Activator for isotopic mutation

[giantkiller]

But physics is austere, results don't come by chance or exceptionally, you have to think and calculate before experimenting, and more think than playing with the scope or the modelling tools

Graham Bell would beg to differ after burning his hand accidentally.

[F6FLT]

Highlighted portion of the statement alluded to this.


But depending how loose your definition of 'free energy', patent 685,957 in your link may fit the description, as it does not involve a prime mover in order to receive useful power:
http://exvacuo.free.fr/div/Sciences/Brevets/Tesla/US000685957%20-%20N%20Tesla%20-%20Apparatus%20for%20the%20utilization%20of%20radiant%20energy%20-%201901.pdf

You have selected one of Tesla's most mediocre patents. Sure it works, but it is the one able to recover µW from ambient static fields, unlikely photoelectric effects, or a tiny part of cosmic rays that manage to reach the ground.
No practical device has ever come out of this for the general public.

I hope that everyone here understands that the free energy we are waiting for is the one able to run a washing machine, heating appliances and vehicles, otherwise we can close the shop right away because the free µW, we already have them.

[F6FLT]

"The mind of the sceptic. What drives the sceptic? Right? What drives the sceptic is somebody who doesn't believe in their own work.
...
J. Bedini

This is typically a charlatan's quote. Does anyone power their home with a free energy machine from Bedini?
The charlatans do not want to be asked for proof since they are unable to provide any, and to justify not providing any, they pose as victims of those who ask them.
They only know how to lie and manipulate the naive people who are their business (a very large prospect of the population, including and especially in the free energy movement ).

What drives the sceptic is the need to get things to work, not just to hear pseudo-scientific gibberish or promises never kept.

[F6FLT]

Graham Bell would beg to differ after burning his hand accidentally.

I don't see why he wouldn't agree, I can even see why he would agree with me.
Experimenting with your ideas requires you to get your hands dirty. Science differs from the current free energy movement in that it requires the confrontation of ideas and theories with observations, experiments, facts.
But one still needs to have ideas, and good ones, before experimenting, otherwise one has the results of the free energy movement today: none. No device on sale in the shops. Be lucid, guys.

[Hakasays]

You have selected one of Tesla's most mediocre patents. Sure it works, but it is the one able to recover µW from ambient static fields, unlikely photoelectric effects, or a tiny part of cosmic rays that manage to reach the ground.

You've built his yourself?   I'd love to see some data regarding output vs elevation and surface area as well as frequency components of the incoming rays when pointed towards empty space (both during day and night, and especially during an eclipse).  We could learn a lot from a faithful replication with modern measuring equipment.

Sadly, far more people are willing to comment on Tesla's works than actually build them.    The rare skeptics that do always seem to take shortcuts+cut corners, or make 'improvements' that destroy the effect (like electroboom's first Tesla coil built to maximize parasitic capacitance )

[Jerry Volland]

"The mind of the sceptic. What drives the sceptic? Right? What drives the sceptic is somebody who doesn't believe in their own work. He doesn't believe that anything's possible because early on in life – he was totally brainwashed. In other words; 1+1=2. Well, what if one and one doesn't equal two? You see my point? What if 1+1 actually equals 1,100? You follow me? Hey – A sceptic looks at a machine and since society has programmed everybody – from day 1 – childbirth – that this is impossible – guess what – it's impossible. The sceptics are "plants" on the internet."

J. Bedini

Every forum has at least one "plant", waiting to rise up and misdirect attention when needed.  Even going as far as attacking presenters themselves.  Sadly, I've seen two forums where the "plant" was the site owner, or other admin.  An aggressive skeptic has such a high opinion of his own superiority to think that if HE can't do something, then no one can, or ever has.  Forums which allow disruption to continue on and on have very little value.  Anything of actual importance is quickly swept away.

[forest]

"In recent experiments I have discovered two novel facts of importance in this connection. One of this facts is that an electric current is generated in a wire extending from the ground yo a great height by the axial, and probably also by the translatory movement of the earth" Nikola Tesla 1900  . interesting that in article next is chapter about
self-acting  engine

[Jerry Volland]

The Scientific Method involves reporting a discovery or observation, for peer review.  Someone who only says the reporting worker is a scam artist or outright liar is in no way a "peer".  Proof is in the replicating.

[F6FLT]

@Renaissance Rising

Don't take it personally, I have no quarrel with you.
When I talk about a charlatan, I only think of Bedini, whose engine has never been overunity. A charlatan is not only a commercial swindler, he can also be a guy who says anything for social promotion and to give himself importance.
References to Bedini do not prove that one is dishonest, but that one has been taken in by an impostor.

As for my opinion, you're right, it's not the law, but I never claimed it was. But I don't know why, many would like me to have the same as theirs rather than justify their different opinion. Amazing!
As for my "unnecessary" scepticism according to you, that is only your opinion, not the law. On the contrary, I find it necessary, it is what allows us not to be fooled by charlatans.
Didn't Bedini claim his motor/generator was overunity?
Does anyone here have a working Bedini overunity motor/generator, or can they tell us who has a working one that we can see in a demonstration?
End of story, I'm sticking to the facts.

[Hakasays]

Didn't Bedini claim his motor/generator was overunity?
Does anyone here have a working Bedini overunity motor/generator, or can they tell us who has a working one that we can see in a demonstration?
End of story, I'm sticking to the facts.

You might be surprised to hear what Eric Dollard has to say about Bedini and most in his circle when the cameras aren't running.
Or perhaps not?  The math-focused experimental engineer scraping pennies together talking about the swifty salesmen with lots of catch-phrases and secrets...

[Jerry Volland]

Likewise - nothing to prove to you either - only wanted to let you know that I find both your style of investigation and ineffective wont to demean the suggestions of others rather distasteful -

Whilst you do play a good devils' advocate (seemingly) in your replies, fact is, you needn't be so arrogant in your assertions It'll get you nowhere in conversation online with total strangers. I'd hazard a guess that you don't know these things as fact, so why present them to others as if they were? (purely rhetorical)

This pettiness isn't what we had ought to be discussing here.. We had ought to be offering practical, actionable questions/suggestions/support on the matter at hand - I'll be updating my project thread soon - and this thread that you seem so happy to have sha* on can die a death .. I'm sure it's been covered on OUR before anyway.

Your undue skepticism is not required in my future posts - you didn't add anything but have seemingly taken it over.

This reminds me of MY post which F6 censored (removed), about someone posting something, then someone else pulling the attention to himself, monopolizing the discussion.

[Jerry Volland]

Protocol on a legitimate forum is that anyone is welcome to show up, present their findings, answer questions, then SIT DOWN, in the absence of constructive comments regarding other researcher's work.  NOT buy your way in with some prior work, then jabber endlessly, distractingly, and disruptively there after.

[F6FLT]

This reminds me of MY post which F6 censored (removed), about someone posting something, then someone else pulling the attention to himself, monopolizing the discussion.

Sorry if one of my interventions aroused more interest than what it was criticising, probably for a good reason.
It's the hard law of peer review, you can't just say anything without being objected to.

Try to understand that the "Claims without evidence and off topic answers" thread, as originally stated, is essentially for storing the "without evidence and off topic" posts that I remove from my other threads and place there transparently. If you post something off-topic there, my only recourse is to simply delete it to avoid this thread becoming a bin, since I can't move it elsewhere.

[Jerry Volland]

Sorry if one of my interventions aroused more interest than what it was criticising, probably for a good reason.
It's the hard law of peer review, you can't just say anything without being objected to.

Try to understand that the "Claims without evidence and off topic answers" thread, as originally stated, is essentially for storing the "without evidence and off topic" posts that I remove from my other threads and place there transparently. If you post something off-topic there, my only recourse is to simply delete it to avoid this thread becoming a bin, since I can't move it elsewhere.

You object to my statement that you're pulling attention away from legitimate researchers?  That statement has already passed peer review.