PopularFX
Home Help Search Login Register
Welcome,Guest. Please login or register.
2024-05-23, 07:47:03
News: Check out the Benches; a place for people to moderate their own thread and document their builds and data.
If you would like your own Bench, please PM an Admin.
Most Benches are visible only to members.

Pages: [1]
Author Topic: OUR Award - Draft Rules, Terms, and Conditions  (Read 25242 times)

Group: Administrator
Hero Member
*****

Posts: 3217
It's not as complicated as it may seem...
Terms and Conditions for OUR Award Applications

1) Any person submitting an application for the OUR award must outline in sufficient detail that they have performed adequate measurements to merit their claim and application. This includes electrical, mechanical and heat-producing devices. The measurements and methods must be included with the application. The device must be able to produce a continuous1 output power of 15W (minimum) over and above the total amount of power applied to the device as an input source of power. If and when it is deemed that the applicant's submitted measurements are credible, the applicant will either submit the prototype for testing by OUR, or provide all the details necessary to replicate the device in question. The working device must be replicable.

2) OUR will make additional measurements on an adequate replication (or an applicant-submitted prototype) themselves using their own test equipment, in order to determine the merit of the application, at no cost to the applicant.

3) If the device operates in a self-sustaining mode while producing a continuous1 excess output power of 15W (minimum), and can be properly demonstrated as such, either in person, or with an applicant-submitted prototype, the OUR Award will be granted to the applicant. Alternatively, the applicant may submit to OUR all the details necessary to replicate the device in question.

4) In the event the application is successful and the OUR Award is to be granted, the applicant must first agree to publicly open-source the full details of the submitted device (within thirty days of the completion of the OUR tests) -- then the Award will be granted.

1. "Continuous" in the sense that apart from mechanical or electrical component (excluding battery or source material depletion) failure, the device shall produce this excess energy indefinitely.

the OUR team.
Last Edit: 2013-02-03, 10:43 by poynt99 & ION
« Last Edit: 2013-02-03, 17:43:29 by poynt99 »


---------------------------
"Some scientists claim that hydrogen, because it is so plentiful, is the basic building block of the universe. I dispute that. I say there is more stupidity than hydrogen, and that is the basic building block of the universe." Frank Zappa
   
Newbie
*

Posts: 40
What is required from the applicant?
Our claim is that whatever the industry of today is doing with electricity it's not in accord with nature.
Whatever it is that doesn't copy nature, it is not valid.
We have the first model that is built with the knowledge of how electricity works exactly. In this forum we described what the differences are and what should be done to correct it. The question is, what is the next step?
Best Regards,
   

Sr. Member
****

Posts: 409
Be the change you wish to see in the world
Surely the output amount should be a bit lower?

If something is provably running itself, over-unity and reproducible, even 1 watt output capacity should count?

As it could be refined and improved ?
« Last Edit: 2023-03-09, 16:25:57 by Renaissance Rising »
   
Group: Ambassador
Hero Member
*****

Posts: 4016
What is required from the applicant?
Our claim is that whatever the industry of today is doing with electricity it's not in accord with nature.
Whatever it is that doesn't copy nature, it is not valid.
We have the first model that is built with the knowledge of how electricity works exactly. In this forum we described what the differences are and what should be done to correct it. The question is, what is the next step?
Best Regards,

Sir
It would be wonderful if you make a path towards this claim ( scientific validation)
We have scientists in open source community willing to assist you towards that goal!
Sending  you an Email
Respectfully
Chet K


   

Newbie
*

Posts: 5
Hi,

what is the current status of the award? anyone won? if yes, is the award still in effect?

suppose someone fulfilled the terms and conditions.
suppose it's a very simple everyday physics phenomenon.
suppose it's the way to harness mountain, atmosphere, iron,  water, copper, molecule, fire, wind in which not commonly used in this age.
suppose it's a very simple thing with reasoning as clear as day that everyone can replicate it with sufficient preparations.
will that someone still get the award/ prize from our? (that is if the award still there to begin with)

thanks in advance,


---------------------------
And We made pliable for him iron,
and We made flow for him a spring of [liquid] copper
34:10,12
   

Jr. Member
**

Posts: 59


Buy me some coffee
I'm up for the challenge, where do I sign up?

https://www.overunityresearch.com/index.php?topic=4539
   
Group: Ambassador
Hero Member
*****

Posts: 4016
Sir
I dropped a note to Peter,
However he works many hours ,and Wednesday ( tomorrow) he is
Occupied with caring for family after work.

Regardless
He will be aware of claim,( although I am uncertain of status with this prize)
Wishing you the best .

Respectfully
Chet K
   
Pages: [1]
« previous next »


 

Home Help Search Login Register
Theme © PopularFX | Based on PFX Ideas! | Scripts from iScript4u 2024-05-23, 07:47:03