from Jason:
www.r-charge.com/Nov2010.html (http://www.r-charge.com/Nov2010.html)

Circuit setup for next test.

GK,

Unless you are doing something a bit out of the ordinary, you will short circuit your 'SSR' as soon as you flip the switch or HV will get into the 'SSR'. From your drawing I can't tell if one or both will happen.

WW

When the ssrs conduct the upper diodes are bypassed. Then when the SSr are off the field gets stuck in the coils. The HV will be tamed to 5ma. More shock than conduction.

The SSR Jason created was using a MOSFet, best I recall. MOSFets can die if you drag your feet on the carpet before touching them. There is a fair amount of foot-dragging with your power supply.

I now have a digitally programmable sine wave generator. The problem is the LM7171 output won't drive a coil. I am designing a buffer, driver / amplifier to rectify this.
The lm7171 output is 8.7vac @ 100ma max. Its supply is +-5.5 regulated from a 2 battery supply of +11 -11 . I would like to use the whole 22v across the coil and drive the coil with a 3055 or tip41. The transistors won't turn on.
I am on the protoboard. If anybody has any submission it would save me time or give insight into other areas I am not thinking of.

GK,

I assume you want to pulse the coils?

If so, what are you using to convert the sine wave? A schematic of what your circuit is at the moment might be helpful in encouraging ideas.

.99

I have a dual channel sine wave generator with output from LM7171. In talking with Jason I decided to make a Darlington pair using a pn2222 to a 2n3055. This will give me a single supply operation with current drive.
I am using the resonance to build a self destructing resonant harmonic ocsillator using feedback instead of excess current. Having attained that I will then impart a control mechanism. 
http://mb-soft.com/public/hurrican.html

QuoteHarmonic resonance is the preeminent organizational principle of matter and
energy in the universe. Like life itself, harmonic resonance represents a rare
example where the entropy or disorder of a system is not increased, but is actually
reduced with the onset of resonance, a spontaneous emergence of ordered
spatial pattern out of a high entropy homogeneous medium. Harmonic resonance
is the force that binds waves into particles of matter, and it is the harmonic
resonance of chemical bonds that lock particles into bulk material substance. The
octet rule that makes atoms swap or share electrons in an attempt to form
complete outer shells, is itself a resonance phenomenon. A planet spinning on its
axis is a kind of round-and-round pendulum, a rotational resonance with the
surrounding universe, as is the orbit of a satellite around its planet, which can
range from a near circular orbit to an extreme back-and-forth pendulum motion.
Harmonic resonance is the force that organizes planets in their orbits, and stars in
their galaxies. And it is harmonic resonance that binds the individual activations of
countless billions of individual neurons into the coherent integrated framework of
experience and willful action that we call Mind.

The secondary winding is of interest here. If the form of the secondary is straight then a tube works fine. As the tube is made into ring spaces occur on the outer side due to the diameter of the minor radius, the tube itself and not the ring. The diameter of the ring gives more windings. When the minor radius is made small this enables more windings and closer proximity of the outer winding increasing the inductance. Use 30awg to increase the inductance further.
Another way to increase the inductance is to make the minor radius an elipse of elongated as in the picture. The example of this is the Don Smith and Steven Mark larger ring devices which show a greater promise of output.

QuoteHarmonic resonance is an extraordinarily diverse and varied phenomenon seen
in countless forms throughout the universe, from gravitational orbital resonances,
to electromagnetic oscillations, to acoustical vibrations in solids, liquids, and
gases, to laser resonance in light and microwaves. Harmonic resonance spans a
vast range of spatial scales, from the tiniest wave-like vibrations of the elemental
particles of matter, to orbital resonances that emerge from spinning disks of gas
and stars. But across this vast range of spatial scales and diverse media, there
are certain general properties of harmonic resonance that are common to all of
them. They all tend to oscillate at some characteristic frequency, and at its higher
harmonics, frequencies that are integer multiples of the fundamental frequency.
They all exhibit spatial standing waves, whose wavelength is inversely
proportional to their frequencies. They all tend to subdivide one, two, or threedimensional
spaces into equal intervals of alternating reciprocating forces
dynamically balanced against each other, with the twin properties of periodicity
and symmetry across every possible dimension of space and time. These, and
many other properties, are properties of resonance in the abstract, manifested
across all those diverse forms and media. Harmonic resonance is a higher order
organizational principle of physical matter, that transcends any particular
implementation in a physical medium. It is the properties of that transcendent,
more general concept of harmonic resonance that are the focus of this book,
because it is those transcendant properties that reveal the essential properties of
resonance itself, and explain how those properties lead to the emergence of mind
from brain.
The minimal prerequisite for harmonic resonance is some system that when
deflected from some rest state, or equilibrium condition, experiences a restoring
force that pushes it back toward that equilibrium state. Also required is some kind
of inertia, or momentum term, that makes it overshoot the equilibrium point and
pass on through, continuing on to a deflection of equal magnitude in the opposite
direction, from which point the restoring force will accelerate the system back
toward the equilibrium center again, setting up for repeating back and forth
oscillations that can continue indefinitely in the absence of frictional losses.

QuoteBut some of the most interesting aspects of
resonance occur as a distortion of that endless pattern, as the resonance resists
the distortion and tries to restore the symmetry of the perfect periodic pattern. In
the phenomenon of entrainment, two oscillators, like pendulum clocks hung next
to each other on a wall, will subtly distort each other's oscillations a bit at a time,
bending and warping each sinusoidal time trace until they are swinging in lockstep
counterphase harmony.

QuoteThe simple harmonic oscillator has another peculiarity that is of significance: it
responds not only to periodic forces applied at its natural fundamental frequency,
but it also responds to higher harmonics of that frequency. For example if a
pendulum, initially motionless, is tapped periodically at exactly double its
fundamental frequency at the moment it reaches the equilibrium point, it will begin
to swing half-cycles, making repeated excursions in one direction only, to reverse
abruptly at the equilibrium point as it rebounds off the next tap. Although it takes
precise tapping at precisely the right time and strength to achieve this kind of
motion, this peculiar property of the simple harmonic oscillator opens the
possibility for setting up pairs of identical pendulums swinging against each other,
colliding and rebounding off each other across the equilibrium point, creating a
double oscillation of mirror-symmetric motions at double the fundamental
frequency. In fact, any number of simple harmonic oscillators can be strung
together in this manner to create compound oscillator systems. For example
mass-and-spring oscillators can be chained together into a string of masses
connected by springs, each one a simple harmonic oscillator, but together they
form a complex compound oscillator that exhibits many more levels of resonance
than the simple harmonic components of which it is composed.

QuoteHowever only harmonically related frequencies form closed
trajectories, or static Lissajous figures. If the frequency fx is not an integer multiple
or fraction of fy then the pattern will cycle endlessly across the scope, a travelling
wave rather than a standing wave, never quite retracing exactly the same pattern.

QuoteOnce again we see a very simple system
composed of two independent oscillators, that produces a fantastically complex
repetoire of beautiful periodic and/or symmetrical patterns when combined.

QuoteThe electrostatic forces that hold atoms in their molecular places, act over a quite
limited range. But atoms also interact across much longer distances by the
principle of entrainment and resonance. An agitated atom in a lattice vibrates
energetically at its natural resonant frequency, and that tiny oscillating
electrostatic charge radiates energy outward in all directions as an
electromagnetic field, that appears in the form of a miniscule, but constantly
reciprocating force of modulated attraction or repulsion. That tiny alternating force
can be detected by a distant atom that happens to share exactly the same
resonant frequency, because the tiny pushes of the alternating field accumulate
over time, as when pushing a child on a swing with carefully timed shoves, and
thus the effect of that reciprocating field is magnified by orders of magnitude in
influence, compared to the static force of attraction or repulsion, whose effect is
negligable except at very short range.

I believe Steven Mark called it a new form of induction.
The gyrating, thumping of the TPU is harmonic resonance.
Steven Mark also stated that 'Bang on' was a bad thing.
It has also been stated the power line transformers blow because of impedance mismatch. One place is but the whole process is Harmonic.
Have achieved 'Bang on' with squares and sines. It ain't pretty...

QuoteThis "sea" of electrons thus behaves like an emergent larger object, an elastic object
on the size scale of the bulk material itself. The resonant frequency of this "sea" of
electrons, therefore, is not a property of the individual electrons of which it is
composed, but rather, it is a property of the larger global entity into which they are
seamlessly merged.

Sounds like Aether to me...

QuoteThe selective amplification of harmonic oscillations over chaotic or inharmonious
ones stems from the fact that the chaotic, random oscillations tend to cancel each
other out, whereas any coherence in the oscillations of groups of atoms will feed
back on itself each cycle, which eventually produces global coherent oscillations
from the energy of initially random noise.

Two coils driven in resonance 180 degrees out of phase. A reader or collector sandwiched in between.
The middle layer will be impedance mismatched.

Sounds like a MEG configuration.

QuoteThe wave equation captures the very essence of the higher order organizational principle behind
harmonic resonance that is common to all of the diverse physical manifestations
of resonance.

QuoteGiven the fact that Fourier theory shows that virtually any
waveform can be expressed to arbitrary precision as a sum of component
sinusoids, we see that virtually any waveform can be expressed in the form of
standing waves in a harmonic resonance representation, and those patterns that
have the properties of symmetry and periodicity can be most easily expressed
using only the lower harmonics that require the least energy.

http://www.falstad.com/modebox/ (http://www.falstad.com/modebox/)

@00:26 seconds...

Very interesting!

Our universe is indeed very "electric."

The speaker expresses thoughts which are very much
in line with what we're told in "The Book."  Our Creator
is an inexhaustible source of energy more enormous
than we can possibly imagine;  to whom all things are
possible.

We may not yet have the intellectual capacity to fully
comprehend the magnitude and the beauty of the entire
creation, but one day we will.  Each of us.

There are many, many "secrets" to be gradually revealed.

The 30awg quadrants of the GK4 are 3 ohms! The kit47(TDA2003) and kit 143(TDA2005) are usable drivers for 2 to 4 ohms! The kits are 6-10watts output.
SHWEEEEEET!
With 3 layers I have 12 speakers in a handheld package.
And in line with Keely I have 2 chord pairs. In each pair I will invert the phase of 1 chord against the other.
A chord is 3 notes. The Star of David is 2 chords. The Gk4 is comprised of 2 stars.
The Star of David is all over the Coral castle. The witnesses in Homestead heard tones.

I have in inventory: http://www.dualav.com/mobileaudio/xpa.php (http://www.dualav.com/mobileaudio/xpa.php)

600watts!

I am going to push some serious magnetic fields.

QuoteTrigger two oscillations with the right frequency and phase relation,
and you get a rotating pattern. This kind of dynamic pattern generation principle
could be used for example in motor control, to produce a rotary pattern of
muscular contraction, and in sensory systems, to capture or characterize the
rotation of a dynamically cycling waveform pattern by the phase relation between
its static harmonic components.

Quote from: giantkiller on 2011.01.06, 04:23:53
...

The witnesses in Homestead heard tones.
...

I am going to push some serious magnetic fields.

We too are listening!

GK,
Your really getting into this, sounds like a great setup! Are you wiring the two phase coils in series for 6 ohms or in parallel for 1.5 ohms. Remember the coils have to be set up in pairs for rotation, one pair per phase. So I assume you will have 6 phases then. I would probably just start off with one phase pair and make sure you are actually getting rotation with your hookup before moving on to multiple phases. Good luck.

Room

I have spent 5 years studying squares and sines in this new view. And it is nothing I ever learned in school.

On order are 2 dual channel audio amplifiers. Have programmable sines and phasing done on the DDS board.
Have tested the AVR and DDS board through a single channel TDA2003 board and it works fine.

I have yet to configure the GK4 for a 2 phase setup. That is next.

Have measured all twelve 30awg quadrants for ohmage and inductance. Going to measure natural resonance next.

http://web.archive.org/web/20110109224630/http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=1872.msg21431#msg21431

Hi GK,
I was wondering about the connections, parallel or series, because I had some trouble connecting to get rotation.  Apparently so did Tesla as he shows it two different ways in some of his patents. One way he shows, does not work, pay close attention to winding start marks (dots) I have shown on my schematics. If they are not connected to rotate, the field in the coils will just shift back and forth like AC and you will be scratching your head like me when I first tried it (built from the wrong Tesla drawings, yes he was not infallible).

Nice looking build, I hope the gaps between quadrants don't allow to much stray or lost field?

I will take note on the polarities.
Also if the windings need to cover more I can make those additions. It was incredibly easy to make in the first place.

Quote from: Room3327 on 2011.01.11, 19:53:57
Hi GK,
I was wondering about the connections, parallel or series, because I had some trouble connecting to get rotation.  Apparently so did Tesla as he shows it two different ways in some of his patents. One way he shows, does not work, pay close attention to winding start marks (dots) I have shown on my schematics. If they are not connected to rotate, the field in the coils will just shift back and forth like AC and you will be scratching your head like me when I first tried it (built from the wrong Tesla drawings, yes he was not infallible).

Nice looking build, I hope the gaps between quadrants don't allow to much stray or lost field?

Current build ans set up.

Smoked an LM7171BIM opamp. My bad. Did not have the negative 5v hooked up correctly.

Hi GK,
I think you have it connected wrong for rotation, it looks like the first configuration I tried and the field just shifts back and forth. I believe you need to connect the opposite coils criss cross to get the rotating field.

Room

I agree. The one you are talking about is the Swaztika configuration.
I was going to try what I posted first. But definitely both configurations.
I repost Otto's wiring scheme of the GK4 initially.

While I wait for DDS board replacement parts I am going to switch to the Keely controller.

Quote from: Room3327 on 2011.01.15, 19:34:21
Hi GK,
I think you have it connected wrong for rotation, it looks like the first configuration I tried and the field just shifts back and forth. I believe you need to connect the opposite coils criss cross to get the rotating field.

Room

You got it GK,
The last graphic above is correct, but definately try it the other way just to see the difference.

I can only go down to 13hz on my xr2206 based Keely controller, though. But this is ok for now.

I will reproduce Room3327's LSR spec here since this is current build.
I will show progress tracking.

Currently focused on the phase shift part of the circuit.

Have dual 8vpp @ 90 degree phasing. Current build is running at 417hz-arbitrary just to get signal through circuit to GK4.
I get 40 degree static deflection on compass.
Next step is find resonant frequency of the 2 phase sides of coil unit.
Then spin field.

No doubt I have to lower the operating frequency to get the compass to entrain. This will also involve changing the cap values in the phasing circuit.

I got shweet here.

I had this coil config setup [bucking] so i ran it. The compass turns to ccw to -40 degrees.
(http://www.overunityresearch.com/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=33.0;attach=3127;image)

I will reconfig the coil to 2nd diagram a [rotational]:
(http://www.overunityresearch.com/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=33.0;attach=3129;image)

GK4 configured as diagram #2 [rotational].
Compass is deflected 180 degrees. The frequency used is 4.9k. Replaced the 1uf with the .01uf.
The amplifier TDA2005 bandwidth is 15hz to 50khz.

Next step:
Find resonant frequency of each quadrant then add caps for that LC tank configuration.
My hope is that the resonation will compensate for the gaps in the control windings.

Where the phasing crosses there is a node created and it shows up on the scope.

SM said 'No' to my 20 foot diameter audio ring connected to a stun gun. But if you look at the SM17 there is twenty feet of cord in those large hoops. Now if we shock those we would get a high speed effective aperture. I wanted to know if we push away the natural magnetic force and when it returns we effectively have many lines (Flux) crossing a fewer lines (copper). See what my youtubes all point to now? When I saw the large white sparks on the SM17 video I knew it was a stun gun circuit driving it and I was trying to fit this against a tuned circuit with a return force. This is where I am headed with this current effort. It is a combination of all things discussed here and closely fits the SM17 physical design. With the large capacitors, the large diodes and the assumed 'Closed' spark gap device it sure looks like the stun gun circuit to a tuned ring, no? That would make it a horizontal ringed Tesla coil. The discharge we never seen but it thumps. Same thing. And it fits the simple circuit as most have tauted because we already know this design. This is why I posted this here.

A charge pulse circuit with a coil, a diode, a neon bulb to a secondary. The shock wave that hits the secondary is minor current and huge voltage. This rings the secondary into a greater force. The magnetic field is held outward until this coil setup subsides and then is snaps back. No?

In looking at a copper core in comparison to an iron core the field of the copper exists outside and is more available for manipulation. When using an iron core the power gets stuck in the core like the Leedskalnin permanent magnetic holder. The course or path has to be broken for the current to escape to an alternate path like the LED.
With the copper core there is major Bloch wall dynamics going on. Do you agree and or can you see this?

Biasing a copper core is one of the next additions I will inject into the test. I have a 3 layer copper core build but it is trinary phase or 120 degree.

I also think that a compass would entrain to the copper core field since the energy is not saturating the core.

I did post the two phase mix in the iron core and there is a spike where the phases cross in opposition. One would there would be nullification. But I contend that is an artifact of  Bloch wall manipulation or stressing natural forces.

Surface area to manipulate now exists between the center clockwise north field and the outer counterclockwise south field.

Giantkiller:

If the blue in your diagram represents the magnetic flux like you would get in a toroidal inductor, then indeed it's accurate to say that if the flux in the center runs clockwise then the vestigial flux outside the toroid runs counterclockwise.

However, it's inaccurate to say one flux path is a "north field" and the other flux path is a "south field."  It's sometimes difficult to grasp that there is no north field and south field when it comes to a magnet.  They are just naming conventions to make it easier to discuss magnetic fields.

The "north field" clockwise flux path is both "north" and "south" at the same time.  If you sliced the toroid in two along the radial axis like you would break a doughnut apart in your hands, all of a sudden you would have a north-south half-doughnut facing a south-north half-doughnut.

In effect there is an infinity of north-south magnets within the flux path if you imagine making two arbitrary radial slices through the toroid. It's the same idea where if you slice up a bar magnet each individual slice becomes a brand-new north-south magnet.  No matter how you slice it up you create new north-south magnets.

MileHigh

Thanks.
I realize N & S map to a planetary or orbital axis as arbitrary labels. I put those in there just as labels.
It is the rest of the description that is of greater importance.

GK201102 fully wound and connected in 2 phase drive.

I now see how the top edge of the SM17 was formed.

Field representation

Current test of current build.

@GK

How you do'in bro. Nice vid and nice build. I have one almost like yours but my center copper core is full. Yours with top and bottom horizontals is a good move.

You may want to try this frequency generator that I put on my OU FTP site.
http://purco.qc.ca/ftp/Software/frequency-generator/

You can use your sound card output via an amp and then have left/right pulses with phase control up to 20khz.

The sound you are showing is very normal when using sound waves. Sine waves with variable amplitude. You should be able to hear up to 5khz, high pitch then nothing above that. Very normal for loose coil winds.

But what I am more interested in is your mention of the nodes. So take the top and  bottom horizontals. Connect one end of each inverse to the other and together as ground or common. Then put your left and right outputs to the other ends. Try pulsing those horizontals and see what type of output you will get from your outer coils. the horizontals will create a node point on each of the verticals that should be reversing polarity from top to bottom. You can then see the difference with your outer coils in quads parallel, halves parallel or all in series. This will give you a good base to see how the nodes either are additive or of canceling nature since this is what I am thinking now for my next build.

So imagine your same build but your outer coils are all connected together with a top ring and a bottom ring, thus making all the verticals in parallel. This way when the inner top and bottom horizontals are pulsed the reaction of the nodes on the verticals can immediately exit the wires and collect on the parallel rings.

This instead of having that energy try to make its way out of a complete quad, half or complete winding. You see, what I think will happen in the first test is that a good portion of the impulses will be lost in cancellation since some will be pushing against others and only the subset or remainder of all those push/pull effect will make it out of the winding. Whereas if all the verticals are in parallel, there is almost zero holding them back from exiting their appropriate polarity.

When I get my build done on this hopefully this week, I will make a video of it. I am trying to see if such a scheme can help Bruce_TPU at OU.

wattsup

@WU,
Great. I will download the software and put it on my Acer.

I have a few more steps to comply with Room's schematic for the phase pulsing.
Then I can connect this build up in more ways.
But at that point I need to mount this down with better connectors. Then I can change connections faster. The topology will be in a star or octopus layout. The testing should speed up to a quicker pace.
I find it hard to work in a rat's nest of leads.

I will diagram up your current description for a visual. You are the Node Master so I can see what you are telling.
Thanks for the 'Answer to the call' here. There are a number of combinations possible with this build and I believe the many windings of small gauge wire does most of the trick. This is a programmbale Tesla coil with the head biting the tail. Harvesting an EMP.

Pulsing sequential segments to spin a compass is misleading. Camster spun a compass with a pancake coil. Entrainment/micro magnetic not macro magnetic connection.

This protocol here can help Bruce. He is performing by fixed frequency and focusing on wire length where the greater flexibility can start with variable frequency control.

Quote from: giantkiller on 2011.02.08, 18:21:57
@WU,
This protocol here can help Bruce. He is performing by fixed frequency and focusing on wire length where the greater flexibility can start with variable frequency control.

Yes I agree. I am also worried that his fixed method will run into some dead ends that he will not be able to see past. For now I think it is just important to let him do his thing and bring forth some of his results. Only after that would I consider bringing some new things to the table because before that, we risk detouring his effort. I must say that his methodology is very precise and even though some have posted objections, he is holding strong to his orientation. The distraction factor can get very high at times.

wattsup

GK,

You mentioned that you were monitoring something with your scope as well. Would that be the output of the TDA2005 by any chance? If so, does it look clean, and with what wave form are you driving this with?

It sure seems odd that you were always getting a string of harmonics, in particular the second harmonic. A strong second harmonic appearing would indicate that you are driving with a sine wave, and the TDA2005 is distorting one half of the wave.

.99

The outputs were clean sine waves. I did see that the second and nth harmonics appeared.
I had to label the coil ends and measure the coil henries. I disconnected the coils and reconnected with 2.2uf caps for LC tanking test.
I can go back and retest that, if need be. It was just a start up test.

Whenever I have to change frequency I have to go back and adjust the lead lag phase adjust and the volume of the TDA2005 board..

This is what previous testing has shown me:
The GK201102 was hooked in a semi bucking mode. I have found that this is a good initial trial. Here is why:
The bucking congifuration on iron core needs high amperage to get the field far enough outside to move matter like wire.
The more iron in a core like a multiple turn iron core needs more power to make the windings sing. But this is even tough to do because the small awg will burn up. To advertise the coil activity use a magnet placed next to the coil.
With an air core the windings are more available to move so the sound is audible.

Quote from: wattsup on 2011.02.08, 13:21:07
@GK

But what I am more interested in is your mention of the nodes. So take the top and  bottom horizontals. Connect one end of each inverse to the other and together as ground or common. Then put your left and right outputs to the other ends. Try pulsing those horizontals and see what type of output you will get from your outer coils. the horizontals will create a node point on each of the verticals that should be reversing polarity from top to bottom. You can then see the difference with your outer coils in quads parallel, halves parallel or all in series. This will give you a good base to see how the nodes either are additive or of canceling nature since this is what I am thinking now for my next build.

So imagine your same build but your outer coils are all connected together with a top ring and a bottom ring, thus making all the verticals in parallel. This way when the inner top and bottom horizontals are pulsed the reaction of the nodes on the verticals can immediately exit the wires and collect on the parallel rings.

This instead of having that energy try to make its way out of a complete quad, half or complete winding. You see, what I think will happen in the first test is that a good portion of the impulses will be lost in cancellation since some will be pushing against others and only the subset or remainder of all those push/pull effect will make it out of the winding. Whereas if all the verticals are in parallel, there is almost zero holding them back from exiting their appropriate polarity.
wattsup

I will also wire each horizontal loop wired in series to a biphase segment to bias the other layer or its own collector.
Much like Otto showed with the GK4.  8)

I have been getting great feedback from a number of you. Thanks. I listen. The combinations for this build that are in line with the TPU oeration are phenominal.
I did get the 30awg leads labeled and numbered the connecting terminal blocks. These are in a position to mount to a work plate. But just having them labeled makes a huge difference in set up speed. I found that too many small gauge wires are not trackable by me.  :D


http://www.youtube.com/user/AlienScientist#p/a/f/1/KfVS-npfVuY (http://www.youtube.com/user/AlienScientist#p/a/f/1/KfVS-npfVuY)

Here is a wiring diagram:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Resonant_inductive_coupling

QuoteWhile many transformers employ resonance, this type has a high Q and is often air cored to avoid 'iron' losses.  The two coils may exist as a single piece of equipment or comprise two separate pieces of equipment.

Losses? Energy is absorbed. It is not lost but needs to extracted in a different manner is all. Or use air core to have the power readily available.

SM mentioned 'New type of inductive coupling'. From what I have seen the inductive resonance isn't used much except in OU type applications.

Pertaining to the output of Choir groups, the audience feels the sounding notes of impact when the singers are harmonically in synch. The audience feels the power blast but the singers did not raise their volume.

I am now using the Frequency generator program posted by Wattsup.
This allow the faster frequency sweep than Room3327's lead-lag phase adjustment.
A reader coil is on the bottom.
This setup is now good to go. I found the resonant freq of the secondary biphase 30awg of ~12k.
Next step is to calc the length and turns of the 22awg primary and and the trinary 'head' coil.
The 30awg winding picks up everything. It is a very sensitive antenna. It took about 12 hours.

Left and right channel frequency and volume. At 90d phase.
1   12115   35.7065967002153   12115   35.7065967002153

That coil must have taken quite some time and effort to make GK.

What is the significance of those numbers?

.99

Final stages finished.
Programmable primary and trinary. Silver coated copper.

Hi @GK,

Looking good ma man.
The ability of those two outer coils to slide to different areas of the ring is a very good idea for flexibility in testing.
Can you indicate how you plan to start driving this although I know the options are so great.

However you drive it, try to find a fast acting diode and a good sized uF capacitor as your load. If you have a 150000 uF 16 VDC or more capacitor, this will permit you to capture even the high voltage and high frequencies and have the capacitor stabilize it for reading. Put a volt meter on the capacitor. Then put a scope probe on that output. This will give you your output readings and help you find the most energy producing effects to compare different pulsing schemes.

I cannot build for a few days for personal stuff. After Wednesday, I will make two new coils and post them here just to show you what I have planned for a bigger build as next move. Hopefully by them you will have some results of preliminary testing.

Oh, a few days ago I purchased a HP AGILENT 8116A 1-50 MHZ PULSE/FUNCTION GENERATOR for 350cdn landed.
They are going for too high a price these days so this one was good to get.
This will go with my other one at 20mhz and now I want to buy a third up to 500mhz. Then I can play some triolets.
Then I can test more ways faster.

Since my brother is an avid E-bay seller, I will be putting my EC600-90 up for sale since it does not do what I want. I will give him some other equipment to put up for sale because I am not using them and I am starting to look for more space. This summer I will have a garage built and transfer everything there. I want to make a large coil grid where you have a good 20 types of coils and connected to a patch system so you can put any or all on online by the push of a button and do some great testing.

Speak to you soon,

wattsup

The number of designs I have seen over the years fall into 2 camps.
Spark gaps and High Q resonance. Combine both of these and you get tremendous effects into the environment.

Using square waves into coils produces EMP and other emmisions, strictly spurious harmonics or flying monkeys. This area is real easy to create WMDs. I do this in my sleep.
Using square waves to charge a circuit for a spark gap is the easiest way to generate the high impact for a coil. The series LC is the control gate or window for the output frequency.
Using sine waves to charge an LC loop to create the spark gap necessitates the need for a cheap sine wave generator. Many avoid this because of the 555 for square waves is just plain easier.
Using a sine wave to resonate high Q to clearly transmit at 95% and above is the purest of finesse. This gives the strongest control of the media. There is better control of the matching of the destination resonant frequency with the generation frequency and this is the key to manipulating the reality we live in.
With radio we take an input, impress it into a resonate relationship, the correct frequency to surrounding space, and ship it out. This shipping is a good match of the 2 factors of exercising the environment for the the greatest distance to a destination. At the destination the exact opposite occurs. We extract the information from the carrier.
Let's overlay this process onto the TPU. We put the receiver inside the transmitter to achieve near field reception and near field feedback.
Mobiously well done...

Stranded silver coated copper of two horizontal layers. Why copper? Because I want to affect the magnetic field for my purpose and the storage has no losses in the core. There is no latency or dimunation like ferrous type materials. My current build in the diagram is 2 tesla coils side by side. The multipactor is 2 multipactors side by side.
In other words instead of manipulating a force or a set of parameters in a ferrous material I can affect with a different set of parameters by sliding the yellow primaries to different postions. Why? This has not been in the OU camp that I have seen and I see this as another tool to try to pry the logic from the mystery. It can be done and this will then hopefully get me or us past the extraction point to play with the next or higher set of parameters. To actually affect physical parameters of objects in this physical reality. Not too big of a request I hope. I want to reproduce the Hutchison effect with exacting processes.

The mindset of 'Needing' current is incorrect.

Uh oh I can hear it now.

How else can a bulb be lit with one wire? Kinetic force. We don't burn the destination, we shake it.

I repeat, uh oh.

We shake it?
This is what the kinetic force does by application of very, very fast, high speed, high frequency pulses or spark gaps. Same thing. Uh oh...

All the circuits that are mysterious all have the same thing. High speed switching, heterodyning multiple frequencies or spark gaps.
Why are there so many arguments over this application? If the device has this aspect included in it then the viewer that is suspicious or argumentative should take a deeper look. Who dare would argue with Tesla, Dollard, Moray, Smith, EVGray or Hutchison? They all have spark gaps. Hello?
Tesla production was with spark gaps which propelled his circuits into resonance. Hutchison goes one step farther by application of the resonance to produce molecular stress using Tesla coils. Keely is the grand daddy of them all by applying high frequencies created from metal spheres, very high frequencies and applying them to stress the molecular bonds.

Does any body else see this? Am I alone in this vigil?
http://www.antenna-theory.com/basics/aperture.php (http://www.antenna-theory.com/basics/aperture.php)
http://amasci.com/tesla/tesceive.html (http://amasci.com/tesla/tesceive.html)

Quotehttp://www.intalek.com/Index/Projects/SparkGapExp/SparkGapExp.htm

Quotehttp://tlt.its.psu.edu/mto/energy/sparkgap.html

QuoteNOT CRACKPOTTY AFTER ALL
Note that this does not violate any rules of conventional physics. If we add stronger EM fields, they sum with the incoming EM plane waves and cause these radio waves to bend towards the tiny antenna, and the antenna absorbs them. This increases the antenna's EA (effective area, or effective aperture.) We can use this process to alter the coupling between the antenna and the surrounding space, but the total energy still follows the conservation law. The altered fields only change the "virtual size" or EA of the antenna.

More importantly, the phenomenon is quite limited. We can only use it with electrically "small" antennas. We cannot increase the "virtual size" much beyond a quarter wavelength for the waves involved. If we already have a large 1/2-wave dipole, then no matter how large is our artificially-add AC voltage, we cannot make it absorb more incoming waves. However, if we have an extremely small antenna, say, a 10KHz loop antenna the size of a pie plate, we can make that antenna seem very, very large indeed. Think like this: how large is the diameter of the antenna's nearfield region at 10KHz? Around 10 kilometers? What if we could extract half of the incoming energy from that entire volume?!! In theory we can: half can be absorbed, and the other half scattered. In theory a tiny loop antenna sitting on your lab bench can intercept just as much energy as a longwire 1/2-wave antenna which is 10KM long. Bizarre, eh?

QuoteBUT HOW DO ATOMS DO IT?
OK, if this supposedly explains how tiny atoms can receive long light waves, how can we increase the voltage signal to a SINGLE ATOM?! Actually it's not difficult. No angstrom-sized radio transmitter is needed. The key is to use EM energy stored as oscillating fields; i.e. resonance.

If an atom resonates electromagnetically at the same frequency as the incident light waves, then, from a Classical standpoint, that atom's internal resonator will store EM energy accumulated from the incoming waves. It will then behave as an oscillator, becoming surrounded by an increasingly strong AC electromagnetic field as time goes by. (Quantum Mechanics might say that the atom is surrounded by virtual photons at the resonant frequency.) If this alternating field is locked into the correct phase with the incoming light wave, then the atom's fields can interact with the light waves' fields and cancel out quite a bit of the light energy present in the nearfield region around the atom. The energy doesn't vanish, instead it ends up INSIDE the atom. Half of the energy goes into kicking an electron to a higher level, and the other half is re-emitted as "scattered" waves.


By resonantly creating an "anti-wave", which superposes with incoming waves and bends them towards the atom, the tiny atom has "sucked energy" out of the enormously long light waves as they go by. And since the atom has no conventional copper coils inside it wasting energy, it can build up some really strong fields which allow it to behave extremely "large" when compared to it's physical diameter.

Or is this all just a circle jerk? Uh oh.

http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/tesla/esp_tesla_17.htm (http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/tesla/esp_tesla_17.htm)

Analysing the conguration between the AC source coil and the primary of the output stage.
I can hide a neon bulb in a black box.


Two different views of the same thing that most cannot even conceive of:

What dreams are made of...

QuoteMagnifier Transmitter

Of a truth, dielectric energy was native source of incredible proportion and virtually eternal duration. Able to use such a kinetic source, one could dispense entirely with the Power Transmitters necessary in stimulating and impressing "extra pulsations" on the aether flow. Tesla often defined the dielectric field as a natural flow of aether particles, one that seemed impossible to utilize through lack of appropriate resistive materials. In order to obtain momentum from the flowing particles of a dielectric field, one required special matter poised in equally special symmetries. The otherwise continuous flow could be absorbed directly, being exchanged to utilities, appliances, and other applications.

Tesla had already considered the condition of charged particles, each representing a tightly constricted whorl of aether. The force necessarily exerted at close distances by such aetheric constrictions was incalculably large. Aetheric ponderance maintained particulate stability. Crystalline lattices were therefore places within which one could expect to find unexpected voltages. Indeed, the high voltages inherent in certain metallic lattices, intra-atomic field energies, are enormous. The close Coulomb gradient between atomic centers are electrostatic potentials reaching humanly unattainable levels. By comparison, the voltages, which Tesla once succeeded in releasing, were quite insignificant. In these balanced lattices, Tesla sought the voltages needed to initiate directed aetheric streams in matter. Once such a flow began, one could simply tap the stream for power.

In certain materials, these aether streams might automatically produce the contaminating electrons, a source of energy for existing appliances. One could theoretically then "tailor" the materials needed to produce unexpected aetheric power with or without the attendant detrital particles. Tesla did mention the latent aetheric power of charge forces, the explosive potentials of bound aether, and the aetheric Power inherent in matter. In these studies, Tesla sought replacement for the 100,000,000 volt initiating pulses which natural law required for the implementation of space aether. Tesla had long been forced to abandon those gigantic means by other, less natural laws.

Thereafter, Tesla shifted his attentions from the appreciation of the gigantic to an appreciation of the miniature. He sought a means for proliferating an immense number of small and compact aether power receivers. With one such device, Tesla succeeded in obtaining power to drive an electric car. But for the exceptional account, which follows, we would have little information on this last period in Tesla's productive life, one that very apparently did not cease its prolific streams of creativity to his last breath. The information comes through an unlikely source, one rarely mentioned by Tesla biographers. It chanced that an aeronautical engineer, Derek Ahlers, met with one of Tesla's nephews then living in New York. Theirs was an acquaintance lasting some 10 years, consisting largely of anecdotal commentaries on Dr. Tesla. Mr. Savo provided an enormous fund of knowledge concerning many episodes in Tesla's last years.

http://www.kryon.com/k_26.html (http://www.kryon.com/k_26.html)

QuoteTHE COSMIC LATTICE

We wish to tell you this night of a specific kind of energy. We wish to tell you this night of what some of you will think of as an object, but it is not—it is a phenomenon. It is something so common that it is around all of you, yet so mysterious that few know of it. It is the missing piece of energy that you have been looking for so long. It is the energy of love. It is the energy of Spirit. It is the energy of the Universe and we are speaking this night of something in English that we will call "The Cosmic Lattice." I will dole out this information carefully and slowly to my partner so that you will understand what it is and how it works. And before this meeting is finished this night you will understand how it applies to you.

It is very common in the teaching of Kryon that we start with the big and go down to the small so that you will understand the overview and how it affects the human heart. The Cosmic Lattice, dear ones, is the common denominator of the unified energy source of the Universe. The common denominator—meaning that all things emanate from The Cosmic Lattice. It is difficult to define this all at once, so we will tell you its many attributes slowly this night. The Cosmic Lattice is everywhere. It is throughout the Universe. Everything that you can see and everything you cannot see contains the lattice. From the smallest particles of your physics, and from the electron haze forward, The Cosmic Lattice is present. Those of you in physics will begin to understand and recognize this principle, and it will start to make sense as to what this lattice actually is.

SIZE

Let us first begin with its size. This is only appropriate, even before we define how it works and what it is. The Cosmic Lattice is the largest energy you have ever conceived of. It encompasses the entire Universe and more. It is present everywhere. There is no place that you can conceive of—no matter what the dimension—that is without the lattice. The Cosmic Lattice is perhaps what you could call the consciousness of God and yet it is physics and it is energy and it contains conscious love. Therefore, what we are telling you is that it is pervasive everywhere and encompasses the entire universe, including all dimensions. Can you conceive of something so large? As far as you can see in the skies—as far as any astronomer can gather light over ours on a photographic plate—The Cosmic Lattice is already there. And yet it has one single consciousness all at the same time—always at the same time. Distance is nothing to The Cosmic Lattice and this, my partner, is where things get difficult to explain.

Worthy of saving...

QuoteI will preface this post with a comment,
Grumpy I will delete Posts you feel are Off topic here
Or I won't post anything here if you wish!
And no offence will be taken [even if implied!:}

Q2 Comments on a post from Wattsup, where he  made some observations on Q2
Quote:
quarktoo

If you were not so completely ignorant and crazy, you would be conscious enough to realize I am a lap ahead of you on this.

The foam coming out the end of the coil is the dielectric insulator. It is called a home made HV polystyrene capacitor {deleted Nasty]

http://cgi.ebay.com/3-x-30kV-1000pF-High-Voltage-capacitors-HV-HAM-audio-/150565681562?pt=LH_DefaultDomain_0&hash=item230e69f99a#ht_2388wt_982

In the SR193 device and others, they are using bifilar wound coils and using the inductive capacitance between winds as a capacitor {Same Nasty with more vitriol "deleted"]

When the spark gap fires, it is the same effect as explosive used the flux compression generator just like I stated {concentrated Nasty Deleted]

I guess you were one of those people that was too stupid to notice that there is a tan wire going into the first layer of the SR193 device on one end and it magically comes out as a blue wire on the other end weren't you [The last Nasty in this theme Deleted ]

I'm not going to disclose any more on how this thing works because quite frankly, you are too stupid to work with high voltage and compressed magnetic energy and don't deserve the help.

If you want to help, stop posting since all you do is drive the smart people away.

Yeah... Just ignore Kapanadze's finger pointing at a cold war EMP device while he explians how it works and where he got the information...  Just ignore that coper 1 turn tube running through the center of the coil... Just ignore that high voltage GTK wire being used on his coil... just ignore the same coil shape and parts configuration between the Russian EMP and Los Alamos devices... and instead, believe a rumor that some idiot calling himself wattsup heard on-line... That a magical hidden spark gap is what makes it all work.

{Deleted A gardening tip From Q2 here {Off Topic}

EDIT  { edit to edit ,thats not my edit its Q2's]

I told you to read the Vladimir Utkin stuff. Maybe Wattsup was too stupid to find a link. Here:

http://www.slock.co.cc/kapanadze/FREE.pdf

--------------------------------------------------------------


also I asked q2 a question His responce,

Quarktoo
Whats A "magnetic seed"?
Home Depot doesn't seem to stock any?
Chet

Q2 quote:


You just don't know where to look. You need something to produce a magnetic field to move the voltage field. Notice on the 3K kapanadze device how the ends of the coil are larger? Seeds? I would look at the ferrite ring magnet section near the fasteners.

Ferrite ceramic ring magnets used in speakers have coils wound around them but do not lose their magnetic fields because they are tough like me.

The people you need to be listening to are DOLE, StiveP and a few others. I moved on from this days ago and am back to working on another project. I just stopped in to see what was going on and happened to notice the { a nasty deleted here] was trying to defend his inability to back up his claim by dismissing my claim that is backed up by Kapanadzi himself.

Here, I'll make it easy on you. Search and find this file. "free-energy.geo.avi"

Go to 90% towards the end and you see the part that was not on youtube. Kapanadze explains how it works or where he got the idea when he apparently sold out.

_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_---_-_----

The How its Done post
Q2
Quote:

The principle of operation of the Kapanadze device is simple. You build up an electrostatic field between windings of a bilar coil, or a steyrofoam capacitor in the core, or many other methods. Then you blast that down the core and pickup coil with a electromagnetic field.

If you look at that last schematic I re-posted, you see how the modulation coil opposes the blast coil (Bloch wall) and how the blast coil is wound unidirectional I.e., like Norm Wootan coil from years ago. (Acceleration???) Notice how SR193 has a stack of ring magnets on the end acting as backing iron.

Without gnd connected the output measures 510mvp-p.

@GK

What you see here is a beat frequency of 1, because only 1 hertz between both.

Try it up to 7 or 8 hertz spread will give you more aggressive shifting but I find any higher and it lessens.

Also, try to off phase one side by 6-8 degrees only.

Then try the F1 and F2 to start on same side with ground on the other side. So both horizontals receive their frequency from the same side but slightly off phase. This will give you an up and down pulse hitting on the outer red coil. I think in the reverse way you are doing it may be making cancellations in the verticals. You want to push everything the same way.

wattsup

I saw the aggressive beat frequency at that spread and the diminishing at anything higher.
The 7 to 8 hz is the Schumann resonancy.
I also have the combination of different connections in the list next so all the fields go the same way.
Thought I'd post a step of progress. One of these nights I plan to open up the ceiling to let the lightnining in. Muwhahaha...

Quote from: wattsup on 2011.03.01, 06:33:00
@GK

What you see here is a beat frequency of 1, because only 1 hertz between both.

Try it up to 7 or 8 hertz spread will give you more aggressive shifting but I find any higher and it lessens.

Also, try to off phase one side by 6-8 degrees only.

Then try the F1 and F2 to start on same side with ground on the other side. So both horizontals receive their frequency from the same side but slightly off phase. This will give you an up and down pulse hitting on the outer red coil. I think in the reverse way you are doing it may be making cancellations in the verticals. You want to push everything the same way.

wattsup

Both Horizontals are pulsed with sine waves in same direction.
Beat frequency of 10 at 18,006hz and 18,016hz,
Phase of 6.3 and this trace just jumped out of the scope.
Very tight parameters for tuning  high number of turns of 30awg.
Again: 90 coupling... ;)



Slower time per division:


Frequency generator data:
1   18006   42.0074109023513   18011   42.0074109023513

I noticed the FTPU pics on the 'new observations' thread has three horizontals. This leads me to think of adding another around the outside of my gk201102 coil. I am curious if that would be different than having it inside the windings. My gut tells me yes. I will make another if I have to.

Quote from: wattsup on 2011.03.01, 06:33:00
@GK

What you see here is a beat frequency of 1, because only 1 hertz between both.

Try it up to 7 or 8 hertz spread will give you more aggressive shifting but I find any higher and it lessens.

Also, try to off phase one side by 6-8 degrees only.

Then try the F1 and F2 to start on same side with ground on the other side. So both horizontals receive their frequency from the same side but slightly off phase. This will give you an up and down pulse hitting on the outer red coil. I think in the reverse way you are doing it may be making cancellations in the verticals. You want to push everything the same way.

wattsup

@GK

Also, before you make any changes to the build please try this.

This may create multiples in the loop. You may have a hard time catching this on the scope because it moves.

wattsup

I lifted ground from the scope and the p-p vout rose to 1,24 vp-p.
I lifted ground from the horizontals and the volt p-p is 3.24v.

Next I will add one of the yellow driver primaries between the cap negative and the red secondary.

Schematic updated. Looks like the center of the stun gun circuit.

Added the inclusion of the yellow primary in the loop.
This raised the scope voltage display to 4.5vp-p. Am only reading half the red secondary.
I consider this an important finding in the creation of the allusive looping.
The yellow I included is on the other half of the red secondary.
I will include the other secondary half next.
This next setup will create a cross coupling of the primaries to opposite secondaries. A mobious type configuration.

http://www.spaceandmotion.com/quantum-theory-max-planck-quotes.htm
http://www.lucypringle.co.uk/articles/worth-the-effort-2010/

Ouch...

QuoteAny intelligent fool can make things bigger, more complex, and more violent.
It takes a touch of genius - and a lot of courage - to move in the opposite direction.
(Albert Einstein)

Simplicity is the ultimate sophistication.
(Leonardo da Vinci)

A selection of configurations.

Partial schematic supplied from SM
This has 2 drivers facing each other
http://www.overunityresearch.com/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=33.0;attach=2325

Bifilar supplied from Wattsup
This has 2 drivers facing each other
http://www.overunityresearch.com/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=33.0;attach=4065

Fet triggering with ghost pulsing supplied by Peterae
This is a noisy dual pulse protocol
http://www.overunityresearch.com/index.php?topic=356.msg5028#msg5028

Regenerative feedback supplied by EM
http://www.overunityresearch.com/index.php?topic=356.msg11178#msg11178

Effective aperture supplied by EMdevices
This is the external feedback loop caused by an internal feedback loop
http://www.overunityresearch.com/index.php?topic=356.msg11190#msg11190

The 2 drivers facing each other cause a virtual sparkgap. I believe this is part of the center toroid thingy.
This is easily pickuped by a perpendicular winding and can be part of the loopback. But what about using larger loops?
When I stated to SM that I wanted to place a 20 foot loop on stun gun terminals by an airport he said 'No'.

My thinking is what I have currently is 2 pieces of the puzzle but that each piece sits at different places than what I have configured. There would be another stage between the 2 pieces I have and there would be an output stage. But I can't place it just yet. The post by EM fits in this configuration. I have the large loops from a setup I did with Bruce_TPU and am thinking of applying EMs schematic to it.

Another thing I see is that an NST and a 555 ckt are interchangable. The NST gives sine waves but HV. This is a comparable action to the fast rise time of the square wave so HV would not be necessary using square waves..

GK
Have you seen Loners latest post Here?
http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=10303.msg276764#new

Chet

yes.
I pity the fool who forgets history.
That is intended for all.

What if when the driving pulse subsides the collapse is faster than light and more powerful?

Place the Kunel Patent and the tv demo on top of each other for a configuration verification.
You don't want to use batteries? LOL. LOL. LOL. LOL. Excuse me for that but simplicity is raking me over the coils. Put a coil on the ring to bias the iron wire into a polarized magnetic field. MuwHaahahahah! 90 degree coupling again. Oh yeah! AND(drum roll please) you can control the magnetic field at your whim! (This is a biggie).
Instead of a big ol' fat iron handful you could use a single strand of iron wire and make it as small as you want to create the virtual spark gap. MuwHahahaha!

And you can short that whole mess when ever it deems fitting. A very big MuwHahahahah!

Placement, alignment, polarity and timing.
It is going to be a very great weekend!

p.s. Don't beat this info up with hypos or technikies. It is just too simple not to bench it out, turn it on and let it rip!

GK
Sir,
I hope you have a very productive weekend,The world gets scarier by the Day.
5 reactors in Japan could go chernobyl..........................
Chet

http://www.ted.com/talks/janna_levin_the_sound_the_universe_makes.html?utm_source=newsletter_weekly_2011-03-15

SSOOooooo.......

How's Tings??

Chet

@Ramset!
Doing well. I've come down from the mountain once again to divulge info.

#1: Doesnt matter how we produce the bemf, just capture it, and charge a cap.
#2: http://profiles.nlm.nih.gov/WG/ (http://profiles.nlm.nih.gov/WG/)

Funny you should mention 'Tings'.

I miniturized the Quatum coil by following a book lead that Grumpy had posted. The 'The body electric' isbn 0-688-06971-1.
Attached is the schematic. Of course it has a stun gun. The connecting wires are 3 feet in length, silver coated copper. Wrap them around the sore joint or along the pain area and Viola'. Pain gone and you sleep. Oh yeah... I have been doing this for 2 weeks now. Suffered a snowboarding fall and this is the ticket. Cheap too. And fully documented by Dr. Rife and Dr. Dotto. You got pain, arthritis? Then apply this technology. Tesla said it works. Now who you gonna argue with? I had over extended my knee and then could not lay on my side. Hey! Its me and I got the technology! Now I sleep with no pain through the night like  baby.  8) O0
I am going to expand on the configuration to include the hypothalmus, thyroid and pituitary. Since this application creates sleep then it causes the production of endorphines. I am looking to control production of DMT in the brain also.

If you are playing with anything that plugs in a wall and also has wires that touch a human body then you must be careful.  I think that all medical devices with this property have to have at least 2000 volts of isolation from the mains power.

I have to be honest in that your posting made me uncomfortable.  People have to exercise common sense and caution with respect to these things.  Hooking electrodes up to your body to shock your hypothalmus, thyroid, and pituitary glands sounds crazy to me.

MileHigh

@MH

I am sure @GK knows about any dangers in that respect.

@GK

Try out this program I put on my ftp site. Very interesting with 1015 ailments and their frequencies and made in advance to produce a wave tone. Sometimes I will open several at a time. They also time out on their own. You can actually feel these acting n the body.

http://purco.qc.ca/ftp/Software/Body-Tones/

Dotto also used the cold side. The hot side was the coil pulse.  If you are standing in his device in a center platform, the platform was rotating slowly so the body is hit with one coil on one side and a cold source on the other side. I think it has to do with the coil side frequency is hitting the bad cells, and then the cold side will stress the whole body system including those just hit by the coil side. That cold stress is not enough to harm regular cells but those already weakened by the coil just collapse with the added cold stress. Pretty smart like one-two sequence knock out punches.

So maybe it is good to use the included frequencies but let's say for 1 minute on, then one minute off and so on to simulate the body turning at one revolution per two minutes when standing in a Dotto device. I do not know his rotations per minute. Even then, maybe a cold source is also required when using these frequencies.

wattsup

The stun gun does not plug into the wall. The neon light starter completes the circuit in a softer way. The etherial shockwave is still transmitted by the leads. The DNA strands only pick up the harmonics like micro tuning forks. The DNA sings in unison. It has been shown that cancer is DNA in chaos. The shockwave is cold electricity at the nano and fempto scale. Eating the correct foods causes molecular and atomic alignments which we call good health. Eating bad foods causes health problems which is chaotic energy consumption.
Joe Coors of beer fame beat cancer on a diet of colorful raw vegetables.
We can do it electronically now and make other alignments in the body electric.

Read the book 'The body electric' for more background and the Dotto paper about the Japanese in Yuzuri Hara. The current Hyaluronic acid sales for extended health is not all there as Dotto found out these people lived in a highly charged ionic arena.

I also read Karl Meyer's works and he found the same pattern of positive action through immense extraction of biomass juices that get into the body quicker.

Not only do I stand on the shoulders of others greater than I but I act on the higher view from the vision to pursuit. I don't question the short view but inquire of the long view. To act alone is to curse the darkness. There is no such thing as graduation into knowledge but only a journey into Verständnis und nicht nur uberleben.

Giantkiller:

Does the neon starter plug in the wall?

This is not to start a big debate but a few comments:

I haven't read any of your books but it's doubtful that I would.  Just the way I think, they aren't for me.

The singing and the harmonics are part of a New Age belief system.  Unfortunately there is no evidence to back up those ideas.  Of course, if this is all supposed to be on a "spiritual plane," so be it.

I am not a medical expert but I will just share my thoughts.  DNA is subject to very low level natural degradation, like any other molecule is subject to.  The individual atoms themselves can fall apart, but I am not sure if that is statistically significant.  The main culprit is when DNA tries to make a copy of itself.  The zippering process can fail statistically.  That can cause genetic defects.  Then the molecule can get smashed up because of natural or man-made radiation.  The copies pass on the defect.

DNA is not affected by what you eat.  What you eat becomes packets of sugar sent to all of your cells via your bloodstream.  There is no distinction made as to what type of food was used to create the sugar packet.

I am pretty sure for the average person their DNA never changes over the course of their life.  It's just the "file" that describes you.  I think some of the bits in your DNA can change as you get very old but they have no real effect.  It's just the statistical nature of the DNA to start to fail over time.

Ultimately all that it means is that you have a few cells in the overall body conglomerate that are "slightly foreign" to your reference DNA code.

Again, I am just a lay person here that used to watch Nova.

MileHigh

Nothing plugs into the wall.
Eating sugar exacerbates cancer.
The DNA does not change but shifts in response to chemicals that are absorbed over a life time that elicits the sweeping change as the DNA reacts to the current exposure of inputs. And that is more than sugars.
The lifetime of radiation absorption is what effects the DNA.
The lifetime of pollution absorption is what effects the DNA.
If the information is not for you then why ask for answers?
Must be my early morning sarcastic posts that trigger rebounds.  ;D

Dave's not here...
http://www.manifestation.com/neurotoys/eliza.php3

Quote from: giantkiller on 2009.12.18, 16:03:13
Hack link to chat page.
http://www.overunityresearch.com/chat/index.php (http://www.overunityresearch.com/chat/index.php)


I am going to start this thread out with nothing but pertinere:

And to this list I would add Tesla's balanced coil if I could find it again. It was as big as a room.

http://serenityhealing.net/20.html

I had the idea of drawing several schematics to describe a version of a UFO I saw in cross-section at the back of a "man made" UFO expose' by Borderlands Pubs.---I believe---awhile ago.   I have the drawing(s) backed up to my thumb drive, but I'm not sure there's going to be much interest in the subject.
        Which I why bring it up here rather than start a dead-end thread.   Waht does anyone think?

--Lee

It may be awhile 'til I get back to OUR.com, so be patient.

I've always been interested in "propulsion" and how we may, one day, get off this rock and explore the universe.

I have produced an attractive effect on matter, and Charles Morton produced both attracton and repulsion.  He has had a handful of article appear in the "Electric Spacecraft Journal".  i think I can get a repulsive effect, but haven't tried it yet.  I'd like to see if varying the level or shifting the pulse rate between positive and negative regions will produce actual movement.

A bias field with secondary excitation:
(http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/d/df/Schrana01.jpg)

@GK

How heavy can the device be under that cover when it is held up rather leisurely by only four elders.

Nice one.

wattsup

The weight of the Ark of the Covenant is never given. I suspect the potential lessened it true weight.
The Israelis kept it covered. That made it a controlled power. The Philistines won it in battle, had it 7 weeks and GAVE it back. They left it uncovered and suffered its wrath of potential.
Here it is used to fell the walls of Jericho.

Quote from: giantkiller on 2012.01.05, 04:31:10
The weight of the Ark of the Covenant is never given. I suspect the potential lessened it true weight.
The Israelis kept it covered. That made it a controlled power. The Philistines won it in battle, had it 7 weeks and GAVE it back. They left it uncovered and suffered its wrath of potential.
Here it is used to fell the walls of Jericho.

You're correct.   It was the Holy of Holies, and caused Moses' face to shine like he was radioactive.   He covered it after that.



For what I have in mind, a very high voltage Tesla coil is mounted vertically in a double-convex 'saucer' arrangement that's electrically insulated around the rim, which separates both halves.   The Tesla coil output charges the top to a positive potential---and the bottom is local(ship system) ground.
        (That's where a flyback transformer comes into play.   They output pulsating DC, usually.   The positively charged top is attracted to the positive ionosphere, the bottom repels the negatively-charged Earth---electromagnetically.)

The insulated insides, top and bottom, each have a coil of wire that acts like an antenna to draw power from the environment from.   I think it'll work in space, but I have no experimental experience.   I have a cross-section drawing of this design, but this particular terminal is set against accepting uploads from a thumb drive.  I have a couple of power generation wiring schemes in .PDF, but it'll have to wait, or I'd upload them.    This is bull!

I'm stuck where I live 'til at least the 19th or so.   I can try and get to the library then.

Quote from: the_big_m_in_ok on 2012.01.05, 23:23:43
I'm stuck where I live 'til at least the 19th or so.   I can try and get to the library then.

I've decided to take this personal discussion on theoretical UFO propulsion concepts to my own Bench in the "Benches" Forum.   If you're interested, look at it there.

--Lee

What are the differences of these 2 circuit types?
I have looked across the net and have not found the reason for the 2 different types.

The top one depicts a parallel tank circuit and the bottom one a series tank circuit.

The series tank has the lowest impedance at the resonant frequency.
The parallel tank has the highest impedance at the resonant frequency.

Hi guys,
Change the position of the spark gap in the lower drawing so it effectively shorts the incoming power from the xformer.
If you've not typo'd the sketch try it. It kicks ass.

Ok. I have added the 3rd configuration. This presents a bias based in the circuit and also in space. This produces a shock wave in the circuit field then a magnified shock in the surrounding resonant space field. So we get a magnified injection into the previous injection shock wave/ring down. This would create a better pump. But I still see a chaotic discharge which could be useful in other designs. I am aiming for a resonance field for a 'soft' bench experiment. The discharge from a large pump would sink into the target material at a localized point which would create a burning or a variated tunnel of varying depth. My first attempt is a homogenious field that encompasses the target. This would lend to smooth control of the the molecular makeup instead of randomly or radically slicing matter.

The sphere within a sphere as noted by Schumann.

http://www.conspiracy.co/forums/content/10-secret-egyptians-edward-leedskalnin-7129-6105195-nikola-tesla-3-6-9.html (http://www.conspiracy.co/forums/content/10-secret-egyptians-edward-leedskalnin-7129-6105195-nikola-tesla-3-6-9.html)

http://www.overunityresearch.com/index.php?topic=1101.msg27381#msg27381 (http://www.overunityresearch.com/index.php?topic=1101.msg27381#msg27381)
(http://s1.postimage.org/nonjatfen/Globe_Animation6.gif)

I realized the difference in the serial and parallel spark gap stage. Thanks for the feedback on my question about the two differing spark gap stages.
In serial stage the secondary of the output stage(the big coil) is charged and resonating through 100% of the circuit operation. And then that bias is struck.
In the parallel circuit the big coil is only hit when the spark fires and then there is only ring down.  So the big coil is not in the circuit operation 100% of the time.

This difference becomes apparent when the operation is above 40khz. The circuit transmits like radio carrying the discharge farther out.

I see six circuits in the previous 3 circuit diagram. Three under 40khz and three over 40khz.

For the first build completion I choose the serial with 68khz operation. Am working on the 68khz spark gap stage.

In regards to the 3d request I will attempt the model.

In regards to the 3 discs on the UAP underbelly: This triad promotes a 3 point Alcubierre model. By altering the parameters of any one disc gives rise to a shift in balance which the craft immediately 'Falls' into. The vertical proponent could be variation in all 3 discs or the craft hull is a vertical Alcubierre configuration.1: The three discs shift processes to cause a horizontal precession in the greater field of the craft hull.or2: The three discs do all the work and the craft hull is merely a container.

Quote from: giantkiller on 2022.12.02, 18:11:03
In regards to the 3 discs on the UAP underbelly: This triad promotes a 3 point Alcubierre model. By altering the parameters of any one disc gives rise to a shift in balance which the craft immediately 'Falls' into. The vertical proponent could be variation in all 3 discs or the craft hull is a vertical Alcubierre configuration.1: The three discs shift processes to cause a horizontal precession in the greater field of the craft hull.or2: The three discs do all the work and the craft hull is merely a container.

The craft hull as merely a container is the best thing I've heard lately.  I think it's really sad to have a huge vehicle with a tiny cockpit volume.  But I don't think those sphere electrodes on the bottom have to be Alcubierre.  Perhaps they pull charged Bernoulli Plasmoid across the top, increasing atmospheric pressure on the bottom.  Besides that, NASA did a test which verified Ray Palmer's ball theory.  He said there's a highly conductive cone shaped spring inside the sphere, and the sphere is filled with Mercury vapor.  A heavy pulse produces a magnetic effect which causes the cone to invert and ions to slam into the top of the sphere, on the inside.  [Reverse momentum is absorbed through elastic scattering].  After the pulse, the cone coil springs back to it's original orientation.  NASA sprayed plasma through a pancake coil and proved it produced thrust by measuring it.

How about this one: "Space, the Financial Frontier"

In the end the search is for the correct configuration of an Armstrong oscillator.
The feedback and reception are the key elements.
The medium depends on the materials used.
This too will control how the charge is channeled.

GK

QuoteIn regards to the 3 discs on the UAP underbelly: This triad promotes a 3 point Alcubierre model. By altering the parameters of any one disc gives rise to a shift in balance which the craft immediately 'Falls' into. The vertical proponent could be variation in all 3 discs or the craft hull is a vertical Alcubierre configuration.1: The three discs shift processes to cause a horizontal precession in the greater field of the craft hull.or2: The three discs do all the work and the craft hull is merely a container.

I came to a different conclusion than most.

The craft I saw pulled near 100G and accelerated beyond 60,000 mph. Moving from a low altitude hover to beyond low orbit in under one second.

As such propulsion has little to do with it in my opinion and the only logical solution is that they found a way to modify the property of inertia relating to mass. If there is no inertia there are no G forces and it could accelerate to any velocity using small propulsive forces.

I think Jerry hit on part of the answer and the 4000 year old Sanskrit texts described flying machines called Vimana using mercury vapor engines. Mercury vapor being used in these systems is a common theme ie. Tesla, Otis Carr, Moray, Correa's.

The notion of the craft hull being merely a container seems non-intuitive. The Vimana and other craft in the literature were massive some claimed to be as large as a small village weighing hundreds of tons. In fact, some claimed the weight was irrelevant and the more mass the craft had the more stable it was. Which makes more sense when we understand weight like mass is an illusion and completely dependent on a property we call inertia.

I figured out how some of this could work but it's beyond my pay grade. Conceptually the technology is not even that difficult but the dangers involved are mind boggling. Can you imagine moving to high altitude or worse low orbit in a second then having a short circuit somewhere?. There's also the issue of a high energy field known to cause radiation burns, transmutation and levitation of nearby objects. Can you imagine your shop just casually lifting off it's foundation doing a test?. No thanks...

AC

Regardless of the inherent dangers that this sort of tech may pose to the public, there is no excuse for it not having been developed as an energy source already, to fuel the human enterprise.

Instead we are told that fission is the best we've ever had .. Lies IMO

If we are at the point that ARV's are being flown so carelessly as to let us see them, then "they" have surely developed the energy source required past the point of being able to spin a turbine; there is a wealth of information coming out on this topic, say what you will about Steven Greer but he seems to be addressing these issues in a very deliberate and straightforward way.

Circuits adding up to resonant harmonics