I watt in 50 watts out = Reactive Watts at a live demonstration.

[Tommey Reed]

Hi Farmhand,

Where should I start?

First of all listen what you just said, 90% efficiency in what?

Electricity at 100% is just that, but when you start moving electrons  from A to B  in any electrical form you have a lost.

Taking power from a capacitor is another lost even if you claim 90% that is questionable with real power drain that need to do work. Lighting a LED or simple test is just foolish to make claims that high.

If that was the case, my solar power is OVER UNITY, by the way it works only when the sun is out .

When dealing with power like 1hp(746w) I bet you will find your 90% fall shorter then your claims.

My opinion is clear, it's not what these clowns claim it to be.

No free energy, but maybe people will give free $$ at the end!

Tom

[Farmhand]

My boost converter was 90% efficient at lighting a couple of 6 watt filament bulbs, but it wasn't designed for 100's of Watts.

If a small boost converter can be 90% efficient then a large one can as well. The manufacturers of the chip I linked claim 96% efficiency, I believe them, 96% is 96% is 96%.

Anyway this is off topic and a simple side note is to say that no one disputes that if we charge a capacitor from a battery we lose 50% of the energy.

Back to the topic of the SERP's please. If you want to dispute the efficiency possible with boost converters you might want to start another thread about that, then
we can present our evidences there.

And what made you think I was claiming any free energy ? Please explain. You obviously have not read many of my posts. And did not read the posts I made here properly.

If a boost converter tests 90% efficient it is hardly foolish. The power level is irrelevant. Do not insult me. It isn't necessary. I can be insulting as well, wanna see ?

......

So when the caps in the scheme Stefan posted are charging the lamps will see a reducing voltage. I think that
would adversely affect the amount of light the lamps would emit. If what Stefan proposes is the actual switching scheme
then I think the results they show as scope shots might be wrong.

The efficiency of charging capacitors need not be relevant to the point I'm trying to make.

....

[Tommey Reed]

Farmhand

I don't have time to play games, My opinions stands.

Move on...

I have better things to do, then fighting a lost cause of other people opinions.

I will say it one more time, this is not free energy just another magic trick that no one has discovery yet.

[TinMan]

Farmhand


I will say it one more time, this is not free energy just another magic trick that no one has discovery yet.

Yes Tom,that is what FarmHand is saying.

[Matt Watts]

I'll take one for the team with this.

When Aaron puts his video up for sale, I'll buy it (as much as I hate to) then ride him a little to explain what I'm really looking at.  Call it the "leave no stone unturned" approach to OUR.  Even if this turns out to clearly be a magic trick, maybe, just maybe there is something that sparks the imagination, fills a hole, makes us look at the same stuff we have looked at for years a different way.  As my Pa used to say, "You pay your money and take your chances."  I have said, "Nope, don't work" to much bigger fish without anyone getting hostile; I can surely do it again.

[Farmhand]

Tommy, I think you have a reading comprehension problem, I've been saying clearly that the SERP's is a scam, it has to be, common sense tells us that.

I have no idea how you came to the conclusion that I was saying anything in favor of the device. Has to be a comprehension problem. I refuse to allow people to put words into my mouth I did not say.

Somehow we got off on the wrong foot. Could it have something to do with this thread from OU.com http://www.overunity.com/14679/making-a-back-emf-motor-generator-and-load-testing/#.U8MirpSSyk4

I predicted that the generator coils would show the spikes and that's what happened. I thought I was helping, but I guess you know everything and I know nothing.

I'm not playing games you are, you misunderstand me then insult me and tell me to move on. Whaaat. Get a grip. Lets make a agreement, I won't reply to your posts and
you don't reply to my posts, problem solved. Basically if you make out I am saying something I am not I have no choice but to set things straight.

Now that we've sorted out the problem and I know others can see what I said is what i said, there's no need to continue. Don't make out I am saying things I didn't say and don't insult me and we be fine, no problems.

I was simply trying to clear up a misunderstanding, and you say I'm playing games. Not so it's the opposite.

..

[Tommey Reed]

Farmhanded,

I was not talking about that other stuff, we all know there is a scam at work, the capacitor claims you have open up about getting 90% efficient was my questions.


Farmhand, "My boost converter was 90% efficient at lighting a couple of 6 watt filament bulbs, but it wasn't designed for 100's of Watts."

You must have the comprehension problem, you're right no need to answer!

Move on...

[TinMan]

Tom
Burried here some where,is a thread that an ex member showed how to charge a cap with near 100% efficiency. His name was Exnihiloest-very smart man. Maybe some one can dig up that thread,and the schematic for efficiently charging a cap.

[Room3327]

There are a lot of good threads here!  Why new posters don't read the forums that they post in is beyond me?

[Matt Watts]

Here's the freebie video, of the panel discussion:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-JJpGhgqu6A

[Matt Watts]

And a bit more:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rP6fpN6avIc

Notice that Jim did mention connecting this to an MG (motor/generator), which fits exactly with my other post on the subject.  Just so happens I have such a setup ready and waiting.

And yes, I did shell out my 37 dollars to these guys.  I'll let you know if there is anything in there we can discuss.

[Matt Watts]

Okay, watched the video and for my 37 bucks, here's two key points I found:

The SERPS uses a process to pull electrical energy from the generation source, through the load and into a storage device (cap or inductor).  It then turns this collected power around, pushes it through the load again and sends it back to the source.  In the case of a generator, for a brief moment, it turns the generator into a motor, cutting the true energy consumption down by at least half.  And with load getting to utilize the same chunk of energy twice, total power usage goes below 25% minimum.

The second key point is Paul's high-speed switching behaves as a mechanical switch.  It uses a MOSFET in parallel (or series -- not 100% sure) with an SCR so that it can be turned on and off at speeds approaching 5ns, using a digital control that pre calculates the delay overlap.  This allows large inductors to be switched before the voltage climbs too high to deal with.

Lots of other interesting pictures and comments, but the above are the items someone might be able to make real use of.

[Tommey Reed]

Hi Matt,

I'm sorry but when I see some of the clowns like Eric Dollard and others make claims it just proves it's a total scam, that's my opinion!

Did you get a refund?

Tom

[Matt Watts]

Did you get a refund?

No, not yet.  What I saw in the video is similar enough to Doug Konzen's work that I figure I'll at least give it a try before I do any bashing.  So the jury is still out...