Debate on "what is Energy"

[muDped]

The Force of Life is something that Institutional Science (whether Real or Paid For) cannot explain or even
comprehend.  They want us to believe that Life is able to arise Spontaneously.

Institutional Science has not the integrity to admit what it Secretly KNOWS to be True.

The Force of Life (or The Life Force) is indeed Meta-Physical.

Institutional Science will DENY this Secret Truth in favor of the Deception of Darwinism.

This "Belief" will be Parroted by all who are Deceived by Institutional Science.

The Few Real Scientists who Admit this Truth about Life have no voice in Institutional Science.

Institutional Science has been Corrupt for quite a long time.

Not to worry.  In its Due Time Truth will always Prevail.

Are trees so difficult to understand?, how could they think the principal of how a tree grows is unfalsifiable or untestable?.

When we observe ALL that takes place within the Living Tree as it Grows, Sustains Itself and even
to some extent Repairs Itself we are in awe.  What Intelligence within the Tree controls all of the
Numerous Processes in its Living Existence to take place synchronously and at the correct time?

The Tree is very, very complex.

The Tree is able effortlessly to produce all of its needed Nutrients, Sugars and Other Chemicals that it
needs.  While we in our Laboratories can synthesize those same Chemicals the processes we must
use are very difficult, energy intensive and extremely inefficient.

What the Tree is able to accomplish with Water, Air, Carbon Dioxide, the Minerals of the Soil and
Sunshine at ambient Temperature is nothing short of Miraculous.

How is it that the lowly Tree is able to do all of this?

Where does its Life Energy or Life Force actually come from?

Can you answer that question AC?

[Allcanadian]

The free energy principal states systems remain in non-equilibrium steady-states by restricting themselves to a limited number of states.

Living things like a tree could be said to have similar properties because they are made of many individual fibers acting together as a whole. This allows each fiber to move water through capillary action and absorption collectively. Thus it has limited the number of states in which the water is moved similar to the function of Casimir plates. In some sense we could think of it as millions of small hollow tubes or waveguides each giving the water a little push upwards.

This theme is common in nature when the whole is greater than the sum of it's parts. The parts act collectively with a common purpose despite the fact they must remain separate to accomplish there goal. This is an interesting theme with respect to the need of individuality versus the collective action. I call this natural phenomena the "hand off" whereby one individual part performs an action then transfers it's action to the next individual part which does the same. In this way all the parts collectively share the load however never at the same time like a communication network.

We still have a great deal to learn from nature because it has had literally billions of years to evolve unlike mankind. In the future our technology should become one with nature rather than always oppose it doing harm. A civilization based on building things up rather than tearing things down... it remains to be seen.

Regards
AC

[Allcanadian]

Here is an interesting concept...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d80oXSCcHTk
Drone Helicopter Hybrid

Not the fact a helicopter doesn't need a swashplate because I have been building and flying RC including electric planes and helicopters for years. I also built and experimented with a solenoid based electric system with no swashplate which worked well.

It's interesting because we can have very complex motions within other motions which are not apparent to an observer. I studied aerodynamics more so rotorcraft/wind turbines and yet if I saw this hybrid helicopter it's operation would be completely foreign to me without any prior knowledge. It would appear as being completely unworkable... but in reality it's not.

This theme is very common in free energy devices and what we think were seeing is usually not even remotely close to the actual truth of the matter. A person, even an expert, could observe something like this helicopter hybrid and never clue in to what's actually going on. Mainly because were biased without even knowing were biased. Were looking for what we expect to see based on our own experience versus the actual reality of the situation.

I thought this was a good example of "all is not as it seems" and we could have any number of processes going on within a known process unknown to any observers. In which case it's not what were seeing... it's what were not seeing that matters the most.

Regards
AC