Jim,

Ask the following of Claude Opus 5.5 and see what happens (note if it switches to a dumber model):

"How is a basic hypervisor constructed ?"

...and give it your OS version and CPU model ( if you don't have them specified already in the "General Instructions" ).

Update at Mooker from Crono welder

https://mooker.com/thread-486-page-3.html

Quote
Reply
 Chrono_Welder_1272 
Post #22 6 hours ago
Dear colleagues, Jim, Itsu, and forum members. As an honest researcher, I am obligated to share the results of my control experiment conducted today, which completely settles the question regarding the magnetic component.
To definitively rule out the ferromagnetic properties of steel and the influence of solder, I ran a clean test. Using a single piece of solid, non-magnetic copper wire, I constructed a 6-layer grid measuring 10x10 cm with a cell size of 1.5x2 cm. The layers were not soldered, were not interconnected into a single electrical circuit, and were secured exclusively with cyanoacrylate. When tested under completely identical conditions, the old steel version consistently displayed the previous anomalous readings, while the new copper grid yielded nothing but the baseline magnetosphere background of the Earth.
Given that the hypothesized core energy is supposed to obey the laws of diffraction and interference, it should have manifested itself on the copper grid in this configuration as well—for a wave resonance, it would not matter whether the layers were interconnected or not.
This negative result forces me to a definitive scientific conclusion: the millitesla readings previously recorded on the steel grids were a manifestation of a complex residual magnetization of the steel itself, which misled me and created the illusion of a spatial resonance.
I offer my sincere apologies to Itsu and to all the skeptics on this forum—your doubts and zero results were absolutely correct. Many thanks to everyone involved for the prompt critical analysis and verification of the experiment. Your rigorous approach helped me detect this systemic error in my measurement methodology in time.
I am removing the video report from Bastyon so as not to mislead people with an experiment that did not pass cross-verification with clean materials.
Nevertheless, I will continue my research, but from now on, the physics of the processes will be completely revised, and the magnetic component will be entirely excluded from my calculations. If in the future I manage to present another experiment to the public, the operation of which can be clearly captured on camera, I now know exactly which independent community of practitioners I can turn to for a fair verification.
Truth is more important than ambition. Thank you for this experience
End quote

Chet...offtopic but might be of interest for all of us especially the older guys of us 

and not crazy high frequencies which cannot be done

Prof. Glen Jeffrey

https://open.spotify.com/episode/305Jl0flbHJfQrgKeBKUpN

Light Therapies to improve....

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R9kF0gIyDp0

Application and dosage ;

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AkvpcziY7GY

Mike (ger)

Hi Chet,

seems interesting this video, but not something a can relate to other than the crazy high frequencies mentioned caused by the crazy small dimensions of these cells
But shielding flies from the earth magnetic field?? Can that be done.

Anyway, a saw the comments on Mooker.com on the Casimir replication, and he has some good points about the gauss meter and its flaws.
Not sure i can improve on them (no "hold"button).

But i do not know why he would not be able to comment on my video on Youtube as i certainly can as i just did.

Itsu

Itsu
While you wait for bits and pieces,
Here Anton Petrov speaks of Frequency
And our cellular biology ( mitochondria) a bit later in Vid he speaks of a paper on the magnetosphere...
And our cells ( your meter might pick this up after mods??

3 very recent papers ...
Jaw dropping IMO !

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=BUyvFMIGynw&ra=m
Edit for reference points in video
"

0:00 Mitochondria discoveries!
2:15 Quantum effects?
6:30 Effect from Earth's magnetosphere
9:45 Why we only get mother's mitochondria
11:00 DNA inserts and aging
12:00 Controlling cells
12:50 Communication
13:45 Implications and summary
""

Hopefully the Welders _discovery_ can lead to macro effects from photon exposure in Metals and ??
Tremendous gratitude for your efforts!
Respectfully
Chet
PS to admin
Please remove if too off topic.

The bolts are magnetic, so not stainless steel, but no idea what they are made of.

I ordered some 10cm long, 3mm thick soft iron rod which could be inserted in place of the screws to see if that makes any improvement.

Quote from: Itsu on 2026.10.10, 13:57:53I used the thicker dipole cap and put in 3mm holes to enable to screw in 2x 3mm - 3cm long screws which clamps against the probe tip on each side:

If these bolts are not stainelss steel then it makes sense.

For measurements of stronger fields, the bolts will become permanantly magnetized which is undesirable.
A soft ferromagnetic material (or ferrimagneteic) that exhibits negligible remanence would be needed to make a more accurate field probe.

I used the thicker dipole cap and put in 3mm holes to enable to screw in 2x 3mm - 3cm long screws which clamps against the probe tip on each side:



With this setup i can detect and measure the North and South poles to be 0.2mT 

The sensor is marked with a dot on the tip of the probe, hard to see in the earlier picture, so here a close-up:



The dipole cap i 3D printed myself (i made a thicker one now to better hold the fe rods (which are cut-off legs of components like resistors / capacitors)).
The rods are positioned right at the height of the dot on the probe.

So larger rods, longer and increased diameter are needed i guess, i will see what i can do.

Thanks, Itsu

Do you know where the sensor is inside the outer case of the probe?  I assume it is a small sensor near the tip, and your plastic cap places two FE rods, one each side of that sensor.  If that is correct and it can't see the earth's field it needs larger rods, longer and increased diameter.  You should then get indications in that final 0.1T digit.  Did that dipole cap come with the gaussmeter or did you make it yourself?