The Work of Andrey Melnichenko

[lfarrand]

I wouldn't really call it a device at this stage. A collection of components arranged haphazardly would be a better description for what I have.

Nevertheless, behold:



The magnet wire spool (yellow circle) is L1 and the Litz wire winding (green circle) is L2.

I'm in the process of tidying things up and removing the unecessary bits so I'll post a follow up photo later.

[F6FLT]

@lfarrand

Thanks for the picture. I was mistaken, I had seen quickly the diagram of the Don Smith device and I thought that it was what you were doing, so I was surprised by the high current intensity because the metglass core is closed, there can only be a very weak flux coming from the outside.
But with Melnichenko, this is normal. I had modelled his setup with LTspice some time ago, without noticing anything abnormal, but well, it was a simulation so not surprising. Only experimentation can show something if his patent really works so I'll follow your results.

[lfarrand]

I built the circuit that I posted earlier. The load and my switching board are both powered by a 12V 7AH LiFePO 4 battery. The switching board is powered by a 15W AC/DC adapter, which is an inefficient DC-AC-DC conversion. I could probably go DC all the way from battery to board, but going through an AC inverter allows me to measure the power usage a little easier.



I'm switching the coil on the left of the ferrite rod using my MOSFET switching board.



Power usage of the switching board when idle is 4.7W. The fans consume 0.5W each.



Switching at 100kHz takes power usage up to 7W, so 2.3W for switching at 100kHz doesn't sound too bad.



I got this interesting waveform on the scope.



The yellow trace is the left coil and the pink trace is the right coil. The left coil is connected to the power supply whereas the right coil isn't connected to a power source directly and is instead induced by the left coil. The negative spike on the yellow trace is clearly visible.

I'm not sure what to make of the waveforms yet. I'm going to reflect on them and post some thoughts later.

I also need to test DC power consumption with and without the right coil to see if Melnichenko was right in saying that the diode should prevent the right coil from consuming from the source. If he's correct then I'd expect power consumption to remain the same. If power consumption changes then either  I've made a mistake somewhere he's wrong.

[lfarrand]

Another interesting effect I observed was when I placed a coil with windings perpendicular to the left exciter coil and then put a ferrite rod in the absolute centre protruding downwards about 2cm into the coil.







The following waveform appeared on the scope.



The frequency matched the PWM frequency of the switching board, but it's now appearing as a pure sine wave.

If the ferrite rod was moved up, down, left or right away from the position shown (relative to the red coil) then the signal on the scope disappeared. Moving the red coil with the ferrite rod as one unit towards or away from the exciter caused the signal to increase or decrease in amplitude but the waveform shape remained the same.

[lfarrand]

I also need to test DC power consumption with and without the right coil to see if Melnichenko was right in saying that the diode should prevent the right coil from consuming from the source. If he's correct then I'd expect power consumption to remain the same. If power consumption changes then either  I've made a mistake somewhere he's wrong.

So I tested this theory out. I added a switch to the secondary coil (right hand side) so that I could open/close circuit it at will. I also tested with and without the diode + capacitor.

What I found was that the secondary coil consumed no additional power from the battery. Without the diode + capacitor the secondary coil consumed additional power from the battery.

It seems that Melnichenko was correct when he said that no power would be consumed from the power source if you introduced a diode to block the positive current (establishing the magnetic field) and only allow the negative current to flow on the secondary coil.

Interesting...

[lfarrand]

My next steps are to test the following:

• Move the secondary coil to a separate ferrite core instead of sharing one with the primary
• Add more secondary coils
• Use 2000 strand Litz wire as a secondary coil

During my testing I've found that the primary capacitor will charge to 200V and the secondary coil will charge to 100V when running 12V through the primary coil at 100kHz.

If it is possible to add more secondaries without affecting the power consumption then that would be a big deal.

[lfarrand]

My coils are quite rudimentary. They are 50 turns each wound in the same direction, 230uH inductance, 0.13ohm resistance and some low pF capacitance.

The capacitors are Panasonic 18uF 1100V EZPV1B186MTB.

I also tested different diodes for capturing the inductive kickback. Here's my relative comparison that some might find useful.

Model	Left coil voltage	Right coil voltage	Total
C4D02120A	214.5	100.3	314.8
UF5408	216.3	94.8	311.1
SF1600-TR	219	91.9	310.9
MUR8100EG	213	97	310
RHRP15120-F102	211	97.7	308.7
BY203-TAP	217.6	90.7	308.3
IDH085120AKSA1	189.5	104.2	293.7
VF25-12X	203	82.5	285.5
GB10SLT12-220	175.8	100.7	276.5
GC10MPS12-220	172.5	91.9	264.4

As a result of the test above I am using Wolfspeed C4D02120A SiC Schottky diodes in my circuit.

[hermes]

"all with the same theme of an iron core surrounded with two or three copper windings, the outer loosely fitted."

Measurement error or Cold electricity:

Hi All,

Glenn Steckling director of the George Adamski Foundation:

https://www.adamskifoundation.com/

said in one of Rene Erik Olsen's Youtube conversations:

https://www.youtube.com/@wantingtoknow244

that the aliens use free energy generators with no moving parts. Take a ferrite rod and wind the turns of the father coil clockwise. upon it wind a child coil turns clockwise or anti-clockwise and upon it wind  the turns of the mother coil anti-clockwise.

The Father coil and the Mother coil are the primary coils and can be connected either in parallel or in series. Remember that the north-south poles are reversed in the mother coil. The child coil is the secondary coil which is connected to a 1 ohm resistor. The frequency is 175 khz or more due to it being a ferrite rod with only one layer of each coil.

When I connected the primary coils in series I could load the child coil with a 1 ohm resistor and still get a 2 volt peak to peak voltage across the 1 ohm resistor. It will be 2 amps peak to peak, through the resistor. But the 1 ohm resistor which was 1/4 watt was cold. I have done many free energy experiments and always ended up using a decade resistor box 1 ohm-100 kilo ohm.

It is the first time that I get such a large output voltage, at such a low resistance. All other attempts have produced less than 100 millivolts. I use a frequency generator that is built into the oscilloscope and when I tested it by loading it without a transformer, it put out 25 volts peak to peak and about 20 milliamps. It gives an output power of max 0.5 watts. In the experiment with series-connected primary coils, the input voltage was 15 volts peak to peak. For lower frequencies, you can use transformer sheet metal as an iron core.

Best wishes, Hermes

[hermes]

Hi Everyone,

Now I have measured my ET transformer. I used the Voltcraft 632 FG 30 MHz Oscilloscope to measure the voltage from the frequency generator built into the oscilloscope as well as across the 1 ohm resistors.

The frequency was measured with a TES 2208 Multimeter and the inductance of the transformer coils with a Voltcraft LCR-9063. The direct current resistance in the inductances is a maximum of 0.1 ohm.

Best wishes, Hermes

[gyula]

Hi Hermes,

I assume ET means Extra Terrestial? 

Would you mind showing a picture of the transformer setup that includes the 1 Ohm resistors?

Thanks
Gyula

Hi Everyone,

Now I have measured my ET transformer. I used the Voltcraft 632 FG 30 MHz Oscilloscope to measure the voltage from the frequency generator built into the oscilloscope as well as across the 1 ohm resistors.

The frequency was measured with a TES 2208 Multimeter and the inductance of the transformer coils with a Voltcraft LCR-9063. The direct current resistance in the inductances is a maximum of 0.1 ohm.

Best wishes, Hermes

[hermes]

Question and Answers with Kone:

Kone wrote:

Hi Hermes

Wow thats pretty good!
What is the resistance in ohms of the father, the mother, and child coil?

- 0.1 ohm in each coil

How many turns in each?

- don't know. I just used 1 of 2 flyback transformer cores from an old TV.
Actually I have many flyback transformers from a surplus store.

What is thickness of wire?

- it's 0.75 mm
 
Is it just one layer?

- Yes one layer each coil.

Is it a ferrite core?  How long and what diameter?

- Yes a ferrite core from an old TV.  The core was wind 3 cm long and 1.5 cm diameter. You will find a photo of the transformer core from an old TV at:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e2p58tWIxNc

- I used 1 of 4 parts of the core. It has no magnetic loop. I just wanted to test it similair to a ferrite rod with open ends.


Really good! 
Maybe those ET fuckers really do have something going on haha

I watched that Adamski video part one and two pretty interesting I always thought he fake but I have read too much garbage on internet  (like wikipedia)

I did not hear where he described this transformer design in parts one and two at least.
Where did you hear about it?

- I might remember wrong on the videos, but I do remember that Glenn Steckling said that the ET secret of free energy is to use two input coils - one clockwise wind and the other anti clockwise wind. It was up to me to figure up what he mean.

I liked the blown up photo of the alien hiding behind hill - spooky....

I would like to try this at 60hz with laminate steel core from a MWOT instead of ferrite- maybe U-shaped?

- just remember after winding the "father coil" clockwise on the laminate steel core. You have to wind the "child coil" clockwise over (upon) the "father coil" and the "mother coil" anti clockwise over (upon) the "child coil".

Also could be awesome motor coils with "counter direction" induced  pickup winds sharing core with motor coils as described last post.

- I have no idea if it could work, maybe you can try. And I have no idea why the inductance differ between the coils. I just wind the coils a layer each. I have a suggestion. Because the voltage was so small (0.8 volt) from the "child coil". You can wind the "child coil" with more layers, maybe 4 to 7 layers more than the "father coil" and the "mother coil" Maybe it works the same as the transformer theory with different primary and secondary windings?

- Best Wishes, Hermes

- And I want to correct a mistakes I did on the et_transformer drawing. It should be 3 volts input. Not 5 volts. I have no idea why it loads down the voltage output of the frequency generator when lowering the frequency from <1MHz.

Kone 

[F6FLT]

...the aliens use free energy generators with no moving parts...

Can you ask these aliens to come to our forum?
I've always preferred to have first-hand information rather than that of intermediaries on youtube who don't understand anything.

[hermes]

Hi F6FLT,

The Aliens will never go public. They will work in secret.

From https://www.mooker.com/showthread.php?tid=142

magluvin Wrote:
thanks for the info.  is it that the mother coil needs to be wound counter clockwise, or could it be clockwise and connected oppositely?

mags
Hello magluvin. I have not tested winding the mother coil in the same direction as the father and child coils. Bad news is that, when connecting a capacitor in series with the child coil for resonance, the circuit is not above unity: 7.5 kHz Input power: 50 mA*6 volts = 0.3 watts. Output power: 400 mA*0.4 volts = 0.16 watts. I think it is phase shift in the transformer. It is inductive but the load is resistive.

But considering that the child coil is wound with the same number of turns as both the father coil and the mother coil and consumes more milliamps, maybe the et_transformer can be used as a motor coil in a permanent magnet motor? Like the Robert Adams electric motor?

http://gratisenergi.se/adams.htm

Best wishes, Hermes

P.S has anyone built a motor that consumes reactive power? I mean ampere turns?

P.S 2 all three coils must be wound on the same ferrite rod or on the same transformer leg. They must be wrapped over each other. The father coil is wound on the core, the child coil over the father coil and the mother coil over over the child coil.

[F6FLT]

...
The Aliens will never go public. They will work in secret.
...

so "secret" that everyone here knows about extraterrestrial free energy. These aliens really suck, unable to do anything discreetly.
I've heard that the Gorgons are also secretly working on FE, to power their hoverboards using the principle of their petrifying laser eyes.  Does anyone have any secret info?