PopularFX
Home Help Search Login Register
Welcome,Guest. Please login or register.
2021-10-21, 03:55:43
News: Forum TIP:
The SHOUT BOX deletes messages after 3 hours. It is NOT meant to have lengthy conversations in. Use the Chat feature instead.

Pages: 1 [2]
Author Topic: Potential Energy  (Read 19649 times)
Full Member
***

Posts: 163
Thanks for clearing this up guys. Any good books on this subject?
   
Hero Member
*****

Posts: 1994
@GK
Quote
Starting at 23:50 we see the agitation or action at a distance where a new electron is added and the whole valence accumulation adjusts like a ringing bell or ripples in water.

As well if each electron when jumping from atom to atom could cause a wave like disturbance or oscillation then the whole of the object could oscillate not unlike the phenomena of the Barkhausen effect. If these fundamental oscillations then coupled to external EM oscillations then the external interference pattern could easily be interpreted as a "field". It would be nice to have a rational explanation for the primary fields instead of magical particles popping in and out of existence from other parallel universes. In fact if this were the case then most of the complex phenomena we see could be explained in a simple manner that actually made sense.

This is the model I am working on however I can't see it ever being accepted because it may be too easy and realistic, we can't have just anybody understanding everything or all those scientists would be out of work.

AC


---------------------------
Comprehend and Copy Nature... Viktor Schauberger

“Progress is impossible without change, and those who cannot change their minds cannot change anything.” George Bernard Shaw
   

Group: Experimentalist
Hero Member
*****

Posts: 2376


Buy me a beer
That's false.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gibbs_free_energy



Disagree

Gibb's free energy is the "available" energy and not the actual energy without change it is not until you change it that it developes the energy

Quote

the greatest amount of mechanical work which can be obtained from a given quantity of a certain substance in a given initial state, without increasing its total volume or allowing heat to pass to or from external bodies, except such as at the close of the processes are left in their initial condition.[3]

Regards

Mike 8)


---------------------------
"All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed, second it is violently opposed, and third, it is accepted as self-evident."
Arthur Schopenhauer, Philosopher, 1788-1860

As a general rule, the most successful person in life is the person that has the best information.
   

Group: Experimentalist
Hero Member
*****

Posts: 2376


Buy me a beer
@ Giantkiller

Nice video O0

Mike 8)


---------------------------
"All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed, second it is violently opposed, and third, it is accepted as self-evident."
Arthur Schopenhauer, Philosopher, 1788-1860

As a general rule, the most successful person in life is the person that has the best information.
   
Group: Guest
...
Gibb's free energy is the "available" energy and not the actual energy without change it is not until you change it that it developes the energy
...

 ;D
That's always true. "Potential" means that there is nothing until the realization of the potentiality!
But this potentiality is as a reservoir. That's why what you said is false: "the atoms are stable there is NO energy, NO potential difference, when it is unstable we have energy". E=M*c². The fact that you don't use it, doesn't mean "NO energy". E=M*c² is a potential energy of matter that you can extract by disintegrating it. You can get energy at a given time, only because it was stored somewhere in some form.

   

Group: Experimentalist
Hero Member
*****

Posts: 2376


Buy me a beer
;D
That's always true. "Potential" means that there is nothing until the realization of the potentiality!
But this potentiality is as a reservoir. That's why what you said is false: "the atoms are stable there is NO energy, NO potential difference, when it is unstable we have energy". E=M*c². The fact that you don't use it, doesn't mean "NO energy". E=M*c² is a potential energy of matter that you can extract by disintegrating it. You can get energy at a given time, only because it was stored somewhere in some form.



OK hands up we are splitting words here and I did write it badly, usually a problem of mine :-[, I should have said no energy materialised until an event takes place, it's a store of energy but sleeping until we can unbalance it and not that there is no energy ;D C.C what an idiot I am.

Mike 8)


---------------------------
"All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed, second it is violently opposed, and third, it is accepted as self-evident."
Arthur Schopenhauer, Philosopher, 1788-1860

As a general rule, the most successful person in life is the person that has the best information.
   
Group: Guest
That is why Armagdn03's post makes good sense while the question of "potential maximum amount of energy be per unit of space" means nothing: there is no absolute potential.

A "potential difference" of what? Energy? Voltage? What are you talking about? A charge is not a potential. You may even have separated positive and negative charges and no potential difference between them. "Potential" means "capable of being but not yet in existence". A "potential difference" is not a physical object that we could pretend to be in motion.


SO are we after the meaning of potential or potential difference?Two different meaning's.
Potential is as you say,but potential difference is simply this
:potential difference is the difference in energy of two location.
The atom has an electrical,chemical and magnetic potential difference.
That potential difference is there to use,when you can work out how to use it without destroying the atom itself.

Only just now have they worked out how to split the atom and then put it back together.
And there is no pretending about motion,everything is in motion.
   
Group: Guest
OK hands up we are splitting words here and I did write it badly, usually a problem of mine :-[, I should have said no energy materialised until an event takes place, it's a store of energy but sleeping until we can unbalance it and not that there is no energy ;D C.C what an idiot I am.

Mike 8)

Not a question of splitting words, Mike. This thread is about "potential energy" and it's indispensable to correctly handle the concept.
When you know that "potential" means nothing real, the underlying implication is that "potential energy" is not a physical reality, unlike the electron or the electric field. It's just our idea of a condition, a state of physical objects, that could possibly produce a work, or not at all if we have not the means to use it.
I often hear "free energy is real because there is energy everywhere" and I always think that this statement is particularly stupid: the problem is not that of the potentiality of the "everywhere" energy that nobody denies, but of its transformation into usable work. It's a truism to say it, however it is obviously not understood by those saying "free energy is real because there is energy everywhere".

   
Group: Guest
...
The atom has an electrical,chemical and magnetic potential difference.
That potential difference is there to use,when you can work out how to use it without destroying the atom itself.
...

These are banalities. There are thousands of transformations from a state of matter to another one that could provide a usable work, see the condensed matter physics.
 
The first question is how to do it.
But there is another one. A work done by a change from potential A to potential B is the same as from potential B to potential A (except the sign). Therefore the process can't be self-looped. So after having answer the question of how to get work by changing from potential A to potential B, the second question is either 'how the potential A could be restored from the potential B in order to repeat the cycle' (for instance input from the ZPE, the heat and so on...) or 'what potential couple A, B could be used at will without having to care the inverse transformation' (because in very in large quantities).



   
Group: Guest
These are banalities. There are thousands of transformations from a state of matter to another one that could provide a usable work, see the condensed matter physics.
 
The first question is how to do it.
But there is another one. A work done by a change from potential A to potential B is the same as from potential B to potential A (except the sign). Therefore the process can't be self-looped. So after having answer the question of how to get work by changing from potential A to potential B, the second question is either 'how the potential A could be restored from the potential B in order to repeat the cycle' (for instance input from the ZPE, the heat and so on...) or 'what potential couple A, B could be used at will without having to care the inverse transformation' (because in very in large quantities).




I think if we could answer the(how to do it bit)then we would have a way to use that potential.
But you are right-that is the hard bit.
But i guess that if we were the ones to tell others 100 years ago that we could turn the suns rays into electricity,we would have been seen as wacko's.
But the solar pannel is now a main streem free energy device-in the sence that we dont have to pay for the energy that it can deliver.

I guess it is only a matter of time until we can convert this free energy into a usable energy.
   

Group: Experimentalist
Hero Member
*****

Posts: 2376


Buy me a beer
Not a question of splitting words, Mike. This thread is about "potential energy" and it's indispensable to correctly handle the concept.
When you know that "potential" means nothing real, the underlying implication is that "potential energy" is not a physical reality, unlike the electron or the electric field. It's just our idea of a condition, a state of physical objects, that could possibly produce a work, or not at all if we have not the means to use it.
I often hear "free energy is real because there is energy everywhere" and I always think that this statement is particularly stupid: the problem is not that of the potentiality of the "everywhere" energy that nobody denies, but of its transformation into usable work. It's a truism to say it, however it is obviously not understood by those saying "free energy is real because there is energy everywhere".



Exactly on what you have written I am 100%. Of course there is energy everywhere, it is like the phrase, water water everywhere and not a drop to drink, I for one don't have much of an ego, the ones that do are the ones who normally try to shoot me down. I am now giving information of many years of work to a small group who are replicating and finding there way with the replications and opening their minds to what they see. What I give is the basics, no claims, the claims they can make themselves afterwards, what is in the future for me "been there done that and it is my living at the moment on an industrial scale" but they are in the learning curve and it is not an easy one to learn. Involved in my work is chemistry and physics as well as electronics to make the thing run, but I am an industrial engineer and my knowledge has a limit in each but is gold when combined O0

Mike 8)


---------------------------
"All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed, second it is violently opposed, and third, it is accepted as self-evident."
Arthur Schopenhauer, Philosopher, 1788-1860

As a general rule, the most successful person in life is the person that has the best information.
   
Pages: 1 [2]
« previous next »


 

Home Help Search Login Register
Theme © PopularFX | Based on PFX Ideas! | Scripts from iScript4u 2021-10-21, 03:55:43