Space: The final frontier

[MileHigh]

If you are playing with anything that plugs in a wall and also has wires that touch a human body then you must be careful.  I think that all medical devices with this property have to have at least 2000 volts of isolation from the mains power.

I have to be honest in that your posting made me uncomfortable.  People have to exercise common sense and caution with respect to these things.  Hooking electrodes up to your body to shock your hypothalmus, thyroid, and pituitary glands sounds crazy to me.

MileHigh

[wattsup]

@MH

I am sure @GK knows about any dangers in that respect.

@GK

Try out this program I put on my ftp site. Very interesting with 1015 ailments and their frequencies and made in advance to produce a wave tone. Sometimes I will open several at a time. They also time out on their own. You can actually feel these acting n the body.

http://purco.qc.ca/ftp/Software/Body-Tones/

Dotto also used the cold side. The hot side was the coil pulse.  If you are standing in his device in a center platform, the platform was rotating slowly so the body is hit with one coil on one side and a cold source on the other side. I think it has to do with the coil side frequency is hitting the bad cells, and then the cold side will stress the whole body system including those just hit by the coil side. That cold stress is not enough to harm regular cells but those already weakened by the coil just collapse with the added cold stress. Pretty smart like one-two sequence knock out punches.

So maybe it is good to use the included frequencies but let's say for 1 minute on, then one minute off and so on to simulate the body turning at one revolution per two minutes when standing in a Dotto device. I do not know his rotations per minute. Even then, maybe a cold source is also required when using these frequencies.

wattsup

[giantkiller]

The stun gun does not plug into the wall. The neon light starter completes the circuit in a softer way. The etherial shockwave is still transmitted by the leads. The DNA strands only pick up the harmonics like micro tuning forks. The DNA sings in unison. It has been shown that cancer is DNA in chaos. The shockwave is cold electricity at the nano and fempto scale. Eating the correct foods causes molecular and atomic alignments which we call good health. Eating bad foods causes health problems which is chaotic energy consumption.
Joe Coors of beer fame beat cancer on a diet of colorful raw vegetables.
We can do it electronically now and make other alignments in the body electric.

Read the book 'The body electric' for more background and the Dotto paper about the Japanese in Yuzuri Hara. The current Hyaluronic acid sales for extended health is not all there as Dotto found out these people lived in a highly charged ionic arena.

I also read Karl Meyer's works and he found the same pattern of positive action through immense extraction of biomass juices that get into the body quicker.

Not only do I stand on the shoulders of others greater than I but I act on the higher view from the vision to pursuit. I don't question the short view but inquire of the long view. To act alone is to curse the darkness. There is no such thing as graduation into knowledge but only a journey into Verständnis und nicht nur uberleben.

[MileHigh]

Giantkiller:

Does the neon starter plug in the wall?

This is not to start a big debate but a few comments:

I haven't read any of your books but it's doubtful that I would.  Just the way I think, they aren't for me.

The singing and the harmonics are part of a New Age belief system.  Unfortunately there is no evidence to back up those ideas.  Of course, if this is all supposed to be on a "spiritual plane," so be it.

I am not a medical expert but I will just share my thoughts.  DNA is subject to very low level natural degradation, like any other molecule is subject to.  The individual atoms themselves can fall apart, but I am not sure if that is statistically significant.  The main culprit is when DNA tries to make a copy of itself.  The zippering process can fail statistically.  That can cause genetic defects.  Then the molecule can get smashed up because of natural or man-made radiation.  The copies pass on the defect.

DNA is not affected by what you eat.  What you eat becomes packets of sugar sent to all of your cells via your bloodstream.  There is no distinction made as to what type of food was used to create the sugar packet.

I am pretty sure for the average person their DNA never changes over the course of their life.  It's just the "file" that describes you.  I think some of the bits in your DNA can change as you get very old but they have no real effect.  It's just the statistical nature of the DNA to start to fail over time.

Ultimately all that it means is that you have a few cells in the overall body conglomerate that are "slightly foreign" to your reference DNA code.

Again, I am just a lay person here that used to watch Nova.

MileHigh

[giantkiller]

Nothing plugs into the wall.
Eating sugar exacerbates cancer.
The DNA does not change but shifts in response to chemicals that are absorbed over a life time that elicits the sweeping change as the DNA reacts to the current exposure of inputs. And that is more than sugars.
The lifetime of radiation absorption is what effects the DNA.
The lifetime of pollution absorption is what effects the DNA.
If the information is not for you then why ask for answers?
Must be my early morning sarcastic posts that trigger rebounds.  

Dave's not here...
http://www.manifestation.com/neurotoys/eliza.php3

[the_big_m_in_ok]

Hack link to chat page.
http://www.overunityresearch.com/chat/index.php


I am going to start this thread out with nothing but pertinere:

And to this list I would add Tesla's balanced coil if I could find it again. It was as big as a room.

http://serenityhealing.net/20.html

I had the idea of drawing several schematics to describe a version of a UFO I saw in cross-section at the back of a "man made" UFO expose' by Borderlands Pubs.---I believe---awhile ago.   I have the drawing(s) backed up to my thumb drive, but I'm not sure there's going to be much interest in the subject.
        Which I why bring it up here rather than start a dead-end thread.   Waht does anyone think?

--Lee

It may be awhile 'til I get back to OUR.com, so be patient.

[Grumpy]

I've always been interested in "propulsion" and how we may, one day, get off this rock and explore the universe.

I have produced an attractive effect on matter, and Charles Morton produced both attracton and repulsion.  He has had a handful of article appear in the "Electric Spacecraft Journal".  i think I can get a repulsive effect, but haven't tried it yet.  I'd like to see if varying the level or shifting the pulse rate between positive and negative regions will produce actual movement.

[giantkiller]

A bias field with secondary excitation:

[wattsup]

@GK

How heavy can the device be under that cover when it is held up rather leisurely by only four elders.

Nice one.

wattsup

[giantkiller]

The weight of the Ark of the Covenant is never given. I suspect the potential lessened it true weight.
The Israelis kept it covered. That made it a controlled power. The Philistines won it in battle, had it 7 weeks and GAVE it back. They left it uncovered and suffered its wrath of potential.
Here it is used to fell the walls of Jericho.

[the_big_m_in_ok]

The weight of the Ark of the Covenant is never given. I suspect the potential lessened it true weight.
The Israelis kept it covered. That made it a controlled power. The Philistines won it in battle, had it 7 weeks and GAVE it back. They left it uncovered and suffered its wrath of potential.
Here it is used to fell the walls of Jericho.

You're correct.   It was the Holy of Holies, and caused Moses' face to shine like he was radioactive.   He covered it after that.



For what I have in mind, a very high voltage Tesla coil is mounted vertically in a double-convex 'saucer' arrangement that's electrically insulated around the rim, which separates both halves.   The Tesla coil output charges the top to a positive potential---and the bottom is local(ship system) ground.
        (That's where a flyback transformer comes into play.   They output pulsating DC, usually.   The positively charged top is attracted to the positive ionosphere, the bottom repels the negatively-charged Earth---electromagnetically.)

The insulated insides, top and bottom, each have a coil of wire that acts like an antenna to draw power from the environment from.   I think it'll work in space, but I have no experimental experience.   I have a cross-section drawing of this design, but this particular terminal is set against accepting uploads from a thumb drive.  I have a couple of power generation wiring schemes in .PDF, but it'll have to wait, or I'd upload them.    This is bull!

I'm stuck where I live 'til at least the 19th or so.   I can try and get to the library then.

[the_big_m_in_ok]

I'm stuck where I live 'til at least the 19th or so.   I can try and get to the library then.

I've decided to take this personal discussion on theoretical UFO propulsion concepts to my own Bench in the "Benches" Forum.   If you're interested, look at it there.

--Lee

[giantkiller]

What are the differences of these 2 circuit types?
I have looked across the net and have not found the reason for the 2 different types.

[BEP]

The top one depicts a parallel tank circuit and the bottom one a series tank circuit.

The series tank has the lowest impedance at the resonant frequency.
The parallel tank has the highest impedance at the resonant frequency.

[szaxx]

Hi guys,
Change the position of the spark gap in the lower drawing so it effectively shorts the incoming power from the xformer.
If you've not typo'd the sketch try it. It kicks ass.

[giantkiller]

Ok. I have added the 3rd configuration. This presents a bias based in the circuit and also in space. This produces a shock wave in the circuit field then a magnified shock in the surrounding resonant space field. So we get a magnified injection into the previous injection shock wave/ring down. This would create a better pump. But I still see a chaotic discharge which could be useful in other designs. I am aiming for a resonance field for a 'soft' bench experiment. The discharge from a large pump would sink into the target material at a localized point which would create a burning or a variated tunnel of varying depth. My first attempt is a homogenious field that encompasses the target. This would lend to smooth control of the the molecular makeup instead of randomly or radically slicing matter.

The sphere within a sphere as noted by Schumann.

[giantkiller]

http://www.conspiracy.co/forums/content/10-secret-egyptians-edward-leedskalnin-7129-6105195-nikola-tesla-3-6-9.html

http://www.overunityresearch.com/index.php?topic=1101.msg27381#msg27381

[giantkiller]

I realized the difference in the serial and parallel spark gap stage. Thanks for the feedback on my question about the two differing spark gap stages.
In serial stage the secondary of the output stage(the big coil) is charged and resonating through 100% of the circuit operation. And then that bias is struck.
In the parallel circuit the big coil is only hit when the spark fires and then there is only ring down.  So the big coil is not in the circuit operation 100% of the time.

This difference becomes apparent when the operation is above 40khz. The circuit transmits like radio carrying the discharge farther out.

I see six circuits in the previous 3 circuit diagram. Three under 40khz and three over 40khz.

For the first build completion I choose the serial with 68khz operation. Am working on the 68khz spark gap stage.

In regards to the 3d request I will attempt the model.

[giantkiller]

In regards to the 3 discs on the UAP underbelly: This triad promotes a 3 point Alcubierre model. By altering the parameters of any one disc gives rise to a shift in balance which the craft immediately 'Falls' into. The vertical proponent could be variation in all 3 discs or the craft hull is a vertical Alcubierre configuration.1: The three discs shift processes to cause a horizontal precession in the greater field of the craft hull.or2: The three discs do all the work and the craft hull is merely a container.

[Jerry Volland]

In regards to the 3 discs on the UAP underbelly: This triad promotes a 3 point Alcubierre model. By altering the parameters of any one disc gives rise to a shift in balance which the craft immediately 'Falls' into. The vertical proponent could be variation in all 3 discs or the craft hull is a vertical Alcubierre configuration.1: The three discs shift processes to cause a horizontal precession in the greater field of the craft hull.or2: The three discs do all the work and the craft hull is merely a container.

The craft hull as merely a container is the best thing I've heard lately.  I think it's really sad to have a huge vehicle with a tiny cockpit volume.  But I don't think those sphere electrodes on the bottom have to be Alcubierre.  Perhaps they pull charged Bernoulli Plasmoid across the top, increasing atmospheric pressure on the bottom.  Besides that, NASA did a test which verified Ray Palmer's ball theory.  He said there's a highly conductive cone shaped spring inside the sphere, and the sphere is filled with Mercury vapor.  A heavy pulse produces a magnetic effect which causes the cone to invert and ions to slam into the top of the sphere, on the inside.  [Reverse momentum is absorbed through elastic scattering].  After the pulse, the cone coil springs back to it's original orientation.  NASA sprayed plasma through a pancake coil and proved it produced thrust by measuring it.

How about this one: "Space, the Financial Frontier"

[giantkiller]

In the end the search is for the correct configuration of an Armstrong oscillator.
The feedback and reception are the key elements.
The medium depends on the materials used.
This too will control how the charge is channeled.

[Allcanadian]

GK

In regards to the 3 discs on the UAP underbelly: This triad promotes a 3 point Alcubierre model. By altering the parameters of any one disc gives rise to a shift in balance which the craft immediately 'Falls' into. The vertical proponent could be variation in all 3 discs or the craft hull is a vertical Alcubierre configuration.1: The three discs shift processes to cause a horizontal precession in the greater field of the craft hull.or2: The three discs do all the work and the craft hull is merely a container.

I came to a different conclusion than most.

The craft I saw pulled near 100G and accelerated beyond 60,000 mph. Moving from a low altitude hover to beyond low orbit in under one second.

As such propulsion has little to do with it in my opinion and the only logical solution is that they found a way to modify the property of inertia relating to mass. If there is no inertia there are no G forces and it could accelerate to any velocity using small propulsive forces.

I think Jerry hit on part of the answer and the 4000 year old Sanskrit texts described flying machines called Vimana using mercury vapor engines. Mercury vapor being used in these systems is a common theme ie. Tesla, Otis Carr, Moray, Correa's.

The notion of the craft hull being merely a container seems non-intuitive. The Vimana and other craft in the literature were massive some claimed to be as large as a small village weighing hundreds of tons. In fact, some claimed the weight was irrelevant and the more mass the craft had the more stable it was. Which makes more sense when we understand weight like mass is an illusion and completely dependent on a property we call inertia.

I figured out how some of this could work but it's beyond my pay grade. Conceptually the technology is not even that difficult but the dangers involved are mind boggling. Can you imagine moving to high altitude or worse low orbit in a second then having a short circuit somewhere?. There's also the issue of a high energy field known to cause radiation burns, transmutation and levitation of nearby objects. Can you imagine your shop just casually lifting off it's foundation doing a test?. No thanks...

AC

[Excelsior]

Regardless of the inherent dangers that this sort of tech may pose to the public, there is no excuse for it not having been developed as an energy source already, to fuel the human enterprise.

Instead we are told that fission is the best we've ever had .. Lies IMO

If we are at the point that ARV's are being flown so carelessly as to let us see them, then "they" have surely developed the energy source required past the point of being able to spin a turbine; there is a wealth of information coming out on this topic, say what you will about Steven Greer but he seems to be addressing these issues in a very deliberate and straightforward way.

[giantkiller]

Circuits adding up to resonant harmonics