I have never heard anyone mention any significance of SM mentioning a Nuclear Explosion.
Well it turns out it's a EMP that's produced.
See Explanation below
http://textfiles.com/survival/emp.txt
QuoteSignificance of the Problem
------------ -- --- -------
THREE ten-megaton thermonuclear weapons detonated 250 miles ( 400 kilometers )
above the United States or Canada would produce EMP's strong enough to knock
out the entire electrical power grid of North America including the entire
civilian-telephone network, and just about every broadcast station.
Virtually every piece of unprotected electronic equipment in the country
-- radios, TV sets, computers, electronic controls in homes, office build-
ings, factories, cars, airplanes, and instruments in hospitals -- would be
damaged, if not destroyed. The pulses would also damage or destroy large
portions of the military command's control and communication (C3) system.
A chain reaction could be set in motion at nuclear power plants, due to elec-
tromagnetic pulses. Although it is a point that is frequently disputed, the
possibility exists that reactor core meltdowns might occur as a result of
EMP's. The meltdowns would be a by-product of electronic control system
failure. The control systems are used to monitor and control the processes at
the plants. The EMP's could cause the system to fail and result in partial or
complete loss of control over vital functions, causing subsequent melt-
downs. We know that those nuclear plants are designed to be fail safe,
but has anyone considered the possibility of every circuit breaker in a
plant failing at the same instant?
Characteristics of EMP's
--------------- -- -----
AT an altitude of 250 miles, the gamma rays produced in the first few nano-
seconds ( billionths-of-a-second ) of a nuclear explosion can travel hundreds
of kilometers before colliding with electrons in atmospheric molecules.
That kind of collision may take place in a region 2,000 miles in diameter and
6-miles thick. Electrons are accelerated by those collisions, a phen-
omenon referred to as the Compton effect; and upon reaching the earth's
magnetic field, they set up electromagnetic pulses that radiate downward
toward earth (Fig.1). Due to the extremely large area of collision, vast
amounts of ground area are exposed to electromagnetic fields with strengths
up to 50,000-volts per meter. The ground area exposed to electromagnetic
pulses could cover the entire continental United States and most of
Canada by one nuclear blast; if not, certainly large regions such as New
England would be electrically and electronically devastated.
FIG. 1 -- Electrons set into motion by gamma rays from a nuclear explosion in
space will produce enormous electromotive pulses (EMP's) when the negative
charges enter the Earth's magnetic-field. It is estimated that the ideal
height for such an explosion should be 250 miles above the Earth's surface.
:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
: :
: O - Nuclear Explosion :
: :
: / / :
: / / - Gamma Rays :
: --------------------------- :
: < Earth's Magnetic Field > :
: --------------------------- :
: ******* ******* ******* :
: ***** ***** ***** :
: *** EMP *** EMP *** :
: ***** ***** ***** :
: ******* ******* ******* :
: =============================== :
: EARTH :
: :
:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
EMP I wonder if this is what you would call Radiant Energy and exactly what Tesla produced from his stout wire experiments remember the 90 degree radiation.
Here's an article on EMP , quiet interesting what it says about Lightning strikes notice the 90 degree radiation
http://www.cci-msc.com/surgecontrol/fundamentals_overstress.html
QuoteElectromagnetic waves are formed by the discharge and radiate at 90 degrees from the path of the strike. So we see electromagnetic waves propagating through air directly away from the discharge. We also observe ground (Earth) currents propagating away from the point of ground strike. Direct strikes on power cables inject high currents into primary circuits producing voltage transients by flowing through ground resistance or through the impedance of the primary circuit. (See Figure 2)
Tv's use leaded glass in the construction of the CRT this helps absorb some of the gamma Xrays produced by the high voltage.
I believe it maybe quiet feasible to assume early crt's did not yet have the glory of lead shielding.
If a fault develops in the EHT supply or it gets missadjusted and exceeds the design specification then it is quiet possible for the gamma Xrays to reach higher levels, We have electron guns firing 3 streams of electrons in a colour TV Red,Green and blue, the electrons bombard a phosphorescent screen to allow the 3 colours to be seen, sounds like we have all the ingredients that causes the EMP in a nuclear explosion built within a TV that is running at way higher unregulated HT fault condition.
Are you thinking a TPU acts as a sink for ionospheric potential?
I don't recall SM talking about things nuclear. Where would I find that discussion?
Well i hope i have that right WW, i am sure SM talked about the magnetic field created during an explosion oh or was it Spheric, you got me confused now.
According to SM it was Dr. Schinzinger who mentioned it.
You can find it in the attached pdf.
Thanks Chef :-[
Although then not from SM, maybe time to ditch this thread then.
I was trying to point to the possible significance of switching transients and the possibility of them being what Tesla called Radiant energy, and that it maybe possible to capture the energy by some sort of 90 degree induction.
Because of the 90 degree event, it maybe possible to increase their power level or focus them into a V^2 power device.
Spherics.
Sm mentioned 2 freqs.
Ramset/Chet posted an excellent synopsis of 1 pulse right after the initial pulse.
gk and Chef looks like both mentioned it Quote from pdf above
QuoteIt was during this discussion with Dr. Schinzinger that he pointed out that
during an atomic explosion aside from the gigantic blast wave and heat
produced there is also an extremely large magnetic force which is so
strong that it travels way out into space during the explosion.
The magnetic wave is so strong that it will completely destroy any
unprotected electronic circuits of solid state design.
That is why solid state radios will be useless after an nuclear attack on
your country.
Let us ponder where the huge magnetic field comes from when you
explode an atomic bomb.
It is just created?
Is it converted?
Is it part of the earth somehow?
Is it just a by product of the fabric of time and space being ripped into
pieces in a fragment of a second?
I am curious as to where this unbelievably huge magnetic force comes
from during an atomic explosion...
It is something else to think about.
My point being
Quotedestroy any
unprotected electronic circuits of solid state design.
radiant energy/ EMP/ Power Spike / Kick they could be all the same thing
We know from Tesla that we need to make sure the current does not reverse during creation of the radiant pulse.
I wouldn't discount the whole idea.
SM did mention distant thunderstorms and how they were (supposedly) detected when they were at different points in their travel path. This made me think there was some importance to the distance between points where the moving storm was detectable.
A lightning strike does produce an EMP with a compression EM wave.
( I know peeps dislike the reference to compression waves but they are simply a different perspective of a transverse wave. i.e. You are looking at a sudden current flow traveling from your left to your right.... the increasing magnetic field created by that current flow appears to you as a sudden change in the density of the EM flux.)
If you ever experience a close proximity lightning strike you will feel the 'thump' of the strike. 'Close' being so close the only thunder you hear (If you can still hear) will be reflected sound.
Tesla crowning realization was that there is no energy in anything that does not come from the environment:
there is no energy in matter other than that received from the environment
Everyone here should explore Radiant Energy. Have any of you witnessed the charging effect?
QuoteHave any of you witnessed the charging effect?
See i am thinking that all modern design is in place to kill EMP pulses, for instance with a PCB a ground plane is used, Tesla could charge a metal plate from the radiant effect, pcbs use this pate charging as a plate dissipation same thing really.
If the ground plane is in place to dissipate the spike's energy then it must manifest as a ground current, this could be utilized as a self feeding system, i am more interested in the mixing of spikes and the resulting magnitude of the resulting energy.
I am wondering if a emp is created and allowed to dissipate over a ground plane and a resistor is placed in the ground plane path wether the energy can be monitored, can a negative and positive emp negate each other and can a positive and positive emp add in a V^2 fashion, i am not sure how much work has been done on this, i imagine it has been studied a lot the last decade or so, with as view to killing emp.
We know that Tesla place filters on the DC lines that exhibited the killing surges on power up, sounds the same as EM control as well, all these things seem to be very similar in nature.
So switch fast EM pulse radiates at 90 degrees to the conductor, collect with a large surface collector and use the ground current to feed the system.
Quote from: Grumpy on 2011.12.11, 17:04:41
Have any of you witnessed the charging effect?
Yes I have and do. There is no doubt this occurs. It is difficult to produce without high levels of energy being dissipated but less difficult if you stop trying to employ math intended for transverse wave propagation.
The other difficulty is saying you understand that a field is a property of space and not the object but everything you do indicates you think otherwise.
I'll say it again as it always rings true: People see what they either wish to see or are able to relate to previous experience.
Why do so many motorcyclists die? Primarily because other motorists don't see them. They are expecting two headlights, not one. The motorcycle didn't exist.
Being that the subject is EMP...
http://www.naturalnews.com/034344_EMP_weapons_electronics_modern_civilization.html
Would there be any way to protect devices from this?
The new thing seems to be, to convert all paper records to electronic. :o
Would CDs or DVDs be affected? Not that any drives will work after.
Crazy
Mags
If anyone in this thread will replicate the pulsed HV charging effect, we can un-poison the TPU well-spring and move forward.
(I'd show it myself, but I have to do a lot of work to put it all together. One of my greatest bench mistakes is to keep using the same parts, leaving little of the previous setups. It's much easier to build new setups.)
Imagine if there's a recipe for creating the ultimate EMpulse, we know they are created by switching noise but there must be an optimum ingredient that can make them bigger and more effective, i am wondering now if this is what was causing my controllers to crash during the delayed pulse experiments.
The 2 whitenoise channels that produced that nice big pulse in my copper ring, maybe when the timing is right i produced an EMP
I wonder if switching current or switching voltage creates bigger EMPulses.
So chaps whats the best way of producing EMpulses without using loads of energy in the first place, once the EMP is created it could be collected in many places at the same time, i am imagining it being like a high speed ripple in a pond as Tesla could walk around the room and see if or how it varied with distance.
I'm glad everyone is talking about these things again.
Well we certainly need a fresh look at this i think.
QuoteIf anyone in this thread will replicate the pulsed HV charging effect
I think this is a given certainty, Tesla charged objects and metal plates, and then there's the ground plane that channels to earth, we have also seen a video by borderland showing this to happen with a HV disc cap.
Funny everytime i think of radiant energy i keep thinking spark gap. Tesla, Don Smith, Grey, Kapanadze theres probably more.
EMP's/ transients in every device
Maybe the the best move would be to build Tesla's radiant collector and fire our EMP's at that as a guide to how well we are producing them.
Tesla Radiant Energy detector per his two patents is a good start. I have an old road sign I can polish up for this per Tesla's instructions. Ground can be to plumbing or electrical ground rod.
A second test would be to use the spark gap with deflector as a source. I have several thoughts on this when the time comes.
Darkspeed produced a stinging effect here:
http://www.overunityresearch.com/index.php?topic=561.msg8739#msg8739
Here is a diagram of a setup to produce the Radiant Energy Effect.
I do not recommend a Microwave transformer unless you limit the current as it is quite high (1000mA ?) (It did work but I was afraid I would smoke the coil so stopped using it.)
Very little current is manifest in the coil, it never gets hot, it never arcs over. I use high temp magnet wire. Note that the slightest nick in the insulation will cause to arc, but this type of insulation is very tough.
This is drawn from memory, so it might have errors, but gives the general idea.
One cool thing is that you can hold a screwdriver near a conductor in front of the coil and draw an arc off the conductor to the screwdriver.
:)
:)
Glad to see everyone warming to the idea of RE.
We need to move beyond the same points and references that have been touted and reposted over the last several years, with very little, if any, usable explanations accompanying them.
Longitduinal waves - Waves of "what"? How are they made? How are they used?
Gravity pulses - why is it called a gravity pulse? How did "gravity" even enter into this conversation?
I won't even bring up Bearden's terminology...
:)
I am glad there's some interest here.
Borderland showed how to convert to and from Longitudinal waves using caps and inductors in a ladder configuration.
I am going to try and show that switching noise does not obey conventional transformer action, and that there can be apparent power but that it's not usable in a conventional way, i did this experiment some time ago and came to these conclusions, i will try to replicate the experiment and post the results.
Too many people avoid HV.
Many following the TPU may not know it, but SM emailed several people as "Mercury Manilla" to say that the US Navy had a similar device in the 1950's.
A search of US patents reveals that there were several patents filed for Nuclear Batteries using radioactive components. These are interesting as they produce a very high voltage with little current, indefinitely. there may be some similarties between nuclear batteries and Tesla's Radiant Energy.
Interesting papers there tao
QuoteBecause due to the symmetry of a spherical terminal, most of the magnetic field vectors arising from the dynamic electric field cancel each other. What are emitted are concussive waves made of divergent vector potentials, and vector potentials are merely gradients of a scalar superpotential field, a.k.a. ether. So the spherical terminal would essentially radiate "sound waves" into the ether, just as Tesla surmised. For more on longitudinal waves and potential fields, see my other science-related research notes.
QuoteBecause due to the symmetry of a spherical terminal, most of the magnetic field vectors arising from the dynamic electric field cancel each other. What are emitted are concussive waves made of divergent vector potentials, and vector potentials are merely gradients of a scalar superpotential field, a.k.a. ether. So the spherical terminal would essentially radiate "sound waves" into the ether, just as Tesla surmised. For more on longitudinal waves and potential fields, see my other science-related research notes.
See? What is he describing with those colorful metaphors:
the magnetic field vectors arising from the dynamic electric field cancel each otherconcussive waves made of divergent vector potentialsvector potentials are merely gradients of a scalar superpotential field, a.k.a. ether"sound waves" into the ether :D
QuoteSee? What is he describing with those colorful metaphors:
Tesla's wireless energy transfer.
http://montalk.net/notes/tesla-wireless-technology
QuoteThe Secret of Free Energy
In case you missed it, there is a critical implication here. The transmitter does not lose energy by generating longitudinal waves, yet the receiver responds to those waves and generates a measurable current. This means that if the transmitter uses a million watts, and the receiver outputs the same, ten more receivers can each output a million watts without putting additional load on the transmitter. Where does the extra energy come from?
Well, there is something very special about an oscillating divergence in the vector potential, namely that it creates an oscillating time field that extracts energy from the flow of time itself. If you have ever wanted to know the secrets of free energy, this is definitely one of them. Under ideal conditions, the transmitter sends an information signal that nudges the receiver into extracting free energy from the time stream. Some would call it extracting the zero point energy, same thing if viewed from the quantum mechanical perspective instead of general relativistic. Due to the first equation showing the relation between divergence and charge density, charges vibrating in a compressive / expansive manner automatically extract free energy that adds to the amplitude of their oscillation.
That the transmitter and receiver electrically oscillate at resonance is how one can dial specifically into the other, and that their mode of oscillation involves radial electron compression makes the entire process assisted by free energy.
Quote from: Peterae on 2011.12.12, 21:54:46
Tesla's wireless energy transfer.
http://montalk.net/notes/tesla-wireless-technology
QuoteThe Secret of Free Energy
In case you missed it, there is a critical implication here. The transmitter does not lose energy by generating longitudinal waves, yet the receiver responds to those waves and generates a measurable current. This means that if the transmitter uses a million watts, and the receiver outputs the same, ten more receivers can each output a million watts without putting additional load on the transmitter. Where does the extra energy come from?
Well, there is something very special about an oscillating divergence in the vector potential, namely that it creates an oscillating time field that extracts energy from the flow of time itself. If you have ever wanted to know the secrets of free energy, this is definitely one of them. Under ideal conditions, the transmitter sends an information signal that nudges the receiver into extracting free energy from the time stream. Some would call it extracting the zero point energy, same thing if viewed from the quantum mechanical perspective instead of general relativistic. Due to the first equation showing the relation between divergence and charge density, charges vibrating in a compressive / expansive manner automatically extract free energy that adds to the amplitude of their oscillation.
That the transmitter and receiver electrically oscillate at resonance is how one can dial specifically into the other, and that their mode of oscillation involves radial electron compression makes the entire process assisted by free energy.
I underlined some absurdities. This is so "Bearden-esque" that I could barely stomach it. A couple of blurbs about "negentropy" and I would have lost my lunch. How can "charges vibrating" extract free energy? They totally miss the point and people with good intentions suffer for it.
There is so many of these "assumption-filled mis-interpretations" around that it is almost impossible to find good, truthful information. These good men lay down reams of typed hoopla, explaining this and that over and over, but never once do they offer up the goods.
Tesla had an approach to powering devices wirelessly.
If the process is not transmitting watts then what is transmitting?
The only other approach would be high frequency reactance.
Unless...
Shhhh, Aetheric manipulation. :o
Quote from: giantkiller on 2011.12.13, 00:16:15
Tesla had an approach to powering devices wirelessly.
If the process is not transmitting watts then what is transmitting?
The only other approach would be high frequency reactance.
Unless...
Shhhh, Aetheric manipulation. :o
Tesla's magnifier is an RE source, although is a horrible explanation and very misleading. Still no one ever builds the receiver, except for that Tesla Radio guy and he got excellent results.
EDIT:
The statement above means that most explanations of Tesla's work are absolute BS. Also, I seriously doubt the stories that Morgan pulled the plug when he found out the energy would be free. I think this is absolute BS to perpetuate lies and misleading BS.
Sure the magnifier was a generator of sorts but one magnifier would not power everything on the earth. Tesla showed in an article that several towers would be required as they only work over an area.
His reciever uses a coil and secondary which indicates the energy recieved varies or it would not induce the secondary. His other RE receivers have a cap and spark gap because the energy recieved is steady, so you have to switch it.
If you read Tesla Colorado springs notes, many times "resonance" would not be where he thought it would be based on calculations as he tunes for greatest effect and it was not LC resonance. Of course everyone else is an expert and has perpetuated misinterpretations for 100 years, why should anyone believe me?
:)
Quote from: tao on 2011.12.13, 15:27:09
So, it seems we need to start at square one so to speak. Generate some RE and try to characterize it, and interface with it for power generation.
So, Grumpy, how you envision RE being 'lenzless'/'non-reciprical'(in the sense of not loading the source)? Is it the fact that we create these RE 'emanations' via HV and very low to no current that allows this, since HV is 'cheap'? That would certainly allow a 'non-reciprical' type of power generation and a FE effect for sure, provided we can intercept and turn that RE 'emanation' back into a 'usable current' for our needs.
The "source" is not "THE SOURCE". "THE SOURCE" is the environment, the entire universe. Remember Tesla crowning realization, which is also my own greatest realization:
"there is no energy in matter other than that received from the environment"What we consider a source of energy is just that which creates the energy imbalance, not the energy itself.
The more I say, the less people will experiment, and I am beginning to think that people don't really want an alternative generator, but rather just want to know how it works to satisfy their curiosity. Never-the-less, I have stood, unwavering, by the affirmation that Tesla RE is the answer for several years now. (It is only very recently that I came to agree that the energy really is in the environment, it is available everywhere in the universe, and there is no limit to it.)
:)
Quote from: tao on 2011.12.13, 15:53:43
Aha, ok, that makes total sense in relation to Tesla's 'Non-polluting gradient', the idea being that all the energy comes from the 'environment', in Tesla's example it came from a lake, but in general, that lake could be viewed as the 'aether'/'natural medium'.
You are right Grumpy, the more you talk and we talk, the more all this just becomes a talk-fest and no one ends up experimenting because most will just want to keep talking and not doing, its no one's fault, its just what 'always happens'.
I think, for me, I just would like to have something defined, at least somewhat, that we can then test against. First and foremost would be to start producing what we feel is RE, and then once we are producing it and can do it on demand, then we can move forward from there. What do you think?
I think, those adventurous few, I'm sure there won't be that many, but, I think that we should come together, get some relatively simple setups going, that we can all have similar setups, and can all attempt to first produce the RE from these setups. Then we can further collaborate and move from there, figuring out and defining our goals and interactions with our emanated RE productions and move onward toward proper working devices.
Yes, I agree that producing the RE effect is the first step. Darkspeed and Dollard did it, shared it, but everyone was, and still are, doing other things. It's open-source. No one can lay claim to it, or buy it.
Does this diagram have an error? If so, no one has called me on it.
EDIT:
The following are questions and answers from a HAM test:
What is the phase relationship between the current through and the voltage across a series resonant circuit?
The voltage and current are in phase
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
What is the phase relationship between the current through and the voltage across a parallel resonant circuit?
The voltage and current are in phase
We can derive from this requirement, and a bunch of other indications from Tesla-ish literature, since he ran everything at resonance, that you need the current, and it's associated magnetic field, to be present at the same time as the electric pulse.
It would probabaly be a good idea to add a steady magnetic field coil around the coil in that diagram.
:)
Quote from: tao on 2011.12.13, 17:02:40
I guess, my thing is, we are not going to be making large magnifying transmitters, and therefore we need to characterize and confine the effect into a smaller portable setup where we can use the RE effect to imbalance and then intercept the energy for use. What that setup will eventually look like, I don't know at the moment, but that is what experimentation would bring forth. So, in my mind, the first step would be, create the Stinging Effect, why?, so that we know we have RE, and because it stings, we can clearly define it as RE, then from there, we can do some experimentation to characterize the RE some, and then from there, we can try to 'intercept' the 'imbalances' in the 'environment' that we are making with our manifested RE. Sound like a plan or no?
Based on currently available information, I don't feel the Magnifier is practical for alternative energy. Kapanadze's green box device is a step forward, but still has the ground connection and a ground reference grid would probably be a good idea to keep the output steady.
RE doesn't always sting. This is only at a certain range of repetion rates. Around 15kHz as I recall, but this should be confirmed. So, create the charging effect - that is the plan. Forget about the imblances for now.
I have posted several references to density changes of the vacuum itself and that this increases the permeability. Nipher performed experiments indicating that electric potential increases permeability. Apparently no one has stopped to think about what this implies. Ferromagnetic materials increase permeability. Moving a piece of ferrite into and out of a coil changes the inductance of a coil. A magnet increaes permeabilty. Move the magnet into and out of a coil and a current is induced. By changing the density of the vacuum, I make a very strong magnet, and move it very quickly, and very little work is required since I do not have to move the mass, but the current induced is based on the magnetic field density and rate of change - not the mass. ;)
Anyone can put together a coil and magnet or two coils and a piece of ferrite and verify that changing permeability induces current, as a proof of concept.
Anyway, all this is interesting but fruitless without effort and experiments. You need a HV DC pulser and some wire, magnet, power supply or batteries for the DC field. A magnet will react without the DC field.
:)
Attached is a file of an article by a man that tried Bearden's Radiant Battery Charging idea from his latest book. Results were less than he expected, but he did get his hands dirty and learn from the experiment.
Side note: Back in elementary school, I entered a failed experiment into a science fair and win an honarable mention for it. My father help me cleverly word the results to show that experiment had indead shown that the hypothesis was incorrect, and therefore was successful.
Even failed experiments provide results.
My take on the whole thing is to stick with what Tesla actually said and did. Do not follow the advice of using "any" material, such as steel, and 70 foot long wire. Tesla used a polished plate for good reasons. Tesla states in his patent that a battery can be placed across the capacitor instead of a ground connection. I guess the B-B Team didn't read it.
The the B-B Team of "charletans" have poisoned good minds with their crap, like the whole "different kind of energy stored in a capacitor" BS. "Negative energy" - what the hell is that? It's really sad that the B-B Team soils the name of Tesla like they do. Granted Tesla was human, not a God, an as fallable as anyone else.
When you start experimenting, it will help to have resistive voltage dividers that draw very little current, so you can see your hv signals on your scope, but keep in mind that the signal is attenuated, so detail is lost. Values can be calculated on the hyperphysics web site.
OK some very interesting stuff from Eric Dollard Only 1 year old
This is a must see.
Part1 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y-DjFZfTITk
Part2 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1_R0t8mYWj0
Part3 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qy4cHF0LLBw
Part4 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VNAWvF3RYwE
Part5 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b4CC-QsWr5k
Part6 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1N7Ryf1x-wo
Lets run this up the flag pole...
I have done the compwave generation tests multiple times, but with 12Vdc on a paper towel tube coil.
I have never raised the voltage. So this I will do with the newest coil. I have the electrostatic ec600 @ 2000vdc to involve also.
To me this looks like a new entry.
Also I live close to top secret testing areas. The other day some neighbors and I were watching a fighter jet circle the area when it just disappeared in plain sight. Not over the horizon but right above our heads at about 1k feet. It was not ascending but traversing horizontally. It wasn't a glint or a flash then reapperance but totally disappeared. We could still hear it though. The neighbors dont know what I do...
So I am apprehensive about my testing. I tend not to do it in the day time. But I also don't know what spectrum the tracking sites are looking at either.
Or one day I become MIB cloak property. I could end up in a new lab or in the ground.
Quote from: Peterae on 2011.12.13, 20:23:55
OK some very interesting stuff from Eric Dollard Only 1 year old
This is a must see.
Part1 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y-DjFZfTITk
Part2 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1_R0t8mYWj0
Part3 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qy4cHF0LLBw
Part4 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VNAWvF3RYwE
Part5 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b4CC-QsWr5k
Part6 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1N7Ryf1x-wo
It's from 1996.
:)
Yes, but you may think about the possibility of -VL actually being -L resulting in -VL.
At least, this is something I am wondering about for the moment.
A negative inductor behaves almost similarly to a capacitor, they are reciprocal to each other, however, a true capacitor exibits a lower impedance with increased frequency, while a negative inductor exibits an increasing impedance with frequency, but it behaves as a capacitor from the standpoint of the phase, meaning the current leads by 90 deg (or is it the other way around?)
Here's the math, let's calculate the impedance of a negative inductor:
Z = j (2 pi f) (-L) = (1/j) (2 pi f) (L)
See how simple that was. ;D
EM
Thanks EM.
You've provided the math for the current definition of a negductor - one simulated with digital electronics.
Quote from: poynt99 on 2011.12.14, 01:17:26
It's from 1996.
This is more recent: http://www.energeticforum.com/renewable-energy/1631-peter-whatever-happened-eric-p-dollard-24.html#post172086 (http://www.energeticforum.com/renewable-energy/1631-peter-whatever-happened-eric-p-dollard-24.html#post172086)
EDIT: Link updated. (HTMLL?)
Quote from: Rosphere on 2011.12.14, 23:05:18
This is more recent: http://www.energeticforum.com/170073-post631.htmll (http://www.energeticforum.com/170073-post631.htmll)
HTMLLLLLLLLLL?
Waddya got? Park mumble? :P
Let try this for real:
http://www.energeticforum.com/170073-post631.html (http://www.energeticforum.com/170073-post631.html)
So, um, Eric Dollard never found the Holy Grail of OU?
:)
The equation doesn't indicate that increased permeability, slows down radiant energy, impedes its flow.
Theories, assumptions, and hypothesis only get you so far and then you have to test them, update them, then test them again.
Have any of you read Tesla two patents for Radiant Energy receivers? Many write if off to the photoelectric effect, or cosmic rays (high energy particles or photons), but the plate is insulated and one side of the cap is grounded.
:)
Quote from: giantkiller on 2011.12.14, 23:51:26
HTMLLLLLLLLLL?
Waddya got? Park mumble? :P
...
Sorry about that. My bad. I should have tried my link after posting. I just updated it.
It looks like tao is already discussing equations with T-rex while I have been trying to catch-up on reading all the T-rex posts since August. (I had just found them when I posted the htm-double-L link. Where had I been?)
I have also been collecting the recommended reading. I will try to attach them here.
EDIT: I was only able to slip two of six documents under the 20,000 KB limit. One can find lower resolution documents elsewhere on the 'interwebs' but the text is hard on the eyes and images of iron-filings-and-such detail are difficult to make out.
QuoteReferences:
1. Electro-magnetic Theory Vol. 1 by Oliver Heaviside.
2. Impulses, Waves and Discharges by Carl Steinmetz.
[Electric Discharges, Waves and Other Impulses Charles Proteus Steinmetz]
3. Electricity and Matter by J.J. Thompson.
4. Recent Researches Into Electricity. By J.J. Thompson
5. Discharges In Windings by E.P. Dollard
[Introduction to Dielectric & Magnetic Discharges in Electrical Windings, Electrical Oscillation]
6. Occult Ether Physics by Layne
73 DE N6KPH
EDIT: I found a better copy of number 2.
EDIT: Found number 5.
By combining Fundamental, 3rd and preferably 5Th harmonics it is possible to create square waves.
Acoustically or even magnetically i wonder if it is possible to create a series of spacial transitions?
Using coils to mix Fundamental, 3rd and 5Th + more going much higher, then i wonder if it would be possible to get close to the perfect square wave, i am not talking about creating a square wave in a wire, i am talking about creating a square wave in space, but then would a square wave really appear square in space, surely it would appear as a gradient.
Once the spacial transition has been created it would just be a matter of feeding the harmonics produced back to the input :D
QuoteAn ideal square wave requires that the signal changes from the high to the low state cleanly and instantaneously. This is impossible to achieve in real-world systems, as it would require infinite bandwidth. It would also require particles to be able to be able to travel faster than the speed of light, as the slope of an ideal square wave at these points is undefined (or infinite)
In fact this would explain the early crackles i was getting in a ferrite core driven from 3 separate frequency sources, and also the large transitions i have been seeing and explosions in wires, i was just trying to create them using switches when a system is needed that can create harmonics without switches, roll on the magnetic saturated inductor for creating odd harmonics where the spacial result can easily be fed back into the input
HIGH TEMPERATURE AND NEUTRON PRODUCING SYSTEM
Quote from: Peterae on 2012.01.01, 21:49:53
By combining Fundamental, 3rd and preferably 5Th harmonics it is possible to create square waves.
Acoustically or even magnetically i wonder if it is possible to create a series of spacial transitions?
Using coils to mix Fundamental, 3rd and 5Th + more going much higher, then i wonder if it would be possible to get close to the perfect square wave, i am not talking about creating a square wave in a wire, i am talking about creating a square wave in space, but then would a square wave really appear square in space, surely it would appear as a gradient.
Once the spacial transition has been created it would just be a matter of feeding the harmonics produced back to the input :D
In fact this would explain the early crackles i was getting in a ferrite core driven from 3 separate frequency sources, and also the large transitions i have been seeing and explosions in wires, i was just trying to create them using switches when a system is needed that can create harmonics without switches, roll on the magnetic saturated inductor for creating odd harmonics where the spacial result can easily be fed back into the input
True, but the combination isn't just a simple superposition:http://www.energeticforum.com/renewable-energy/5762-missing-fundamental-generator.html#post97086 (http://www.energeticforum.com/renewable-energy/5762-missing-fundamental-generator.html#post97086)
It needs to be diminished by 1/n :http://www.energeticforum.com/renewable-energy/5762-missing-fundamental-generator.html#post96486 (http://www.energeticforum.com/renewable-energy/5762-missing-fundamental-generator.html#post96486)
8)
Thanks Harvey very interesting O0
Peterae,
I have always considered the low frequencies (vibrations, etc.) SM referred to as being due to subharmonics generated from the mix of other signals. Of course, the generation of electronic subharmonics is flatly denied by most but it does happen and the results can be very wide ranging.
The best example I can think of is the use of parametric ferrite antennas for undersea and subterranean communication and imaging. The first thing widely denied is the antenna can be smaller than a lunch-box and simultaneously have a very high Q, gain and be fully resonant under 30kHz. The second thing widely denied is that such a device could produce extremely high energy audible signals, some sub-audible (below frequency range of our hearing) at super low frequencies( .1 to 30Hz.).
I stopped looking for proof such a thing was used in magnetic imaging when a study was announced to determine the extent of the detrimental effects of this device upon ocean life :D
I use the same method to make wire loops, normally resonant in the mHz range, resonate at frequencies magnitudes lower.
Here is an accepted use of the same theories: http://www.google.com/patents/US4458248
Hi WW
Yeah i understand what you are saying, i have had audible lower frequency oscillations pop up when using much higher frequencies, now if we could produce a high frequency oscillation and see a much stronger sub harmonic that would be nice 8)
Infact that could be an interesting experiment drive a high freq tuned circuit and place a series of much lower sub tuned circuits near it and compare the power levels, I'm sure this must be a comonly known procedure for people that know what they are doing. ???
Quote from: Peterae on 2012.03.18, 11:35:25
I'm sure this must be a comonly known procedure for people that know what they are doing. ???
It isn't a commonly known method for those thinking they know what they are doing ;D Most of those folks will blow the concept off as stupidity.
The Navy of most countries will disagree. We haven't trailed mile-long cable behind our traveling subs as a communication antenna in decades, except for some old emergency com systems still used.
It helps to remember that EM propagation is a completely different animal in frequency ranges below 200kHz. (I suppose this is another point where the 'know what they are doing' crowd would start barking).
You can experiment with the concept without the ferrite cores.
It is my old claim of making a few feet of wire resonate at 35kHz. Remember?
Instead of using a frequency and additional winding to vary the resonant point of a loop you can inject frequencies into the loop and extra winding to create a subharmonic signal in a second loop and/or vibration and/or audible effects.
Monstein and Wesley: Observation of scalar longitudinal electrodynamic waves
http://www.astro.ethz.ch/people/pdf_files/cmonstei/7210.pdf
At the end of this paper, they attribute the large effect associated with nuclear explosion to a scalar longitudinal EM wave.
Quote from: Grumpy on 2012.10.09, 02:55:17
...
At the end of this paper, they attribute the large effect associated with nuclear explosion to a scalar longitudinal EM wave.
"One of us (Wesley) [5,6], was unable to explain the huge electrodynamic signal produced by a nuclear-bomb explosion, when it was assumed that only transverse electrodynamic waves are possible."...
This is a sophism known as "Argumentum ad ignorantiam" (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument_from_ignorance).
This kind of speech demonstrates the poorness of their intellectual reflexion and confirms the levity of their experiment which has been rejected (http://iopscience.iop.org/0295-5075/66/1/153).