Spin Conveyance Theory (SCT)

[wattsup]

This thread is opened and will harbor Spin Conveyance Theory.

This thread will probably always remain locked to permit the logical flow of content and I will open a companion thread for @members who wish to discuss.

Back soon.

wattsup

[wattsup]

Are you looking for Ideas for Experiments?

This post #1 will hold my Shout Outs to anyone out there that can do experiments. I will add them on this post and hopefully some will have what it takes to accomplish any of them as this will help tremendously in the bettering of Spin Conveyance Theory (SC or SCT) as well as that which we hold today may either be stronger when integrated with or eventually fade out of favor, that will not be only up to me. hahaha

So I will give a summary of the experiments and if anyone can do it please PM me before with your plans on how to proceed.

Oh, if you are a university professor and have great ideas for new experiments that may go against the present grain of thought and you do not want to risk losing your position, send it to me via PM. I will post it here and but ask me to mark it as Origin: Anonymous, then I will delete your PM. hahaha

Lastly, if you have seen an experiment that would help explain similar effects, please let me know.

**********************************************************************************

1. Magnetic forces in a vacuum. Origin: wattsup

Make a base and a jig that can hold four pairs of magnets under normal gravity as follows;

M = Magnet, E = Expanding Spring between Attraction, A = Ambient Repulsion Space N = North, S = South

SET-----------1------2-----3-----4
TOP-----------N-----S-----N-----S
TOP-----------S-----N-----S-----N
OPEN---------A------A-----E-----E
BOTTOM------S-----N-----N-----S
BOTTOM------N-----S-----S-----N
BASE ---------------------------------

These should be mounted on a base, then do some distance measurements between the top and bottom magnets for initial Repulsion (A) and Attraction (E). Then take that base and secure it in a vacuum chamber that can gradually produce a good, serious vacuum. During the gradual rise in vacuum, see if there is any change in the distances of the four pairs. Provide a video of the experiment(s).

These can also be done in single pairs and four runs.

Please be careful since the Attraction magnets should have an expanding spring between them and should the vacuum suddenly arrive at any critical level that the Attraction is nullified instantly, the magnets could fly up and maybe break something.

If you consider how much was spent on CERN and on everything field related, it would be a true insult indeed if the field was but concentrated air, and maybe that explains why magnets loose strength when they get hot. That would then confirm that even CERN is not producing a field because they do their colliding in a vacuum as well and that would show that the coils are producing gravity and gravity being equal all around, the atom will still stay in the center, like it would in free space and their instruments would still show what they see now.

Hahaha. I know this is asking a lot but I have never seen or read anyone do this one experiment that would give any chance for the field to survive. But........it could eliminate the field and for Spin Conveyance, either way, it would be good to know. I think only a University could do this as I do not have that kind of equipment.

So which University would like to do an experiment that could disprove the field in one shot? If nothing happens, great, but we still would need to see this as a minimal.

Basis: Drill a well to the outer edge of Earths core and tell me what will be the atmospheric pressure at that level. Like all would imagine it being very high, maybe high enough to float in air, like two balloons pressing against each other or like two repulsing magnets holding their own atmospheric integrity while being unhindered by manual touch.

The only experiment I have seen that comes to mind is this great demo of liquid oxygen poured over strong N/S poles of a huge magnet and what I see is so important since liquid oxygen can at least be seen. You can read my comment on that video since for me it is not conclusive if the liquid pouring effect is not also done on two pieces of wood or anything else non-magnetic to show that the effect only occurs between two magnetic poles. Search Liquid Oxygen on Youtube for more.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lt4P6ctf06Q

Now look at this one and listen to the explanation of oxygen;
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KcGEev8qulA

So......when that finite volume of the liquid oxygen finally disappears, evaporates, returns to open air that for this magnet would seem as infinite in available volume, who is to say that the same concentration we saw is not still there. We know air is there but have we ever tested if it plays into the repulsion.

If there was a higher oxygen concentration on the magnet pole, can it be explained with this experiment of a magnet submerged in water? Can the oxygen in water want to concentrate on the magnetic pole so much that it will split off the water molecule and produce those two bubble clouds? hehehe

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9u7L-J59iZw

Have fun.

**********************************************************************************

2. Solar Energy while mimicking Amazon Tree Tops - Origin: wattsup

It is well known that the richness of the undergrowth in the Amazon jungle cannot be explained by sunlight since it is covered by a rather dense tree canopy. Is it possible that constant sun produces less atomic vibration or ultimately a delta V (in voltage), while the moving canopy produces intervals of sun and shade that creates a higher delta V?

Take two sets as follows;
Small Solar Panel and Battery Charger Circuit, Battery, Volt Meter.
plus, one variable controlled electric fan or any other rotating fan type object.

Under identical sunlight conditions run both sets for 30 minutes to get a paired comparison. Then place the fan in front of only one of the sets so that the fan blades create a moving shade over the solar panel and set the rotation speed to a slow passage, vary until you can notice any rise or decrease in the volts in that set compared to the other. Show a video and tabulating results of volts and maybe fan rpm.

**********************************************************************************


3. Animation and programming of gyroscopic sphere magnet (even 3D printing as well) Origin: wattsup

Imagine you take a 1" sphere magnet with its North and South poles and snap it into a gyroscopic mechanism that you can control by moving one or more variable sized magnets of variable type. So as you move the small magnets, the center sphere will react. hahaha This would be a dream in 3D.

Animation - Now imagine you have a million of those gyros all stuck inside a XX AWG length of copper wire. All of them all pointing down towards the Earth Core. Then a magnet passes nearby and they start turning towards it simply based on closest mutual vector points plus their mutual gyro conveyance which is one of the bases of Spin Conveyance.

You then add features like the center magnet is replaced by the nucleus of copper and you can include a few more or all periodical elements selection. You provide a degree buoyancy based on the atomic weight plus the spread between neutrons and protons for that element. The greater will be the pointer that provides a level for how reactive it is to magnetic influence. hahaha

You can then add a scope output showing what the slightest copper atom nuclei jitter, or sway, or show, or swing, or shoot, or stay would produce. You could program iterations in degrees per pico-second and start equating those to volts and amps. hehehehehe That would be so great to produce the link between SC and the scope.

You then include an amperage function that shows the cut away of a wire at X AWG and by varying the amperage you show that more and more or less and less atom are under the same gyrations.

This project is much more complicated then I could resume here so if anyone in really able to produce animations and have interest, please let me know.

*********************************************************************************

That's it for now but I will add more of these on this post as well as any experiments that were done on of the above.

wattsup

[wattsup]

@GK

I saw your recent posts. It's been a while. I'm always lurking around as a guest here but have been concentrating on my Spin Conveyance Theory these days working on putting out a few videos on the subject instead of endless writing. I think the videos will get the point across much better. But OK let me use some SC to give you another perspective.

Well in SC there are no fields or electrons nor any "electron flow" nor any "field collapse". Simple enough right. I know it's hard to get your head around it. It's the nuclei in every atom that does the effect that one conveys to the next down the wire of copper atoms. If you look at any EE effect, it is the copper nuclei that responds in the pulsed coil and makes copper nuclei respond in the pick up coil. The primary is pulsed to a certain discourse and the secondary translates that into another discourse but it's the nuclei that are doing it. This will become more evident in my next videos but let's proceed anyways.

OK, I am attaching an excel file showing the Periodical Table as per how I look at it under SC. It is not finished. It needs some new math and more columns that the future will apply but anyways, just to give you a look.

In that table look at Aluminum (AL) or Atomic Number (AN) 13 (lucky number). It has 13 protons and 14 neutrons. So you have 1 more neutron then you have protons so the Heavyside (HS) number for Al is 1. There is an imbalance in the AL nucleus of 1 and a total balance number of 26 neutrons and protons. This means when that 1 off balance is influenced to slightly nudge (sway) towards an energy source or via an inline influence, that one is moving 26, one of the highest numbers in the SC Table.

Compare that to Copper AN29 that has P29 and N35 giving you a HS of 6 and a nucleic balance of 58 making each one HS nudging 9.67 P/Ns. AL has over twice the ability to nudge itself. So look at these two videos.

1) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=azsqhKg8hX8
2) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=006d36WWyaQ

In the first video notice the copper loop absolutely requires that AL plate below it for the loop to rise. Copper does not have enough Nucleic Inertia to stay up alone.

In the second video see how the AL ring is staying up all alone just with the proper pulse. If a field existed there that is keeping the ring in the air, how is that possible if AL is not field sensitive. Even a magnet would not make it move in its own. So how is it staying afloat? Yes siree. It is the AL nuclei with its HS of only 1 controlling a Nucleic Balance of 26 exerts a Nucleic Inertia of 26. The pulse nudges the nuclei in an upsway movement where it take less energy for the nuclei to return to its original degree at pulse off, then nudge upward again. Look at the ring it is thin and wide. How can a field hold it up? It cannot, that's how. It is the nuclei jumping upward that is keeping it afloat plus this gentleman added a small load on it to show it can carry more then itself. Bing, bang, boom some brains might be sizzling by now because they realize what this implies and the breath of what this means because this is only the tip of the SC iceberg because what we see is aluminum cast in random nucleic directions so a great portion of the pulse is being cancelled by its own off-angle nuclei.

So look at how flying saucers move around. If the material used to make the saucer is so advanced that the nuclei HS were all pointing in the same direction, there wold be no internal cancellation and that material when pulsed would fly out to space in a minute under the same pulse level.

So if AL has great nucleic inertia it may also have great coupling potential when pulsed at the right frequency and when the secondary as copper wire is in the right topological way to be conveyed the nudging action of the AL.

In the table you will notice many many things. The outer shell numbers are the former electron numbers but these do not serve electron action. They serve as bonding but more importantly determine how transparent the shell is for the nuclei to "see" the outer world. Too thick and it reacts only within itself. Just perfect and they will not only bond but permit spin conveyance from one nuclei to the next. Why is copper such a great 360 degree sensor? Because of the random placement of the copper HS means if only one copper nuclei reacts to an outside influence derived from any angle it will convey that information to all the others in the wire hence your blip on the screen. This little action explains in one way or another everything around us without exceptions.

Now I don't know how you can use this information as an SM analog and this is not the purpose of what I am showing you. It is too push you to understand that our EE topology only works with losses because our wires are random, now we have aligned steel cores which is a move in the right direction but the wires are checkmate. SM said wire is very important. Wire is wire. One wire cannot be more important then another wire. But the wire atoms can.

Just as an additional note, you will see in the table where certain atoms have an HS of 0. Notice that they are all non-magnetic elements because the nuclei is always balanced and cannot be influenced as an inertial action. This chart is not a fluke. It took me 10 years to figure out and attack it from all sides and still it has won.

So maybe use AL ring(s) and get it to rise. Once you can make it rise you can put copper near it to pick up its influence and work it from there. Remember SM said "slight vibration". Atoms are alive and very talented and certainly not the numbskulls we made them out to be giving all the prowess of our cause and effects to electrons and fields. SC will put the cause/effect back into the Atom.

wattsup

PS: I added a second table that groups AL, FE an CU so you can see their HS relationships and their inertia per HS. Look, I know I am taking a big chance in putting this here and will most certainly be treated like a crazy moose looking to mate a racoon. I had good Flack Training at OU.com so I guess I am ready.

There are other EE objects or components that have great coupling potential. Can you think of one?