|
Hi all I would like to comment on some of the thoughts above,and also give the readings from the meters after the cool joule was running all night in the dark. Total voltage is now 2.487 Run battery-1.222 volts,a drop of .006 volt's Charge battery-1.259 volt's,a rise of .154 volt's--This was since the last time i measured the charge battery voltage alone.
Both these battery's are new-first timed used-straight out of the garden lights.
WW-One LED is very unlikely to be a hidden source of charging power but if you go the route of other experimenters and 'load' your JT down with a huge array of LEDs you are actually just adding solar cell capacity as the charging source.]
Not possable,as the current flow from the LED would be in the wrong direction to charge.I also have a diode on the collector that would stop current flow from the LED in that direction.The transistor would also be open when and if the current could flow in that direction.I think you will find that all ss system's would not be receiving a charge from the LED's,as the current flow is in the wrong direction-and also because the collector is open when the current from an LED array could flow.Even when the C-E junction is close-the positive charge would be flowing straight to the negative of the run battery-as the emitter on the npn is ground(or negative).So i cannot see any way that any number of LED's could be adding to the system?.
@ION-Don't forget that batteries can gain voltage capability in the short term by pulsed elimination of sulphation thus reducing internal impedance
As i said above,the battery's are new-first time used.They are also nicad's-so no desulphation taking place here,only the conversion of potassium hydroxide to cadmium hydroxide as the battery discharges-so no sulphide involved here.
@WW-Yes. Another tricky part to these battery circuits and why most folks fade away when they replace the battery with a cap. Of course, some well known folks just claim a battery and a cap don't work the same way. They are correct but not for the wild reasons given.
The only problem i see is that although a cap;s parallel resistance is low(like a batteries),the series resistance is very high.As we have the batteries hooked in series,this may be a problem when switching to cap's-as the circuits resistance will rise?.I do intend on switching to cap's,but i will use super caps to try and bring the series resistance down as far as we can.There is also that lose you get when charging one cap with another-i believed Ex and poynt mentioned this a couple of time's.
I have been playing around with pulse motors and ss system's for many years now,and am well aware of battery effect's that can take place when using SLA's.I also see nothing special about this simple oscillator,other than i have never seen this happen with nicad's.The thing to remember here is that we dont have high voltage spike's charging a battery-the voltage the charge battery is receiving is only 2.42 volt's(after the LED has had it's bite at the voltage available). The reason i like using nicad's is because to gain voltage when charging,you must convert one chemical back to another.The amount of this change determines the charge within the battery-unlike SLA's where you can have a surface charge form on the plate's them self.
---------------------------
Never let your schooling get in the way of your education.
|