@Valerify Mr. Stevin proved the law of the equilibrium on an inclined plane I would agree the law of equilibrium applies to simple systems however there may more to it than meets the eye. When I was considering the Bessler wheel I remembered a quote by Tesla in his lecture "The Problem of Increasing Human Energy". Tesla implied that in any system such as this the equilibrium can only be maintained if the mass is constant however if it should change then all all bets are off. Then it occurred to me that mass may be constant but weight is conditional and many have confused the two terms. For instance I can have a 10 Kg mass that weighs 0 Kg in space or 5 Kg when accelerating downward or 15 Kg when accelerating upward. Apparent weight is variable depending on velocity in an external field and Inertia. Which explains Tesla's thoughts that if the apparent weight could be changed then the rules could be changed as well. At which point we have a very big problem because nobody knows what inertia is, they know what it tends to do but not what it is fundamentally. This is the wonderful thing about science, they always describe how things tend to act but never tell us what it is in reality because they do not know. However is has been speculated that if all the particles which constitute a mass where set in oscillation at a point of resonance that the property of Inertia would no longer exist. At which point we would have what Tesla envisioned because one object with inertia could accelerate producing a force in the opposite direction as is normally the case and another with no inertia would not ie.. non-equilibrium. In the end I came to the same conclusions as Tesla which are most definitely not common knowledge. Inertia is a universal constant because the universe is filled with fields interacting with matter on the most fundamental level thus mass is bound to space. If we modify the mass-space interactions then Inertia becomes variable and really we can do whatever the hell we want,lol. Now think about this, I have a 80 Kg mass free floating in space and I push on it and it resists the force of my pushing. If the mass was 80 Kg and I was 80 Kg then we would move in equal and opposite directions at the same velocity. I can believe this but it doesn't answer the question as to why the 80 kg mass resisted a change in motion in the first place. The answer is not inertia because we do not know what inertia is, it is a non-answer, so where did the force come from which resisted the change in motion?. Weird or what?. Here is a clue, the property of inertia resists "changes in motion" or an acceleration but not motion in itself such as a constant velocity. Where have we heard this before?, it sounds kind of like Induction to me. An inductor will resist changes in current but not current in itself such as a constant current... hmm. Believe me when I say once you have seen the "Big Picture" you will believe in magic. AC
---------------------------
Comprehend and Copy Nature... Viktor Schauberger
“The first principle is that you must not fool yourself and you are the easiest person to fool.”― Richard P. Feynman
|
Author
Topic: Simon Stevin's inclined plane (Read 6765 times)
