PopularFX
Home Help Search Login Register
Welcome,Guest. Please login or register.
2024-10-31, 22:49:52
News: Check out the Benches; a place for people to moderate their own thread and document their builds and data.
If you would like your own Bench, please PM an Admin.
Most Benches are visible only to members.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6
Author Topic: Dose it take energy to create a magnetic field  (Read 20919 times)
Group: Guest
   Thanks Chet, and good luck with that.

   NickZ
   

Jr. Member
**

Posts: 59


Buy me some coffee
   Your advice is nice, but it's not as good as showing how well you can build a self runner. We already have thousands of pages of theories and advice. Not a single self runner to show for it. If you get the point...

  NickZ

That is all about to change very shortly...

I do agree with WLW however. Understanding the properties of crude oil for example, and the refinement processes that have led to a mind boggling amount of products. This kind of research applied to aether and frequency... the universe would be our oyster.
   
Group: Guest
   That type of research has been denied, by the powers that be. For a reason.
And free energy is not even a theme mentioned in schools, nor are Tesla's ideas allowed.
   We are being manipulated, by the dark governments, and educational systems. How long will we allow them to take control of our lives? They even deny UFOs and ETs. And rush to lock them away from our sight. Not to mention the thousands of people working in the many underground secret facilities.
   Even guys like Verpies, is here to tell us that free energy from the ambient is non existent, that Tesla was wrong concerning the mentioned Aether, and that Tesla was not even into free energy, that he is aware of. So, excuse me for not trusting them.
  Keep them in the dark and feed them bullshit...like mushrooms...

   NickZ
« Last Edit: 2023-11-20, 12:47:13 by NickZ »
   

Group: Professor
Hero Member
*****

Posts: 3477
Is being devoid of self-reflection, same as being a pendejo?
No but it is a prerequisite for immutability and stubbornness, which you consider a virtue.

Verpies, what can you say about free energy. Anything, proff???
The jury is still out

Even guys like Verpies, is here to tell us that free energy from the ambient is non existent,
Not exactly.  There is some free energy that can be harvested from the environment, such as the sunlight, wind, tides, sea waves, geothermal energy gradient, lightning and the even minuscule energy of the vertical electric gradient above Earth's surface (see this and this ) but this is not the source of energy that you are referring to, is it?
So what source exactly are you referring to ?
Better yet, what experiment are you proposing that can verify the existence of that OTHER source, which you are proposing ?

Remember that it is impossible in principle to prove that something does not exist in an unbounded system, because: The lack of proof of existence is not a proof of non-existence.
So the burden of proof rests on the one who makes the proposition of existence. ...you should remember that, since we've been there before.

Anyway, this thread is about the question whether it takes energy to create a magnetic field  - not what you are discussing.

@Chet & Peter:
If I had my "Copy" or "Move" button I'd move it to another thread (with a link back here).  I could delete it but that would be tantamount to censorship and I won't do that.

P.S.
"Copy" is better than "Move" because it allows the moderator to move only a half of an off-topic post somewhere else by editing out the original post and adding a link to the copied/moved part .
   
Group: Guest
   I think that the discussion of the magnetic field is over, for now.

   None of the free energy things that you mentioned are FREE.
   How much do solar panels to light and heat ones house cost??? Let's say 10KW.  No need to answer that proff.
   I wish that I could move you to another conventional electronics forum thread, as there is no information about free energy coming from you, sir.
 Talk about encouraging free energy, instead of belittleing those who are here for that.

   NickZ
   
Group: Experimentalist
Hero Member
*****

Posts: 1778
FWIW, I will share a true story for which I have no proof, so feel free to dismiss or not.

Some 10 years ago or so, I became aware, through a personal friend of my wife, of a company that supposedly built free energy generators.  This person told me about this company and the individual Bill Wampler who owned it and of course I asked for contact info but she had none.  She did say that she knew how to contact the wife of the owner and would pass on the fact that I was very interested to know more, and if they were interested, he would contact me.

Several days later I did receive a call from Bill Wampler and he graciously told me as much as he could about their company.  He clearly stated that they had developed stand alone 12kW generators that they gave away freely to certain peoples of third world countries who needed electrical energy to survive.  He also said he made enough money manufacturing desalination equipment to be able to finance the operation.  They were extremely private and stealth about their location and other details concerning their operations, etc., and had no interest in commercialization of their product.  He stated that governments would not allow them to continue if they went commercial and in fact, their lab had been raided by the ATF who confiscated all equipment, prototypes, inventory, files, etc.  Fortunately, they anticipated such a move and had multiple backups of everything.  Bill also shared that Jesus Christ was the CEO of the company and no decisions were made without prayer and meditation.

My point is sharing all this is simple.  Although he wouldn't give any details of how their device worked, he did say that it was solid state with no moving parts and needed a battery to start.  He also said that the energy is all around us and there are two problems one must solve.  First, you have to learn how to "collect" the energy and second, you must then learn how to "control" it!  I will never forget his emphasis on these points as he shared in the early days of research how one of the devices began to run away with itself and they all fled from the lab for fear of their lives.  Obviously they survived and were able to solve the problem.

IMO, the aether contains energy and because of this belief, I continue to pursue OU/FE or whatever you wish to call it even though up to this point, I've not been successful.

Regards,
Pm
   
Sr. Member
****

Posts: 471
One way to free energy could be with recreating lighthing, even Edwin Gray said something like that. I proposed the sequence of operations needed and in fact it is simple electrostatic induction and interfacing with ground just accelerated to Mhz range. Nothing fancy at all.
   
Hero Member
*****

Posts: 2735
Verpies
Quote
Remember that it is impossible in principle to prove that something does not exist in an unbounded system, because: The lack of proof of existence is not a proof of non-existence.
So the burden of proof rests on the one who makes the proposition of existence. ...you should remember that, since we've been there before.

The burden of proof of what?, science has already proven the universe is energy and energy is found everywhere on every level.
The only relevant claim the critics of free energy have is that some may not be intelligent enough to convert some more complex forms of energy.

We should be clear the concept of a universe full of energy, "free energy", was never in question only our intelligence and/or ability to access and convert some forms of energy. We could even go further and say the only real problem remaining is the direct conversion of the energy to usable electrical energy. We already understand how to rearrange molecules/atoms to produce energy using combustion, fission, fusion but the conversion to electricity is indirect. The next logical step is the direct conversion of energy and there are literally tens of millions of scientists working on this problem.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Direct_energy_conversion
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0029549398002829
https://pubs.aip.org/aip/apr/article/6/3/031305/123870/High-power-direct-energy-conversion-by-nuclear
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/B9780128199848000084

Which begs the question, what exactly is your objection Verpies?.

-It cannot be that energy is not present everywhere because science has already proven energy is everywhere on every level.
-It cannot be that nobody is working on the direct conversion of heat, EM energy or atomic energy to electricity very similar to a supposed free energy device. Millions are working on the problem and the science journals are littered with proposals and experiments.

It would seem to me the only objection left is that you have not seen a free energy/direct conversion device first hand. No worries, I have seen a few first hand and I suspect you will too in the near future.

AC






---------------------------
Comprehend and Copy Nature... Viktor Schauberger

“The first principle is that you must not fool yourself and you are the easiest person to fool.”― Richard P. Feynman
   
Group: Guest
   At Walmart, $19.98.10 KW, self starting.
Made in China.
   That will be the day...

   NickZ
   

Group: Professor
Hero Member
*****

Posts: 3477
It would seem to me the only objection left is that you have not seen a free energy/direct conversion device first hand.
I have only seen a working Wesley Gary motor but I did not build the working model and could not get it to work myself.

Which begs the question, what exactly is your objection Verpies?.
Lack of precise definition of nonmaterial energy sources.  The umbrella term "energy from the ambient" which is so vague it can mean anything or nothing.
And in Nick's vernacular, it seems to mean anything as long as it is not material.  I object to this exclusion.

I don't object to the conversion of charged particle's kinetic energy into electric energy, but what is the source of these charged particles (sun and Aurora Borealis) ?.  Not only such conversion makes sense but most importantly you are precisely defining this mechanism.  Nick does not define anything precisely.
« Last Edit: 2023-11-22, 00:48:16 by verpies »
   

Group: Professor
Hero Member
*****

Posts: 3477
  None of the free energy things that you mentioned are FREE.
In that list I have written, the energy is free and it is from the environment. The devices to collect that energy are not free but that is a different story.

I asked you a question. What exact source of energy from the environment are you proposing if you do not like the ones from my list ?

How much do solar panels to light and heat ones house cost??? Let's say 10KW.
A lot but these panels are just collectors. The energy itself is free.
   
Sr. Member
****

Posts: 471
Per every 1m of elevation there is a potential difference of 100V to ground, while using radio antenna I think it is not so true. In fact using Tesla coil may just occur like having elevated plate at hgh place above ground.
   

Group: Professor
Hero Member
*****

Posts: 3477
Per every 1m of elevation there is a potential difference of 100V to ground, while using radio antenna I think it is not so true.
I already enumerated this source of energy in my list and gave links to videos of experiments that extract it  (see this and this )

However Nick responded to this list as follows:
None of the free energy things that you mentioned are FREE.
Which is incorrect of course because he is conflating the cost of collectors with the cost of energy.

...but must importantly he has not proposed any alternative.
   
Group: Guest
  My response may be incorrect, but, what I was getting at is the actual cost of an Akula's/Ruslan device, compared to any thing in Verpies list. Production cost are probably about $50 dollars total to build, maybe less from China.
   Actual cost afterwards, are minimal. And, yes the energy is free, not paid for, not dependent on grid systems.

  May not be free either, but, cheap, to build. Some guys are still at it Verpies, so, give it time.

     NickZ

   PS :  And are you oblivious to how many times myself and others have mentioned what you called an "imaginary" source??? That you are not aware of, and about the devices that utilize that source. Which you are "not aware of".
Perhaps proff, you need to do do your homework.

« Last Edit: 2023-11-21, 23:52:09 by NickZ »
   

Group: Professor
Hero Member
*****

Posts: 3477
PS :  And are you oblivious to how many times myself and others have mentioned what you called an "imaginary" source???
Imaginary source will not do.
It has to be something tangible and measurable.  At least define its properties precisely or design an experiment to measure these properties.
   
Group: Guest
  Will not do, well good luck with that. Your current science can't measure, nor is it currently tangible, sorry.
  Perhaps you'd like to show us what will do. Besides paying electric bills.
   
   NickZ.
« Last Edit: 2023-11-22, 01:25:55 by NickZ »
   
Group: Guest
   It has already been designed, you must of missed it.

   NickZ
   

Group: Professor
Hero Member
*****

Posts: 3477
Your current science can't measure, nor is it currently tangible to us, sorry.
If it cannot be measured, then how do you propose to distinguish it from a contrivance of your mind ?

Perhaps you'd like to show us what will do.
For example take sun light. Its reflection and refraction angles can be measured with a ruler.  Its wavelength can be measured by interference and diffraction.
Its chirality can be measured by polarizers, its power can be measured with calorimeters. ...plethora of experiments and properties that can be measured for this source of energy.

What properties does your energy source have and how can they be measured?  What experiments can be performed on it to describe its properties ?

P.S.
"My" science? I do not own any science. I just follow the scientific method of discovery.


https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/8/82/The_Scientific_Method.svg/390px-The_Scientific_Method.svg.png
Dose it take energy to create a magnetic field
   
Group: Guest
     It can not be measured, that's the problem at this time. With the science that you don't own.
    Maybe some day they will be able to measure what you call nothing.  This is about non material sources.
   Like trying to prove sprits.

     NickZ
   
Group: Restricted
Full Member
*

Posts: 102
Verpies
//Which begs the question, what exactly is your objection Verpies?.//
Verpies is right in every bit of his statement.
Free Energy wording  is to be understood as Energy for Free
The device is not for free but energy  is.
e.g. Niagara Falls, a spectacular waterfall in the Niagara River, is the world’s greatest waterfall by volume at 2,832 m 3. It is split in two by Goat Island.
and  this energy  is for free = FE.
The  set of electric generators there converting mechanical energy into  electric energy is not for free.
In other words net energy gain pays for all expenses and maintenance and in  addition to it  makes few guys  very wealthy from sale of
that particular  FE.
You would do it too so I do not see a problem here.
If you were to build your own without the license  it will cost you  money  but  it will be for free till someone finds you guilty.
The same is with solar, wind, thermal energy, mechanical energy of sea water wave, and energy from isotopes.
The more exotic conversion is  energy from falling wall or building, the  volcanic energy of lava, the tectonic energy, vibrational energy of devices or structures
seen as a waste till it is converted to FE, sewer system  energy,  flow of rain water in city pipes system, highway noise and vibration system, or walking people vibrational system.
In one sentence I gave you  all of these FE sources sparkling   your imagination.
Yet another  exotic  application is my own  energy extraction from Schumann waveguide .

FE= Something or someone loss becoming your gain.
e.g. when you are a child.. or when you are supported by parents, lover etc.
It is up to you to use  it or lose it.
This fine group of  strangers here is a random group of driven by potential of sudden opportunity individuals garbing ideas  to their own
as fast  as they can before someone else does it.- nothing wrong just  human nature.

Direct energy conversion is not important or not that important, as you must pay for a "convertor" anyhow.
Wesley

   

Group: Professor
Hero Member
*****

Posts: 3477
The same is with solar, wind, thermal energy, mechanical energy of sea water wave, and energy from isotopes.
Yes all these are sources of free energy, but to parametrize them fully you'd have to consider several other factors, such as:

  • energy density and specific energy (see here)
  • power
  • portability
  • periodicity/constantness
  • safety
  • controllability

Energy density being the main usability factor because if you had something portable with an Exajoule per Liter (or Gallon) that does not release all of it within an hour, then you're finished with the search.
   
Group: Experimentalist
Hero Member
*****

Posts: 2068
     It can not be measured, that's the problem at this time. With the science that you don't own.
    Maybe some day they will be able to measure what you call nothing.  This is about non material sources.
...

What cannot be measured and is not material is not science but superstition.  If supertition could provide power, we'd have had free electricity for millennia.
That said, I respect urban legend specialists. Like poets, they make people dream, but only the naive.


---------------------------
"Open your mind, but not like a trash bin"
   

Group: Professor
Hero Member
*****

Posts: 3477
What if they discourage any experimentation that does not fit that dream ?
   
Group: Guest
   Who are they?
   How about, who is encouraging Free Energy tests and sharing successfull results , impartially? Instead...

   I have the feeling that some one has been let loose, again.

   NickZ
   
Group: Guest
Imaginary source will not do.
It has to be something tangible and measurable.  At least define its properties precisely or design an experiment to measure these properties.


   Attributes: Does not have a smell, can't be seen with the naked eye, or any other way, does not weigh anything, and your scientist know about it, but, are afraid to say so.
   Why don't you educate your self concerning where the energy comes from.
He' right, " it's not science", it's something beyond limited conventional science, and their lies.
And it doesn't have to be something material, to be real. In case you don't know.
 
     NickZ
   
Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6
« previous next »


 

Home Help Search Login Register
Theme © PopularFX | Based on PFX Ideas! | Scripts from iScript4u 2024-10-31, 22:49:52