Jim is this what you are after

If looking for old documents, its worth looking in wayback machine to see if a copy was recorded 

My AI research lab found a better way to arrange 64 wind turbines in a standard computer test. The same turbines, in the same area, produced about 0.85% more electricity in the simulation than the best published layout we found. We checked it using the test's original software, published the coordinates, and asked one of the researchers who created the test to verify it.
https://zenodo.org/records/23448033

cool vid Verpies.

🏆🎉⚡ CONFIRMED RESULT: THREE SKEPTICS AGREE!!! ⚡🎉🏆 EVALUATED WITH THE OFFICIAL CONSTELLARATION 0.3.0 GEOMETRICALPROBLEM EVALUATOR, THE BOUNDARY IN OBJECT/BOUNDARY.JSON IS FEASIBLE UNDER THAT EVALUATOR'S 1E-2 RELATIVE-TOLERANCE RULE (FEASIBILITY 0.0098997) AND HAS MAX ELONGATION 1.1743662351223367, STRICTLY LOWER THAN THE BEST FEASIBLE ENTRY (1.1756487689141413) IN THE PROXIMA-FUSION/CONSTELLARATION-BENCH-RESULTS GEOMETRICAL TABLE AS FETCHED ON 2026-10-17. 🥳🎊🚀🌍

Headline: a new boundary for ConStellaration's geometrical problem has max elongation 1.1743662351, below the best feasible public entry (1.1756487689) under the official evaluator. The gain mostly comes from using more of the evaluator's 1% feasibility tolerance (0.0099 against the leader's 0.0090). Second target: nothing found on Kasagi et al. 2025, the nickel–hydrogen excess-heat paper.

ConStellaration: I reproduced the leader's score locally to 1.6e-14, then refined that public boundary step by step with the official evaluator scoring every candidate. The gain is 0.11%. About a fifth of it holds even at the leader's own feasibility level, so it isn't only spent tolerance. The design stays feasible only on the evaluator's fixed 201-point grid; at 401 points both it and the leader would fail.

Quote from: JimBoot on 2026.10.16, 02:11:59...surface charge density of order 1 C/m²

Jeez!  That charge density would cause effects similar to this:
https://youtu.be/jNuify4u-28

10/15/26

A few new open source builds at Mooker
Thaelin is going to be sharing more information on his pulse motor

https://mooker.com/thread-488.html


"Jim and Lasco Figuera Parallel Build "

"Pierre Cotnoir's DZ Generator "

Link to Mooker below ....
—-////////

There is need at Overunity Machines forum
Link here

https://overunitymachines.com/index.php/topic,82.msg2834.html#msg2834

////——///—-////———-

Below are other open source forums,

Edit on overunity.com
Stefan's Forum Archive will be opening again at a new domain ( hosted by overunitymachines administrator)
Link to under construction archive

https://overunityarchives.com/
Also:
Note Overunity.com link should provide link to Stefan's Telegram forum .


—-////——///


Below a list of open source and "other" forums .
*** NEW LINK ( thanks to member Ronee)

https://groups.io/g/EVGRAY/topics

http://www.quantumheat.org/index.php/en/ (Martin Fleischmann memorial project THOR reactor+ ( see list at site.
Note a gent from Australia hosting updates on Thor reactor https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KHMuiGR-dlg
Above channel has Miami meeting update,

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=bUvOy3plKxA&t=336s

https://mooker.com/ ( Floodrod at OU.com ( Jim Mac at mooker


***HERE some ongoing projects at Mooker
member unimortal is working on the Hubbard coil here

https://www.mooker.com/showthread.php?tid=308

Also Jim Mac (Floodrod) is hosting a Figuera group investigation with a new twist here

https://mooker.com/thread-357.html****

http://typeright.social/forum/ (host  Joel legace
Joel's YouTube
https://m.youtube.com/@joellagace1679


https://www.beyondunity.org/ ( "Fighter" is I believe administrator Please Note Atti's  Adam's motor topic he is wonderful open source researcher  , hopefully onto a gain mechanism

https://overunitymachines.com/ ( UFOpolitics is administrator

https://www.merlib.org/ ( administrator esarouho ( longtime open source gentleman
       
In addition to open source forums above, other News below
a claim  from Aaron at Energetic forum ( open source??)

Note: I see Wesley also has links to topics there.
http://www.energeticforum.com/forum/energetic-forum-discussion/renewable-energy/eric-dollard-official-forum/513000-colorado-springs-20-1-replication#post514296


End of list

Topic under construction: not a thread ,just a bulletin board ( this forum has no such provision
Did mention this board to administrator prior to presenting)
Respectfully
Chet

P.S.
For the time being, List will be bumped periodically

1st confirmed output that passed.

Confirmed result: three skeptics agree!!!
In US10144532b2, equation 2 (stated by the source to follow from its non-relativistic equation 1) yields the illustrated 10³³ W/mat the quoted surface charge density of order 1 C/m² with f_g = 1 only if its speed-dimensioned bracket (r_v v²) t_op equals about 8.85*10²¹ m/s (about 2.95*10¹³ c) for any r_v and t_op, whereas keeping that bracket at or below c caps the flux at about 3.4*10¹⁹ W/m², and the quoted "operational time on the order of the inverse of the vibrational amplitude" is dimensionally 1/m so the source's 10³³ figure depends on the length unit chosen.

@JimBoot

Hermes cannot write code like Claude.

I rarely use claude these days as my main harness is Hermes. I don't need to do that test as I saw it happen months ago which is one of the main reason I'm on hermes. I still use their models though. If you use claude you are subjkect to the sytem prompt and all their other rules. In hermes I'm just using it for backend inference.

Anthropic are the worst in chat. However I;m using this method. https://github.com/elder-plinius/V3R1T4S - Already about 10 maths problems have been solved on opus 5.5 using this method. If I get a refusal it should be obvious. But I also have qwen3.8 27b jailbroken running locally (no gaurdrails) this model is as good as SOTA ones from just a few months ago. We can work around the censorship. The main thing this author does is jailbreak models

hey jim
so which ai's do you believe come up with the best solutions and info on these ou subjects?  does it seem like some or all have built in restrictions on these subjects?

thanks

mags