thanks for testing with the short wire, i too had very little response on a short piece.
Although my results are fluctuating and lately i can not get the response of +-4uV anymore, the effect of having a negative value at the red side of the wire and a positive value at the black side is constantly there.
I do not hear you and Partzman report that, does that mean that you are not seeing this effect?
You mean when you place the magnet on one side or the other, it changes the direction of the current?
Actually, I didn't get that effect. And you get the same direction of current regardless of the polarity of the magnet?
Anyway, could your hypothesis also explain this positive/negative effect?
Here i used a freshly cut piece of the same iron wire (the old piece got some residual magnetism showing (8mT) on both sides) and it still shows this positive / negative effect, see video: https://youtu.be/W4XYgePfAGQ
It's hard to say. There are two distinct things: 1) the often slow evolution of voltage and 2) the origin of the voltage. I don't want to be too categorical, but on my side, point 1) is a question of the contact surface of the metals.
In my opinion, mechanical movements surely cause the contact points to shift at the microscopic level, and then they slowly relax before reaching a new equilibrium position. This affects the current and voltage.
For point 2), there is no certainty at this stage as to whether it is related to the Voltaic potential of metals, but the interface between metals does seem to be closely linked to the source of the voltage, because with an ordinary generator, it would not vary so much.
I replaced the contact on my stainless steel bar with rolled aluminium foil, because the Fe/Al or stainless steel/Al couple is higher than Fe/Cu. When I rotate the bar in the aluminium foil for a few seconds in one direction and then the other, the voltage increases dramatically, exceeding 70 µV and, in current mode, 40 µA (no more need for magnets). Then I clamp the aluminium with a clamp. It quickly drops back to 40 µV, but several minutes later, I still have more than 10 µV and, in current mode, 10 µA. An hour later, I still have a few µV. There may also be electrolytic effects with air humidity and metal oxides, even though it is rather dry here and the contacts are tight. I don't know what else to do to pinpoint the source of these voltages.
New hypothesis:
- Ultimately, it seems impossible for Volta's potentials to do any work (except for an improbable Maxwell's demon).
- An electrochemical reaction can be ruled out. Even when the two metals interpenetrate, these potentials still exist.
- I asked ChatGPT what hypothesis would remain, and it gave me a plausible answer: the Seebeck effect.
Indeed: ΔT of 1–10 mK → µV to tens of µV.
These mK could be obtained by friction when the contacts are moved, which also exerts stresses that modify the resistivity. We could therefore be in the presence of a thermoelectric effect. I still have some doubts, as the return to equilibrium time is very long for temperature equalisation.