Eliminate 99.99% of overunity to move forward, question of method

[ion]

Dear Fred;

I started a thread for the UDT in the section "Solid State Generators" so those among us so inclined can begin replicating and testing the device.

https://www.overunityresearch.com/index.php?topic=3756.msg73803;topicseen#msg73803

I for one would like to see this thread continue with your study of FE devices, and directions you and others may point to (and agree to), without the thread becoming a focus or discussion on any particular device. The newly created individual focused topics for each of the devices you present will be the arena for in depth study.

Meanwhile, in this thread it would be interesting to create a master reference list of various categories and subcategories under each heading of devices that you and others deem are worthy of a focused study, e.g Heat to Energy and it's entries.

On another note, I do understand your stance on devices like the TPU and can appreciate that.

Thank you for your in thoughtful contributions to this forum.

Regards

[PhysicsProf]

Hi PhysicsProf, F6LT, all,

Thanks! Sure, I can put forth some projects/patents that would have a high chance of success. Unless someone volunteers a liking for plasma, arcs, LENR, water, thermal, I'm just going to stick to the EM area.
I'd rather not put forth one project or concept as 'the one' because that narrows understanding and may cause unnecessary disputation. I'm a synthesizer and pattern see-er, and don't ever consider one experiment or test in isolation. At the same time, as Centraflow mentioned, there is a tendency on forums such as this to disperse an initial experimental direction into multitudinous ideas, and I've been very guilty of that in the past, so I'm careful now to stay on point. I'll record new ideas and theories as we go along, and when/if we get stuck, then maybe something in that pool will help.

... snip
I'm not too interested in who invented what....

I have to get ready for an appointment, but to start the thinking, one prime candidate for replication/development is attached. Although the info is plenty detailed, please don't fixate on this particular form of the operating principle. But it is a place to start.

Regards,
Fred

And a good place to start!  thank you.
I'm reading the Paul Jensen transformer material - it deserves its own thread!

I like his attitude also:

A Free-Energy Device

by Paul Raymond Jensen

I have built a transformer which supplies more power to its load than is drawn from its primary source.

I named this device The Unidirectional Transformer (UDT), because the magnetic reaction of the load current does not affect the magnetic action of the primary circuit.

The UDT is composed of a parallel LC resonant primary, a split secondary, a gapped magnetic core, and a "feedback winding."

...  [lots of details ]

I have invented and developed the UDT on my own, without benefit of any knowledge of other free-energy devices, if they exist, which utilize

the basic principles of UDT operation.

Please feel free to use this information as you desire. However, I hope that no one will attempt to patent and control this type of transformer. The time on Planet Earth is 15 minutes before midnight; there is no time left to waste. Free-energy technology is not meant to be controlled by vain and greedy parasites who wish to use a gift from God to exploit their fellow man. Free-energy technology represents a spiritual transition of the human race. Free-energy is not meant to be owned, period!

[PhysicsProf]

PS - I see that ION has started a thread on the Paul Jensen transformer - thanks, ION!  And thank you, Fred!   

[Orthofield]

Hi Ion,

Yes, thanks for creating an independent thread for UDT type projects. I'll post here only on the meta- issues of 'what types of devices to focus on?' and subjects like that-- as it was originally intended.  I did actually have a master list at one point, but it would probably need to be updated now, if I can even find it. In truth, at the risk of sounding arrogant, it would be easier for people to just put forth ideas and I can tell them if there is sufficient literature to support research in that area. (Knowing full well that literature can be wrong!)

To keep my own tendency to scatter too many ideas in check, I'm only going to put forth information in three threads right now, the two overunity areas already mentioned, as well as a lot of material that I'll post in the Heat To Electricity thread. I see there is already an old Mandleshtam and Papaleksi thread that could serve as a place for overunity parametric projects, but maybe it should be renamed Parametric Devices, or another thread started with that name.

In some ways I began this initiative three years ago, when last I posted. However, at the time I was working for a company, as well as running my bookstore, and I burnt myself out trying to do too much. I've since dropped corporate activities, and am more or less retired from my store, so I have a much better chance of following through than I did last time.

Thanks for your support!
Fred

[muDped]

Where is "overunity" if it exists?

It is being "blacked."  But, only for a time.

Disclosure is taking place, albeit it very slowly, in spite
of institutional efforts to keep it hidden.

[TinMan]

Imagine how quiet it would be here if we were to only present actual OU devices.


Brad

[F6FLT]

Where is "overunity" if it exists?

It is being "blacked."  But, only for a time.

...

As I no longer want to tire of countering crackpots like Laviolette, because it is impossible to put rational arguments against gibberish, I will quote what the skeptics say:

"LaViolette appears to be a general-issue pseudophysicist, his theories appear to be general-issue pseudoscience handwaving. He's not even particularly prolific or well-known. His attempts to explain "subquantum kinetics" appear to be limited to a three-part 1985 journal article (the journal's web page says this article has been downloaded six times since 2007) and a self-published 1994 book (the listed "publisher", Starlane Publications, operates out of LaViolette's home address and has "published" nothing but three LaViolette books.)". His theory "is a bunch of nonsensical gibberish and not actually a theory at all." "No evidence supporting it, no useful predictions that it makes. (His "predictions" are simply reanalyses of existing well-understood phenomena -- e.g., he "predicts" the Hubble red shift.)"

Laviolette's theses are part of the 99.99% of absurdities taken up by the small world of free energy, to be eliminated.

[F6FLT]

Imagine how quiet it would be here if we were to only present actual OU devices.


Brad

Do we have even one post?

[TinMan]

 
Do we have even one post?

I think we discussed this OU thing many years ago F6FTL.

My belief still stands ,in that there is no such thing as OU,but more so a !yet! to be understood/discovered energy source.

We do not yet have one post showing a self running machine/device that cannot be explained using what we know today.


Brad