All none directly related will go here for future reference.
AG
What are your thoughts on Tesla transmitting power at a distance
As it applies to his car at Niagara
Is there proof ?
Oddly I have some Contacts for the architect Stanford White who helped design wardenclyffe
A few very close friends are much more than casual acquaintances of the family!
As it all happened in an area which I spent a good deal of my life !
I will endeavor to meet with them to ask about this claim of the car !
And yes I absolutely believe things get covered up in this world for all kinds of reasons!
Do you have info or thoughts on this ?
Respectfully
Chet K
Ps
This is a query based on F6 comments here post 22
https://www.overunityresearch.com/index.php?topic=4321.msg100371;topicseen#msg100371
No need to start new direction or questions in Hakasays topics !
Quote from: Chet K on 2022.08.29, 13:04:28
AG
What are your thoughts on Tesla transmitting power at a distance
As it applies to his car at Niagara
Is there proof ?
...
It is possible, but at very short distance, with tuned LC circuits.
For it to work at long distance, we would have to scale them up, by increasing the size of the circuits and the wavelength in proportion to the distance, and we would quickly reach the limits: we would need towers several kilometers high just to power a city, and with a low efficiency.
Apart from his patents, where he was brilliant, what we hear today about Tesla's theories is what imaginative people have embroidered around his allusions to alternative theories. Many claim to be able to do what Tesla did not do, either practically or theoretically. For Tesla never formalized any theories, and he probably had good reason.
What we hear about Tesla's theories is not Tesla's, and therefore it doesn't work.
Thank you for reply
I am asking for more info from persons who are also
Investigating this power transmission at a distance
Aside from Hakasays work here !
And additionally
a fellow who wrote of another tower like the Milford Texas tower
But a rancher with huge property that hired someone to replicate some version
Of Milford at his ranch
I will call him for more info soon!
Unfortunately still under the weather here ...but this should become an interesting venture !
Well honestly I am most impressed with member Hakasays actual experimental efforts
He inspires!!
Respectfully
Chet K
there are newspaper clipping of tesla driving around for 2 weeks, we know it had an aerial, polyphase motor connected to a box 2ftx1ftx1ft with dials, also described by his nephew when he was alive?
Although he also inserted 2 iron bars into the box ;)
Hmm I think F6 could be way off on his idea.
Over on youtube was Troy Reeds electric car
https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=troys+electric+car
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tMumLZJCD3s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Au7l_BSHmMs
Sil
This looks familiar
Out of all the similar claims over the years ( unproven to this day for you and I)
Why this one ?
Are you aware of some history
Or reason to accept his claim ?
Well why would you trust YouTube or your government ? its best to keep an open mind and any way they killed him over it. And there are umpteen devices.
Ether show them all or none!
http://blog.hasslberger.com/2013/11/german_inventor_solves_permane.html
Oops F6 ji just press the out of date button on the toilet handle and flushed it wile doing some hard ware build tests sorry oldman! :-* :-*
PS with all this jabbering about off grid power transitions aint it metered yet, soon will be any way Ain't you got your own bench in that vacuum your on about ?
Quote from: AlienGrey on 2022.08.30, 00:38:22
Hmm I think F6 could be way off on his idea.
Over on youtube was Troy Reeds electric car
https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=troys+electric+car
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tMumLZJCD3s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Au7l_BSHmMs
Sil
The 3 outdated videos that AG is throwing at us, without even bothering to explain technically why, confirm what I said.
People invoke Tesla, presenting themselves as high priests and him as the god of their cult. But since they are not as smart as he is, and since even Tesla failed in the transmission of energy over long distances, the only thing they are able to do is to feed the urban legend with videos that are either faked or not faked but showing conventional effects like the transmission of energy over short distances.
This last case can be modeled by Maxwell's electromagnetism, no need for Tesla, and is already used in traditional industry, see for example the wireless battery chargers already on the market, even for drones https://getcorp.com : "Global Energy Transmission (GET) enables battery-powered drones to fly forever by safely and quickly recharging while still in flight".
We are on a research forum, not in a playground.
When we talk about new technology, we don't pretend to achieve miracles by invoking Tesla when what we present is conventional. And we don't use fake news blogs or confusing videos with blah blah blah to show off and impress the naive and ignorant. We use the language of engineers: plans, diagrams, logic, measurement protocols, data, as Tesla did in his patents.
A little respect for the participants here, please!
PS-
AG is deleting my posts. Obviously the truth is disturbing.
Quote from: AlienGrey on 2022.08.30, 07:34:58
Well why would you trust YouTube or your government ?
...
This comparison is revealing of this problem of confusion of science with politics or religion.
Science does not need to seduce, but to present logic and facts. It doesn't need youtube, except for popularization made by people who understand it, for those who understand almost nothing about it. And even popularization is not science.
It may be convenient (mentally) to dismiss all as fanciful beliefs !
However there are plenty of unexplained anomalous claims from our
Recent history!
And regarding Tesla and power transmission at a distance
I am not able to dismiss newspaper articles claiming Tesla had driven a large car at distance from some transmitter?
(Would be nice to see those articles tho)
While charlatans are everywhere in FE world
Tesla was certainly not such a person !
AND
There have been very recent investments into this large scale wireless power transmission
Should be interesting to learn more about that !
AND WE WILL!!( along with perhaps some newer claims)
Quote from: Chet K on 2022.08.30, 13:52:15
It may be convenient (mentally) to dismiss all as fanciful beliefs !
It's much less convenient (mentally) than believing everything we hear.
Quote
However there are plenty of unexplained anomalous claims from our
Recent history!
And regarding Tesla and power transmission at a distance
I am not able to dismiss newspaper articles claiming Tesla had driven a large car at distance from some transmitter?
(Would be nice to see those articles tho)
While charlatans are everywhere in FE world
Tesla was certainly not such a person !
AND
There have been very recent investments into this large scale wireless power transmission
Should be interesting to learn more about that !
AND WE WILL!!( along with perhaps some newer claims)
Nobody denies the possibility of transmitting energy at a distance, certainly not me, I have already said that it is perfectly possible and the industry already sells these devices.
The principle is near field coupling (like Tesla) or a classical EM wave.
Tesla was obviously not a charlatan but the most brilliant inventor. However, what he experimented with in terms of energy transmission was at short distance, and therefore compatible with Maxwell. His theoretical misinterpretation led him to believe that he could reach great distances. This is impossible with coupled LC circuits. So he failed. And in the end, he has no patent for long distance energy transmission. And he has not formalized any alternative theory. The facts are limited to that.
In spite of the facts, the prevailing "Teslamania" maintains the illusion that he is an infallible genius, against the rest of academic science, which is false. He was an electrical engineer, knew much more about conventional electromagnetism than the Teslamania followers who talk about him, and was fallible like everyone else.
Transmitting energy over long distances, and with good efficiency, is challenging. One can succeed more or less with microwave beams or lasers, but I don't think that's what you are talking about.
If someone has succeeded by unconventional means in transmitting energy efficiently at a distance of, say, a few kilometers, or even only a few hundred meters, where are the credible references, with diagrams, plans, measurements that would allow us to study something real rather than talking about rumors?
I dont realy have time to answer awkwardly selected questions since I don't make unfounded claims on the subjects he is selecting
If F6 needs to ask me about stuff like he has been. I will just erase it, he needs to get his own board to post on.
Sil
[quote author=F6FLT link
If someone has succeeded by unconventional means in transmitting energy efficiently at a distance of, say, a few kilometers, or even only a few hundred meters, where are the credible references, with diagrams, plans, measurements that would allow us to study something real rather than talking about rumors?
[/end quote]
—////—-
Yes this is exactly what is on the table at the moment!
And how to replicate!
Coming weeks should have interesting discourse!
Respectfully
Chet K
It seems that we don't have the same table, or not the same requirement on what the table has to present in order for us to progress. :)
Recent claims of power transmission at a distance !
And I agree the table is not "set"
Yet !
Your predisposed opinions on as yet undisclosed offerings do make you appear an ingrate!
To hold prejudice without investigation is the height of ignorance!
and definitely not the scientific method !
Respectfully
Chet K
I would say some of the 'flamebait' posts do border on trolling, but that by itself is not a huge deal. I'm more concerned about the signal-to-noise ratio.
I think we'd all prefer productive questions, useful experiments, insightful research, articulate critiques, and deep analysis over pompous ego-stroking declarations.
(regardless of which side of the fringe-sciences they fall on)
But I don't think anyone is beyond redemption, provided they are willing to learn. Or more specifically, willing to be taught. :-X
After decades of extraordinary announcements that were just fakes or mistakes that have now been forgotten, you'll understand, Hackasays, that I'm now cautious.
My questions are constructive, as I am asking for errors to be eliminated, and I made a request for clarification in the other thread about telluric communications.
Telecommunications being my primary interest, of course I would like to believe it.
But first step: always check the facts. Then we talk engineering or theory.
What supposed "telluric communication" took place between whom and whom, and where?
Quote from: F6FLT on 2022.08.30, 18:34:05
After decades of extraordinary announcements that were just fakes or mistakes that have now been forgotten, you'll understand, Hackasays, that I'm now cautious.
F6, I think you've found that I'm well-read and articulate enough to at least pay attention to. I'm obviously not selling anything, and I don't believe in keeping secrets. :P
Honest critique and productive questions/advice are always welcome; bold and ignorant declarations are not.
Wireless Power and Data Transfer - Meyl
Konstantin Meyl - Neutrino Power and the Existence of Scalar Waves,
Extraordinary Tech Conf 2004
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sLB9IpMmmZU (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sLB9IpMmmZU)
At about 30:00 minutes Dr. Mely demonstrates his "Scalar Wave Wireless Power Transfer" scheme (kit).
Interesting - did this using flat coils, generator and "Garden SS Viewing Globes" (Amazon), it works!
At that time it appeared that there was more power output than was input; but it was not of prime interest,
so was not confirmed.
Might still be controversal, but it does work as advertised. Meyl has published a lot of technical information
on the subject.
Edit: It appears the links and information on the following sites is no longer available for whatever reason
(way-back may have them). However the information has been archived as part of a long-term ongoing research project.
Time permitting - maybe more later, but it will be available again soon. Oh well!
Also see Steve Jackson's page, IEEE Hamilton talk and demo, for the description and information of a DIY kit of sorts:
https://ewh.ieee.org/r7/hamilton/biographies/JacksonS.htm (https://ewh.ieee.org/r7/hamilton/biographies/JacksonS.htm)
Presentation:
https://ewh.ieee.org/r7/hamilton/y2011/2011events.htm#a20110324 (https://ewh.ieee.org/r7/hamilton/y2011/2011events.htm#a20110324)
In a sense, this experiment is a pre-cursor to studying the Ruslan/Kapanadze devices...
SL
Here's a link to a NASA publication with more Scalar Wave - Meyl information:
April 2005
NASA/CR-2005-213749
Advanced Energetics for Aeronautical Applications: Volume II
Chapter 3.4 Scalar Waves; starts on Page 53 -
https://www.aeroturk.info/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/NASA-Advanced-Energetics-for-Aeronautical.pdf (https://www.aeroturk.info/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/NASA-Advanced-Energetics-for-Aeronautical.pdf)
An interesting read as well. Reviews a number of devices claiming Excess Energy - yes; there are a few
scientists and engineers who (quietly) study this sort of thing!
SL
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwi1l4jRnvH5AhWgLFkFHf7JCWIQFnoECBIQAQ&url=https%3A%2F%2Fntrs.nasa.gov%2Fapi%2Fcitations%2F20050170447%2Fdownloads%2F20050170447.pdf&usg=AOvVaw19UHKqjTBIH23A-wEoJ3rH
Quote from: Grumpy on 2022.08.31, 14:01:07
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwi1l4jRnvH5AhWgLFkFHf7JCWIQFnoECBIQAQ&url=https%3A%2F%2Fntrs.nasa.gov%2Fapi%2Fcitations%2F20050170447%2Fdownloads%2F20050170447.pdf&usg=AOvVaw19UHKqjTBIH23A-wEoJ3rH
Wow, I'm surprised to see so many references to Dollard, Steinmetz, and Farnsworth in a NASA-sourced paper :o
How'd you even come across it?
F6FLT, you might be interested in Section 3.3
"Differences Between Longitudinal and Transverse Electric Waves."(PDF pages 60 to 67)
I can confirm the effects in Fig.8 A-D by firsthand experience.
I Googled NASA/CR-2005-213749 from SolarLab's post above.
http://rexresearch.com/corumzenneck/texzon.pdf
Just one link
Quote from: Hakasays on 2022.08.31, 15:48:49
Wow, I'm surprised to see so many references to Dollard, Steinmetz, and Farnsworth in a NASA-sourced paper :o
How'd you even come across it?
F6FLT, you might be interested in Section 3.3 "Differences Between Longitudinal and Transverse Electric Waves."
(PDF pages 60 to 67)
I can confirm the effects in Fig.8 A-D by firsthand experience.
In 2004, NASA had launched a vast exploratory project on alternative technologies, and was open to exotic theories, the goal being especially to imagine innovative propulsion methods.
I'll leave out the suspense about the result: nothing came of it (even the EM drive turned out to be a failure).
Then you will notice that on the pages indicated, it is always said "The BSRF experimenters claimed...". It is not NASA that "claims". NASA simply reports, it has never taken on board all these exotic theories. And it was right. When you see the images on the page marked "50" (actually page 64 of the PDF), you understand that the BSRF experimenters did not understand what they were observing.
At the end of the electric wire, there is a strong gradient of electric field. When we approach the finger or an object, it is subjected to this field gradient and therefore to a force towards the terminal of the wire. It is, in the electric domain, the same phenomenon that we have in the magnetic domain when a flat coil carrying a current is attracted by another close one. If the current is alternating, it doesn't change anything because it is in both coils that the current changes direction, so the force remains in the same direction.
Here in the electrical domain, the strong electric field at the end of the wire attracts the opposite charges of the object that is presented nearby. If the field is alternating, the force is always of attraction since the charges induced in the object are always of opposite sign to those at the end of the wire.
The explanation for the charge on the nearby capacitor is obvious: the field ionizes the air, and since the ionization is greater on one side of the capacitor than on the other, it becomes charged.
The attached diagram explains what the proponents of the longitudinal wave want to see, compared to what engineers with some experience, especially those in the RF field, see.
Longitudinal wave proponents see only appearances: a wire with nothing at the end.
Engineers who have a little experience see the capacitance at the end of the wire, the one that any conductor has in relation to the ground and to the other conductors in the vicinity, and never ignore it in their calculations (that's why they shield the RF circuits). This capacitance, associated with Maxwell, explains everything about single wire transmission currents, and for the electric field, see my explanation above by the gradient.
Quote from: F6FLT on 2022.09.01, 09:24:30
It is not NASA that "claims". NASA simply reports, it has never taken on board all these exotic theories.
I still found it impressive that NASA would be open at all to alternative models/theories/experiments. O0
Quote from: F6FLT
And it was right. When you see the images on the page marked "50" (actually page 64 of the PDF), you understand that the BSRF experimenters did not understand what they were observing.
It was decent by 80's fringe-science standards but certainly not for today. :P
Adrian does a far better job scientifically in his replication: https://www.am-innovations.com/teslas-radiant-energy-and-matter-part-1/
Quote from: F6FLT
At the end of the electric wire, there is a strong gradient of electric field. When we approach the finger or an object, it is subjected to this field gradient and therefore to a force towards the terminal of the wire.
The fields/rays generated by the Borderlands-style disruptive discharge setup are attractive to metals but repulsive to other things.
By-hand, it feels as if there is a very thin layer of soft 'rubber' or gel covering the bulb when the devices are in operation.
This rubber-like field felt by the hand expands and contracts slightly in-sync to the somewhat irregular spark discharges.
In addition, while the filament becomes hot in one-wire operation it visually appears different. One will see straight, needle-like arcs emanating in all directions from the filament that gradually become more dense and numerous as the power is increased. At full power the emanations merge into a puff or 'cloud', that doesn't show up well on camera. The light from the bulb appears pure white as a result, rather than the yellowish glow normally seen when the bulb is driven with AC or RF.
That is the same description as a bulb being powered (lit?) by "cold current", which has been defined very well.
Is there a transverse current and a longitudinal current that are two separate things or are they different manifestations of the same thing? (Second option sounds more likely.)
Quote from: Grumpy on 2022.09.01, 14:22:23
That is the same description as a bulb being powered (lit?) by "cold current", which has been defined very well.
Is there a transverse current and a longitudinal current that are two separate things or are they different manifestations of the same thing? (Second option sounds more likely.)
Personally I would go with 'two different forms of induction' since dielectric and magnetic fields can both separately transfer power across empty space. Two separate elastic properties of space; permittivity+permeability.
And the properties of dielectric induction appear to differ significantly from magnetic induction (because why wouldn't they? :P).
But for terminology, I personally think there are many terms describing the same exotic phenomena.
Capacitive coupling, 'cold electricity', dielectric induction, displacement current, longitudinal networks, are all focused on the dielectric over the magnetic.
Quote from: Grumpy on 2022.08.31, 16:25:53
I Googled NASA/CR-2005-213749 from SolarLab's post above.
Interesting and weighty document. But it is Voluime 2. Can anyone find the Volume 1? I can't find it on NTRS.
Quote from: Paul-R on 2022.09.01, 14:58:28
Interesting and weighty document. But it is Voluime 2. Can anyone find the Volume 1? I can't find it on NTRS.
This is Volume 1. Interesting refs to Bearden, zpe and lifters around page 90 (doc page 80 approx).
Quote from: Hakasays on 2022.09.01, 14:05:22
I still found it impressive that NASA would be open at all to alternative models/theories/experiments. O0
It didn't last, and for good reasons, the same ones that I ask for and that are missing, experimental evidence. They are still open but more selectively today.
Quote
It was decent by 80's fringe-science standards but certainly not for today. :P
Adrian does a far better job scientifically in his replication: https://www.am-innovations.com/teslas-radiant-energy-and-matter-part-1/
The fields/rays generated by the Borderlands-style disruptive discharge setup are attractive to metals but repulsive to other things.
By-hand, it feels as if there is a very thin layer of soft 'rubber' or gel covering the bulb when the devices are in operation.
This rubber-like field felt by the hand expands and contracts slightly in-sync to the somewhat irregular spark discharges.
In addition, while the filament becomes hot in one-wire operation it visually appears different. One will see straight, needle-like arcs emanating in all directions from the filament that gradually become more dense and numerous as the power is increased. At full power the emanations merge into a puff or 'cloud', that doesn't show up well on camera. The light from the bulb appears pure white as a result, rather than the yellowish glow normally seen when the bulb is driven with AC or RF.
I do not understand. You still bring back bewildering interpretations and human sensations to evaluate physical phenomena. You get nowhere with subjectivity, and you fail in technology when effects are only supposed from doubtful, non-formalized theories.
Rather than listening to the opinions of others, which copy each other and have resulted in an implausible mythology around Tesla, one must make the effort to confront the real facts. In science, one takes the trouble to verify by measurement.
The beautiful speeches without formal logic or proven facts, everyone can make them, do not believe everything we find on the Internet. Why don't you use your skills in electricity and electronics to verify by measurements what people not necessarily more competent than you say, or even, which is more efficient, to base your own interpretations from your own tests?
I am talking about elementary tests at the beginning. And only then, if it works, do we move on to the biggest achievements like a big Tesla coil for Transatlantic Communication.
Quote from: F6FLT on 2022.09.01, 15:14:49
It didn't last, and for good reasons, the same ones that I ask for and that are missing, experimental evidence. They are still open but more selectively today.
I do not understand. You still bring back bewildering interpretations and human sensations to evaluate physical phenomena. You get nowhere with subjectivity, and you fail in technology when effects are only supposed from doubtful, non-formalized theories.
Rather than listening to the opinions of others, which copy each other and have resulted in an implausible mythology around Tesla, one must make the effort to confront the real facts. In science, one takes the trouble to verify by measurement.
The beautiful speeches without formal logic or proven facts, everyone can make them, do not believe everything we find on the Internet. Why don't you use your skills in electricity and electronics to verify by measurements what people not necessarily more competent than you say, or even, which is more efficient, to base your own interpretations from your own tests?
I am talking about elementary tests at the beginning. And only then, if it works, do we move on to the biggest achievements like a big Tesla coil for Transatlantic Communication.
F6FLT You make it sound like you work for, or contract with, NASA (bold/underline above).
What's your
mail stop?
Maybe someone can point you to the information you asked for -
"
the same ones that I ask for and that are missing, experimental evidence" (?).
Be specific, there are volumes available.
Regards,
SL
Quote from: F6FLT on 2022.09.01, 15:14:49
I do not understand. You still bring back bewildering interpretations and human sensations to evaluate physical phenomena.
An honest scientist would not ask someone to ignore firsthand observations just because they disagreed with them.
F6FLT, did you read any portion of Adrian Marsh's paper that I linked above to see if it meets your scientific standards?
Or are you
again making conclusions based on blind ignorance? C.C
If you're not willing to approach these exotic subjects with an open mind, I don't think this forum is the right place for you.
I was very specific, explaining why the past experiments of longitudinal waves can be explained by radio waves or why the effects invoked in the "single wire transmission" are not exotic.
If we take as gospel what others have said or done and interpreted before us, it becomes useless to make experiments, we would only see what we want to see.
To experiment is not to become complacent in what we want to believe, but to question what is affirmed, to be sure. It is as well to question that it would be a radio wave, as to question that it would be a longitudinal wave.
The truth only comes out of the elimination of bad hypotheses.
This is why I proposed to make a radio transmission on the same frequency as the hypothetical longitudinal wave to distinguish the two.
This is why I made the proposal of a link on a path, a frequency, and a time where the radio wave cannot pass.
Obviously they had no echo, so any link with a Tesla coil is considered as proof of a longitudinal wave: it is the justification of a credo in an "exotic subject", which proves that the subject is "exotic" (we are going around in circles) and that those who have never found any reality in it, like ham radios, however great experimenters of waves, are not open-minded! C.C
I am not interested in non-scientific methods nor in esotericism.
Quote from: F6FLT on 2022.09.02, 08:55:14
I was very specific, explaining why the past experiments of longitudinal waves can be explained by radio waves or why the effects invoked in the "single wire transmission" are not exotic.
Performing experiments yourself, or speaking from third-hand knowledge again? C.C
F6, I still await your results comparing transverse and longitudinal networks on the bench or with a circuit simulator. https://www.overunityresearch.com/index.php?topic=4320.msg100440#msg100440
If you're having problems, I can help put one together for you with https://www.falstad.com/circuit/
Observations to note:
* Compare 1/4 wave resonant frequencies
* Measure and understand the geometric ratio between resonant frequency in transverse and longitudinal modes.
* Measure Q factor in both circuits.
* Observe differences in voltage magnification.
* Determine effective velocity of both circuits using 1/4 wave frequency.
Quote from: Hakasays on 2022.09.02, 13:00:03
Performing experiments yourself, or speaking from third-hand knowledge again?
...
I did not wait for you to do experiments on longitudinal waves, even with plasmas according to the method of R Zimmerman. And of course I was confronted with radio radiation.
The difference is that I did not shout "victory, I have a longitudinal wave, I am the worthy successor of Tesla" like K Meyl and others, because I would have a link between LC circuits, which is conventional and within the reach of everyone.
Quote
Observations to note:
* Compare 1/4 wave resonant frequencies
* Measure and understand the geometric ratio between resonant frequency in transverse and longitudinal modes.
* Measure Q factor in both circuits.
* Observe differences in voltage magnification.
* Determine effective velocity of both circuits using 1/4 wave frequency.
The method is incorrect. As already said, various resonances or Q factors do not prove a longitudinal wave, but several tuning modes. This is common in electronics (I even invented a double oscillator with a single triode, which oscillates on two frequencies).
As for speed measurement, in the near field it is impossible because of standing waves and a too slow front. Metrology is a science in itself.
If I stopped testing in this field, it is because I see the experimental complexity, especially to eliminate the EM wave. It is not the naive methods used so far that prove anything, they are inadequate.
I have proposed two very simple methods which remove all doubt, but the bad methods are obviously preferred, they allow to keep one's illusions.
So establish your UK/US link and show that it is not a radio wave. You said you were working with Eric Dollard on this, what's the status? Only then can we start to talk about the possibility of a longitudinal wave in free space or through the earth.
Quote from: F6FLT on 2022.09.02, 14:42:12
The difference is that I did not shout "victory, I have a longitudinal wave, I am the worthy successor of Tesla" like K Meyl and others
You can shout victory if you wish. I can explain circuit configurations with anomalous effects that I have only seen replicated online by a few other people.
I've not see any naysayers willing to perform actual experiments.
Quote from: F6FLT
The method is incorrect. As already said, various resonances or Q factors do not prove a longitudinal wave, but several tuning modes. This is common in electronics.
As I've stated multiple times, transverse and longitudinal modes are always present in every system. Building transverse+longitudinal network analogues merely highlight the differences between them more directly. Makes them easier to explore.
It's important to understand operating principles because they help guide our experiments.
Quote from: F6FLT
As for speed measurement, in the near field it is impossible because of standing waves and a too slow front. Metrology is a science in itself.
It seems you still do not understand the rationale behind building transmission network models on the bench.
The components represent lumped elements in an
arbitrarily long transmission line.For example, each element in the transverse/longitudinal network could represent a 500ft section of transmission line across telephone poles. ;D
Quote from: F6FLT
So establish your UK/US link and show that it is not a radio wave. You said you were working with Eric Dollard on this, what's the status?
I've been posting regular updates in the other thread. I also posted links in that thread to others with more detailed experimental setups you've probably still haven't explored. 8)
Quote from: F6FLT
If I stopped testing in this field, it is because I see the experimental complexity, especially to eliminate the EM wave.
I can tell. Your demeanor is of someone who has stopped exploring.
Quote from: Hakasays on 2022.09.02, 15:06:17
You can shout victory if you wish.
I can't. Some people have built a lifter and shout "victory, I have antigravity". Ridiculous.
As an experimenter since I was very young, I can only claim victory if it works without artifacts, according to the claimed principle.
Sorry to be an experimenter, not a reproducer of other people's experiments, which even if they work, can't be proof of what they say about it.
Quote
I can tell. Your demeanor is of someone who has stopped exploring.
Attacking the person when you don't know how to invalidate what he says, is a well known sophism.
You can't tell anything. You don't know anything about me. I am mostly experimenting with radio, and unlike you who has not yet established your US/UK link by longitudinal waves, I have results like this omni-directional UWB antenna I invented last year, which has been on my roof for a year, and outperforms all commercial antennas of its class and volume like discone antennas.
I know what I'm talking about when it comes to electromagnetic waves, that's my domain. I see effects falsely claimed as evidence of longitudinal waves by people who obviously have no experience with them (or are lying to us).
The thing is F6 what your saying here also applies to you and every thing you say, at the end of the day F6 your just a critic who likes rubbing up people the wrong way I think the term is a Troll and iut applies to you.
Quote from: F6FLT on 2022.09.02, 15:29:03
Attacking the person when you don't know how to invalidate what he says, is a well known sophism.
F6, your hasty responses suggested to me that you hadn't explored any of the source material and references that you asked me for.
(specifically Adrian Marsh, since he maintains very high quality work that is directly related to tellurics as well as transverse v. longitudinal propagation)
It felt like you were trolling me by asking for material you weren't going to read. I apologize if I was mistaken.
Hakasays
QuoteAs I've stated multiple times, transverse and longitudinal modes are always present in every system. Building transverse+longitudinal network analogues merely highlight the differences between them more directly. Makes them easier to explore.
It's important to understand operating principles because they help guide our experiments.
I would agree longitudinal waves are different from transverse waves like RF.
In fact I built a neat little detector circuit made of an air coil, rectifiers and two LED's inside a copper mesh cube aka (Faraday Cage) to help determine the difference. As is often the case I stumbled onto the radiant/longitudinal wave circuit/effect which penetrated a metal enclosure by blind luck. From there, as you implied, it was just a matter of determining what was happening and why by working the problem/logic backwards. That is, how does a Faraday Cage actually block EM waves?, how could a different wave property circumvent said blocking effect?.
So all this nonsense F6FLT is talking about seems foreign to me because I nailed down most of this stuff almost a decade ago. I mean, if some thing is doing something different then there must be a rational explanation. We can apply as many beliefs, dogma's, bandwagon fallacies, denial and other excuses as we want but at the end of the day if there's something to it then it should be addressed.
Here's how it works and it's actually so simple anyone can understand it...
The actual problem is that most are generalizing and confusing the terms "frequency" and "period". Frequency relates to the cycles/changes per second while the time period relates only to the rise/fall time. Ergo we can have a low frequency(cycles per second) and a small period(rise/fall time) which displays the same effects as a high frequency. Can you see the problem?, the effect has little if nothing to do with "frequency" only the rise/fall time normally associated with said frequency. It's actually the rise/fall magnitude which determines the nature of the external effects not frequency.
It's a question of extremes. What do you think would happen if we could discharge tens of millions of volts in nanoseconds?. It's not the voltage that matters it's the total energy which could be transformed which always relates to the time period...
So the longitudinal wave/Faraday Cage penetration problem has nothing to do with EM waves or frequency. It only relies upon a term few even talk about but Tesla did which is the time period. So the new rule is that if the total rate of change (magnitude of event within the smallest time period) occurs and said change occurs faster than the rate of conduction then said disturbance can penetrate any conductor and a Faraday Cage.
So it does come back full circle to understanding the principal of the thing in question as you implied. In my mind there is nothing more important than the principal which defines the how, where and why of something. Not some rigid dogma some other person imagined but something we can prove for ourselves. In this respect F6FLT is correct however his mistake is in thinking his or others experience/knowledge must be similar to ours/others but this is not always the case. What if we observed/measured something almost nobody else has, a discovery?. As they say... new discoveries are made every hour of every day somewhere.
Regards
AC
Quote from: Allcanadian on 2022.09.03, 00:20:13
In fact I built a neat little detector circuit made of an air coil, rectifiers and two LED's inside a copper mesh cube aka (Faraday Cage) to help determine the difference. As is often the case I stumbled onto the radiant/longitudinal wave circuit/effect which penetrated a metal enclosure by blind luck. From there, as you implied, it was just a matter of determining what was happening and why by working the problem/logic backwards. That is, how does a Faraday Cage actually block EM waves?, how could a different wave property circumvent said blocking effect?.
IMO the Faraday cage can do a good job of blocking electro-magnetic radiation (down to a reasonable level), but for impulses/disruptive discharges, or longitudinal tuning the Faraday cage just becomes one plate of a capacitor.
It's not magic per-se, but it is a very different property than we're normally used to (modern electronics are usually designed to prevent longitudinal transients.)
Quote from: Allcanadian
The actual problem is that most are generalizing and confusing the terms "frequency" and "period". Frequency relates to the cycles/changes per second while the time period relates only to the rise/fall time.
Indeed, for impulses+transients, terms like 'frequency' lose meaning. Transients generally result in exponential curves which have to be measured in things like decibals-per-second.
Quote from: Allcanadian
So it does come back full circle to understanding the principal of the thing in question as you implied. In my mind there is nothing more important than the principal which defines the how, where and why of something. Not some rigid dogma some other person imagined but something we can prove for ourselves. In this respect F6FLT is correct however his mistake is in thinking his or others experience/knowledge must be similar to ours/others but this is not always the case. What if we observed/measured something almost nobody else has, a discovery?. As they say... new discoveries are made every hour of every day somewhere.
I would say that if there is room for BIG discovery, it would be in places that are poorly mapped+explored today.
Post-1890's Tesla was focused almost exclusively on high-voltage impulses and disruptive discharges. In the modern world, longitudinal impulses/transients are usually suppressed instinctively in order to protect solid-state electronics.
Quote from: Allcanadian on 2022.09.03, 00:20:13
Hakasays
I would agree longitudinal waves are different from transverse waves like RF.
...
Everyone agrees with that, including me, it's a cliché.
AC and Hackasays don't seem to understand that the question is only to demonstrate the existence of this wave in free space, or through dielectrics or conductors like the earth.
On the other hand, they do not know how to define mathematically this wave, how much energy it carries, what level would be emitted by a Tesla coil, what level would be received after a path of such or such nature.
The "science" of those who refer to Tesla to speak about longitudinal wave is of the zero level, which does not prevent them from telling us that it would be like this or like that, without obviously providing the slightest experimental demonstration nor the slightest equation nor quantified data.
As far as the longitudinal wave is concerned, there are much better formalizations than the rumor coming from the mythology around Tesla, like the one of A Zhakatayev ("Long-Range Longitudinal Electric Wave in Vacuum"), or of B Zohuri ("Principle of Scalar Electrodynamics Phenomena Proof") and many others, while the transmission of a Tesla coil is perfectly described by conventional electromagnetism, as by Z Blazevic ("Simple Transmission Line Representation of Tesla Coil").
But on these subjects it is necessary to think rather than to indulge in a myth, an activity where one rarely meets FE "researchers".
F6, was I correct in assuming that you haven't yet explored the experiments and reference materials you asked me for?
Quote from: Hakasays on 2022.09.03, 11:18:32
F6, was I correct in assuming that you haven't yet explored the experiments and reference materials you asked me for?
I have experimented with Tesla coil couplings. It is all conventional, I have not found any anomalies, nor do I see any in past experiments by others. They confuse the effects either with near field coupling for short distance links or with electromagnetic waves for long distance links.
So I am waiting for convincing results from other experimenters, which is why I was interested in your US/UK transmission, which might well demonstrate this if it succeeds.
I asked you how you would eliminate the likely artifact of an electromagnetic wave, since this is the huge weakness of long distance experiments with Tesla coils, and I don't see any commitment on this point.
I asked you where you were with your project: no answer.
Instead I see the usual rhetoric about theories that are unfounded because they are not proven by experiment, often off topic (e.g. the question of transmission lines), those created by this mythology around Tesla. I am not part of this bigotry, sorry.
If you say you are experimenting, please really do it, tell us where you are at, and provide your concrete results, even if they are negative because we learn from them too.
As far as I'm concerned, and until I get proof of the contrary from those who believe in it, there are no longitudinal waves produced by Tesla's coils. And the little that could be produced indirectly would anyway be completely masked by the EM waves generated by the current in the coil, a coil that is a classical radio antenna and that Tesla's experimenters do not even bother to screen!
I do not deny the possibility of the existence of a longitudinal wave in free space or others, but it will be complex to implement, the level attenuating in 1/r² and not 1/r like an EM wave.
I have already provided links to a much better formalization of the longitudinal wave theory, such as that of Zaimidoroga recently mentioned by Grumpy, who also proposed with Podgainy an extension of Maxwell's equations to include the longitudinal wave ("Nonrelativistic theory of electroscalar field"). There are others, like B Zohuri who arrives at results similar to Zaimidoroga, or Zhakatayev. As for the experiments, there are many of them, in particular linked to the scalar wave itself linked to the potential vector, some of which I have tested, such as that of Zimmerman with plasmas. It is also confronted with the possible pollution by an electromagnetic wave (my duplication of this experiment was inconclusive because of that) but also because the experiment, as for Tesla's coils, can be explained classically (see the conclusion of the reproduction that KJ6VW made).
One must understand that the existence of a longitudinal wave imposes the loss of gauge invariance, which seriously challenges a solid part of physics. The potentials would no longer be relative but absolute.
So before tinkering, we must put everything in perspective to understand what we are dealing with, to avoid doing anything and drawing conclusions that are as false as they are hasty on what we observe in the experiments.
Quote from: F6FLT on 2022.09.03, 17:00:22
I have experimented with Tesla coil couplings. It is all conventional, I have not found any anomalies, nor do I see any in past experiments by others. They confuse the effects either with near field coupling for short distance links or with electromagnetic waves for long distance links.
I understand you have a great deal of experience working in the EE field, but please don't ask me again for information if you don't plan on pursuing. It wastes both our time.
Quote from: F6FLT
I asked you how you would eliminate the likely artifact of an electromagnetic wave, since this is the huge weakness of long distance experiments with Tesla coils, and I don't see any commitment on this point.
I asked you where you were with your project: no answer.
The intended strategies to quantify both modes were addressed the first time you asked me:
https://www.overunityresearch.com/index.php?topic=4320.msg99802#msg99802
Adrian has his own method that somewhat overlaps with this that you can also critique: https://www.am-innovations.com/telluric-transference-of-electric-power-brookmans-park-am-radio-transmitter/
Quote from: F6FLT
If you say you are experimenting, please really do it, tell us where you are at, and provide your concrete results, even if they are negative because we learn from them too.
I've been posting updates regularly in the other thread; my current issue is maximizing dielectric coupling to ground through a high surface-area, as my earlier hypothesis that achieving a low resistance ground by hitting the water table would be good enough did not pan out experimentally (at least in the 160m band).
Adrian's further ahead of us in terms of direct experimental results, which you are always welcome to comment on:
Mid-field: https://www.am-innovations.com/transference-of-electric-power-single-wire-vs-telluric/
2-8 miles: https://www.am-innovations.com/telluric-transference-of-electric-power-mf-band-2-8-miles/
27-70 miles: https://www.am-innovations.com/telluric-transference-of-electric-power-mf-band-27-70-miles/
110 miles: https://www.am-innovations.com/telluric-transference-of-electric-power-mf-band-110-miles/
The reason I've been focused on Transverse vs. longitudinal transmission line analogues lately is because it provides a potential operating principle that can be
directly predicted and modeled without writing any new laws of electricity.
These networks can be used as analogues to represent systems of arbitrary size.That's why one near-term goal is determining the bulk impedance properties of freshwater, saltwater, and various quality soil; because one could directly predict and engineer telluric transverse and LMD mode performance knowing only the volume inductance/resistance/capacitance/conductance at a given frequency.
It would also tell us if we need to scrap the 160m band experiments and go down to the 50-100kc region where Tesla was operating.
That's why I was asking about dielectric loss-tangents in the LF/MF bands. :P
Quote from: Hakasays on 2022.09.03, 23:06:13
...
That's why I was asking about dielectric loss-tangents in the LF/MF bands. :P
This question does not make sense, it depends on the terrain crossed, and near the surface even the weather. In the Sahara desert or along the Scottish loch, it is totally different.
If you don't know where your longitudinal wave will pass, answering this question for all cases will give a huge range of orders of magnitude depending on the location, the depth, even often unknown especially when the path is deep in the ground, and the answer will be of no use.
Do you know the path that your longitudinal wave will take? Does it stay near the surface? Does it cut the terrestrial arc?...
Can anyone explain me in simple terms what is light ? How about Dark ? What is dark, absence of light or opposite of light ?
white light doesn't come from the sun it's dark out in space, everything is about free electrons hit by the sun's rays
if you hit the right frequency of the color it will cause the electrons to vibrate and deplete and while doing that
they give of light if you hit it's frequency, a bit like the depletion layer in a diode but the p and the n layers are
together so you wont se it glow unless it's an LED construction.
Quote from: AlienGrey on 2023.07.29, 17:26:18
white light doesn't come from the sun it's dark out in space, everything is about free electrons hit by the sun's rays
if you hit the right frequency of the color it will cause the electrons to vibrate and deplete and while doing that
they give of light if you hit it's frequency, a bit like the depletion layer in a diode but the p and the n layers are
together so you wont se it glow unless it's an LED construction.
Lets be clear, I'm not doing anything i am the observer. Your explanation for dark stand for what ? Once you mention that everything is dark out in the space. The sun not doing the work ? Nor any other similar stars ? A solar panel won't work there ?
Quote from: Classic on 2023.07.29, 20:39:46
Lets be clear, I'm not doing anything i am the observer. Your explanation for dark stand for what ? Once you mention that everything is dark out in the space. The sun not doing the work ? Nor any other similar stars ? A solar panel won't work there ?
I didn't say the sun emitted no visible radiation read it again, a solar panel is silicon it will pick up IR and UV ect
but white light still comes from our atmosphere. look it up on Nasa
Ah, my bad, sorry.
Than we can conclude that the light has a full gradient at least from our human perspective we're we can see only a fraction of it
Hmm, this begs the question what is the mass of light as we can't have velocity without mass, or how this mass of light behaves at ends of spectrum?