Interesting similarities

[Classic]

If anyone lay on a paper an tesla valves regulator, next to Victor Schauberger water flow regulator, next to Avramenko plug might find that the design flow for water and electricity is identical.

Flow and contra flow where where turning the flow against itself creates those beautiful symphonies of waves.

The only difference is in avrameko plug we have an increased "speed" while for water (fluids) we observe decrease speed ... which makes me think if we replace capacitors with resistors (giving up rectification) we might get some interesting results, possibly creating same effects for negative resistance in solid state version replacing coils, where we can trial and error with different values for diodes and resistors for resonance instead of shorting transformers (tesla's coils).

Imagine a kapagen or similar the size of mobile phone 

Anyone want to experiment ?

[Classic]

Almost all devices claiming FE related to electricity have common elements like: high voltage, high frequency, negative resistance which will drive a great disturbance in one field with more positive bias against second field with less positive bias (negative if you prefer) which we don't disturb. Harvesting point is the place where less positive field will meet the effects of the disturbed positive field.

So, proper design of device MUST include all elements in the right order and needs to be calculated according to desired load parameters and characteristics. So, bear in mind that what you create will be matched by nature/environment/aether whatever name, by its property to keep everything perfectly balanced.

So, amplification needs to have an element of negative resistance on top of high frequency and high voltage for efficiency reason.

[Excelsior]

I don't think there are any hard & fast rules, besides that which we produce to govern ourselves.
Mother nature is a "hippy chick with muddy feet" as Ken Wheeler (Apophasis) puts it.
I favour this analogy as it defies the strictness in "mainstream" science and its unwillingness to comprehend the open questions that surround them. Instead many seem to find solace (and oftentimes an income) from beating a very dead horse ..
("it's not possible to do what we aim to achieve")


There is relatively very little interest in this topic despite the ramifications.
That alone should speak volumes to an enquiring mind

[Classic]

@Excelsior, do you really mind what mainstream science have to say ? Do you really think the Inquisition was right and inquisitors learned or listened those practising heresy and magic ?

Do your thing and ignore them, eventually be prepared to defend yourself in any mean as for sure they will be after your blood in the very minute you gather friends mind like. I rather stop the enquire to prepare or both.

Today I just heard someone on YT that in Europe (and not only) will be a law soon banning lead acid batteries.

Also it is utterly useless to try to get a patent nowadays as big boys don't want anything that isn't coming from their in-house labs, were scientists are paid peanuts or nothing at all if they don't agree with big boys terms ... just have a look at any patent database anywhere in the world and you can see we have the knowledge and the mean to produce almost anything we want/need and can be done at large scale in less than a month.

I can suggest to anyone engaged on this path to stockpile wire, batteries, magnets, rare earth materials or anything they thing might be useful in very near future as they will start to disappear for shops (it's already happening). Also taxation will go sky high for the energy reason.

[Excelsior]

We should do our best to trounce logical fallacies wherever they happen to appear.
Regardless of your "scientific credibility"..
Science should be about finding faults in your theory, not patching it up with circular arguments

[Classic]

Another interesting similarities

Wheatstone bridge and rectify bridge (full wave)

Series+ parallel connections in both cases.

Trying to think what we might get if we use capacitors in series+parallel  ... extended time for the same usage ? Like that we get for batteries connected in series + parallel ?

[Classic]

This is not a similarity, just a good finding:

2 capacitors of the same capacity value connected in series between 2 coils will perform a phase shift 180 degrees. If 1 of the 2 capacitors will have half of the capacity of the other one phase shift will be 135 degrees and will double the frequency if a volatge signal is injected.
Worth to mention they need to be at least 0.5pF each but less than 10 pF together. So at least 0.5 pF is enough to produce phase shift and less than 10 pF not to influence overall inductance of coils.

Also a polarisation unit where a change in polarity is desired can be done by using electrets.

Both findings are described in Arie deGeus patents.