OUR Award - Draft Rules, Terms, and Conditions

[poynt99]

Terms and Conditions for OUR Award Applications

1) Any person submitting an application for the OUR award must outline in sufficient detail that they have performed adequate measurements to merit their claim and application. This includes electrical, mechanical and heat-producing devices. The measurements and methods must be included with the application. The device must be able to produce a continuous¹ output power of 15W (minimum) over and above the total amount of power applied to the device as an input source of power. If and when it is deemed that the applicant's submitted measurements are credible, the applicant will either submit the prototype for testing by OUR, or provide all the details necessary to replicate the device in question. The working device must be replicable.

2) OUR will make additional measurements on an adequate replication (or an applicant-submitted prototype) themselves using their own test equipment, in order to determine the merit of the application, at no cost to the applicant.

3) If the device operates in a self-sustaining mode while producing a continuous¹ excess output power of 15W (minimum), and can be properly demonstrated as such, either in person, or with an applicant-submitted prototype, the OUR Award will be granted to the applicant. Alternatively, the applicant may submit to OUR all the details necessary to replicate the device in question.

4) In the event the application is successful and the OUR Award is to be granted, the applicant must first agree to publicly open-source the full details of the submitted device (within thirty days of the completion of the OUR tests) -- then the Award will be granted.

1. "Continuous" in the sense that apart from mechanical or electrical component (excluding battery or source material depletion) failure, the device shall produce this excess energy indefinitely.

the OUR team.
_{Last Edit: 2013-02-03, 10:43 by poynt99 & ION}

[ourunity]

What is required from the applicant?
Our claim is that whatever the industry of today is doing with electricity it's not in accord with nature.
Whatever it is that doesn't copy nature, it is not valid.
We have the first model that is built with the knowledge of how electricity works exactly. In this forum we described what the differences are and what should be done to correct it. The question is, what is the next step?
Best Regards,

[Excelsior]

.

[Chet K]

What is required from the applicant?
Our claim is that whatever the industry of today is doing with electricity it's not in accord with nature.
Whatever it is that doesn't copy nature, it is not valid.
We have the first model that is built with the knowledge of how electricity works exactly. In this forum we described what the differences are and what should be done to correct it. The question is, what is the next step?
Best Regards,

Sir
It would be wonderful if you make a path towards this claim ( scientific validation)
We have scientists in open source community willing to assist you towards that goal!
Sending  you an Email
Respectfully
Chet K

[ryh]

Hi,

what is the current status of the award? anyone won? if yes, is the award still in effect?

suppose someone fulfilled the terms and conditions.
suppose it's a very simple everyday physics phenomenon.
suppose it's the way to harness mountain, atmosphere, iron,  water, copper, molecule, fire, wind in which not commonly used in this age.
suppose it's a very simple thing with reasoning as clear as day that everyone can replicate it with sufficient preparations.
will that someone still get the award/ prize from our? (that is if the award still there to begin with)

thanks in advance,

[unimmortal]

I'm up for the challenge, where do I sign up?

https://www.overunityresearch.com/index.php?topic=4539

[Chet K]

Sir
I dropped a note to Peter,
However he works many hours ,and Wednesday ( tomorrow) he is
Occupied with caring for family after work.

Regardless
He will be aware of claim,( although I am uncertain of status with this prize)
Wishing you the best .

Respectfully
Chet K